********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.21.1 - 8271f65b618decdd516f3bd4a943e5566ffabed6::20250211-191351 || 2025/02/11
/home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao oneview -R1 -WS -c=/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-418-9654/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/config.json --with-FLOPS --replace xp=/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-418-9654/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744202032 -of=html
CPY: [true] /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-418-9654/intel/CoMD/run/base_runs/defaults/gcc/exec --> /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-418-9654/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744202032/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-418-9654/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744202032/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-418-9654/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744202032/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100 --nSteps=500 --xproc=2 --yproc=1 --zproc=1
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-418-9654/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744202032/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-418-9654/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744202032/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100 --nSteps=500 --xproc=2 --yproc=1 --zproc=1
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=4 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-418-9654/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744202032/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-418-9654/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744202032/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100 --nSteps=500 --xproc=2 --yproc=1 --zproc=1
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=8 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-418-9654/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744202032/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-418-9654/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744202032/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100 --nSteps=500 --xproc=2 --yproc=1 --zproc=1
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=16 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-418-9654/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744202032/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-418-9654/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744202032/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100 --nSteps=500 --xproc=2 --yproc=1 --zproc=1
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=18 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-418-9654/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744202032/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-418-9654/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744202032/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100 --nSteps=500 --xproc=2 --yproc=1 --zproc=1
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-418-9654/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744202032/tools/lprof_npsu_run_6" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-418-9654/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744202032/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100 --nSteps=500 --xproc=2 --yproc=1 --zproc=1
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=32 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-418-9654/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744202032/tools/lprof_npsu_run_7" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-418-9654/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744202032/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100 --nSteps=500 --xproc=2 --yproc=1 --zproc=1
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=36 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-418-9654/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744202032/tools/lprof_npsu_run_8" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-418-9654/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744202032/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100 --nSteps=500 --xproc=2 --yproc=1 --zproc=1
In run 2x1, 17 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.024484958368703% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
34 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.061840451613534% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x2, 18 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.034842989698518% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
9 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0020311482512625% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x4, 19 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.029464558159816% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
6 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0015508575888816% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x8, 18 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.027676065292326% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00076035525125918% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x16, 18 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.029794192319969% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00073019969568123% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x18, 20 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.027297752720187% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00086676915816498% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x24, 19 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.02773817506386% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
6 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00081975068314934% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x32, 15 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.023725730301521% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00036507275217445% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x36, 20 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.024579637771239% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0001165690846392% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
