OV - exec - Function main.omp

	Function: main.omp_outlined.27	Module: exec	Source: stream.c:330-332	Coverage (incl. loops): 95.75% \| (excl. loops): 0.00%

/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-4625/stream-scale/build/stream-scale/src/stream.c: 330 - 332

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

330: #pragma omp parallel for

331: 	for (j=0; j<STREAM_ARRAY_SIZE; j++)

332: 	    b[j] = scalar*c[j];

0x203270 PUSH	%RBP

0x203271 MOV	%RSP,%RBP

0x203274 PUSH	%R15

0x203276 PUSH	%R14

0x203278 PUSH	%RBX

0x203279 SUB	$0x28,%RSP

0x20327d MOV	(%RDI),%EBX

0x20327f LEA	-0x7(%RIP),%RAX

0x203286 MOV	$0x2ba1,%R15

0x203290 MOV	%RDX,%R14

0x203293 MOVQ	$0,-0x30(%RBP)

0x20329b MOVQ	$0x3344ffff,-0x20(%RBP)

0x2032a3 MOVQ	$0x1,-0x38(%RBP)

0x2032ab MOVL	$0,-0x24(%RBP)

0x2032b2 ADD	%RAX,%R15

0x2032b5 SUB	$0x8,%RSP

0x2032b9 MOV	$-0x1210,%RDI

0x2032c3 LEA	-0x38(%RBP),%RAX

0x2032c7 LEA	-0x24(%RBP),%RCX

0x2032cb MOV	$-0x1020,%R10

0x2032d5 LEA	-0x30(%RBP),%R8

0x2032d9 LEA	-0x20(%RBP),%R9

0x2032dd MOV	%EBX,%ESI

0x2032df MOV	$0x22,%EDX

0x2032e4 ADD	%R15,%RDI

0x2032e7 PUSH	$0x1

0x2032e9 PUSH	$0x1

0x2032eb PUSH	%RAX

0x2032ec CALLQ	(%R15,%R10,1)

0x2032f0 ADD	$0x20,%RSP

0x2032f4 MOV	-0x20(%RBP),%RCX

0x2032f8 MOV	$0x3344ffff,%EAX

0x2032fd CMP	$0x3344ffff,%RCX

0x203304 CMOVL	%RCX,%RAX

0x203308 MOV	-0x30(%RBP),%RCX

0x20330c MOV	%RAX,-0x20(%RBP)

0x203310 CMP	%RAX,%RCX

0x203313 JG	203354

0x203315 VMOVSD	(%R14),%XMM0

0x20331a MOV	$0x334500030,%RDX

0x203324 MOV	$0x19a280030,%RSI

0x20332e DEC	%RCX

0x203331 ADD	%R15,%RDX

0x203334 ADD	%R15,%RSI

0x203337 NOPW	(%RAX,%RAX,1)

(4) 0x203340 VMULSD	0x8(%RDX,%RCX,8),%XMM0,%XMM1

(4) 0x203346 VMOVSD	%XMM1,0x8(%RSI,%RCX,8)

(4) 0x20334c INC	%RCX

(4) 0x20334f CMP	%RAX,%RCX

(4) 0x203352 JL	203340

0x203354 MOV	$-0x11f8,%RDI

0x20335e MOV	$-0x1010,%RAX

0x203368 MOV	%EBX,%ESI

0x20336a ADD	%R15,%RDI

0x20336d CALLQ	(%R15,%RAX,1)

0x203371 ADD	$0x28,%RSP

0x203375 POP	%RBX

0x203376 POP	%R14

0x203378 POP	%R15

0x20337a POP	%RBP

0x20337b RET

0x20337c NOPL	(%RAX)

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►99.84+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run aocc_10

Source file and lines	stream.c:330-332
Module	exec

The function is defined in /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-4625/stream-scale/build/stream-scale/src/stream.c:330-332.

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.75 to 0.83 cycles (9.30x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your function is not vectorized. Only 9% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions). By vectorizing your function, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.75 to 0.56 cycles (13.82x speedup).

Details

All SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized function can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

No data for this section

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

Calling (and then returning from) a function prevents many compiler optimizations (like vectorization), breaks control flow (which reduces pipeline performance) and executes extra instructions to save/restore the registers used inside it, which is very expensive (dozens of cycles). Consider to inline small functions.

unknown: 2 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-4625/stream-scale/build/stream-scale/src/stream.c:330
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-4625/stream-scale/build/stream-scale/src/stream.c:330

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

CMOVL: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-4625/stream-scale/build/stream-scale/src/stream.c:331

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 44 bytes. The binary function is storing 36 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	57
nb uops	62
loop length	252
used x86 registers	13
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	1
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	7.75 cycles
front end	7.75 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	5.33	5.33	5.33	5.33	5.33	5.33	3.25	3.25	3.25	3.25	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	5.33	5.33	5.33	5.33	5.33	5.33	3.25	3.25	3.25	3.25	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	7.75
Dispatch	5.33
Overall L1	7.75

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	9%
load	10%
store	7%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	9%

all	12%
load	12%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	9%
load	10%
store	7%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	9%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 7.75 cycles. At this rate:

2% of peak load performance is reached (5.68 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
3% of peak store performance is reached (4.65 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Performance is limited by instruction throughput (loading/decoding program instructions to execution core) (front-end is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.75 to 5.33 cycles (1.45x speedup).

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 203270

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x28,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV (%RDI),%EBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (6.3%)
LEA -0x7(%RIP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x2ba1,%R15	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %RDX,%R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOVQ $0,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x3344ffff,-0x20(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x38(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVL $0,-0x24(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
ADD %RAX,%R15	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $-0x1210,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x38(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x24(%RBP),%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $-0x1020,%R10	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x30(%RBP),%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x20(%RBP),%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
ADD %R15,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
CALLQ (%R15,%R10,1)	4	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	2.20	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x20(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x3344ffff,%EAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CMP $0x3344ffff,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
CMOVL %RCX,%RAX	2	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOV -0x30(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RAX,-0x20(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (12.5%)
CMP %RAX,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JG 203354 <main.omp_outlined.27+0xe4>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
VMOVSD (%R14),%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x334500030,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x19a280030,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
DEC %RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
ADD %R15,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
ADD %R15,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
NOPW (%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A
MOV $-0x11f8,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $-0x1010,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
ADD %R15,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CALLQ (%R15,%RAX,1)	4	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	2.20	N/A
ADD $0x28,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
RET	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
NOPL (%RAX)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run aocc_10

Source file and lines	stream.c:330-332
Module	exec

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.75 to 0.83 cycles (9.30x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

No data for this section

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

unknown: 2 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-4625/stream-scale/build/stream-scale/src/stream.c:330
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-4625/stream-scale/build/stream-scale/src/stream.c:330

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

CMOVL: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-4625/stream-scale/build/stream-scale/src/stream.c:331

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 44 bytes. The binary function is storing 36 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	57
nb uops	62
loop length	252
used x86 registers	13
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	1
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	7.75 cycles
front end	7.75 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	5.33	5.33	5.33	5.33	5.33	5.33	3.25	3.25	3.25	3.25	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	5.33	5.33	5.33	5.33	5.33	5.33	3.25	3.25	3.25	3.25	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	7.75
Dispatch	5.33
Overall L1	7.75

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	9%
load	10%
store	7%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	9%

all	12%
load	12%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	9%
load	10%
store	7%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	9%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 7.75 cycles. At this rate:

2% of peak load performance is reached (5.68 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
3% of peak store performance is reached (4.65 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 203270

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x28,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV (%RDI),%EBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (6.3%)
LEA -0x7(%RIP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x2ba1,%R15	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %RDX,%R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOVQ $0,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x3344ffff,-0x20(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x38(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVL $0,-0x24(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
ADD %RAX,%R15	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $-0x1210,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x38(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x24(%RBP),%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $-0x1020,%R10	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x30(%RBP),%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x20(%RBP),%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
ADD %R15,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
CALLQ (%R15,%R10,1)	4	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	2.20	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x20(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x3344ffff,%EAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CMP $0x3344ffff,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
CMOVL %RCX,%RAX	2	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOV -0x30(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RAX,-0x20(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (12.5%)
CMP %RAX,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JG 203354 <main.omp_outlined.27+0xe4>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
VMOVSD (%R14),%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x334500030,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x19a280030,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
DEC %RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
ADD %R15,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
ADD %R15,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
NOPW (%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A
MOV $-0x11f8,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $-0x1010,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
ADD %R15,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CALLQ (%R15,%RAX,1)	4	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	2.20	N/A
ADD $0x28,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
RET	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
NOPL (%RAX)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A

Name	Coverage (%)	Time (s)
▼main.omp_outlined.27–	95.75	4.17
○Loop 4 - stream.c:331-332 - exec	95.75	4.11

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code