options

exec - 2025-09-12 15:07:11 - MAQAO 2025.1.2

Help is available by moving the cursor above any symbol or by checking MAQAO website.

  • run_0

Stylizer  

[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (11.92 s)

To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.

[ 3 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions compiled with -g and -fno-omit-frame-pointer

-g option gives access to debugging informations, such are source locations. -fno-omit-frame-pointer improves the accuracy of callchains found during the application profiling.

[ 3 / 3 ] Optimization level option is correctly used

[ 2 / 3 ] Security settings from the host restrict profiling. Some metrics will be missing or incomplete.

Current value for kernel.perf_event_paranoid is 2. If possible, set it to 1 or check with your system administrator which flag can be used to achieve this.

[ 0 / 3 ] Compilation of some functions is not optimized for the target processor

Architecture specific options are needed to produce efficient code for a specific processor ( -mcpu=native ).

[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 0.00 % of the execution time)

To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code

[ 1 / 1 ] Lstopo present. The Topology lstopo report will be generated.

Strategizer  

[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (70.87%)

If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 4 / 4 ] Threads activity is good

On average, more than 92.11% of observed threads are actually active

[ 4 / 4 ] CPU activity is good

CPU cores are active 96.68% of time

[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat

At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (68.63%), representing an hotspot for the application

[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (69.83%)

If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 4 / 4 ] Affinity is good (99.41%)

Threads are not migrating to CPU cores: probably successfully pinned

[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS1 operations

It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations

[ 0 / 3 ] Too many functions do not use all threads

Functions running on a reduced number of threads (typically sequential code) cover at least 10% of application walltime (18.96%). Check both "Max Inclusive Time Over Threads" and "Nb Threads" in Functions or Loops tabs and consider parallelizing sequential regions or improving parallelization of regions running on a reduced number of threads

[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (1.04%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (69.83%)

Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS2 operations

BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)

Optimizer

Loop IDAnalysisPenalty Score
Loop 310 - libggml-cpu.so+Execution Time: 68 % - Vectorization Ratio: 66.67 % - Vector Length Use: 59.52 %
Loop Computation Issues+2
[SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points.2
Loop 70 - libggml-cpu.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 51.92 %
Control Flow Issues+1
[SA] Presence of calls - Inline either by compiler or by hand and use SVML for libm calls. There are 1 issues (= calls) costing 1 point each.1
Vectorization Roadblocks+1001
[SA] Presence of calls - Inline either by compiler or by hand and use SVML for libm calls. There are 1 issues (= calls) costing 1 point each.1
[SA] Too many paths (at least 1000 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are at least 1000 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point.1000
Loop 1694 - libggml-cpu.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 9.52 % - Vector Length Use: 38.81 %
Loop Computation Issues+2
[SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points.2
Control Flow Issues+872
[SA] Presence of calls - Inline either by compiler or by hand and use SVML for libm calls. There are 1 issues (= calls) costing 1 point each.1
[SA] Too many paths (865 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 865 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points.869
[SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
Vectorization Roadblocks+872
[SA] Presence of calls - Inline either by compiler or by hand and use SVML for libm calls. There are 1 issues (= calls) costing 1 point each.1
[SA] Too many paths (865 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 865 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points.869
[SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
Loop 71 - libggml-cpu.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 40.38 %
Control Flow Issues+3
[SA] Presence of calls - Inline either by compiler or by hand and use SVML for libm calls. There are 1 issues (= calls) costing 1 point each.1
[SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
Vectorization Roadblocks+1003
[SA] Presence of calls - Inline either by compiler or by hand and use SVML for libm calls. There are 1 issues (= calls) costing 1 point each.1
[SA] Too many paths (at least 1000 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are at least 1000 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point.1000
[SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
Loop 52 - libggml-cpu.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 52.21 %
Control Flow Issues+12
[SA] Too many paths (6 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 6 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points.10
[SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
Vectorization Roadblocks+12
[SA] Too many paths (6 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 6 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points.10
[SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
Loop 1706 - libggml-cpu.soExecution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 100.00 % - Vector Length Use: 81.82 %
Loop 301 - libggml-base.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 14.02 % - Vector Length Use: 35.29 %
Loop Computation Issues+18
[SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 3 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each.12
[SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points.4
[SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points.2
Control Flow Issues0
Vectorization Roadblocks+1000
[SA] Too many paths (at least 1000 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are at least 1000 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point.1000
Loop 49 - libggml-cpu.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 47.22 %
Control Flow Issues+1
[SA] Presence of calls - Inline either by compiler or by hand and use SVML for libm calls. There are 1 issues (= calls) costing 1 point each.1
Vectorization Roadblocks+1
[SA] Presence of calls - Inline either by compiler or by hand and use SVML for libm calls. There are 1 issues (= calls) costing 1 point each.1
Loop 760 - libggml-cpu.soExecution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 100.00 % - Vector Length Use: 75.00 %
Loop 1395 - libggml-cpu.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 14.29 % - Vector Length Use: 32.14 %
Loop Computation Issues+8
[SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 1 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each.4
[SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points.4
Control Flow Issues+1
[SA] Presence of calls - Inline either by compiler or by hand and use SVML for libm calls. There are 1 issues (= calls) costing 1 point each.1
Data Access Issues+2
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
Vectorization Roadblocks+3
[SA] Presence of calls - Inline either by compiler or by hand and use SVML for libm calls. There are 1 issues (= calls) costing 1 point each.1
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
×