OV - exec - Loop 4

	Loop Id: 4	Module: exec	Source: stream.c:292-292	Coverage: 0.67%

0x401d11 VMOVSD	(%RDI),%XMM14    [1]

0x401d15 VMOVSD	0x8(%RDI),%XMM0    [1]

0x401d1a VMOVSD	0x10(%RDI),%XMM2    [1]

0x401d1f VMOVSD	0x18(%RDI),%XMM4    [1]

0x401d24 VMOVSD	0x20(%RDI),%XMM6    [1]

0x401d29 VMOVSD	0x28(%RDI),%XMM8    [1]

0x401d2e VMOVSD	0x30(%RDI),%XMM10    [1]

0x401d33 VMOVSD	0x38(%RDI),%XMM12    [1]

0x401d38 VADDSD	%XMM14,%XMM14,%XMM15

0x401d3d VADDSD	%XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM1

0x401d41 VMOVSD	%XMM15,(%RDI)    [1]

0x401d45 VMOVSD	%XMM1,0x8(%RDI)    [1]

0x401d4a VADDSD	%XMM2,%XMM2,%XMM3

0x401d4e VADDSD	%XMM4,%XMM4,%XMM5

0x401d52 VMOVSD	%XMM3,0x10(%RDI)    [1]

0x401d57 VMOVSD	%XMM5,0x18(%RDI)    [1]

0x401d5c VADDSD	%XMM6,%XMM6,%XMM7

0x401d60 VADDSD	%XMM8,%XMM8,%XMM9

0x401d65 VMOVSD	%XMM7,0x20(%RDI)    [1]

0x401d6a VMOVSD	%XMM9,0x28(%RDI)    [1]

0x401d6f VADDSD	%XMM10,%XMM10,%XMM11

0x401d74 VADDSD	%XMM12,%XMM12,%XMM13

0x401d79 VMOVSD	%XMM11,0x30(%RDI)    [1]

0x401d7e VMOVSD	%XMM13,0x38(%RDI)    [1]

0x401d83 ADD	$0x40,%RDI

0x401d87 CMP	%R8,%RDI

0x401d8a JNE	401d11

/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz16.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0012/stream-scale/build/stream-scale/src/stream.c: 292 - 292

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

292: 		a[j] = 2.0E0 * a[j];

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○98.94	gomp_thread_start	team.c:130	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○1.06	GOMP_parallel	libgomp.h:982	libgomp.so.1.0.0

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	5.33
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.23
Bottlenecks	P5, P6, P7,
Function	main._omp_fn.3
Source	stream.c:292-292
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	5.33
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	5.33
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	5.33
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	1.00
Front-end cycles	4.33
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.50
P2 cycles	0.25
P3 cycles	0.25
P4 cycles	0.50
P5 cycles	5.33
P6 cycles	5.33
P7 cycles	5.33
P8 cycles	0.00
P9 cycles	0.00
P10 cycles	4.00
P11 cycles	4.00
P12 cycles	4.00
P13 cycles	4.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	27.00
Nb uops	26.00
Nb loads	8.00
Nb stores	8.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	1.50
Nb FLOP add-sub	8.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	24.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	64.00
Bytes stored	64.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	1.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio load	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio store	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	5.33
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.23
Bottlenecks	P5, P6, P7,
Function	main._omp_fn.3
Source	stream.c:292-292
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	5.33
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	5.33
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	5.33
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	1.00
Front-end cycles	4.33
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.50
P2 cycles	0.25
P3 cycles	0.25
P4 cycles	0.50
P5 cycles	5.33
P6 cycles	5.33
P7 cycles	5.33
P8 cycles	0.00
P9 cycles	0.00
P10 cycles	4.00
P11 cycles	4.00
P12 cycles	4.00
P13 cycles	4.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	27.00
Nb uops	26.00
Nb loads	8.00
Nb stores	8.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	1.50
Nb FLOP add-sub	8.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	24.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	64.00
Bytes stored	64.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	1.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio load	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio store	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	main._omp_fn.3
Source file and lines	stream.c:292-292
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz16.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0012/stream-scale/build/stream-scale/src/stream.c:292.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 8 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers.

By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 5.33 to 1.00 cycles (5.33x speedup).

Details

All SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ftree-vectorize (included in O3) to enable loop vectorization (including FP reductions).
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Performance is limited by:

reading data from caches/RAM (load units are a bottleneck)
writing data to caches/RAM (the store unit is a bottleneck)

By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 5.33 to 4.33 cycles (1.23x speedup).

Workaround

Read less array elements All SSE and/or AVX registers are used: in that case, try to relax register pressure by reducing the unroll factor or splitting your loop
Write less array elements
Provide more information to your compiler:
- hardcode the bounds of the corresponding 'for' loop
- use the 'restrict' C99 keyword

No data for this section

Type of elements and instruction set

8 SSE or AVX instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in scalar mode (one at a time).

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 8 FP arithmetical operations:

8: addition or subtraction

The binary loop is loading 64 bytes (8 double precision FP elements). The binary loop is storing 64 bytes (8 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.06 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

Unroll opportunity

Loop is data access bound.

Workaround

Unroll your loop if trip count is significantly higher than target unroll factor and if some data references are common to consecutive iterations. This can be done manually. Or by recompiling with -funroll-loops and/or -floop-unroll-and-jam. Or with the unroll (resp. unroll_and_jam) directive on top of the inner (resp. surrounding) loop. You can enforce an unroll factor: #pragma GCC unroll N

General properties

nb instructions	27
nb uops	26
loop length	123
used x86 registers	2
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	16
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	0

Front-end

ASSUMED MACRO FUSION FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	4.33 cycles
front end	4.33 cycles

Back-end

	ALU0/BRU0	ALU1	ALU2	ALU3	BRU1	AGU0	AGU1	AGU2	FP0	FP1	FP2	FP3	FP4	FP5
uops	0.50	0.50	0.25	0.25	0.50	5.33	5.33	5.33	0.00	0.00	4.00	4.00	4.00	4.00
cycles	0.50	0.50	0.25	0.25	0.50	5.33	5.33	5.33	0.00	0.00	4.00	4.00	4.00	4.00

Execution ports to units layout:

ALU0/BRU0: ALU, BRU
ALU1: ALU
ALU2: ALU
ALU3: ALU
BRU1: BRU
AGU0 (256 bits): store address, load
AGU1 (256 bits): store address, load
AGU2 (256 bits): store address, load
FP0 (256 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
FP1 (256 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
FP2 (256 bits): VPU
FP3 (256 bits): VPU
FP4 (256 bits): FP store data
FP5 (256 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	4.33
Dispatch	5.33
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	5.33

Vectorization ratios

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Vector efficiency ratios

all	12%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 5.33 cycles. At this rate:

12% of peak load performance is reached (12.00 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
18% of peak store performance is reached (12.00 out of 64.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 401d11

Instruction	Nb FU	ALU0/BRU0	ALU1	ALU2	ALU3	BRU1	AGU0	AGU1	AGU2	FP2	FP3	FP4	FP5	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
VMOVSD (%RDI),%XMM14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x8(%RDI),%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x10(%RDI),%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x18(%RDI),%XMM4	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x20(%RDI),%XMM6	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x28(%RDI),%XMM8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x30(%RDI),%XMM10	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x38(%RDI),%XMM12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VADDSD %XMM14,%XMM14,%XMM15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VADDSD %XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM15,(%RDI)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	1	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM1,0x8(%RDI)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	1	scal (12.5%)
VADDSD %XMM2,%XMM2,%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VADDSD %XMM4,%XMM4,%XMM5	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM3,0x10(%RDI)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	1	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM5,0x18(%RDI)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	1	scal (12.5%)
VADDSD %XMM6,%XMM6,%XMM7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VADDSD %XMM8,%XMM8,%XMM9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM7,0x20(%RDI)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	1	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM9,0x28(%RDI)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	1	scal (12.5%)
VADDSD %XMM10,%XMM10,%XMM11	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VADDSD %XMM12,%XMM12,%XMM13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM11,0x30(%RDI)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	1	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM13,0x38(%RDI)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	1	scal (12.5%)
ADD $0x40,%RDI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
CMP %R8,%RDI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
JNE 401d11 <main._omp_fn.3+0x121>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A

Function	main._omp_fn.3
Source file and lines	stream.c:292-292
Module	exec

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 8 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers.

By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 5.33 to 1.00 cycles (5.33x speedup).

Details

All SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ftree-vectorize (included in O3) to enable loop vectorization (including FP reductions).
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Performance is limited by:

reading data from caches/RAM (load units are a bottleneck)
writing data to caches/RAM (the store unit is a bottleneck)

By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 5.33 to 4.33 cycles (1.23x speedup).

Workaround

Read less array elements All SSE and/or AVX registers are used: in that case, try to relax register pressure by reducing the unroll factor or splitting your loop
Write less array elements
Provide more information to your compiler:
- hardcode the bounds of the corresponding 'for' loop
- use the 'restrict' C99 keyword

No data for this section

Type of elements and instruction set

8 SSE or AVX instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in scalar mode (one at a time).

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 8 FP arithmetical operations:

8: addition or subtraction

The binary loop is loading 64 bytes (8 double precision FP elements). The binary loop is storing 64 bytes (8 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.06 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

Unroll opportunity

Loop is data access bound.

Workaround

General properties

nb instructions	27
nb uops	26
loop length	123
used x86 registers	2
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	16
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	0

Front-end

ASSUMED MACRO FUSION FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	4.33 cycles
front end	4.33 cycles

Back-end

	ALU0/BRU0	ALU1	ALU2	ALU3	BRU1	AGU0	AGU1	AGU2	FP0	FP1	FP2	FP3	FP4	FP5
uops	0.50	0.50	0.25	0.25	0.50	5.33	5.33	5.33	0.00	0.00	4.00	4.00	4.00	4.00
cycles	0.50	0.50	0.25	0.25	0.50	5.33	5.33	5.33	0.00	0.00	4.00	4.00	4.00	4.00

Execution ports to units layout:

ALU0/BRU0: ALU, BRU
ALU1: ALU
ALU2: ALU
ALU3: ALU
BRU1: BRU
AGU0 (256 bits): store address, load
AGU1 (256 bits): store address, load
AGU2 (256 bits): store address, load
FP0 (256 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
FP1 (256 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
FP2 (256 bits): VPU
FP3 (256 bits): VPU
FP4 (256 bits): FP store data
FP5 (256 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	4.33
Dispatch	5.33
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	5.33

Vectorization ratios

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Vector efficiency ratios

all	12%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 5.33 cycles. At this rate:

12% of peak load performance is reached (12.00 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
18% of peak store performance is reached (12.00 out of 64.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 401d11

Instruction	Nb FU	ALU0/BRU0	ALU1	ALU2	ALU3	BRU1	AGU0	AGU1	AGU2	FP2	FP3	FP4	FP5	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
VMOVSD (%RDI),%XMM14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x8(%RDI),%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x10(%RDI),%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x18(%RDI),%XMM4	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x20(%RDI),%XMM6	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x28(%RDI),%XMM8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x30(%RDI),%XMM10	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x38(%RDI),%XMM12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VADDSD %XMM14,%XMM14,%XMM15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VADDSD %XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM15,(%RDI)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	1	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM1,0x8(%RDI)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	1	scal (12.5%)
VADDSD %XMM2,%XMM2,%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VADDSD %XMM4,%XMM4,%XMM5	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM3,0x10(%RDI)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	1	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM5,0x18(%RDI)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	1	scal (12.5%)
VADDSD %XMM6,%XMM6,%XMM7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VADDSD %XMM8,%XMM8,%XMM9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM7,0x20(%RDI)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	1	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM9,0x28(%RDI)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	1	scal (12.5%)
VADDSD %XMM10,%XMM10,%XMM11	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VADDSD %XMM12,%XMM12,%XMM13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM11,0x30(%RDI)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	1	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM13,0x38(%RDI)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	1	scal (12.5%)
ADD $0x40,%RDI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
CMP %R8,%RDI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
JNE 401d11 <main._omp_fn.3+0x121>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A

Report Configuration

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

Unroll opportunity

Workaround

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

Unroll opportunity

Workaround

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code