OV - exec - Loop 918

	Loop Id: 918	Module: exec	Source: inner_product.hpp:155-155 [...]	Coverage: 0.22%

0x44e080 MOVUPD	-0x58(%R9),%XMM4    [1]

0x44e086 MOVUPD	-0x40(%R9),%XMM5    [1]

0x44e08c MOVSD	-0x48(%R9),%XMM2    [1]

0x44e092 MOVHPD	-0x30(%R9),%XMM2    [1]

0x44e098 MOVUPD	-0x28(%R9),%XMM6    [1]

0x44e09e MOVSD	-0x18(%R9),%XMM7    [1]

0x44e0a4 MOVHPD	(%R9),%XMM7    [1]

0x44e0a9 MOVUPD	-0x10(%R9),%XMM8    [1]

0x44e0af MOVUPD	(%R10),%XMM9    [2]

0x44e0b4 MOVUPD	0x10(%R10),%XMM1    [2]

0x44e0ba MULPD	%XMM1,%XMM7

0x44e0be MULPD	%XMM9,%XMM2

0x44e0c3 ADDPD	%XMM7,%XMM2

0x44e0c7 MOVAPD	%XMM9,%XMM7

0x44e0cc UNPCKLPD	%XMM9,%XMM7

0x44e0d1 MULPD	%XMM4,%XMM7

0x44e0d5 ADDPD	%XMM3,%XMM7

0x44e0d9 UNPCKHPD	%XMM9,%XMM9

0x44e0de MULPD	%XMM5,%XMM9

0x44e0e3 MOVAPD	%XMM1,%XMM3

0x44e0e7 UNPCKLPD	%XMM1,%XMM3

0x44e0eb MULPD	%XMM6,%XMM3

0x44e0ef ADDPD	%XMM9,%XMM3

0x44e0f4 ADDPD	%XMM7,%XMM3

0x44e0f8 UNPCKHPD	%XMM1,%XMM1

0x44e0fc MULPD	%XMM8,%XMM1

0x44e101 ADDPD	%XMM3,%XMM1

0x44e105 MOVAPD	%XMM2,%XMM3

0x44e109 UNPCKHPD	%XMM2,%XMM3

0x44e10d ADDSD	%XMM2,%XMM3

0x44e111 ADDSD	%XMM3,%XMM0

0x44e115 ADD	$0x20,%R10

0x44e119 ADD	$0x60,%R9

0x44e11d MOVAPD	%XMM1,%XMM3

0x44e121 DEC	%R8

0x44e124 JNE	44e080

/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs/170-855-3059/intel/miniqmc/build/miniqmc/src/Platforms/CPU/SIMD/inner_product.hpp: 155 - 155

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

155:   for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)

/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs/170-855-3059/intel/miniqmc/build/miniqmc/src/Numerics/OhmmsPETE/TinyVector.h: 61 - 61

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

61:     for (size_t d = 0; d < D; ++d)

/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs/170-855-3059/intel/miniqmc/build/miniqmc/src/Numerics/PETE/OperatorTags.h: 63 - 63

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

63:     return (a * b);

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.89
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	5.02
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.54
Bottlenecks
Function	_ZN16miniqmcreference19DiracDeterminantRefIN11qmcplusplus13DelayedUpdateIddEEE8evalGradERNS1_11ParticleSetEi
Source	inner_product.hpp:155-155,TinyVector.h:61-61,OperatorTags.h:63-63
Source loop unroll info	unrolled by 4
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	main
Unroll factor	4
CQA cycles	9.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	9.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	4.75
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	1.79
Front-end cycles	5.83
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.75
P0 cycles	0.75
P1 cycles	0.50
P2 cycles	0.50
P3 cycles	0.50
P4 cycles	3.33
P5 cycles	3.33
P6 cycles	3.33
P7 cycles	3.00
P8 cycles	5.67
P9 cycles	5.83
P10 cycles	5.50
P11 cycles	0.00
P12 cycles	0.00
P13 cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	9
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	36.00
Nb uops	35.00
Nb loads	10.00
Nb stores	0.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	2.67
Nb FLOP add-sub	12.00
Nb FLOP mul	12.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	14.22
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	128.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	1.00
Stride n	1.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	65.63
Vectorization ratio load	60.00
Vectorization ratio store	NA
Vectorization ratio mul	100.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	71.43
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	44.44
Vector-efficiency ratio all	20.70
Vector-efficiency ratio load	20.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	21.43
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	18.06

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.89
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	5.02
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.54
Bottlenecks
Function	_ZN16miniqmcreference19DiracDeterminantRefIN11qmcplusplus13DelayedUpdateIddEEE8evalGradERNS1_11ParticleSetEi
Source	inner_product.hpp:155-155,TinyVector.h:61-61,OperatorTags.h:63-63
Source loop unroll info	unrolled by 4
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	main
Unroll factor	4
CQA cycles	9.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	9.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	4.75
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	1.79
Front-end cycles	5.83
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.75
P0 cycles	0.75
P1 cycles	0.50
P2 cycles	0.50
P3 cycles	0.50
P4 cycles	3.33
P5 cycles	3.33
P6 cycles	3.33
P7 cycles	3.00
P8 cycles	5.67
P9 cycles	5.83
P10 cycles	5.50
P11 cycles	0.00
P12 cycles	0.00
P13 cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	9
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	36.00
Nb uops	35.00
Nb loads	10.00
Nb stores	0.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	2.67
Nb FLOP add-sub	12.00
Nb FLOP mul	12.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	14.22
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	128.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	1.00
Stride n	1.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	65.63
Vectorization ratio load	60.00
Vectorization ratio store	NA
Vectorization ratio mul	100.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	71.43
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	44.44
Vector-efficiency ratio all	20.70
Vector-efficiency ratio load	20.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	21.43
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	18.06

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	_ZN16miniqmcreference19DiracDeterminantRefIN11qmcplusplus13DelayedUpdateIddEEE8evalGradERNS1_11ParticleSetEi
Source file and lines	inner_product.hpp:155-155
Module	exec

The loop is defined in:

/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs/170-855-3059/intel/miniqmc/build/miniqmc/src/Platforms/CPU/SIMD/inner_product.hpp:155
/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs/170-855-3059/intel/miniqmc/build/miniqmc/src/Numerics/OhmmsPETE/TinyVector.h:61
/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs/170-855-3059/intel/miniqmc/build/miniqmc/src/Numerics/PETE/OperatorTags.h:63

It is main loop of related source loop which is unrolled by 4 (including vectorization).

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is partially vectorized. Only 20% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions). By fully vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 9.00 to 1.79 cycles (5.02x speedup).

Details

65% of SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

60% of SSE/AVX loads are used in vector version.
71% of SSE/AVX addition or subtraction instructions are used in vector version.
44% of SSE/AVX instructions that are not load, store, addition, subtraction nor multiply instructions are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ffast-math (included in Ofast) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

FMA

Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Pass to your compiler a micro-architecture specialization option:
- use march=native
Try to change order in which elements are evaluated (using parentheses) in arithmetic expressions containing both ADD/SUB and MUL operations to enable your compiler to generate FMA instructions wherever possible. For instance a + b*c is a valid FMA (MUL then ADD). However (a+b)* c cannot be translated into an FMA (ADD then MUL).

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant non-unit stride: 1 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vector unaligned load/store instructions

Detected 8 suboptimal vector unaligned load/store instructions.

Details

MOVHPD: 2 occurrences
MOVUPD: 6 occurrences

Workaround

Pass to your compiler a micro-architecture specialization option:
- use march=native
Use vector aligned instructions:
1. align your arrays on 64 bytes boundaries: replace { void *p = malloc (size); } with { void *p; posix_memalign (&p, 64, size); }.
2. inform your compiler that your arrays are vector aligned: if array 'foo' is 64 bytes-aligned, define a pointer 'p_foo' as __builtin_assume_aligned (foo, 64) and use it instead of 'foo' in the loop.

Type of elements and instruction set

2 SSE or AVX instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in scalar mode (one at a time). 11 SSE or AVX instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in vector mode (two at a time).

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 24 FP arithmetical operations:

12: addition or subtraction
12: multiply

The binary loop is loading 128 bytes (16 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.19 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	36
nb uops	35
loop length	170
used x86 registers	3
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	10
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	0
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	1.17

Front-end

ASSUMED MACRO FUSION FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	5.83 cycles
front end	5.83 cycles

Back-end

	ALU0/BRU0	ALU1	ALU2	ALU3	BRU1	AGU0	AGU1	AGU2	FP0	FP1	FP2	FP3	FP4	FP5
uops	0.75	0.75	0.50	0.50	0.50	3.33	3.33	3.33	3.00	5.67	5.83	5.50	0.00	0.00
cycles	0.75	0.75	0.50	0.50	0.50	3.33	3.33	3.33	3.00	5.67	5.83	5.50	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

ALU0/BRU0: ALU
ALU1: ALU
ALU2: ALU
ALU3: ALU
BRU1:
AGU0 (256 bits): store address, load
AGU1 (256 bits): store address, load
AGU2 (256 bits): store address, load
FP0 (256 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
FP1 (256 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
FP2 (256 bits): VPU
FP3 (256 bits): VPU
FP4 (256 bits): FP store data
FP5 (256 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	9.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	5.83
Dispatch	5.83
Data deps.	9.00
Overall L1	9.00

Vectorization ratios

all	65%
load	60%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	100%
add-sub	71%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	44%

Vector efficiency ratios

all	20%
load	20%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	25%
add-sub	21%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	18%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 9.00 cycles. At this rate:

14% of peak load performance is reached (14.22 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 44e080

Instruction	Nb FU	ALU0/BRU0	ALU1	ALU2	ALU3	BRU1	AGU0	AGU1	AGU2	FP0	FP1	FP2	FP3	Latency	Recip. throughput
MOVUPD -0x58(%R9),%XMM4	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	3	0.50
MOVUPD -0x40(%R9),%XMM5	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	3	0.50
MOVSD -0x48(%R9),%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50
MOVHPD -0x30(%R9),%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	1	0.50
MOVUPD -0x28(%R9),%XMM6	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	3	0.50
MOVSD -0x18(%R9),%XMM7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50
MOVHPD (%R9),%XMM7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	1	0.50
MOVUPD -0x10(%R9),%XMM8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	3	0.50
MOVUPD (%R10),%XMM9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	3	0.50
MOVUPD 0x10(%R10),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	3	0.50
MULPD %XMM1,%XMM7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50
MULPD %XMM9,%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50
ADDPD %XMM7,%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	3	0.50
MOVAPD %XMM9,%XMM7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17
UNPCKLPD %XMM9,%XMM7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	1	0.40
MULPD %XMM4,%XMM7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50
ADDPD %XMM3,%XMM7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	3	0.50
UNPCKHPD %XMM9,%XMM9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	1	0.40
MULPD %XMM5,%XMM9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50
MOVAPD %XMM1,%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17
UNPCKLPD %XMM1,%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	1	0.40
MULPD %XMM6,%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50
ADDPD %XMM9,%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	3	0.50
ADDPD %XMM7,%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	3	0.50
UNPCKHPD %XMM1,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	1	0.40
MULPD %XMM8,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50
ADDPD %XMM3,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	3	0.50
MOVAPD %XMM2,%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17
UNPCKHPD %XMM2,%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	1	0.40
ADDSD %XMM2,%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	3	0.50
ADDSD %XMM3,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	3	0.50
ADD $0x20,%R10	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25
ADD $0x60,%R9	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25
MOVAPD %XMM1,%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17
DEC %R8	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25
JNE 44e080 <_ZN16miniqmcreference19DiracDeterminantRefIN11qmcplusplus13DelayedUpdateIddEEE8evalGradERNS1_11ParticleSetEi+0xd0>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1

Function	_ZN16miniqmcreference19DiracDeterminantRefIN11qmcplusplus13DelayedUpdateIddEEE8evalGradERNS1_11ParticleSetEi
Source file and lines	inner_product.hpp:155-155
Module	exec

The loop is defined in:

/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs/170-855-3059/intel/miniqmc/build/miniqmc/src/Platforms/CPU/SIMD/inner_product.hpp:155
/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs/170-855-3059/intel/miniqmc/build/miniqmc/src/Numerics/OhmmsPETE/TinyVector.h:61
/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs/170-855-3059/intel/miniqmc/build/miniqmc/src/Numerics/PETE/OperatorTags.h:63

It is main loop of related source loop which is unrolled by 4 (including vectorization).

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Details

65% of SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

60% of SSE/AVX loads are used in vector version.
71% of SSE/AVX addition or subtraction instructions are used in vector version.
44% of SSE/AVX instructions that are not load, store, addition, subtraction nor multiply instructions are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ffast-math (included in Ofast) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

FMA

Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Pass to your compiler a micro-architecture specialization option:
- use march=native
Try to change order in which elements are evaluated (using parentheses) in arithmetic expressions containing both ADD/SUB and MUL operations to enable your compiler to generate FMA instructions wherever possible. For instance a + b*c is a valid FMA (MUL then ADD). However (a+b)* c cannot be translated into an FMA (ADD then MUL).

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant non-unit stride: 1 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vector unaligned load/store instructions

Detected 8 suboptimal vector unaligned load/store instructions.

Details

MOVHPD: 2 occurrences
MOVUPD: 6 occurrences

Workaround

Pass to your compiler a micro-architecture specialization option:
- use march=native
Use vector aligned instructions:
1. align your arrays on 64 bytes boundaries: replace { void *p = malloc (size); } with { void *p; posix_memalign (&p, 64, size); }.
2. inform your compiler that your arrays are vector aligned: if array 'foo' is 64 bytes-aligned, define a pointer 'p_foo' as __builtin_assume_aligned (foo, 64) and use it instead of 'foo' in the loop.

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 24 FP arithmetical operations:

12: addition or subtraction
12: multiply

The binary loop is loading 128 bytes (16 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.19 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	36
nb uops	35
loop length	170
used x86 registers	3
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	10
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	0
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	1.17

Front-end

ASSUMED MACRO FUSION FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	5.83 cycles
front end	5.83 cycles

Back-end

	ALU0/BRU0	ALU1	ALU2	ALU3	BRU1	AGU0	AGU1	AGU2	FP0	FP1	FP2	FP3	FP4	FP5
uops	0.75	0.75	0.50	0.50	0.50	3.33	3.33	3.33	3.00	5.67	5.83	5.50	0.00	0.00
cycles	0.75	0.75	0.50	0.50	0.50	3.33	3.33	3.33	3.00	5.67	5.83	5.50	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

ALU0/BRU0: ALU
ALU1: ALU
ALU2: ALU
ALU3: ALU
BRU1:
AGU0 (256 bits): store address, load
AGU1 (256 bits): store address, load
AGU2 (256 bits): store address, load
FP0 (256 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
FP1 (256 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
FP2 (256 bits): VPU
FP3 (256 bits): VPU
FP4 (256 bits): FP store data
FP5 (256 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	9.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	5.83
Dispatch	5.83
Data deps.	9.00
Overall L1	9.00

Vectorization ratios

all	65%
load	60%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	100%
add-sub	71%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	44%

Vector efficiency ratios

all	20%
load	20%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	25%
add-sub	21%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	18%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 9.00 cycles. At this rate:

14% of peak load performance is reached (14.22 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 44e080

Instruction	Nb FU	ALU0/BRU0	ALU1	ALU2	ALU3	BRU1	AGU0	AGU1	AGU2	FP0	FP1	FP2	FP3	Latency	Recip. throughput
MOVUPD -0x58(%R9),%XMM4	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	3	0.50
MOVUPD -0x40(%R9),%XMM5	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	3	0.50
MOVSD -0x48(%R9),%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50
MOVHPD -0x30(%R9),%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	1	0.50
MOVUPD -0x28(%R9),%XMM6	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	3	0.50
MOVSD -0x18(%R9),%XMM7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50
MOVHPD (%R9),%XMM7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	1	0.50
MOVUPD -0x10(%R9),%XMM8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	3	0.50
MOVUPD (%R10),%XMM9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	3	0.50
MOVUPD 0x10(%R10),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	3	0.50
MULPD %XMM1,%XMM7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50
MULPD %XMM9,%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50
ADDPD %XMM7,%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	3	0.50
MOVAPD %XMM9,%XMM7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17
UNPCKLPD %XMM9,%XMM7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	1	0.40
MULPD %XMM4,%XMM7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50
ADDPD %XMM3,%XMM7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	3	0.50
UNPCKHPD %XMM9,%XMM9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	1	0.40
MULPD %XMM5,%XMM9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50
MOVAPD %XMM1,%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17
UNPCKLPD %XMM1,%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	1	0.40
MULPD %XMM6,%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50
ADDPD %XMM9,%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	3	0.50
ADDPD %XMM7,%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	3	0.50
UNPCKHPD %XMM1,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	1	0.40
MULPD %XMM8,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50
ADDPD %XMM3,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	3	0.50
MOVAPD %XMM2,%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17
UNPCKHPD %XMM2,%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	1	0.40
ADDSD %XMM2,%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	3	0.50
ADDSD %XMM3,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	3	0.50
ADD $0x20,%R10	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25
ADD $0x60,%R9	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25
MOVAPD %XMM1,%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17
DEC %R8	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25
JNE 44e080 <_ZN16miniqmcreference19DiracDeterminantRefIN11qmcplusplus13DelayedUpdateIddEEE8evalGradERNS1_11ParticleSetEi+0xd0>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1

Report Configuration

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

FMA

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Vector unaligned load/store instructions

Details

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

FMA

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Vector unaligned load/store instructions

Details

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code