OV - exec - Loop 1030

	Loop Id: 1030	Module: exec	Source: :0-0	Coverage: 0.28%

0x492650 VMOVSD	(%R10,%RAX,1),%XMM8    [2]

0x492656 VMOVSD	%XMM8,(%RBP,%RAX,1)    [5]

0x49265c VMOVSD	(%R12,%RAX,1),%XMM10    [6]

0x492662 VMOVHPD	(%R14,%RAX,1),%XMM10,%XMM11    [8]

0x492668 VMOVSD	(%RCX,%RAX,1),%XMM9    [1]

0x49266d VMOVUPD	%XMM11,(%RDX)    [11]

0x492671 VMOVSD	%XMM9,0x10(%RDX)    [11]

0x492676 VMOVSD	(%R13,%RAX,1),%XMM12    [7]

0x49267d VMOVSD	%XMM12,(%R15,%RAX,1)    [9]

0x492683 VMOVSD	0x8(%R10,%RAX,1),%XMM13    [2]

0x49268a VMOVSD	%XMM13,0x8(%RAX,%RBP,1)    [4]

0x492690 VMOVSD	0x8(%R12,%RAX,1),%XMM15    [6]

0x492697 VMOVHPD	0x8(%R14,%RAX,1),%XMM15,%XMM0    [8]

0x49269e VMOVSD	0x8(%RCX,%RAX,1),%XMM14    [1]

0x4926a4 VMOVSD	%XMM14,0x28(%RDX)    [11]

0x4926a9 ADD	$0x60,%RDX

0x4926ad VMOVUPD	%XMM0,-0x48(%RDX)    [10]

0x4926b2 VMOVSD	0x8(%R13,%RAX,1),%XMM2    [7]

0x4926b9 VMOVSD	%XMM2,0x8(%RAX,%R15,1)    [4]

0x4926c0 VMOVSD	0x10(%R10,%RAX,1),%XMM5    [2]

0x4926c7 VMOVSD	%XMM5,0x10(%RAX,%RBP,1)    [4]

0x4926cd VMOVSD	0x10(%R12,%RAX,1),%XMM6    [6]

0x4926d4 VMOVHPD	0x10(%R14,%RAX,1),%XMM6,%XMM9    [8]

0x4926db VMOVSD	0x10(%RCX,%RAX,1),%XMM8    [1]

0x4926e1 VMOVUPD	%XMM9,-0x30(%RDX)    [10]

0x4926e6 VMOVSD	%XMM8,-0x20(%RDX)    [10]

0x4926eb VMOVSD	0x10(%R13,%RAX,1),%XMM10    [7]

0x4926f2 VMOVSD	%XMM10,0x10(%RAX,%R15,1)    [4]

0x4926f9 VMOVSD	0x18(%R10,%RAX,1),%XMM11    [2]

0x492700 VMOVSD	%XMM11,0x18(%RAX,%RBP,1)    [4]

0x492706 VMOVSD	0x18(%R12,%RAX,1),%XMM13    [6]

0x49270d VMOVHPD	0x18(%R14,%RAX,1),%XMM13,%XMM14    [8]

0x492714 VMOVSD	0x18(%RCX,%RAX,1),%XMM12    [1]

0x49271a VMOVUPD	%XMM14,-0x18(%RDX)    [10]

0x49271f VMOVSD	%XMM12,-0x8(%RDX)    [10]

0x492724 VMOVSD	0x18(%R13,%RAX,1),%XMM15    [7]

0x49272b ADD	$0x20,%RAX

0x49272f VMOVSD	%XMM15,-0x8(%RAX,%R15,1)    [3]

0x492736 CMP	%RSI,%RAX

0x492739 JNE	492650

  ***  This Panel is Intentionally Left Blank.  ***

It is due to a lack of debug symbols in the given object
(loop or function).

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►60.18+	miniqmcreference::DiracDetermi[...]		exec
○	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::rat[...]		exec
○	main._omp_fn.1		exec
○	gomp_thread_start	team.c:130	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	__GI___clone3		libc.so.6
►18.11+	miniqmcreference::DiracDetermi[...]		exec
○	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::eva[...]		exec
○	main._omp_fn.0		exec
○	gomp_thread_start	team.c:130	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	__GI___clone3		libc.so.6
►18.09+	miniqmcreference::DiracDetermi[...]		exec
○	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::eva[...]		exec
○	main._omp_fn.0		exec
○	gomp_thread_start	team.c:130	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	__GI___clone3		libc.so.6

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	7.20
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.13
Bottlenecks	P6, P7, P8, P9,
Function	miniqmcreference::einspline_spo_ref::evaluate(qmcplusplus::ParticleSet const&, int, qmcplusplus::Vector >&, qmcplusplus::Vector, std::allocator > >&, qmcplusplus::Vector >&)
Source
Source loop unroll info	NA
Source loop unroll confidence level	NA
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	9.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	9.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	9.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	1.25
Front-end cycles	4.88
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.50
P2 cycles	0.50
P3 cycles	0.50
P4 cycles	0.50
P5 cycles	0.50
P6 cycles	9.00
P7 cycles	9.00
P8 cycles	9.00
P9 cycles	9.00
P10 cycles	1.00
P11 cycles	1.00
P12 cycles	1.00
P13 cycles	1.00
P14 cycles	8.00
P15 cycles	8.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	40.00
Nb uops	39.00
Nb loads	20.00
Nb stores	16.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	35.56
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	160.00
Bytes stored	160.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	5.00
Stride n	6.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	11.11
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	25.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	NA
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	13.89
Vector-efficiency ratio load	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio store	15.63
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	7.20
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.13
Bottlenecks	P6, P7, P8, P9,
Function	miniqmcreference::einspline_spo_ref::evaluate(qmcplusplus::ParticleSet const&, int, qmcplusplus::Vector >&, qmcplusplus::Vector, std::allocator > >&, qmcplusplus::Vector >&)
Source
Source loop unroll info	NA
Source loop unroll confidence level	NA
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	9.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	9.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	9.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	1.25
Front-end cycles	4.88
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.50
P2 cycles	0.50
P3 cycles	0.50
P4 cycles	0.50
P5 cycles	0.50
P6 cycles	9.00
P7 cycles	9.00
P8 cycles	9.00
P9 cycles	9.00
P10 cycles	1.00
P11 cycles	1.00
P12 cycles	1.00
P13 cycles	1.00
P14 cycles	8.00
P15 cycles	8.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	40.00
Nb uops	39.00
Nb loads	20.00
Nb stores	16.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	35.56
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	160.00
Bytes stored	160.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	5.00
Stride n	6.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	11.11
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	25.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	NA
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	13.89
Vector-efficiency ratio load	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio store	15.63
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	miniqmcreference::einspline_spo_ref::evaluate(qmcplusplus::ParticleSet const&, int, qmcplusplus::Vector >&, qmcplusplus::Vector, std::allocator > >&, qmcplusplus::Vector >&)
Source file and lines
Module	exec

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. Only 13% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions). By fully vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 9.00 to 1.25 cycles (7.20x speedup).

Details

11% of SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

0% of SSE/AVX loads are used in vector version.
25% of SSE/AVX stores are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA)

Execution units bottlenecks

Performance is limited by:

reading data from caches/RAM (load units are a bottleneck)
writing data to caches/RAM (the store unit is a bottleneck)

By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 9.00 to 8.00 cycles (1.13x speedup).

Workaround

Read less array elements
Write less array elements
Provide more information to your compiler:
- hardcode the bounds of the corresponding 'for' loop

No data for this section

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant non-unit stride: 6 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This loop is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop is loading 160 bytes. The binary loop is storing 160 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	40
nb uops	39
loop length	239
used x86 registers	10
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	12
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	0

Front-end

ASSUMED MACRO FUSION FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	4.88 cycles
front end	4.88 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	9.00	9.00	9.00	9.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	8.00	8.00
cycles	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	9.00	9.00	9.00	9.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	8.00	8.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	4.88
Dispatch	9.00
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	9.00

Vectorization ratios

all	11%
load	0%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Vector efficiency ratios

all	13%
load	12%
store	15%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 9.00 cycles. At this rate:

6% of peak load performance is reached (17.78 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
13% of peak store performance is reached (17.78 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 492650

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
VMOVSD (%R10,%RAX,1),%XMM8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM8,(%RBP,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD (%R12,%RAX,1),%XMM10	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVHPD (%R14,%RAX,1),%XMM10,%XMM11	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	9	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD (%RCX,%RAX,1),%XMM9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVUPD %XMM11,(%RDX)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	4	0.50	vect (25.0%)
VMOVSD %XMM9,0x10(%RDX)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD (%R13,%RAX,1),%XMM12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM12,(%R15,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x8(%R10,%RAX,1),%XMM13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM13,0x8(%RAX,%RBP,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x8(%R12,%RAX,1),%XMM15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVHPD 0x8(%R14,%RAX,1),%XMM15,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	9	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x8(%RCX,%RAX,1),%XMM14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM14,0x28(%RDX)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
ADD $0x60,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
VMOVUPD %XMM0,-0x48(%RDX)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	4	0.50	vect (25.0%)
VMOVSD 0x8(%R13,%RAX,1),%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM2,0x8(%RAX,%R15,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x10(%R10,%RAX,1),%XMM5	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM5,0x10(%RAX,%RBP,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x10(%R12,%RAX,1),%XMM6	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVHPD 0x10(%R14,%RAX,1),%XMM6,%XMM9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	9	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x10(%RCX,%RAX,1),%XMM8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVUPD %XMM9,-0x30(%RDX)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	4	0.50	vect (25.0%)
VMOVSD %XMM8,-0x20(%RDX)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x10(%R13,%RAX,1),%XMM10	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM10,0x10(%RAX,%R15,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x18(%R10,%RAX,1),%XMM11	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM11,0x18(%RAX,%RBP,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x18(%R12,%RAX,1),%XMM13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVHPD 0x18(%R14,%RAX,1),%XMM13,%XMM14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	9	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x18(%RCX,%RAX,1),%XMM12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVUPD %XMM14,-0x18(%RDX)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	4	0.50	vect (25.0%)
VMOVSD %XMM12,-0x8(%RDX)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x18(%R13,%RAX,1),%XMM15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
ADD $0x20,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
VMOVSD %XMM15,-0x8(%RAX,%R15,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
CMP %RSI,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
JNE 492650 <_ZN16miniqmcreference17einspline_spo_refIdE8evaluateERKN11qmcplusplus11ParticleSetEiRNS2_6VectorIdSaIdEEERNS6_INS2_10TinyVectorIdLj3EEESaISB_EEES9_+0x3b0>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A

Function	miniqmcreference::einspline_spo_ref::evaluate(qmcplusplus::ParticleSet const&, int, qmcplusplus::Vector >&, qmcplusplus::Vector, std::allocator > >&, qmcplusplus::Vector >&)
Source file and lines
Module	exec

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Details

11% of SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

0% of SSE/AVX loads are used in vector version.
25% of SSE/AVX stores are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA)

Execution units bottlenecks

Performance is limited by:

reading data from caches/RAM (load units are a bottleneck)
writing data to caches/RAM (the store unit is a bottleneck)

By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 9.00 to 8.00 cycles (1.13x speedup).

Workaround

Read less array elements
Write less array elements
Provide more information to your compiler:
- hardcode the bounds of the corresponding 'for' loop

No data for this section

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant non-unit stride: 6 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This loop is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop is loading 160 bytes. The binary loop is storing 160 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	40
nb uops	39
loop length	239
used x86 registers	10
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	12
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	0

Front-end

ASSUMED MACRO FUSION FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	4.88 cycles
front end	4.88 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	9.00	9.00	9.00	9.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	8.00	8.00
cycles	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	9.00	9.00	9.00	9.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	8.00	8.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	4.88
Dispatch	9.00
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	9.00

Vectorization ratios

all	11%
load	0%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Vector efficiency ratios

all	13%
load	12%
store	15%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 9.00 cycles. At this rate:

6% of peak load performance is reached (17.78 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
13% of peak store performance is reached (17.78 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 492650

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
VMOVSD (%R10,%RAX,1),%XMM8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM8,(%RBP,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD (%R12,%RAX,1),%XMM10	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVHPD (%R14,%RAX,1),%XMM10,%XMM11	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	9	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD (%RCX,%RAX,1),%XMM9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVUPD %XMM11,(%RDX)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	4	0.50	vect (25.0%)
VMOVSD %XMM9,0x10(%RDX)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD (%R13,%RAX,1),%XMM12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM12,(%R15,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x8(%R10,%RAX,1),%XMM13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM13,0x8(%RAX,%RBP,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x8(%R12,%RAX,1),%XMM15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVHPD 0x8(%R14,%RAX,1),%XMM15,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	9	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x8(%RCX,%RAX,1),%XMM14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM14,0x28(%RDX)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
ADD $0x60,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
VMOVUPD %XMM0,-0x48(%RDX)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	4	0.50	vect (25.0%)
VMOVSD 0x8(%R13,%RAX,1),%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM2,0x8(%RAX,%R15,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x10(%R10,%RAX,1),%XMM5	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM5,0x10(%RAX,%RBP,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x10(%R12,%RAX,1),%XMM6	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVHPD 0x10(%R14,%RAX,1),%XMM6,%XMM9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	9	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x10(%RCX,%RAX,1),%XMM8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVUPD %XMM9,-0x30(%RDX)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	4	0.50	vect (25.0%)
VMOVSD %XMM8,-0x20(%RDX)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x10(%R13,%RAX,1),%XMM10	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM10,0x10(%RAX,%R15,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x18(%R10,%RAX,1),%XMM11	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM11,0x18(%RAX,%RBP,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x18(%R12,%RAX,1),%XMM13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVHPD 0x18(%R14,%RAX,1),%XMM13,%XMM14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	9	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x18(%RCX,%RAX,1),%XMM12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVUPD %XMM14,-0x18(%RDX)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	4	0.50	vect (25.0%)
VMOVSD %XMM12,-0x8(%RDX)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x18(%R13,%RAX,1),%XMM15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
ADD $0x20,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
VMOVSD %XMM15,-0x8(%RAX,%R15,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
CMP %RSI,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
JNE 492650 <_ZN16miniqmcreference17einspline_spo_refIdE8evaluateERKN11qmcplusplus11ParticleSetEiRNS2_6VectorIdSaIdEEERNS6_INS2_10TinyVectorIdLj3EEESaISB_EEES9_+0x3b0>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A

Report Configuration

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code