OV - exec - Loop 2035

0x480ac0 MOV	(%R11,%RCX,1),%RAX    [3]

0x480ac4 IMUL	%R8,%RAX

0x480ac8 ADD	%RDI,%RAX

0x480acb MOVSD	(%R9,%RAX,8),%XMM0    [1]

0x480ad1 MULSD	(%R10,%RCX,1),%XMM0    [2]

0x480ad7 ADD	$0x8,%RCX

0x480adb ADDSD	%XMM0,%XMM1

0x480adf CMP	%RCX,%R14

0x480ae2 JNE	480ac0

  ***  This Panel is Intentionally Left Blank.  ***

It is due to a lack of debug symbols in the given object
(loop or function).

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►96.69+	gomp_thread_start	team.c:130	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	__GI___clone3		libc.so.6
►2.73+	GOMP_parallel	libgomp.h:982	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	void Kripke::DispatchHelper<Kr[...]		exec
○	Kripke::Kernel::scattering(Kri[...]		exec
○	Kripke::SteadyStateSolver(Krip[...]		exec
○	main		exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start		exec

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	3.69
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	8.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	2.00
Bottlenecks
Function	void RAJA::internal::StatementExecutor, RAJA::statement::For<2l, RAJA::policy::sequential::seq_exec, RAJA::statement::For<3l, RAJA::policy::sequential::seq_exec, RAJA::statement::Lambda<0l> > > >, RAJA::internal::LoopTypes, camp::list > >::exec, long>, RAJA::Span, long>, RAJA::Span, long>, RAJA::Span, long> >, camp::tuple<>, camp::resources::v1::Host, ScatteringSdom::operator() >(Kripke::ArchLayoutT, Kripke::SdomId, Kripke::SdomId, Kripke::Core::Set const&, Kripke::Core::Set const&, Kripke::Core::Set const&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&) const::{lambda(Kripke::Moment, Kripke::Group, Kripke::Group, Kripke::Zone)#1}>&>(RAJA::internal::LoopData, long>, RAJA::Span, long>, RAJA::Span, long>, RAJA::Span, long> >, camp::tuple<>, camp::resources::v1::Host, ScatteringSdom::operator() >(Kripke::ArchLayoutT, Kripke::SdomId, Kripke::SdomId, Kripke::Core::Set const&, Kripke::Core::Set const&, Kripke::Core::Set const&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&) const::{lambda(Kripke::Moment, Kripke::Group, Kripke::Group, Kripke::Zone)#1}>&) [clone ._omp_fn.0]
Source
Source loop unroll info	NA
Source loop unroll confidence level	NA
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	2.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	2.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	0.54
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.25
Front-end cycles	1.00
P0 cycles	0.67
P1 cycles	0.67
P2 cycles	0.67
P3 cycles	0.67
P4 cycles	0.67
P5 cycles	0.67
P6 cycles	0.75
P7 cycles	0.75
P8 cycles	0.75
P9 cycles	0.75
P10 cycles	0.50
P11 cycles	0.50
P12 cycles	0.50
P13 cycles	0.50
P14 cycles	0.00
P15 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	2
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	9.00
Nb uops	8.00
Nb loads	3.00
Nb stores	0.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	1.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	1.00
Nb FLOP mul	1.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	12.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	24.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	2.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	1.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	NA
Vectorization ratio mul	0.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio load	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio store	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	3.69
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	8.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	2.00
Bottlenecks
Function	void RAJA::internal::StatementExecutor, RAJA::statement::For<2l, RAJA::policy::sequential::seq_exec, RAJA::statement::For<3l, RAJA::policy::sequential::seq_exec, RAJA::statement::Lambda<0l> > > >, RAJA::internal::LoopTypes, camp::list > >::exec, long>, RAJA::Span, long>, RAJA::Span, long>, RAJA::Span, long> >, camp::tuple<>, camp::resources::v1::Host, ScatteringSdom::operator() >(Kripke::ArchLayoutT, Kripke::SdomId, Kripke::SdomId, Kripke::Core::Set const&, Kripke::Core::Set const&, Kripke::Core::Set const&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&) const::{lambda(Kripke::Moment, Kripke::Group, Kripke::Group, Kripke::Zone)#1}>&>(RAJA::internal::LoopData, long>, RAJA::Span, long>, RAJA::Span, long>, RAJA::Span, long> >, camp::tuple<>, camp::resources::v1::Host, ScatteringSdom::operator() >(Kripke::ArchLayoutT, Kripke::SdomId, Kripke::SdomId, Kripke::Core::Set const&, Kripke::Core::Set const&, Kripke::Core::Set const&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&) const::{lambda(Kripke::Moment, Kripke::Group, Kripke::Group, Kripke::Zone)#1}>&) [clone ._omp_fn.0]
Source
Source loop unroll info	NA
Source loop unroll confidence level	NA
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	2.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	2.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	0.54
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.25
Front-end cycles	1.00
P0 cycles	0.67
P1 cycles	0.67
P2 cycles	0.67
P3 cycles	0.67
P4 cycles	0.67
P5 cycles	0.67
P6 cycles	0.75
P7 cycles	0.75
P8 cycles	0.75
P9 cycles	0.75
P10 cycles	0.50
P11 cycles	0.50
P12 cycles	0.50
P13 cycles	0.50
P14 cycles	0.00
P15 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	2
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	9.00
Nb uops	8.00
Nb loads	3.00
Nb stores	0.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	1.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	1.00
Nb FLOP mul	1.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	12.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	24.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	2.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	1.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	NA
Vectorization ratio mul	0.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio load	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio store	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	void RAJA::internal::StatementExecutor, RAJA::statement::For<2l, RAJA::policy::sequential::seq_exec, RAJA::statement::For<3l, RAJA::policy::sequential::seq_exec, RAJA::statement::Lambda<0l> > > >, RAJA::internal::LoopTypes, camp::list > >::exec, long>, RAJA::Span, long>, RAJA::Span, long>, RAJA::Span, long> >, camp::tuple<>, camp::resources::v1::Host, ScatteringSdom::operator() >(Kripke::ArchLayoutT, Kripke::SdomId, Kripke::SdomId, Kripke::Core::Set const&, Kripke::Core::Set const&, Kripke::Core::Set const&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&) const::{lambda(Kripke::Moment, Kripke::Group, Kripke::Group, Kripke::Zone)#1}>&>(RAJA::internal::LoopData, long>, RAJA::Span, long>, RAJA::Span, long>, RAJA::Span, long> >, camp::tuple<>, camp::resources::v1::Host, ScatteringSdom::operator() >(Kripke::ArchLayoutT, Kripke::SdomId, Kripke::SdomId, Kripke::Core::Set const&, Kripke::Core::Set const&, Kripke::Core::Set const&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&) const::{lambda(Kripke::Moment, Kripke::Group, Kripke::Group, Kripke::Zone)#1}>&) [clone ._omp_fn.0]
Source file and lines
Module	exec

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 8 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers.

By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 2.00 to 0.25 cycles (8.00x speedup).

Details

All SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

FMA

Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Pass to your compiler a micro-architecture specialization option:
- Please look into your compiler manual for march=native or equivalent
Try to change order in which elements are evaluated (using parentheses) in arithmetic expressions containing both ADD/SUB and MUL operations to enable your compiler to generate FMA instructions wherever possible. For instance a + b*c is a valid FMA (MUL then ADD). However (a+b)* c cannot be translated into an FMA (ADD then MUL).

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant unknown stride: 1 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Type of elements and instruction set

2 SSE or AVX instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in scalar mode (one at a time).

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 2 FP arithmetical operations:

1: addition or subtraction
1: multiply

The binary loop is loading 24 bytes (3 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.08 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	9
nb uops	8
loop length	36
used x86 registers	8
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	2
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	0
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	1.00

Front-end

ASSUMED MACRO FUSION FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	1.00 cycles
front end	1.00 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.75	0.75	0.75	0.75	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.00	0.00
cycles	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.75	0.75	0.75	0.75	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	2.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	1.00
Dispatch	0.75
Data deps.	2.00
Overall L1	2.00

Vectorization ratios

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Vector efficiency ratios

all	12%
load	12%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	12%
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 2.00 cycles. At this rate:

4% of peak load performance is reached (12.00 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 480ac0

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
MOV (%R11,%RCX,1),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
IMUL %R8,%RAX	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %RDI,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSD (%R9,%RAX,8),%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MULSD (%R10,%RCX,1),%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
ADD $0x8,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADDSD %XMM0,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	2	0.50	scal (12.5%)
CMP %RCX,%R14	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
JNE 480ac0 <_ZN4RAJA8internal17StatementExecutorINS_9statement8CollapseINS_26omp_parallel_collapse_execEN4camp7int_seqIlJLl0ELl1EEEEJNS2_3ForILl2ENS_6policy10sequential8seq_execEJNS8_ILl3ESB_JNS2_6LambdaILl0EJEEEEEEEEEEEENS0_9LoopTypesINS5_4listIJvvvvEEESJ_EEE4execIRNS0_8LoopDataINS5_5tupleIJNS_4SpanINS_9Iterators16numeric_iteratorIN6Kripke6MomentElPST_EElEENSP_INSR_INSS_5GroupElPSX_EElEES10_NSP_INSR_INSS_4ZoneElPS11_EElEEEEENSO_IJEEENS5_9resources2v14HostEJZNK14ScatteringSdomclINSS_11ArchLayoutTINSS_12ArchT_OpenMPENSS_11LayoutT_DGZEEEEEvT_NSS_6SdomIdES1H_RKNSS_4Core3SetES1L_S1L_RNS1I_5FieldIdJST_SX_S11_EEES1O_RNS1M_IdJNSS_8MaterialENSS_8LegendreENSS_11GlobalGroupES1R_EEERNS1M_INSS_7MixElemEJS11_EEERNS1M_IiJS11_EEERNS1M_IS1P_JS1U_EEERNS1M_IdJS1U_EEERNS1M_IS1Q_JST_EEEEUlST_SX_SX_S11_E_EEEEEvOS1G_._omp_fn.0+0x2c0>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A

Function	void RAJA::internal::StatementExecutor, RAJA::statement::For<2l, RAJA::policy::sequential::seq_exec, RAJA::statement::For<3l, RAJA::policy::sequential::seq_exec, RAJA::statement::Lambda<0l> > > >, RAJA::internal::LoopTypes, camp::list > >::exec, long>, RAJA::Span, long>, RAJA::Span, long>, RAJA::Span, long> >, camp::tuple<>, camp::resources::v1::Host, ScatteringSdom::operator() >(Kripke::ArchLayoutT, Kripke::SdomId, Kripke::SdomId, Kripke::Core::Set const&, Kripke::Core::Set const&, Kripke::Core::Set const&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&) const::{lambda(Kripke::Moment, Kripke::Group, Kripke::Group, Kripke::Zone)#1}>&>(RAJA::internal::LoopData, long>, RAJA::Span, long>, RAJA::Span, long>, RAJA::Span, long> >, camp::tuple<>, camp::resources::v1::Host, ScatteringSdom::operator() >(Kripke::ArchLayoutT, Kripke::SdomId, Kripke::SdomId, Kripke::Core::Set const&, Kripke::Core::Set const&, Kripke::Core::Set const&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&, Kripke::Core::Field&) const::{lambda(Kripke::Moment, Kripke::Group, Kripke::Group, Kripke::Zone)#1}>&) [clone ._omp_fn.0]
Source file and lines
Module	exec

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 8 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers.

By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 2.00 to 0.25 cycles (8.00x speedup).

Details

All SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

FMA

Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Pass to your compiler a micro-architecture specialization option:
- Please look into your compiler manual for march=native or equivalent
Try to change order in which elements are evaluated (using parentheses) in arithmetic expressions containing both ADD/SUB and MUL operations to enable your compiler to generate FMA instructions wherever possible. For instance a + b*c is a valid FMA (MUL then ADD). However (a+b)* c cannot be translated into an FMA (ADD then MUL).

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant unknown stride: 1 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Type of elements and instruction set

2 SSE or AVX instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in scalar mode (one at a time).

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 2 FP arithmetical operations:

1: addition or subtraction
1: multiply

The binary loop is loading 24 bytes (3 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.08 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	9
nb uops	8
loop length	36
used x86 registers	8
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	2
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	0
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	1.00

Front-end

ASSUMED MACRO FUSION FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	1.00 cycles
front end	1.00 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.75	0.75	0.75	0.75	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.00	0.00
cycles	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.75	0.75	0.75	0.75	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	2.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	1.00
Dispatch	0.75
Data deps.	2.00
Overall L1	2.00

Vectorization ratios

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Vector efficiency ratios

all	12%
load	12%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	12%
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 2.00 cycles. At this rate:

4% of peak load performance is reached (12.00 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 480ac0

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
MOV (%R11,%RCX,1),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
IMUL %R8,%RAX	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %RDI,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSD (%R9,%RAX,8),%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MULSD (%R10,%RCX,1),%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
ADD $0x8,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADDSD %XMM0,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	2	0.50	scal (12.5%)
CMP %RCX,%R14	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
JNE 480ac0 <_ZN4RAJA8internal17StatementExecutorINS_9statement8CollapseINS_26omp_parallel_collapse_execEN4camp7int_seqIlJLl0ELl1EEEEJNS2_3ForILl2ENS_6policy10sequential8seq_execEJNS8_ILl3ESB_JNS2_6LambdaILl0EJEEEEEEEEEEEENS0_9LoopTypesINS5_4listIJvvvvEEESJ_EEE4execIRNS0_8LoopDataINS5_5tupleIJNS_4SpanINS_9Iterators16numeric_iteratorIN6Kripke6MomentElPST_EElEENSP_INSR_INSS_5GroupElPSX_EElEES10_NSP_INSR_INSS_4ZoneElPS11_EElEEEEENSO_IJEEENS5_9resources2v14HostEJZNK14ScatteringSdomclINSS_11ArchLayoutTINSS_12ArchT_OpenMPENSS_11LayoutT_DGZEEEEEvT_NSS_6SdomIdES1H_RKNSS_4Core3SetES1L_S1L_RNS1I_5FieldIdJST_SX_S11_EEES1O_RNS1M_IdJNSS_8MaterialENSS_8LegendreENSS_11GlobalGroupES1R_EEERNS1M_INSS_7MixElemEJS11_EEERNS1M_IiJS11_EEERNS1M_IS1P_JS1U_EEERNS1M_IdJS1U_EEERNS1M_IS1Q_JST_EEEEUlST_SX_SX_S11_E_EEEEEvOS1G_._omp_fn.0+0x2c0>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A

Report Configuration

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

FMA

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

FMA

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code