OV - exec - Function main.omp

	Function: main.omp_outlined.14	Module: exec	Source: stream.c:271-275	Coverage (incl. loops): 0.12% \| (excl. loops): 0.00%

/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-2841/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c: 271 - 275

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

271: #pragma omp parallel for

272:     for (j=0; j<STREAM_ARRAY_SIZE; j++) {

273: 	    a[j] = 1.0;

274: 	    b[j] = 2.0;

275: 	    c[j] = 0.0;

0x2034d0 PUSH	%RBP

0x2034d1 MOV	%RSP,%RBP

0x2034d4 PUSH	%R15

0x2034d6 PUSH	%R14

0x2034d8 PUSH	%R13

0x2034da PUSH	%R12

0x2034dc PUSH	%RBX

0x2034dd SUB	$0x28,%RSP

0x2034e1 MOV	(%RDI),%EBX

0x2034e3 LEA	-0x7(%RIP),%RAX

0x2034ea MOV	$0x3b65,%R14

0x2034f4 MOVQ	$0,-0x40(%RBP)

0x2034fc MOVQ	$0x3344ffff,-0x30(%RBP)

0x203504 MOVQ	$0x1,-0x48(%RBP)

0x20350c MOVL	$0,-0x34(%RBP)

0x203513 ADD	%RAX,%R14

0x203516 SUB	$0x8,%RSP

0x20351a MOV	$-0x1380,%RDI

0x203524 LEA	-0x48(%RBP),%RAX

0x203528 MOV	$-0x1028,%R10

0x203532 LEA	-0x34(%RBP),%RCX

0x203536 LEA	-0x40(%RBP),%R8

0x20353a LEA	-0x30(%RBP),%R9

0x20353e MOV	%EBX,%ESI

0x203540 MOV	$0x22,%EDX

0x203545 ADD	%R14,%RDI

0x203548 PUSH	$0x1

0x20354a PUSH	$0x1

0x20354c PUSH	%RAX

0x20354d CALLQ	(%R14,%R10,1)

0x203551 ADD	$0x20,%RSP

0x203555 MOV	-0x30(%RBP),%RAX

0x203559 MOV	-0x40(%RBP),%R13

0x20355d MOV	$0x3344ffff,%R15D

0x203563 CMP	$0x3344ffff,%RAX

0x203569 CMOVL	%RAX,%R15

0x20356d MOV	%R15,-0x30(%RBP)

0x203571 CMP	%R15,%R13

0x203574 JG	203692

0x20357a MOV	$0x334500028,%RAX

0x203584 MOV	%R15,%R12

0x203587 SUB	%R13,%R12

0x20358a XOR	%ESI,%ESI

0x20358c ADD	%R14,%RAX

0x20358f LEA	0x8(,%R12,8),%RDX

0x203597 INC	%R12

0x20359a LEA	(%RAX,%R13,8),%RDI

0x20359e MOV	$-0x1020,%RAX

0x2035a8 CALLQ	(%R14,%RAX,1)

0x2035ac MOV	$0x28,%RAX

0x2035b6 MOV	$0x19a280028,%RCX

0x2035c0 CMP	$0x10,%R12

0x2035c4 JAE	2035ce

0x2035c6 MOV	%R13,%RDX

0x2035c9 JMP	203654

0x2035ce MOV	$-0x6868,%R10

0x2035d8 LEA	(%R14,%RAX,1),%RDI

0x2035dc LEA	(%R14,%RCX,1),%R8

0x2035e0 MOV	%R12,%RSI

0x2035e3 AND	$-0x10,%RSI

0x2035e7 XOR	%R9D,%R9D

0x2035ea VBROADCASTSD	(%R14,%R10,1),%YMM0

0x2035f0 MOV	$-0x6888,%R10

0x2035fa LEA	0x60(%RDI,%R13,8),%RDI

0x2035ff LEA	0x60(%R8,%R13,8),%R8

0x203604 LEA	(%R13,%RSI,1),%RDX

0x203609 VBROADCASTSD	(%R14,%R10,1),%YMM1

0x20360f NOP

(2) 0x203610 VMOVUPS	%YMM0,-0x60(%RDI,%R9,8)

(2) 0x203617 VMOVUPS	%YMM0,-0x40(%RDI,%R9,8)

(2) 0x20361e VMOVUPS	%YMM0,-0x20(%RDI,%R9,8)

(2) 0x203625 VMOVUPS	%YMM1,-0x60(%R8,%R9,8)

(2) 0x20362c VMOVUPS	%YMM1,-0x40(%R8,%R9,8)

(2) 0x203633 VMOVUPS	%YMM1,-0x20(%R8,%R9,8)

(2) 0x20363a VMOVUPS	%YMM0,(%RDI,%R9,8)

(2) 0x203640 VMOVUPS	%YMM1,(%R8,%R9,8)

(2) 0x203646 ADD	$0x10,%R9

(2) 0x20364a CMP	%R9,%RSI

(2) 0x20364d JNE	203610

0x20364f CMP	%RSI,%R12

0x203652 JE	203692

0x203654 DEC	%RDX

0x203657 ADD	%R14,%RAX

0x20365a MOV	$0x3ff0000000000000,%RSI

0x203664 ADD	%R14,%RCX

0x203667 MOV	$0x4000000000000000,%RDI

0x203671 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

(3) 0x203680 MOV	%RSI,0x8(%RAX,%RDX,8)

(3) 0x203685 MOV	%RDI,0x8(%RCX,%RDX,8)

(3) 0x20368a INC	%RDX

(3) 0x20368d CMP	%R15,%RDX

(3) 0x203690 JL	203680

0x203692 MOV	$-0x1368,%RDI

0x20369c MOV	$-0x1018,%RAX

0x2036a6 MOV	%EBX,%ESI

0x2036a8 ADD	%R14,%RDI

0x2036ab VZEROUPPER

0x2036ae CALLQ	(%R14,%RAX,1)

0x2036b2 ADD	$0x28,%RSP

0x2036b6 POP	%RBX

0x2036b7 POP	%R12

0x2036b9 POP	%R13

0x2036bb POP	%R14

0x2036bd POP	%R15

0x2036bf POP	%RBP

0x2036c0 RET

0x2036c1 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run 1x8

Source file and lines	stream.c:271-275
Module	exec

The function is defined in /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-2841/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:271-275.

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 12.50 to 1.25 cycles (10.00x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your function is probably not vectorized. Only 10% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions).

Details

Store and arithmetical SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers).

Workaround

Read the "512-bits vectorization" report at "Potential" confidence level.

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

512-bits vectorization

On some x86 processors supporting 512-bits vectorization, compilers are often too conservative and limit vectorization to 256 bits. Performance can then be improved by enforcing 512-bits vectorization, especially with many vectorized and high trip count loops. 512-bits vectorization performance overhead (compared to 256-bits) is generally lower on newer processors.

Workaround

Recompile with -mprefer-vector-width=512

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

Calling (and then returning from) a function prevents many compiler optimizations (like vectorization), breaks control flow (which reduces pipeline performance) and executes extra instructions to save/restore the registers used inside it, which is very expensive (dozens of cycles). Consider to inline small functions.

unknown: 3 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-2841/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:271
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-2841/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:275
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-2841/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:271

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

CMOVL: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-2841/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:272
LEA: 2 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-2841/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:271
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-2841/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:271

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 60 bytes. The binary function is storing 36 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	91
nb uops	100
loop length	431
used x86 registers	15
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	0
used ymm registers	2
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	12.50 cycles
front end	12.50 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	9.17	9.17	9.17	9.17	9.17	9.17	4.50	4.50	4.50	4.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	9.17	9.17	9.17	9.17	9.17	9.17	4.50	4.50	4.50	4.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	12.50
Dispatch	9.17
Overall L1	12.50

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	5%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	10%

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

INT+FP

all	5%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	8%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	10%
load	6%
store	7%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	11%

all	12%
load	12%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	12%

INT+FP

all	10%
load	10%
store	7%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	11%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 12.50 cycles. At this rate:

1% of peak load performance is reached (4.80 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
2% of peak store performance is reached (2.88 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Performance is limited by instruction throughput (loading/decoding program instructions to execution core) (front-end is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 12.50 to 9.17 cycles (1.36x speedup).

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 2034d0

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x28,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV (%RDI),%EBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (6.3%)
LEA -0x7(%RIP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x3b65,%R14	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVQ $0,-0x40(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x3344ffff,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x48(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVL $0,-0x34(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
ADD %RAX,%R14	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $-0x1380,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x48(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $-0x1028,%R10	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x34(%RBP),%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x40(%RBP),%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x30(%RBP),%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
ADD %R14,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
CALLQ (%R14,%R10,1)	4	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	2.20	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x30(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
MOV -0x40(%RBP),%R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
MOV $0x3344ffff,%R15D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
CMP $0x3344ffff,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
CMOVL %RAX,%R15	2	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
MOV %R15,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (12.5%)
CMP %R15,%R13	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JG 203692 <main.omp_outlined.14+0x1c2>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
MOV $0x334500028,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %R15,%R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
SUB %R13,%R12	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
XOR %ESI,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
ADD %R14,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA 0x8(,%R12,8),%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
INC %R12	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA (%RAX,%R13,8),%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $-0x1020,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CALLQ (%R14,%RAX,1)	4	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	2.20	N/A
MOV $0x28,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x19a280028,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CMP $0x10,%R12	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JAE 2035ce <main.omp_outlined.14+0xfe>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
MOV %R13,%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JMP 203654 <main.omp_outlined.14+0x184>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
MOV $-0x6868,%R10	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA (%R14,%RAX,1),%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA (%R14,%RCX,1),%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %R12,%RSI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
AND $-0x10,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
XOR %R9D,%R9D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
VBROADCASTSD (%R14,%R10,1),%YMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV $-0x6888,%R10	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA 0x60(%RDI,%R13,8),%RDI	2	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	2	0.50	N/A
LEA 0x60(%R8,%R13,8),%R8	2	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	2	0.50	N/A
LEA (%R13,%RSI,1),%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
VBROADCASTSD (%R14,%R10,1),%YMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (12.5%)
NOP	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
CMP %RSI,%R12	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JE 203692 <main.omp_outlined.14+0x1c2>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
DEC %RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
ADD %R14,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x3ff0000000000000,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD %R14,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x4000000000000000,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A
MOV $-0x1368,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $-0x1018,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
ADD %R14,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
VZEROUPPER	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	vect (25.0%)
CALLQ (%R14,%RAX,1)	4	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	2.20	N/A
ADD $0x28,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
RET	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run 1x8

Source file and lines	stream.c:271-275
Module	exec

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your function is probably not vectorized. Only 10% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions).

Details

Store and arithmetical SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers).

Workaround

Read the "512-bits vectorization" report at "Potential" confidence level.

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

512-bits vectorization

Workaround

Recompile with -mprefer-vector-width=512

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

unknown: 3 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-2841/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:271
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-2841/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:275
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-2841/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:271

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

CMOVL: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-2841/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:272
LEA: 2 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-2841/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:271
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-2841/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:271

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 60 bytes. The binary function is storing 36 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	91
nb uops	100
loop length	431
used x86 registers	15
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	0
used ymm registers	2
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	12.50 cycles
front end	12.50 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	9.17	9.17	9.17	9.17	9.17	9.17	4.50	4.50	4.50	4.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	9.17	9.17	9.17	9.17	9.17	9.17	4.50	4.50	4.50	4.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	12.50
Dispatch	9.17
Overall L1	12.50

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	5%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	10%

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

INT+FP

all	5%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	8%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	10%
load	6%
store	7%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	11%

all	12%
load	12%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	12%

INT+FP

all	10%
load	10%
store	7%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	11%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 12.50 cycles. At this rate:

1% of peak load performance is reached (4.80 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
2% of peak store performance is reached (2.88 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 2034d0

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x28,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV (%RDI),%EBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (6.3%)
LEA -0x7(%RIP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x3b65,%R14	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVQ $0,-0x40(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x3344ffff,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x48(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVL $0,-0x34(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
ADD %RAX,%R14	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $-0x1380,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x48(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $-0x1028,%R10	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x34(%RBP),%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x40(%RBP),%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x30(%RBP),%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
ADD %R14,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
CALLQ (%R14,%R10,1)	4	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	2.20	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x30(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
MOV -0x40(%RBP),%R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
MOV $0x3344ffff,%R15D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
CMP $0x3344ffff,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
CMOVL %RAX,%R15	2	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
MOV %R15,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (12.5%)
CMP %R15,%R13	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JG 203692 <main.omp_outlined.14+0x1c2>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
MOV $0x334500028,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %R15,%R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
SUB %R13,%R12	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
XOR %ESI,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
ADD %R14,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA 0x8(,%R12,8),%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
INC %R12	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA (%RAX,%R13,8),%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $-0x1020,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CALLQ (%R14,%RAX,1)	4	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	2.20	N/A
MOV $0x28,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x19a280028,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CMP $0x10,%R12	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JAE 2035ce <main.omp_outlined.14+0xfe>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
MOV %R13,%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JMP 203654 <main.omp_outlined.14+0x184>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
MOV $-0x6868,%R10	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA (%R14,%RAX,1),%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA (%R14,%RCX,1),%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %R12,%RSI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
AND $-0x10,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
XOR %R9D,%R9D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
VBROADCASTSD (%R14,%R10,1),%YMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV $-0x6888,%R10	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA 0x60(%RDI,%R13,8),%RDI	2	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	2	0.50	N/A
LEA 0x60(%R8,%R13,8),%R8	2	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	2	0.50	N/A
LEA (%R13,%RSI,1),%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
VBROADCASTSD (%R14,%R10,1),%YMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (12.5%)
NOP	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
CMP %RSI,%R12	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JE 203692 <main.omp_outlined.14+0x1c2>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
DEC %RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
ADD %R14,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x3ff0000000000000,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD %R14,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x4000000000000000,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A
MOV $-0x1368,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $-0x1018,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
ADD %R14,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
VZEROUPPER	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	vect (25.0%)
CALLQ (%R14,%RAX,1)	4	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	2.20	N/A
ADD $0x28,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
RET	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A

▶Scalability Runs Description

Run 1x8	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Number processes per node: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to none --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-2841/stream/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc_8/oneview_run_1773655287OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threadsOMP_NUM_THREADS: 8
Run 1x64	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Number processes per node: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to none --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-2841/stream/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc_8/oneview_run_1773655287OMP_NUM_THREADS: 64OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x96	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Number processes per node: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to none --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-2841/stream/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc_8/oneview_run_1773655287OMP_NUM_THREADS: 96OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x128	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Number processes per node: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to none --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-2841/stream/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc_8/oneview_run_1773655287OMP_NUM_THREADS: 128OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x160	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Number processes per node: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to none --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-2841/stream/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc_8/oneview_run_1773655287OMP_NUM_THREADS: 160OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x192	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Number processes per node: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to none --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-2841/stream/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc_8/oneview_run_1773655287OMP_NUM_THREADS: 192OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads

(1x8) Efficiency	(1x8) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x64) Efficiency	(1x64) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x96) Efficiency	(1x96) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x128) Efficiency	(1x128) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x160) Efficiency	(1x160) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x192) Efficiency	(1x192) Potential Speed-Up (%)
1	0	0.59	0.02	0.31	0.04	0.24	0.04	0.13	0.07	0.08	0.1

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency

Run	Number of threads	Efficiency (ideal is 1)	Speedup	Ideal Speedup	Time (s)	Coverage (%)
1x8	7	1	1	1	0.035000003874302	0.11518084257841
1x64	25	0.59	4.69	8	0.015000000596046	0.047619439661503
1x96	45	0.31	3.77	12	0.019999999552965	0.060679949820042
1x128	53	0.24	3.91	16	0.029999999329448	0.055990137159824
1x160	91	0.13	2.68	20	0.025000000372529	0.08076486736536
1x192	150	0.08	2.01	24	0.025000000372529	0.11217188835144

Name	Coverage (%)	Time (s)
▼main.omp_outlined.14–	0.12	0.02
○Loop 2 - stream.c:273-274 - exec	0.12	0.03
○Loop 3 - stream.c:272-274 - exec	0.00	0.00

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

512-bits vectorization

Workaround

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

512-bits vectorization

Workaround

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

▶Scalability Runs Description

▼Columns Filter

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency