OV - exec - Loop 96

0x4086e0 LDR	D0, [X12, X4,SXTW #3]    [1]

0x4086e4 SUB	W4, W4, #1

0x4086e8 SUBS	X6, X6, #1

0x4086ec STR	D0, [X12, X5,SXTW #3]    [1]

0x4086f0 ADD	W5, W5, #1

0x4086f4 B.NE	4086e0

/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/build/TeaLeaf/src/omp/local_halos.cpp: 28 - 30

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

28:     for (int kk = 0; kk < depth; ++kk) {

29:       int base = jj * x;

30:       buffer[base + (x - halo_depth + kk)] = buffer[base + (x - halo_depth - 1 - kk)];

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	cg_calc_p(int, int, int, doubl[...]	cg.cpp:125	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	2.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.20
Bottlenecks
Function	update_right(int, int, int, int, double*, bool) [clone .omp_outlined]
Source	local_halos.cpp:28-30
Source loop unroll info	unrolled by 4
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	1
CQA cycles	1.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.50
Front-end cycles	0.75
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.50
P2 cycles	0.58
P3 cycles	0.58
P4 cycles	0.50
P5 cycles	0.50
P6 cycles	0.42
P7 cycles	0.42
P8 cycles	0.50
P9 cycles	0.50
P10 cycles	0.00
P11 cycles	0.00
P12 cycles	0.83
P13 cycles	0.50
P14 cycles	0.67
P15 cycles	0.00
P16 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	6.00
Nb uops	6.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	1.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	16.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	8.00
Bytes stored	8.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	1.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	2.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.20
Bottlenecks
Function	update_right(int, int, int, int, double*, bool) [clone .omp_outlined]
Source	local_halos.cpp:28-30
Source loop unroll info	unrolled by 4
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	1
CQA cycles	1.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.50
Front-end cycles	0.75
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.50
P2 cycles	0.58
P3 cycles	0.58
P4 cycles	0.50
P5 cycles	0.50
P6 cycles	0.42
P7 cycles	0.42
P8 cycles	0.50
P9 cycles	0.50
P10 cycles	0.00
P11 cycles	0.00
P12 cycles	0.83
P13 cycles	0.50
P14 cycles	0.67
P15 cycles	0.00
P16 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	6.00
Nb uops	6.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	1.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	16.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	8.00
Bytes stored	8.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	1.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	update_right(int, int, int, int, double*, bool) [clone .omp_outlined]
Source file and lines	local_halos.cpp:28-30
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/build/TeaLeaf/src/omp/local_halos.cpp:28-30.

The related source loop is unrolled by 4 (including vectorization).

gain
potential
hint
expert

Unrolling/vectorization cost

This loop is peel/tail of a unrolled/vectorized loop. If its cost is not negligible compared to the main (unrolled/vectorized) loop, unrolling/vectorization is counterproductive due to low trip count.

Details

The more iterations the main loop is processing, the higher the trip count must be to amortize peel/tail overhead.

Workaround

recompile with -fprofile-instr-generate, execute ,merge raw profiles with 'llvm-profdata merge -o default.profdata default.profraw' and recompile with -fprofile-instr-use (profile-guided optimization)
hardcode most frequent values of loop bounds by adding specialized paths.:
- For instance, replace for (i=0; i<n; i++) foo(i) with: switch (n) { case (4): for (i=0; i<4; i++) foo(i); break; case (6): for (i=0; i<6; i++) foo(i); break; default : for (i=0; i<n; i++) foo(i); break; }

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 2 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers.

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers).

No data for this section

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop is loading 8 bytes. The binary loop is storing 8 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	6
loop length	24
nb stack references	0

Front-end

FIT IN UOP CACHE

front end

0.75 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	P16
uops	0.50	0.50	0.58	0.58	0.50	0.50	0.42	0.42	0.50	0.50	0.00	0.00	0.83	0.50	0.67	0.00	0.00
cycles	0.50	0.50	0.58	0.58	0.50	0.50	0.42	0.42	0.50	0.50	0.00	0.00	0.83	0.50	0.67	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6: ALU
P7: ALU
P8 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P10 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P12 (256 bits): store address, load
P13 (256 bits): store address, load
P14 (256 bits): load
P15 (64 bits): store data
P16 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	0.75
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	1.00

Vectorization ratios

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 1.00 cycles. At this rate:

8% of peak load performance is reached (8.00 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
16% of peak store performance is reached (8.00 out of 48.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 4086e0

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P12	P13	P14	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LDR D0, [X12, X4,SXTW #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
SUB W4, W4, #1	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
SUBS X6, X6, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (50.0%)
STR D0, [X12, X5,SXTW #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (50.0%)
ADD W5, W5, #1	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
B.NE 4086e0 <_Z12update_rightiiiiPdb.omp_outlined+0x1c0>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

Function	update_right(int, int, int, int, double*, bool) [clone .omp_outlined]
Source file and lines	local_halos.cpp:28-30
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/build/TeaLeaf/src/omp/local_halos.cpp:28-30.

The related source loop is unrolled by 4 (including vectorization).

gain
potential
hint
expert

Unrolling/vectorization cost

This loop is peel/tail of a unrolled/vectorized loop. If its cost is not negligible compared to the main (unrolled/vectorized) loop, unrolling/vectorization is counterproductive due to low trip count.

Details

The more iterations the main loop is processing, the higher the trip count must be to amortize peel/tail overhead.

Workaround

recompile with -fprofile-instr-generate, execute ,merge raw profiles with 'llvm-profdata merge -o default.profdata default.profraw' and recompile with -fprofile-instr-use (profile-guided optimization)
hardcode most frequent values of loop bounds by adding specialized paths.:
- For instance, replace for (i=0; i<n; i++) foo(i) with: switch (n) { case (4): for (i=0; i<4; i++) foo(i); break; case (6): for (i=0; i<6; i++) foo(i); break; default : for (i=0; i<n; i++) foo(i); break; }

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 2 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers.

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers).

No data for this section

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop is loading 8 bytes. The binary loop is storing 8 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	6
loop length	24
nb stack references	0

Front-end

FIT IN UOP CACHE

front end

0.75 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	P16
uops	0.50	0.50	0.58	0.58	0.50	0.50	0.42	0.42	0.50	0.50	0.00	0.00	0.83	0.50	0.67	0.00	0.00
cycles	0.50	0.50	0.58	0.58	0.50	0.50	0.42	0.42	0.50	0.50	0.00	0.00	0.83	0.50	0.67	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6: ALU
P7: ALU
P8 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P10 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P12 (256 bits): store address, load
P13 (256 bits): store address, load
P14 (256 bits): load
P15 (64 bits): store data
P16 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	0.75
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	1.00

Vectorization ratios

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 1.00 cycles. At this rate:

8% of peak load performance is reached (8.00 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
16% of peak store performance is reached (8.00 out of 48.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 4086e0

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P12	P13	P14	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LDR D0, [X12, X4,SXTW #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
SUB W4, W4, #1	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
SUBS X6, X6, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (50.0%)
STR D0, [X12, X5,SXTW #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (50.0%)
ADD W5, W5, #1	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
B.NE 4086e0 <_Z12update_rightiiiiPdb.omp_outlined+0x1c0>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

▶Scalability Runs Description

Run 1x1	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_run_1741271023OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_NUM_THREADS: 1OMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x2	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_run_1741271023OMP_NUM_THREADS: 2OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x4	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_run_1741271023OMP_NUM_THREADS: 4OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x8	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_run_1741271023OMP_NUM_THREADS: 8OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x16	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_run_1741271023OMP_NUM_THREADS: 16OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x24	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_run_1741271023OMP_NUM_THREADS: 24OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x32	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_run_1741271023OMP_NUM_THREADS: 32OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x40	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_run_1741271023OMP_NUM_THREADS: 40OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x48	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_run_1741271023OMP_NUM_THREADS: 48OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x56	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_run_1741271023OMP_NUM_THREADS: 56OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x64	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_run_1741271023OMP_NUM_THREADS: 64OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x72	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_run_1741271023OMP_NUM_THREADS: 72OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x80	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_run_1741271023OMP_NUM_THREADS: 80OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x88	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_run_1741271023OMP_NUM_THREADS: 88OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x96	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_run_1741271023OMP_NUM_THREADS: 96OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads

(1x1) Efficiency	(1x1) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x2) Efficiency	(1x2) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x4) Efficiency	(1x4) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x8) Efficiency	(1x8) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x16) Efficiency	(1x16) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x24) Efficiency	(1x24) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x32) Efficiency	(1x32) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x40) Efficiency	(1x40) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x48) Efficiency	(1x48) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x56) Efficiency	(1x56) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x64) Efficiency	(1x64) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x72) Efficiency	(1x72) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x80) Efficiency	(1x80) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x88) Efficiency	(1x88) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x96) Efficiency	(1x96) Potential Speed-Up (%)
1	0	0.99	0	1.07	0	1.15	0	0.99	0	0.88	0	0.65	0.01	0.74	0.01	0.81	0	0.61	0.01	0.62	0.01	0.81	0	0.82	0	0.58	0.01	0.64	0.01

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency

Run	Number of threads	Efficiency (ideal is 1)	Speedup	Ideal Speedup	Time (s)	Coverage (%)
1x1	1	1	1	1	1.4099998474121	0.089516907930374
1x2	2	0.99	1.97	2	0.79000002145767	0.088606089353561
1x4	4	1.07	4.28	4	0.36000004410744	0.077559724450111
1x8	8	1.15	9.2	8	0.18499998748302	0.055324506014585
1x16	16	0.99	15.88	16	0.12499999254942	0.041297797113657
1x24	24	0.88	21.14	24	0.11499997973442	0.032431282103062
1x32	32	0.65	20.83	32	0.14999997615814	0.033872306346893
1x40	40	0.74	29.55	40	0.10499998182058	0.024912001565099
1x48	48	0.81	39	48	0.074999995529652	0.020111992955208
1x56	55	0.61	34.28	56	0.10999997705221	0.024048449471593
1x64	64	0.62	39.66	64	0.069999985396862	0.021465051919222
1x72	71	0.81	58.59	72	0.054999995976686	0.014873790554702
1x80	78	0.82	65.94	80	0.059999994933605	0.013443564064801
1x88	87	0.58	51.38	88	0.059999998658895	0.017473237589002
1x96	95	0.64	61.08	96	0.049999989569187	0.01504788082093

Report Configuration

Unrolling/vectorization cost

Details

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

ASM code

Unrolling/vectorization cost

Details

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

ASM code

▶Scalability Runs Description

▼Columns Filter

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency