OV - exec - Function main.omp

	Function: main.omp_outlined.27	Module: exec	Source: stream.c:354-356	Coverage (incl. loops): 96.19% \| (excl. loops): 0.00%

/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-5341/stream-triad/build/stream-triad/src/stream.c: 354 - 356

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

354: #pragma omp parallel for

355: 	for (j=0; j<STREAM_ARRAY_SIZE; j++)

356: 	    a[j] = b[j]+scalar*c[j];

0x2035c0 PUSH	%RBP

0x2035c1 MOV	%RSP,%RBP

0x2035c4 PUSH	%R15

0x2035c6 PUSH	%R14

0x2035c8 PUSH	%RBX

0x2035c9 SUB	$0x28,%RSP

0x2035cd MOV	(%RDI),%EBX

0x2035cf LEA	-0x7(%RIP),%RAX

0x2035d6 MOV	$0x2e21,%R15

0x2035e0 MOV	%RDX,%R14

0x2035e3 MOVQ	$0,-0x30(%RBP)

0x2035eb MOVQ	$0x3344ffff,-0x20(%RBP)

0x2035f3 MOVQ	$0x1,-0x38(%RBP)

0x2035fb MOVL	$0,-0x24(%RBP)

0x203602 ADD	%RAX,%R15

0x203605 SUB	$0x8,%RSP

0x203609 MOV	$-0x1210,%RDI

0x203613 LEA	-0x38(%RBP),%RAX

0x203617 LEA	-0x24(%RBP),%RCX

0x20361b MOV	$-0x1020,%R10

0x203625 LEA	-0x30(%RBP),%R8

0x203629 LEA	-0x20(%RBP),%R9

0x20362d MOV	%EBX,%ESI

0x20362f MOV	$0x22,%EDX

0x203634 ADD	%R15,%RDI

0x203637 PUSH	$0x1

0x203639 PUSH	$0x1

0x20363b PUSH	%RAX

0x20363c CALLQ	(%R15,%R10,1)

0x203640 ADD	$0x20,%RSP

0x203644 MOV	-0x20(%RBP),%RCX

0x203648 MOV	$0x3344ffff,%EAX

0x20364d CMP	$0x3344ffff,%RCX

0x203654 CMOVL	%RCX,%RAX

0x203658 MOV	-0x30(%RBP),%RCX

0x20365c MOV	%RAX,-0x20(%RBP)

0x203660 CMP	%RAX,%RCX

0x203663 JG	2036bb

0x203665 VMOVSD	(%R14),%XMM0

0x20366a MOV	$0x19a280030,%RDX

0x203674 MOV	$0x334500030,%RSI

0x20367e MOV	$0x30,%RDI

0x203688 DEC	%RCX

0x20368b ADD	%R15,%RDX

0x20368e ADD	%R15,%RSI

0x203691 ADD	%R15,%RDI

0x203694 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

(6) 0x2036a0 VMOVSD	0x8(%RSI,%RCX,8),%XMM1

(6) 0x2036a6 VFMADD213SD	0x8(%RDX,%RCX,8),%XMM0,%XMM1

(6) 0x2036ad VMOVSD	%XMM1,0x8(%RDI,%RCX,8)

(6) 0x2036b3 INC	%RCX

(6) 0x2036b6 CMP	%RAX,%RCX

(6) 0x2036b9 JL	2036a0

0x2036bb MOV	$-0x11f8,%RDI

0x2036c5 MOV	$-0x1010,%RAX

0x2036cf MOV	%EBX,%ESI

0x2036d1 ADD	%R15,%RDI

0x2036d4 CALLQ	(%R15,%RAX,1)

0x2036d8 ADD	$0x28,%RSP

0x2036dc POP	%RBX

0x2036dd POP	%R14

0x2036df POP	%R15

0x2036e1 POP	%RBP

0x2036e2 RET

0x2036e3 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►99.85+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►99.88+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►99.91+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run 1x8

Source file and lines	stream.c:354-356
Module	exec

The function is defined in /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-5341/stream-triad/build/stream-triad/src/stream.c:354-356.

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 8.00 to 0.83 cycles (9.60x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your function is not vectorized. Only 9% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions). By vectorizing your function, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 8.00 to 0.58 cycles (13.88x speedup).

Details

All SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized function can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

No data for this section

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

Calling (and then returning from) a function prevents many compiler optimizations (like vectorization), breaks control flow (which reduces pipeline performance) and executes extra instructions to save/restore the registers used inside it, which is very expensive (dozens of cycles). Consider to inline small functions.

unknown: 2 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-5341/stream-triad/build/stream-triad/src/stream.c:354
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-5341/stream-triad/build/stream-triad/src/stream.c:354

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

CMOVL: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-5341/stream-triad/build/stream-triad/src/stream.c:355

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 44 bytes. The binary function is storing 36 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	59
nb uops	64
loop length	277
used x86 registers	13
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	1
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	8.00 cycles
front end	8.00 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	5.67	5.67	5.67	5.67	5.67	5.67	3.25	3.25	3.25	3.25	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	5.67	5.67	5.67	5.67	5.67	5.67	3.25	3.25	3.25	3.25	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	8.00
Dispatch	5.67
Overall L1	8.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	9%
load	10%
store	7%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	9%

all	12%
load	12%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	9%
load	10%
store	7%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	9%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 8.00 cycles. At this rate:

2% of peak load performance is reached (5.50 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
3% of peak store performance is reached (4.50 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Performance is limited by instruction throughput (loading/decoding program instructions to execution core) (front-end is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 8.00 to 5.67 cycles (1.41x speedup).

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 2035c0

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x28,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV (%RDI),%EBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (6.3%)
LEA -0x7(%RIP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x2e21,%R15	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %RDX,%R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOVQ $0,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x3344ffff,-0x20(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x38(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVL $0,-0x24(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
ADD %RAX,%R15	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $-0x1210,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x38(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x24(%RBP),%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $-0x1020,%R10	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x30(%RBP),%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x20(%RBP),%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
ADD %R15,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
CALLQ (%R15,%R10,1)	4	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	2.20	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x20(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x3344ffff,%EAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CMP $0x3344ffff,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
CMOVL %RCX,%RAX	2	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOV -0x30(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RAX,-0x20(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (12.5%)
CMP %RAX,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JG 2036bb <main.omp_outlined.27+0xfb>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
VMOVSD (%R14),%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x19a280030,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x334500030,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x30,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
DEC %RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
ADD %R15,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
ADD %R15,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
ADD %R15,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A
MOV $-0x11f8,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $-0x1010,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
ADD %R15,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CALLQ (%R15,%RAX,1)	4	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	2.20	N/A
ADD $0x28,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
RET	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run 1x8

Source file and lines	stream.c:354-356
Module	exec

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 8.00 to 0.83 cycles (9.60x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

No data for this section

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

unknown: 2 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-5341/stream-triad/build/stream-triad/src/stream.c:354
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-5341/stream-triad/build/stream-triad/src/stream.c:354

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

CMOVL: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-5341/stream-triad/build/stream-triad/src/stream.c:355

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 44 bytes. The binary function is storing 36 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	59
nb uops	64
loop length	277
used x86 registers	13
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	1
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	8.00 cycles
front end	8.00 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	5.67	5.67	5.67	5.67	5.67	5.67	3.25	3.25	3.25	3.25	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	5.67	5.67	5.67	5.67	5.67	5.67	3.25	3.25	3.25	3.25	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	8.00
Dispatch	5.67
Overall L1	8.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	9%
load	10%
store	7%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	9%

all	12%
load	12%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	9%
load	10%
store	7%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	9%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 8.00 cycles. At this rate:

2% of peak load performance is reached (5.50 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
3% of peak store performance is reached (4.50 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 2035c0

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x28,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV (%RDI),%EBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (6.3%)
LEA -0x7(%RIP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x2e21,%R15	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %RDX,%R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOVQ $0,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x3344ffff,-0x20(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x38(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVL $0,-0x24(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
ADD %RAX,%R15	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $-0x1210,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x38(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x24(%RBP),%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $-0x1020,%R10	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x30(%RBP),%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x20(%RBP),%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
ADD %R15,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
CALLQ (%R15,%R10,1)	4	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	2.20	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x20(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x3344ffff,%EAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CMP $0x3344ffff,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
CMOVL %RCX,%RAX	2	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOV -0x30(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RAX,-0x20(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (12.5%)
CMP %RAX,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JG 2036bb <main.omp_outlined.27+0xfb>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
VMOVSD (%R14),%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x19a280030,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x334500030,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x30,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
DEC %RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
ADD %R15,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
ADD %R15,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
ADD %R15,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A
MOV $-0x11f8,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $-0x1010,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
ADD %R15,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CALLQ (%R15,%RAX,1)	4	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	2.20	N/A
ADD $0x28,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
RET	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A

▶Scalability Runs Description

Run 1x8	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Number processes per node: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to none --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-5341/stream-triad/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc_5/oneview_run_1773656141OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threadsOMP_NUM_THREADS: 8
Run 1x64	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Number processes per node: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to none --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-5341/stream-triad/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc_5/oneview_run_1773656141OMP_NUM_THREADS: 64OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x96	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Number processes per node: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to none --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-5341/stream-triad/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc_5/oneview_run_1773656141OMP_NUM_THREADS: 96OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x128	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Number processes per node: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to none --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-5341/stream-triad/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc_5/oneview_run_1773656141OMP_NUM_THREADS: 128OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x160	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Number processes per node: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to none --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-5341/stream-triad/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc_5/oneview_run_1773656141OMP_NUM_THREADS: 160OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x192	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Number processes per node: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to none --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-5341/stream-triad/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc_5/oneview_run_1773656141OMP_NUM_THREADS: 192OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads

(1x8) Efficiency	(1x8) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x64) Efficiency	(1x64) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x96) Efficiency	(1x96) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x128) Efficiency	(1x128) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x160) Efficiency	(1x160) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x192) Efficiency	(1x192) Potential Speed-Up (%)
1	0	0.26	66.61	0.17	80.57	0.13	78.94	0.1	81.38	0.08	87.85

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency

Run	Number of threads	Efficiency (ideal is 1)	Speedup	Ideal Speedup	Time (s)	Coverage (%)
1x8	8	1	1	1	5.5749998092651	96.186866760254
1x64	64	0.26	2.1	8	2.8250002861023	90.267471313477
1x96	96	0.17	2	12	2.7400000095367	96.70287322998
1x128	128	0.13	2.04	16	2.8700003623962	90.455345153809
1x160	160	0.1	2.01	20	2.8850002288818	90.467323303223
1x192	192	0.08	1.96	24	2.7750000953674	95.669502258301

Name	Coverage (%)	Time (s)
▼main.omp_outlined.27–	96.19	5.55
○Loop 6 - stream.c:355-356 - exec	96.19	5.53

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

▶Scalability Runs Description

▼Columns Filter

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency