options

exec - 2026-06-16 17:05:58 - MAQAO 2026.0.1

Help is available by moving the cursor above any symbol or by checking MAQAO website.

  • run_0

Experiment Quality  

[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (37.14 s)

To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.

[ 3 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions with source/debug info

-g option gives access to debugging informations, such are source locations.

[ 3 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions with compilation options informations and -fno-omit-frame-pointer is present

-fno-omit-frame-pointer improves the accuracy of callchains found during the application profiling.

[ 3 / 3 ] Host configuration allows retrieval of all necessary metrics.

[ 3.00 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules (99.92%) comes from functions compiled with architecture specialization option -mcpu

[ 3 / 3 ] Optimization level option is correctly used

[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 0.00 % of the execution time)

To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code

[ 1 / 1 ] Lstopo present. The Topology lstopo report will be generated.

[ 0 / 0 ] Fastmath not used

Consider to add ffast-math to compilation flags (or replace -O3 with -Ofast) to unlock potential extra speedup by relaxing floating-point computation consistency. Warning: floating-point accuracy may be reduced and the compliance to IEEE/ISO rules/specifications for math functions will be relaxed, typically 'errno' will no longer be set after calling some math functions.

Code Quality  

[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (49.34%)

If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 2 / 4 ] A significant amount of threads are idle (38.72%)

On average, more than 10% of observed threads are idle. Such threads are probably IO/sync waiting. Some hints: use faster filesystems to read/write data, improve parallel load balancing and/or scheduling.

[ 2 / 4 ] CPU activity is below 90% (61.40%)

CPU cores are idle more than 10% of time. Threads supposed to run on these cores are probably IO/sync waiting. Some hints: use faster filesystems to read/write data, improve parallel load balancing and/or scheduling.

[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat

At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (21.81%), representing an hotspot for the application

[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (44.75%)

If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 4 / 4 ] Affinity is good (95.86%)

Threads are not migrating to CPU cores: probably successfully pinned

[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS1 operations

It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations

[ 0 / 3 ] Too many functions do not use all threads

Functions running on a reduced number of threads (typically sequential code) cover at least 10% of application walltime (26.53%). Check both "Max Inclusive Time Over Threads" and "Nb Threads" in Functions or Loops tabs and consider parallelizing sequential regions or improving parallelization of regions running on a reduced number of threads

[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (4.59%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (44.75%)

Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS2 operations

BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)

Loops Overview

Loop IDAnalysisPenalty Score
Loop 2744 - exec+Execution Time: 21 % - Vectorization Ratio: 20.00 % - Vector Length Use: 60.00 %
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 3719 - exec+Execution Time: 5 % - Vectorization Ratio: 20.00 % - Vector Length Use: 60.00 %
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 3728 - exec+Execution Time: 5 % - Vectorization Ratio: 20.00 % - Vector Length Use: 60.00 %
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 2745 - exec+Execution Time: 2 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 50.00 %
Data Access Issues+8
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 2 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+8
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 2 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 2741 - exec+Execution Time: 1 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 48.08 %
Loop Computation Issues+10
[SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 1 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each.4
[SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points.4
[SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points.2
Control Flow Issues+31
[SA] Too many paths (25 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 25 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points.29
[SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
Vectorization Roadblocks+31
[SA] Too many paths (25 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 25 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points.29
[SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
Loop 3800 - execExecution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 100.00 % - Vector Length Use: 100.00 %
Loop 2738 - execExecution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 100.00 % - Vector Length Use: 100.00 %
Loop 3720 - exec+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 50.00 %
Data Access Issues+8
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 2 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+8
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 2 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 3729 - exec+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 50.00 %
Data Access Issues+8
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 2 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+8
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 2 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 3804 - exec+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 100.00 % - Vector Length Use: 100.00 %
Loop Computation Issues+4
[SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points.4
×