OV - exec - Loop 748

	Loop Id: 748	Module: exec	Source: :0-0	Coverage: 0.45%

0x43f790 MOV	0x310(%R13),%RDX    [8]

0x43f797 MOV	(%RDX,%R9,8),%RDX    [12]

0x43f79b VMOVSD	(%RDX,%R10,8),%XMM0    [11]

0x43f7a1 MOV	0x18(%R12),%RDX    [2]

0x43f7a6 VMOVSD	%XMM0,(%RDX,%RSI,8)    [10]

0x43f7ab MOV	0x328(%R13),%RDX    [8]

0x43f7b2 LEA	(,%RCX,8),%RDI

0x43f7ba LEA	(%RDI,%RDI,4),%RDI

0x43f7be MOV	0x18(%RDX,%RDI,1),%R11    [9]

0x43f7c3 VPBROADCASTQ	%R11,%XMM0

0x43f7c9 VPBROADCASTQ	%R10,%XMM1

0x43f7cf MOVSXD	0x8(%RDX,%RDI,1),%RDX    [9]

0x43f7d4 VMOVQ	%RDX,%XMM2

0x43f7d9 VPSLLDQ	$0x8,%XMM2,%XMM2

0x43f7de VPADDQ	%XMM2,%XMM1,%XMM1

0x43f7e2 VPSLLQ	$0x3,%XMM1,%XMM1

0x43f7e7 VPADDQ	%XMM1,%XMM0,%XMM0

0x43f7eb VMOVQ	%XMM0,%RBX

0x43f7f0 VMOVSD	(%RBX),%XMM1    [15]

0x43f7f4 VPEXTRQ	$0x1,%XMM0,%RBX

0x43f7fa VMOVHPS	(%RBX),%XMM1,%XMM0    [14]

0x43f7fe LEA	(%R10,%RDX,2),%RDX

0x43f802 VMOVSD	(%R11,%RDX,8),%XMM1    [1]

0x43f808 MOV	0x18(%R15),%RDX    [13]

0x43f80c VMOVUPS	%XMM0,-0x10(%RDX,%R8,8)    [7]

0x43f813 VMOVSD	%XMM1,(%RDX,%R8,8)    [7]

0x43f819 MOV	0x340(%R13),%RDX    [8]

0x43f820 MOV	0x18(%RDX,%RDI,1),%RDX    [6]

0x43f825 VMOVSD	(%RDX,%R10,8),%XMM0    [5]

0x43f82b MOV	0x18(%R14),%RDX    [3]

0x43f82f VMOVSD	%XMM0,(%RDX,%RSI,8)    [4]

0x43f834 INC	%RSI

0x43f837 MOV	0x8(%R13),%EDX    [8]

0x43f83b MOV	0x40(%R13),%EDI    [8]

0x43f83f MOV	%EDI,%R11D

0x43f842 IMUL	%EAX,%R11D

0x43f846 CMP	%R11D,%EDX

0x43f849 CMOVL	%EDX,%R11D

0x43f84d MOVSXD	%R11D,%R11

0x43f850 ADD	$0x3,%R8

0x43f854 INC	%R10

0x43f857 CMP	%R11,%RSI

0x43f85a JL	43f790

  ***  This Panel is Intentionally Left Blank.  ***

It is due to a lack of debug symbols in the given object
(loop or function).

Coverage (%)	Name	Module
►70.10+	miniqmcreference::DiracDetermi[...]	exec
○	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::rat[...]	exec
○	main.extracted.109	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask	libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func	libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread	libiomp5.so
○	_INTERNALea951ae6::__kmp_launc[...]	libiomp5.so
○	start_thread	libc.so.6
○	__GI___clone3	libc.so.6
►12.42+	qmcplusplus::SPOSet::evaluate_[...]	exec
○	miniqmcreference::DiracDetermi[...]	exec
○	miniqmcreference::DiracDetermi[...]	exec
○	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::eva[...]	exec
○	main.extracted.116	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask	libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func	libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread	libiomp5.so
○	_INTERNALea951ae6::__kmp_launc[...]	libiomp5.so
○	start_thread	libc.so.6
○	__GI___clone3	libc.so.6
►12.02+	qmcplusplus::SPOSet::evaluate_[...]	exec
○	miniqmcreference::DiracDetermi[...]	exec
○	miniqmcreference::DiracDetermi[...]	exec
○	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::eva[...]	exec
○	main.extracted.116	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask	libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func	libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread	libiomp5.so
○	_INTERNALea951ae6::__kmp_launc[...]	libiomp5.so
○	start_thread	libc.so.6
○	__GI___clone3	libc.so.6
►2.41+	miniqmcreference::DiracDetermi[...]	exec
○	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::rat[...]	exec
○	main.extracted.109	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask	libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func	libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_fork_call	libiomp5.so
○	__kmpc_fork_call	libiomp5.so
○	main	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main	libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main	libc.so.6
○	_start	exec
►1.10+	miniqmcreference::DiracDetermi[...]	exec
○	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::rat[...]	exec
○	main.extracted.109	exec

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.77
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	9.97
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.10
Bottlenecks	micro-operation queue,
Function	miniqmcreference::einspline_spo_ref::evaluate(qmcplusplus::ParticleSet const&, int, qmcplusplus::Vector >&, qmcplusplus::Vector, std::allocator > >&, qmcplusplus::Vector >&)
Source
Source loop unroll info	NA
Source loop unroll confidence level	NA
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	5.75
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	3.25
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	5.75
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.58
Front-end cycles	5.75
P0 cycles	2.33
P1 cycles	2.33
P2 cycles	2.33
P3 cycles	2.33
P4 cycles	2.33
P5 cycles	2.33
P6 cycles	5.25
P7 cycles	5.25
P8 cycles	5.25
P9 cycles	5.25
P10 cycles	2.00
P11 cycles	2.00
P12 cycles	2.00
P13 cycles	2.00
P14 cycles	3.00
P15 cycles	3.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	43.00
Nb uops	46.00
Nb loads	18.00
Nb stores	4.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	28.52
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	124.00
Bytes stored	40.00
Stride 0	4.00
Stride 1	6.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	5.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	31.58
Vectorization ratio load	20.00
Vectorization ratio store	25.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	100.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	15.46
Vector-efficiency ratio load	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio store	15.63
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	14.84

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.77
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	9.97
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.10
Bottlenecks	micro-operation queue,
Function	miniqmcreference::einspline_spo_ref::evaluate(qmcplusplus::ParticleSet const&, int, qmcplusplus::Vector >&, qmcplusplus::Vector, std::allocator > >&, qmcplusplus::Vector >&)
Source
Source loop unroll info	NA
Source loop unroll confidence level	NA
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	5.75
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	3.25
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	5.75
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.58
Front-end cycles	5.75
P0 cycles	2.33
P1 cycles	2.33
P2 cycles	2.33
P3 cycles	2.33
P4 cycles	2.33
P5 cycles	2.33
P6 cycles	5.25
P7 cycles	5.25
P8 cycles	5.25
P9 cycles	5.25
P10 cycles	2.00
P11 cycles	2.00
P12 cycles	2.00
P13 cycles	2.00
P14 cycles	3.00
P15 cycles	3.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	43.00
Nb uops	46.00
Nb loads	18.00
Nb stores	4.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	28.52
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	124.00
Bytes stored	40.00
Stride 0	4.00
Stride 1	6.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	5.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	31.58
Vectorization ratio load	20.00
Vectorization ratio store	25.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	100.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	15.46
Vector-efficiency ratio load	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio store	15.63
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	14.84

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	miniqmcreference::einspline_spo_ref::evaluate(qmcplusplus::ParticleSet const&, int, qmcplusplus::Vector >&, qmcplusplus::Vector, std::allocator > >&, qmcplusplus::Vector >&)
Source file and lines
Module	exec

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 5.75 to 3.25 cycles (1.77x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your loop is poorly vectorized. Only 15% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions). By fully vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 5.75 to 0.58 cycles (9.97x speedup).

Details

31% of SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

20% of SSE/AVX loads are used in vector version.
25% of SSE/AVX stores are used in vector version.
25% of SSE/AVX instructions that are not load, store, addition, subtraction nor multiply instructions are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

No data for this section

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

CMOVL: 1 occurrences►
VPBROADCASTQ: 2 occurrences►
VPEXTRQ: 1 occurrences►

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant unknown stride: 5 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop is loading 124 bytes. The binary loop is storing 40 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	43
nb uops	46
loop length	208
used x86 registers	14
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	3
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	0

Front-end

ASSUMED MACRO FUSION FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	5.75 cycles
front end	5.75 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	2.33	2.33	2.33	2.33	2.33	2.33	5.25	5.25	5.25	5.25	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	3.00	3.00
cycles	2.33	2.33	2.33	2.33	2.33	2.33	5.25	5.25	5.25	5.25	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	3.00	3.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	5.75
Dispatch	5.25
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	5.75

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	40%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	25%

all	22%
load	20%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	31%
load	20%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	25%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	16%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	14%

all	13%
load	12%
store	15%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	15%
load	12%
store	15%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	14%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 5.75 cycles. At this rate:

8% of peak load performance is reached (21.57 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
5% of peak store performance is reached (6.96 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Performance is limited by instruction throughput (loading/decoding program instructions to execution core) (front-end is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 5.75 to 5.25 cycles (1.10x speedup).

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 43f790

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
MOV 0x310(%R13),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOV (%RDX,%R9,8),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
VMOVSD (%RDX,%R10,8),%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x18(%R12),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
VMOVSD %XMM0,(%RDX,%RSI,8)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x328(%R13),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
LEA (,%RCX,8),%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA (%RDI,%RDI,4),%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV 0x18(%RDX,%RDI,1),%R11	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %R11,%XMM0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	1	1	scal (12.5%)
VPBROADCASTQ %R10,%XMM1	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	1	1	scal (12.5%)
MOVSXD 0x8(%RDX,%RDI,1),%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
VMOVQ %RDX,%XMM2	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	scal (12.5%)
VPSLLDQ $0x8,%XMM2,%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	2	0.50	vect (25.0%)
VPADDQ %XMM2,%XMM1,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.25	vect (25.0%)
VPSLLQ $0x3,%XMM1,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	vect (25.0%)
VPADDQ %XMM1,%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.25	vect (25.0%)
VMOVQ %XMM0,%RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD (%RBX),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VPEXTRQ $0x1,%XMM0,%RBX	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVHPS (%RBX),%XMM1,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	9	0.50	vect (12.5%)
LEA (%R10,%RDX,2),%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
VMOVSD (%R11,%RDX,8),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x18(%R15),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
VMOVUPS %XMM0,-0x10(%RDX,%R8,8)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	4	0.50	vect (25.0%)
VMOVSD %XMM1,(%RDX,%R8,8)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x340(%R13),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOV 0x18(%RDX,%RDI,1),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
VMOVSD (%RDX,%R10,8),%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x18(%R14),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
VMOVSD %XMM0,(%RDX,%RSI,8)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
INC %RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV 0x8(%R13),%EDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOV 0x40(%R13),%EDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOV %EDI,%R11D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
IMUL %EAX,%R11D	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
CMP %R11D,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
CMOVL %EDX,%R11D	2	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOVSXD %R11D,%R11	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD $0x3,%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
INC %R10	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CMP %R11,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
JL 43f790 <_ZN16miniqmcreference17einspline_spo_refIdE8evaluateERKN11qmcplusplus11ParticleSetEiRNS2_6VectorIdSaIdEEERNS6_INS2_10TinyVectorIdLj3EEESaISB_EEES9_+0x14e0>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A

Function	miniqmcreference::einspline_spo_ref::evaluate(qmcplusplus::ParticleSet const&, int, qmcplusplus::Vector >&, qmcplusplus::Vector, std::allocator > >&, qmcplusplus::Vector >&)
Source file and lines
Module	exec

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 5.75 to 3.25 cycles (1.77x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Details

31% of SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

20% of SSE/AVX loads are used in vector version.
25% of SSE/AVX stores are used in vector version.
25% of SSE/AVX instructions that are not load, store, addition, subtraction nor multiply instructions are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

No data for this section

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

CMOVL: 1 occurrences►
VPBROADCASTQ: 2 occurrences►
VPEXTRQ: 1 occurrences►

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant unknown stride: 5 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop is loading 124 bytes. The binary loop is storing 40 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	43
nb uops	46
loop length	208
used x86 registers	14
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	3
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	0

Front-end

ASSUMED MACRO FUSION FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	5.75 cycles
front end	5.75 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	2.33	2.33	2.33	2.33	2.33	2.33	5.25	5.25	5.25	5.25	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	3.00	3.00
cycles	2.33	2.33	2.33	2.33	2.33	2.33	5.25	5.25	5.25	5.25	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	3.00	3.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	5.75
Dispatch	5.25
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	5.75

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	40%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	25%

all	22%
load	20%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	31%
load	20%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	25%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	16%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	14%

all	13%
load	12%
store	15%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	15%
load	12%
store	15%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	14%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 5.75 cycles. At this rate:

8% of peak load performance is reached (21.57 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
5% of peak store performance is reached (6.96 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 43f790

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
MOV 0x310(%R13),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOV (%RDX,%R9,8),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
VMOVSD (%RDX,%R10,8),%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x18(%R12),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
VMOVSD %XMM0,(%RDX,%RSI,8)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x328(%R13),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
LEA (,%RCX,8),%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA (%RDI,%RDI,4),%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV 0x18(%RDX,%RDI,1),%R11	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %R11,%XMM0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	1	1	scal (12.5%)
VPBROADCASTQ %R10,%XMM1	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	1	1	scal (12.5%)
MOVSXD 0x8(%RDX,%RDI,1),%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
VMOVQ %RDX,%XMM2	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	scal (12.5%)
VPSLLDQ $0x8,%XMM2,%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	2	0.50	vect (25.0%)
VPADDQ %XMM2,%XMM1,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.25	vect (25.0%)
VPSLLQ $0x3,%XMM1,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	vect (25.0%)
VPADDQ %XMM1,%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.25	vect (25.0%)
VMOVQ %XMM0,%RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD (%RBX),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VPEXTRQ $0x1,%XMM0,%RBX	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVHPS (%RBX),%XMM1,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	9	0.50	vect (12.5%)
LEA (%R10,%RDX,2),%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
VMOVSD (%R11,%RDX,8),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x18(%R15),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
VMOVUPS %XMM0,-0x10(%RDX,%R8,8)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	4	0.50	vect (25.0%)
VMOVSD %XMM1,(%RDX,%R8,8)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x340(%R13),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOV 0x18(%RDX,%RDI,1),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
VMOVSD (%RDX,%R10,8),%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x18(%R14),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
VMOVSD %XMM0,(%RDX,%RSI,8)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
INC %RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV 0x8(%R13),%EDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOV 0x40(%R13),%EDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOV %EDI,%R11D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
IMUL %EAX,%R11D	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
CMP %R11D,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
CMOVL %EDX,%R11D	2	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOVSXD %R11D,%R11	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD $0x3,%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
INC %R10	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CMP %R11,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
JL 43f790 <_ZN16miniqmcreference17einspline_spo_refIdE8evaluateERKN11qmcplusplus11ParticleSetEiRNS2_6VectorIdSaIdEEERNS6_INS2_10TinyVectorIdLj3EEESaISB_EEES9_+0x14e0>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Complex instructions

Details

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Complex instructions

Details

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code