OV - exec - Loop 13

0x403350 LEA	(%R8,%R9,8),%R10

0x403354 ADD	$0x8,%R9

0x403358 VMOVUPD	(%RCX,%R10,1),%ZMM0    [1]

0x40335f VMOVUPD	%ZMM0,(%RDX,%R10,1)    [2]

0x403366 CMP	%RSI,%R9

0x403369 JB	403350

/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-3972/stream-copy/build/stream-copy/src/stream.c: 319 - 320

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

319: 	for (j=0; j<STREAM_ARRAY_SIZE; j++)

320: 	    c[j] = a[j];

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libiomp5.so

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.33
Bottlenecks	P14, P15,
Function	main.extracted.50
Source	stream.c:319-320
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	1.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	1.00
Front-end cycles	0.75
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.50
P2 cycles	0.50
P3 cycles	0.50
P4 cycles	0.50
P5 cycles	0.50
P6 cycles	0.50
P7 cycles	0.50
P8 cycles	0.50
P9 cycles	0.50
P10 cycles	0.00
P11 cycles	0.00
P12 cycles	0.00
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	1.00
P15 cycles	1.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	6.00
Nb uops	6.00
Nb loads	1.00
Nb stores	1.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	128.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	64.00
Bytes stored	64.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	100.00
Vectorization ratio load	100.00
Vectorization ratio store	100.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	NA
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	100.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	100.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	100.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.33
Bottlenecks	P14, P15,
Function	main.extracted.50
Source	stream.c:319-320
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	1.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	1.00
Front-end cycles	0.75
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.50
P2 cycles	0.50
P3 cycles	0.50
P4 cycles	0.50
P5 cycles	0.50
P6 cycles	0.50
P7 cycles	0.50
P8 cycles	0.50
P9 cycles	0.50
P10 cycles	0.00
P11 cycles	0.00
P12 cycles	0.00
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	1.00
P15 cycles	1.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	6.00
Nb uops	6.00
Nb loads	1.00
Nb stores	1.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	128.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	64.00
Bytes stored	64.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	100.00
Vectorization ratio load	100.00
Vectorization ratio store	100.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	NA
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	100.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	100.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	100.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	main.extracted.50
Source file and lines	stream.c:319-320
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-3972/stream-copy/build/stream-copy/src/stream.c:319-320.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is fully vectorized, using full register length.

Details

All SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers).

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

No data for this section

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

VMOVUPD: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-3972/stream-copy/build/stream-copy/src/stream.c:320

Vector unaligned load/store instructions

Detected 2 optimal vector unaligned load/store instructions.

Details

VMOVUPD: 2 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-3972/stream-copy/build/stream-copy/src/stream.c:320
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-3972/stream-copy/build/stream-copy/src/stream.c:320

Workaround

Use vector aligned instructions:

align your arrays on 64 bytes boundaries: replace { void *p = malloc (size); } with { void *p; posix_memalign (&p, 64, size); }.
inform your compiler that your arrays are vector aligned: if array 'foo' is 64 bytes-aligned, define a pointer 'p_foo' as __builtin_assume_aligned (foo, 64) and use it instead of 'foo' in the loop.

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This loop is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop is loading 64 bytes. The binary loop is storing 64 bytes.

Unroll opportunity

Loop body is too small to efficiently use resources.

Workaround

Unroll your loop if trip count is significantly higher than target unroll factor. This can be done manually. Or with the unroll (resp. unroll_and_jam) directive on top of the inner (resp. surrounding) loop. You can enforce an unroll factor: #pragma unroll_and_jam N, unroll_and_jam(N), unroll N or unroll(N)

General properties

nb instructions	6
nb uops	6
loop length	27
used x86 registers	6
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	0
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	1
nb stack references	0

Front-end

ASSUMED MACRO FUSION FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	0.75 cycles
front end	0.75 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.00	1.00
cycles	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.00	1.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	0.75
Dispatch	1.00
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	1.00

Vectorization ratios

all	100%
load	100%
store	100%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Vector efficiency ratios

all	100%
load	100%
store	100%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 1.00 cycles. At this rate:

25% of peak load performance is reached (64.00 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
50% of peak store performance is reached (64.00 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 403350

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P14	P15	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LEA (%R8,%R9,8),%R10	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD $0x8,%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
VMOVUPD (%RCX,%R10,1),%ZMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	3	0.50	vect (100.0%)
VMOVUPD %ZMM0,(%RDX,%R10,1)	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	1	1	4	1	vect (100.0%)
CMP %RSI,%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
JB 403350 <main.extracted.50+0xb0>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A

Function	main.extracted.50
Source file and lines	stream.c:319-320
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-3972/stream-copy/build/stream-copy/src/stream.c:319-320.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is fully vectorized, using full register length.

Details

All SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers).

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

No data for this section

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

VMOVUPD: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-3972/stream-copy/build/stream-copy/src/stream.c:320

Vector unaligned load/store instructions

Detected 2 optimal vector unaligned load/store instructions.

Details

VMOVUPD: 2 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-3972/stream-copy/build/stream-copy/src/stream.c:320
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-3972/stream-copy/build/stream-copy/src/stream.c:320

Workaround

Use vector aligned instructions:

align your arrays on 64 bytes boundaries: replace { void *p = malloc (size); } with { void *p; posix_memalign (&p, 64, size); }.
inform your compiler that your arrays are vector aligned: if array 'foo' is 64 bytes-aligned, define a pointer 'p_foo' as __builtin_assume_aligned (foo, 64) and use it instead of 'foo' in the loop.

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This loop is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop is loading 64 bytes. The binary loop is storing 64 bytes.

Unroll opportunity

Loop body is too small to efficiently use resources.

Workaround

Unroll your loop if trip count is significantly higher than target unroll factor. This can be done manually. Or with the unroll (resp. unroll_and_jam) directive on top of the inner (resp. surrounding) loop. You can enforce an unroll factor: #pragma unroll_and_jam N, unroll_and_jam(N), unroll N or unroll(N)

General properties

nb instructions	6
nb uops	6
loop length	27
used x86 registers	6
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	0
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	1
nb stack references	0

Front-end

ASSUMED MACRO FUSION FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	0.75 cycles
front end	0.75 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.00	1.00
cycles	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.00	1.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	0.75
Dispatch	1.00
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	1.00

Vectorization ratios

all	100%
load	100%
store	100%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Vector efficiency ratios

all	100%
load	100%
store	100%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 1.00 cycles. At this rate:

25% of peak load performance is reached (64.00 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
50% of peak store performance is reached (64.00 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 403350

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P14	P15	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LEA (%R8,%R9,8),%R10	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD $0x8,%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
VMOVUPD (%RCX,%R10,1),%ZMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	3	0.50	vect (100.0%)
VMOVUPD %ZMM0,(%RDX,%R10,1)	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	1	1	4	1	vect (100.0%)
CMP %RSI,%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
JB 403350 <main.extracted.50+0xb0>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A

Report Configuration

Vectorization

Details

Execution units bottlenecks

Complex instructions

Details

Vector unaligned load/store instructions

Details

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Unroll opportunity

Workaround

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Vectorization

Details

Execution units bottlenecks

Complex instructions

Details

Vector unaligned load/store instructions

Details

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Unroll opportunity

Workaround

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code