OV - exec - Function main.omp

	Function: main.omp_outlined.18	Module: exec	Source: stream.c:290-292	Coverage (incl. loops): 0.63% \| (excl. loops): 0.00%

/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz16.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0012/stream-scale/build/stream-scale/src/stream.c: 290 - 292

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

290: #pragma omp parallel for

291:     for (j = 0; j < STREAM_ARRAY_SIZE; j++)

292: 		a[j] = 2.0E0 * a[j];

0x203420 PUSH	%RBP

0x203421 MOV	%RSP,%RBP

0x203424 PUSH	%R14

0x203426 PUSH	%RBX

0x203427 SUB	$0x20,%RSP

0x20342b MOV	(%RDI),%R14D

0x20342e LEA	0x2dab(%RIP),%RBX

0x203435 MOVQ	$0,-0x28(%RBP)

0x20343d MOVQ	$0x3344ffff,-0x18(%RBP)

0x203445 MOVQ	$0x1,-0x30(%RBP)

0x20344d MOVL	$0,-0x1c(%RBP)

0x203454 SUB	$0x8,%RSP

0x203458 MOV	$0x1100,%RDI

0x203462 LEA	-0x30(%RBP),%RAX

0x203466 LEA	-0x1c(%RBP),%RCX

0x20346a LEA	-0x28(%RBP),%R8

0x20346e LEA	-0x18(%RBP),%R9

0x203472 MOV	%R14D,%ESI

0x203475 MOV	$0x22,%EDX

0x20347a ADD	%RBX,%RDI

0x20347d PUSH	$0x1

0x20347f PUSH	$0x1

0x203481 PUSH	%RAX

0x203482 CALL	203fe0 <@plt_start@+0x80>

0x203487 ADD	$0x20,%RSP

0x20348b MOV	-0x18(%RBP),%RCX

0x20348f MOV	$0x3344ffff,%EAX

0x203494 CMP	$0x3344ffff,%RCX

0x20349b CMOVL	%RCX,%RAX

0x20349f MOV	-0x28(%RBP),%RCX

0x2034a3 MOV	%RAX,-0x18(%RBP)

0x2034a7 CMP	%RAX,%RCX

0x2034aa JG	2034d8

0x2034ac MOV	$0x1190,%RDX

0x2034b6 DEC	%RCX

0x2034b9 ADD	%RBX,%RDX

0x2034bc NOPL	(%RAX)

(5) 0x2034c0 VMOVSD	0x8(%RDX,%RCX,8),%XMM0

(5) 0x2034c6 VADDSD	%XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM0

(5) 0x2034ca VMOVSD	%XMM0,0x8(%RDX,%RCX,8)

(5) 0x2034d0 INC	%RCX

(5) 0x2034d3 CMP	%RAX,%RCX

(5) 0x2034d6 JL	2034c0

0x2034d8 MOV	$0x1118,%RAX

0x2034e2 MOV	%R14D,%ESI

0x2034e5 ADD	%RAX,%RBX

0x2034e8 MOV	%RBX,%RDI

0x2034eb CALL	204000 <@plt_start@+0xa0>

0x2034f0 ADD	$0x20,%RSP

0x2034f4 POP	%RBX

0x2034f5 POP	%R14

0x2034f7 POP	%RBP

0x2034f8 RET

0x2034f9 NOPL	(%RAX)

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►99.08+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►99.35+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run 1x8

Source file and lines	stream.c:290-292
Module	exec

The function is defined in /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz16.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0012/stream-scale/build/stream-scale/src/stream.c:290-292.

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your function is not vectorized. Only 9% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions). By vectorizing your function, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 8.00 to 0.58 cycles (13.71x speedup).

Details

All SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized function can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

No data for this section

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

Calling (and then returning from) a function prevents many compiler optimizations (like vectorization), breaks control flow (which reduces pipeline performance) and executes extra instructions to save/restore the registers used inside it, which is very expensive (dozens of cycles). Consider to inline small functions.

unknown: 2 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz16.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0012/stream-scale/build/stream-scale/src/stream.c:290
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz16.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0012/stream-scale/build/stream-scale/src/stream.c:290

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 20 bytes. The binary function is storing 36 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	48
nb uops	48
loop length	200
used x86 registers	11
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	0
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	8.00 cycles
front end	8.00 cycles

Back-end

	ALU0/BRU0	ALU1	ALU2	ALU3	BRU1	AGU0	AGU1	AGU2	FP0	FP1	FP2	FP3	FP4	FP5
uops	5.75	5.75	5.75	5.75	2.00	3.33	3.33	3.33	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	5.75	5.75	5.75	5.75	2.00	3.33	3.33	3.33	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

ALU0/BRU0: ALU, BRU
ALU1: ALU
ALU2: ALU
ALU3: ALU
BRU1: BRU
AGU0 (256 bits): store address, load
AGU1 (256 bits): store address, load
AGU2 (256 bits): store address, load
FP0 (256 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
FP1 (256 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
FP2 (256 bits): VPU
FP3 (256 bits): VPU
FP4 (256 bits): FP store data
FP5 (256 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	8.00
Dispatch	5.75
Overall L1	8.00

Vectorization ratios

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

all	9%
load	10%
store	7%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	9%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 8.00 cycles. At this rate:

2% of peak load performance is reached (2.50 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
7% of peak store performance is reached (4.50 out of 64.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Performance is limited by instruction throughput (loading/decoding program instructions to execution core) (front-end is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 8.00 to 5.75 cycles (1.39x speedup).

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 203420

Instruction	Nb FU	ALU0/BRU0	ALU1	ALU2	ALU3	BRU1	AGU0	AGU1	AGU2	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x20,%RSP	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV (%RDI),%R14D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	3	0.33	scal (6.3%)
LEA 0x2dab(%RIP),%RBX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOVQ $0,-0x28(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x3344ffff,-0x18(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVL $0,-0x1c(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV $0x1100,%RDI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
LEA -0x30(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x1c(%RBP),%RCX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x28(%RBP),%R8	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x18(%RBP),%R9	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %R14D,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (6.3%)
ADD %RBX,%RDI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
CALL 203fe0 <@plt_start@+0x80>	2	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0.50	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV -0x18(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	3	0.33	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x3344ffff,%EAX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
CMP $0x3344ffff,%RCX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
CMOVL %RCX,%RAX	1	0.50	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV -0x28(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	3	0.33	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RAX,-0x18(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.50	scal (12.5%)
CMP %RAX,%RCX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
JG 2034d8 <main.omp_outlined.18+0xb8>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
MOV $0x1190,%RDX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
DEC %RCX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
ADD %RBX,%RDX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
NOPL (%RAX)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
MOV $0x1118,%RAX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOV %R14D,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
ADD %RAX,%RBX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RBX,%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
CALL 204000 <@plt_start@+0xa0>	2	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0.50	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
RET	1	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
NOPL (%RAX)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run 1x8

Source file and lines	stream.c:290-292
Module	exec

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

No data for this section

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

unknown: 2 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz16.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0012/stream-scale/build/stream-scale/src/stream.c:290
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz16.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0012/stream-scale/build/stream-scale/src/stream.c:290

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 20 bytes. The binary function is storing 36 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	48
nb uops	48
loop length	200
used x86 registers	11
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	0
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	8.00 cycles
front end	8.00 cycles

Back-end

	ALU0/BRU0	ALU1	ALU2	ALU3	BRU1	AGU0	AGU1	AGU2	FP0	FP1	FP2	FP3	FP4	FP5
uops	5.75	5.75	5.75	5.75	2.00	3.33	3.33	3.33	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	5.75	5.75	5.75	5.75	2.00	3.33	3.33	3.33	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

ALU0/BRU0: ALU, BRU
ALU1: ALU
ALU2: ALU
ALU3: ALU
BRU1: BRU
AGU0 (256 bits): store address, load
AGU1 (256 bits): store address, load
AGU2 (256 bits): store address, load
FP0 (256 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
FP1 (256 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
FP2 (256 bits): VPU
FP3 (256 bits): VPU
FP4 (256 bits): FP store data
FP5 (256 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	8.00
Dispatch	5.75
Overall L1	8.00

Vectorization ratios

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

all	9%
load	10%
store	7%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	9%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 8.00 cycles. At this rate:

2% of peak load performance is reached (2.50 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
7% of peak store performance is reached (4.50 out of 64.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 203420

Instruction	Nb FU	ALU0/BRU0	ALU1	ALU2	ALU3	BRU1	AGU0	AGU1	AGU2	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x20,%RSP	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV (%RDI),%R14D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	3	0.33	scal (6.3%)
LEA 0x2dab(%RIP),%RBX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOVQ $0,-0x28(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x3344ffff,-0x18(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVL $0,-0x1c(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV $0x1100,%RDI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
LEA -0x30(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x1c(%RBP),%RCX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x28(%RBP),%R8	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x18(%RBP),%R9	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %R14D,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (6.3%)
ADD %RBX,%RDI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
CALL 203fe0 <@plt_start@+0x80>	2	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0.50	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV -0x18(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	3	0.33	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x3344ffff,%EAX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
CMP $0x3344ffff,%RCX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
CMOVL %RCX,%RAX	1	0.50	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV -0x28(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	3	0.33	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RAX,-0x18(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.50	scal (12.5%)
CMP %RAX,%RCX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
JG 2034d8 <main.omp_outlined.18+0xb8>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
MOV $0x1190,%RDX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
DEC %RCX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
ADD %RBX,%RDX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
NOPL (%RAX)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
MOV $0x1118,%RAX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOV %R14D,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
ADD %RAX,%RBX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RBX,%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
CALL 204000 <@plt_start@+0xa0>	2	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0.50	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
RET	1	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
NOPL (%RAX)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A

▶Scalability Runs Description

Run 1x8	Number processes: 1Number nodes: NANumber processes per node: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to none --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz16.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0012/stream-scale/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc_5/oneview_run_1773740879OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threadsOMP_NUM_THREADS: 8
Run 1x64	Number processes: 1Number processes per node: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to none --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz16.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0012/stream-scale/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc_5/oneview_run_1773740879OMP_NUM_THREADS: 64OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x96	Number processes: 1Number processes per node: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to none --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz16.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0012/stream-scale/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc_5/oneview_run_1773740879OMP_NUM_THREADS: 96OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x128	Number processes: 1Number processes per node: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to none --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz16.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0012/stream-scale/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc_5/oneview_run_1773740879OMP_NUM_THREADS: 128OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x160	Number processes: 1Number processes per node: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to none --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz16.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0012/stream-scale/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc_5/oneview_run_1773740879OMP_NUM_THREADS: 160OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x192	Number processes: 1Number processes per node: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to none --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz16.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0012/stream-scale/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc_5/oneview_run_1773740879OMP_NUM_THREADS: 192OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads

(1x8) Efficiency	(1x8) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x64) Efficiency	(1x64) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x96) Efficiency	(1x96) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x128) Efficiency	(1x128) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x160) Efficiency	(1x160) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x192) Efficiency	(1x192) Potential Speed-Up (%)
1	0	0.23	0.5	0.14	0.6	0.12	0.5	0.09	0.58	0.07	0.64

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency

Run	Number of threads	Efficiency (ideal is 1)	Speedup	Ideal Speedup	Time (s)	Coverage (%)
1x8	8	1	1	1	0.035000000149012	0.62702941894531
1x64	64	0.23	1.81	8	0.02000000141561	0.64382249116898
1x96	96	0.14	1.69	12	0.02000000141561	0.6931032538414
1x128	128	0.12	1.98	16	0.02000000141561	0.56807059049606
1x160	160	0.09	1.74	20	0.02000000141561	0.63408714532852
1x192	192	0.07	1.65	24	0.02000000141561	0.68939518928528

Name	Coverage (%)	Time (s)
▼main.omp_outlined.18–	0.63	0.04
○Loop 5 - stream.c:291-292 - exec	0.63	0.04

Report Configuration

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

CALL instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

CALL instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

▶Scalability Runs Description

▼Columns Filter

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency