Help is available by moving the cursor above any 
symbol or by checking MAQAO website.
[ 0 / 4 ] Application profile is too short (9.30 s)
If the overall application profiling time is less than 10 seconds, many of the measurements at function or loop level will very likely be under the measurement quality threshold (0,1 seconds). Rerun to increase runtime duration: for example use a larger dataset or include a repetition loop.
[ 0 / 3 ] Some functions are compiled with a low optimization level (O0 or O1)
To have better performances, it is advised to help the compiler by using a proper optimization level (-O2 of higher). Warning, depending on compilers, faster optimization levels can decrease numeric accuracy.
[ 0 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions without compilation information
Functions without compilation information (typically not compiled with -g) cumulate 100.00% of the time spent in analyzed modules. Check that -g is present. Remark: if -g is indeed used, this can also be due to some compiler built-in functions (typically math) or statically linked libraries. This warning can be ignored in that case.
[ 0 / 3 ] Compilation of some functions is not optimized for the target processor
Architecture specific options are needed to produce efficient code for a specific processor ( -mcpu=native ).
[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 0.18 % of the execution time)
To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (84.23%)
If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat
At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (58.68%), representing an hotspot for the application
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (77.74%)
If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS1 operations
It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations
[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (6.49%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (77.74%)
Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS2 operations
BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.
| Loop ID | Analysis | Penalty Score |
|---|---|---|
| ►Loop 24 - spmxv.exe | Execution Time: 58 % - Vectorization Ratio: 33.33 % - Vector Length Use: 33.33 % | |
| ►Data Access Issues | 4 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each. | 4 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 4 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each. | 4 |
| ►Loop 25 - spmxv.exe | Execution Time: 19 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 25.00 % | |
| ►Data Access Issues | 8 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 2 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each. | 4 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each. | 4 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 8 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 2 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each. | 4 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each. | 4 |
| ►Loop 23 - spmxv.exe | Execution Time: 6 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 23.96 % | |
| ►Loop Computation Issues | 2 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Control Flow Issues | 11 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (5 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 5 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 9 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 11 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (5 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 5 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 9 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Loop 22 - spmxv.exe | Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 17.50 % | |
| ►Control Flow Issues | 11 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (5 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 5 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 9 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 11 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (5 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 5 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 9 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |