OV - exec - Function main.omp

	Function: main.omp_outlined.18	Module: exec	Source: stream.c:290-292	Coverage (incl. loops): 0.52% \| (excl. loops): 0.00%

/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-3092/stream-add/build/stream-add/src/stream.c: 290 - 292

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

290: #pragma omp parallel for

291:     for (j = 0; j < STREAM_ARRAY_SIZE; j++)

292: 		a[j] = 2.0E0 * a[j];

0x203490 PUSH	%RBP

0x203491 MOV	%RSP,%RBP

0x203494 PUSH	%R14

0x203496 PUSH	%RBX

0x203497 SUB	$0x20,%RSP

0x20349b MOV	(%RDI),%EBX

0x20349d LEA	-0x7(%RIP),%RAX

0x2034a4 MOV	$0x2ef3,%R14

0x2034ae MOVQ	$0,-0x28(%RBP)

0x2034b6 MOVQ	$0x3344ffff,-0x18(%RBP)

0x2034be MOVQ	$0x1,-0x30(%RBP)

0x2034c6 MOVL	$0,-0x1c(%RBP)

0x2034cd ADD	%RAX,%R14

0x2034d0 SUB	$0x8,%RSP

0x2034d4 MOV	$-0x1258,%RDI

0x2034de LEA	-0x30(%RBP),%RAX

0x2034e2 LEA	-0x1c(%RBP),%RCX

0x2034e6 MOV	$-0x1020,%R10

0x2034f0 LEA	-0x28(%RBP),%R8

0x2034f4 LEA	-0x18(%RBP),%R9

0x2034f8 MOV	%EBX,%ESI

0x2034fa MOV	$0x22,%EDX

0x2034ff ADD	%R14,%RDI

0x203502 PUSH	$0x1

0x203504 PUSH	$0x1

0x203506 PUSH	%RAX

0x203507 CALLQ	(%R14,%R10,1)

0x20350b ADD	$0x20,%RSP

0x20350f MOV	-0x18(%RBP),%RCX

0x203513 MOV	$0x3344ffff,%EAX

0x203518 CMP	$0x3344ffff,%RCX

0x20351f CMOVL	%RCX,%RAX

0x203523 MOV	-0x28(%RBP),%RCX

0x203527 MOV	%RAX,-0x18(%RBP)

0x20352b CMP	%RAX,%RCX

0x20352e JG	203558

0x203530 MOV	$0x30,%RDX

0x20353a DEC	%RCX

0x20353d ADD	%R14,%RDX

(5) 0x203540 VMOVSD	0x8(%RDX,%RCX,8),%XMM0

(5) 0x203546 VADDSD	%XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM0

(5) 0x20354a VMOVSD	%XMM0,0x8(%RDX,%RCX,8)

(5) 0x203550 INC	%RCX

(5) 0x203553 CMP	%RAX,%RCX

(5) 0x203556 JL	203540

0x203558 MOV	$-0x1240,%RDI

0x203562 MOV	$-0x1010,%RAX

0x20356c MOV	%EBX,%ESI

0x20356e ADD	%R14,%RDI

0x203571 CALLQ	(%R14,%RAX,1)

0x203575 ADD	$0x20,%RSP

0x203579 POP	%RBX

0x20357a POP	%R14

0x20357c POP	%RBP

0x20357d RET

0x20357e XCHG	%AX,%AX

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►99.22+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►99.34+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run 1x8

Source file and lines	stream.c:290-292
Module	exec

The function is defined in /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-3092/stream-add/build/stream-add/src/stream.c:290-292.

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your function is not vectorized. Only 9% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions). By vectorizing your function, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.00 to 0.50 cycles (14.04x speedup).

Details

All SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized function can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

No data for this section

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

Calling (and then returning from) a function prevents many compiler optimizations (like vectorization), breaks control flow (which reduces pipeline performance) and executes extra instructions to save/restore the registers used inside it, which is very expensive (dozens of cycles). Consider to inline small functions.

unknown: 2 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-3092/stream-add/build/stream-add/src/stream.c:290
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-3092/stream-add/build/stream-add/src/stream.c:290

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

CMOVL: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-3092/stream-add/build/stream-add/src/stream.c:291

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 36 bytes. The binary function is storing 36 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	50
nb uops	56
loop length	216
used x86 registers	12
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	0
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	7.00 cycles
front end	7.00 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	3.00	3.00	3.00	3.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	3.00	3.00	3.00	3.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	7.00
Dispatch	5.00
Overall L1	7.00

Vectorization ratios

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

all	9%
load	10%
store	7%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	9%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 7.00 cycles. At this rate:

2% of peak load performance is reached (5.14 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
4% of peak store performance is reached (5.14 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Performance is limited by instruction throughput (loading/decoding program instructions to execution core) (front-end is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.00 to 5.00 cycles (1.40x speedup).

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 203490

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x20,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV (%RDI),%EBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (6.3%)
LEA -0x7(%RIP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x2ef3,%R14	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVQ $0,-0x28(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x3344ffff,-0x18(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVL $0,-0x1c(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
ADD %RAX,%R14	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $-0x1258,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x30(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x1c(%RBP),%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $-0x1020,%R10	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x28(%RBP),%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x18(%RBP),%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
ADD %R14,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
CALLQ (%R14,%R10,1)	4	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	2.20	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x18(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x3344ffff,%EAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CMP $0x3344ffff,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
CMOVL %RCX,%RAX	2	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOV -0x28(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RAX,-0x18(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (12.5%)
CMP %RAX,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JG 203558 <main.omp_outlined.18+0xc8>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
MOV $0x30,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
DEC %RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
ADD %R14,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV $-0x1240,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $-0x1010,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
ADD %R14,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CALLQ (%R14,%RAX,1)	4	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	2.20	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
RET	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
XCHG %AX,%AX	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run 1x8

Source file and lines	stream.c:290-292
Module	exec

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

No data for this section

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

unknown: 2 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-3092/stream-add/build/stream-add/src/stream.c:290
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-3092/stream-add/build/stream-add/src/stream.c:290

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

CMOVL: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-3092/stream-add/build/stream-add/src/stream.c:291

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 36 bytes. The binary function is storing 36 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	50
nb uops	56
loop length	216
used x86 registers	12
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	0
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	7.00 cycles
front end	7.00 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	3.00	3.00	3.00	3.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	3.00	3.00	3.00	3.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	7.00
Dispatch	5.00
Overall L1	7.00

Vectorization ratios

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

all	9%
load	10%
store	7%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	9%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 7.00 cycles. At this rate:

2% of peak load performance is reached (5.14 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
4% of peak store performance is reached (5.14 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 203490

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x20,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV (%RDI),%EBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (6.3%)
LEA -0x7(%RIP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x2ef3,%R14	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVQ $0,-0x28(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x3344ffff,-0x18(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVL $0,-0x1c(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
ADD %RAX,%R14	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $-0x1258,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x30(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x1c(%RBP),%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $-0x1020,%R10	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x28(%RBP),%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x18(%RBP),%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
ADD %R14,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
CALLQ (%R14,%R10,1)	4	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	2.20	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x18(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x3344ffff,%EAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CMP $0x3344ffff,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
CMOVL %RCX,%RAX	2	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOV -0x28(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RAX,-0x18(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (12.5%)
CMP %RAX,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JG 203558 <main.omp_outlined.18+0xc8>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
MOV $0x30,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
DEC %RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
ADD %R14,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV $-0x1240,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $-0x1010,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
ADD %R14,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CALLQ (%R14,%RAX,1)	4	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	2.20	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
RET	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
XCHG %AX,%AX	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A

▶Scalability Runs Description

Run 1x8	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Number processes per node: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to none --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-3092/stream-add/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc_5/oneview_run_1773653896OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threadsOMP_NUM_THREADS: 8
Run 1x64	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Number processes per node: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to none --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-3092/stream-add/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc_5/oneview_run_1773653896OMP_NUM_THREADS: 64OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x96	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Number processes per node: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to none --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-3092/stream-add/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc_5/oneview_run_1773653896OMP_NUM_THREADS: 96OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x128	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Number processes per node: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to none --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-3092/stream-add/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc_5/oneview_run_1773653896OMP_NUM_THREADS: 128OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x160	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Number processes per node: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to none --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-3092/stream-add/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc_5/oneview_run_1773653896OMP_NUM_THREADS: 160OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x192	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Number processes per node: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to none --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz17.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-365-3092/stream-add/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc_5/oneview_run_1773653896OMP_NUM_THREADS: 192OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads

(1x8) Efficiency	(1x8) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x64) Efficiency	(1x64) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x96) Efficiency	(1x96) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x128) Efficiency	(1x128) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x160) Efficiency	(1x160) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x192) Efficiency	(1x192) Potential Speed-Up (%)
1	0	0.25	0.38	0.22	0.31	0.12	0.45	0.1	0.43	0.08	0.47

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency

Run	Number of threads	Efficiency (ideal is 1)	Speedup	Ideal Speedup	Time (s)	Coverage (%)
1x8	8	1	1	1	0.030000001192093	0.52100294828415
1x64	64	0.25	2.01	8	0.015000000596046	0.51078325510025
1x96	96	0.22	2.67	12	0.015000000596046	0.39354729652405
1x128	128	0.12	1.95	16	0.014999999664724	0.51182943582535
1x160	160	0.1	2.05	20	0.015000000596046	0.48023137450218
1x192	192	0.08	1.98	24	0.015000000596046	0.51432698965073

Name	Coverage (%)	Time (s)
▼main.omp_outlined.18–	0.52	0.03
○Loop 5 - stream.c:291-292 - exec	0.52	0.03

Report Configuration

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

▶Scalability Runs Description

▼Columns Filter

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency