OV - exec - Function main.extracted.50

	Function: main.extracted.50	Module: exec	Source: stream.c:318-320	Coverage (incl. loops): 94.11% \| (excl. loops): 0.00%

/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/ins01.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0012/stream-copy/build/stream-copy/src/stream.c: 318 - 320

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

318: #pragma omp parallel for

319: 	for (j=0; j<STREAM_ARRAY_SIZE; j++)

320: 	    c[j] = a[j];

0x4032a0 PUSH	%RBP

0x4032a1 MOV	%RSP,%RBP

0x4032a4 PUSH	%RBX

0x4032a5 SUB	$0x28,%RSP

0x4032a9 MOVL	$0,-0xc(%RBP)

0x4032b0 MOV	(%RDI),%EBX

0x4032b2 MOVQ	$0,-0x20(%RBP)

0x4032ba MOVQ	$0x3344ffff,-0x18(%RBP)

0x4032c2 MOVQ	$0x1,-0x28(%RBP)

0x4032ca SUB	$0x8,%RSP

0x4032ce LEA	-0x28(%RBP),%RAX

0x4032d2 MOV	$0x4ceb88e20,%RDI

0x4032dc MOV	$0x401050,%R10

0x4032e6 LEA	-0xc(%RBP),%RCX

0x4032ea LEA	-0x20(%RBP),%R8

0x4032ee LEA	-0x18(%RBP),%R9

0x4032f2 MOV	%EBX,%ESI

0x4032f4 MOV	$0x22,%EDX

0x4032f9 PUSH	$0x1

0x4032fb PUSH	$0x1

0x4032fd PUSH	%RAX

0x4032fe CALL	%R10

0x403301 ADD	$0x20,%RSP

0x403305 MOV	-0x20(%RBP),%RAX

0x403309 MOV	-0x18(%RBP),%RDI

0x40330d CMP	%RDI,%RAX

0x403310 JA	4033ae

0x403316 SUB	%RAX,%RDI

0x403319 MOV	$0x406060,%RCX

0x403323 MOV	$0x334906060,%RDX

0x40332d INC	%RDI

0x403330 MOV	%RDI,%RSI

0x403333 AND	$0x7ffffff8,%RSI

0x40333a JE	403378

0x40333c LEA	(,%RAX,8),%R8

0x403344 XOR	%R9D,%R9D

0x403347 NOPW	(%RAX,%RAX,1)

(13) 0x403350 LEA	(%R8,%R9,8),%R10

(13) 0x403354 ADD	$0x8,%R9

(13) 0x403358 VMOVUPD	(%RCX,%R10,1),%ZMM0

(13) 0x40335f VMOVUPD	%ZMM0,(%RDX,%R10,1)

(13) 0x403366 CMP	%RSI,%R9

(13) 0x403369 JB	403350

0x40336b CMP	%RSI,%RDI

0x40336e JE	4033ae

0x403370 VPBROADCASTQ	%RDI,%ZMM0

0x403376 JMP	403380

0x403378 VPBROADCASTQ	%RDI,%ZMM0

0x40337e XOR	%ESI,%ESI

0x403380 VPBROADCASTQ	%RSI,%ZMM1

0x403386 MOV	$0x404180,%RDI

0x403390 ADD	%RSI,%RAX

0x403393 VPSUBQ	%ZMM1,%ZMM0,%ZMM0

0x403399 VPCMPNLEUQ	(%RDI),%ZMM0,%K1

0x4033a0 VMOVUPD	(%RCX,%RAX,8),%ZMM0{%K1}{z}

0x4033a7 VMOVUPD	%ZMM0,(%RDX,%RAX,8){%K1}

0x4033ae MOV	$0x4ceb88e40,%RDI

0x4033b8 MOV	$0x401030,%RAX

0x4033c2 MOV	%EBX,%ESI

0x4033c4 ADD	$0x28,%RSP

0x4033c8 POP	%RBX

0x4033c9 POP	%RBP

0x4033ca VZEROUPPER

0x4033cd JMP	%RAX

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libiomp5.so

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run icx_0

Source file and lines	stream.c:318-320
Module	exec

The function is defined in /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/ins01.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0012/stream-copy/build/stream-copy/src/stream.c:318-320.

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 10.17 to 3.00 cycles (3.39x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your function is poorly vectorized. Only 26% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions). By fully vectorizing your function, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 10.17 to 8.29 cycles (1.23x speedup).

Details

22% of SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

66% of SSE/AVX loads are used in vector version.
20% of SSE/AVX stores are used in vector version.
14% of SSE/AVX instructions that are not load, store, addition, subtraction nor multiply instructions are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized function can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

Masked instructions

Detected masked instructions.

Details

Vector registers are partially exploited, which is expected if your function is irregular or mixes elements of different sizes.

Workaround

If your function is irregular, try to remove or hoist conditional structures out of your function. If it mixes elements of different sizes, try to uniformize them.

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

Calling (and then returning from) a function prevents many compiler optimizations (like vectorization), breaks control flow (which reduces pipeline performance) and executes extra instructions to save/restore the registers used inside it, which is very expensive (dozens of cycles). Consider to inline small functions.

unknown: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/ins01.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0012/stream-copy/build/stream-copy/src/stream.c:318

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

VMOVUPD: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/ins01.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0012/stream-copy/build/stream-copy/src/stream.c:320
VPBROADCASTQ: 3 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/ins01.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0012/stream-copy/build/stream-copy/src/stream.c:319
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/ins01.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0012/stream-copy/build/stream-copy/src/stream.c:319
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/ins01.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0012/stream-copy/build/stream-copy/src/stream.c:318

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 148 bytes. The binary function is storing 92 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	58
nb uops	61
loop length	276
used x86 registers	11
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	0
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	2
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	10.17 cycles
front end	10.17 cycles

Back-end

	ALU0/BRU0	ALU1	ALU2	ALU3	BRU1	AGU0	AGU1	AGU2	FP0	FP1	FP2	FP3	FP4	FP5
uops	6.50	6.50	6.50	6.50	3.00	3.33	3.33	3.33	0.50	3.00	3.00	0.50	1.00	1.00
cycles	6.50	6.50	6.50	6.50	3.00	3.67	3.67	3.67	0.50	3.00	3.00	0.50	1.00	1.00

Execution ports to units layout:

ALU0/BRU0: ALU, BRU
ALU1: ALU
ALU2: ALU
ALU3: ALU
BRU1: BRU
AGU0 (256 bits): store address, load
AGU1 (256 bits): store address, load
AGU2 (256 bits): store address, load
FP0 (256 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
FP1 (256 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
FP2 (256 bits): VPU
FP3 (256 bits): VPU
FP4 (256 bits): FP store data
FP5 (256 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	10.17
Dispatch	6.50
Overall L1	10.17

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	15%
load	50%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	14%

all	100%
load	100%
store	100%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	22%
load	66%
store	20%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	14%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	19%
load	53%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	17%

all	100%
load	100%
store	100%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	26%
load	68%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	17%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Detected masked instructions: assuming all mask elements are active. Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 10.17 cycles. At this rate:

15% of peak load performance is reached (14.56 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
14% of peak store performance is reached (9.05 out of 64.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Performance is limited by instruction throughput (loading/decoding program instructions to execution core) (front-end is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 10.17 to 6.50 cycles (1.56x speedup).

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 4032a0

Instruction	Nb FU	ALU0/BRU0	ALU1	ALU2	ALU3	BRU1	AGU0	AGU1	AGU2	FP0	FP1	FP2	FP3	FP4	FP5	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x28,%RSP	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOVL $0,-0xc(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV (%RDI),%EBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0,-0x20(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x3344ffff,-0x18(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x28(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x28(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV $0x4ceb88e20,%RDI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOV $0x401050,%R10	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
LEA -0xc(%RBP),%RCX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x20(%RBP),%R8	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x18(%RBP),%R9	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
CALL %R10	2	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV -0x20(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
MOV -0x18(%RBP),%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
CMP %RDI,%RAX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
JA 4033ae <main.extracted.50+0x10e>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
SUB %RAX,%RDI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV $0x406060,%RCX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOV $0x334906060,%RDX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
INC %RDI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %RDI,%RSI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (12.5%)
AND $0x7ffffff8,%RSI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
JE 403378 <main.extracted.50+0xd8>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
LEA (,%RAX,8),%R8	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
XOR %R9D,%R9D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	scal (6.3%)
NOPW (%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
CMP %RSI,%RDI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
JE 4033ae <main.extracted.50+0x10e>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %RDI,%ZMM0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	1	1	scal (12.5%)
JMP 403380 <main.extracted.50+0xe0>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %RDI,%ZMM0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	1	1	scal (12.5%)
XOR %ESI,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	scal (6.3%)
VPBROADCASTQ %RSI,%ZMM1	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	1	1	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x404180,%RDI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
ADD %RSI,%RAX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
VPSUBQ %ZMM1,%ZMM0,%ZMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.50	vect (100.0%)
VPCMPNLEUQ (%RDI),%ZMM0,%K1																		vect (100.0%)
VMOVUPD (%RCX,%RAX,8),%ZMM0{%K1}{z}	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	vect (100.0%)
VMOVUPD %ZMM0,(%RDX,%RAX,8){%K1}	2	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	1	5	2	vect (100.0%)
MOV $0x4ceb88e40,%RDI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOV $0x401030,%RAX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
ADD $0x28,%RSP	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
VZEROUPPER	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	vect (25.0%)
JMP %RAX	1	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	N/A

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run icx_0

Source file and lines	stream.c:318-320
Module	exec

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 10.17 to 3.00 cycles (3.39x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Details

22% of SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

66% of SSE/AVX loads are used in vector version.
20% of SSE/AVX stores are used in vector version.
14% of SSE/AVX instructions that are not load, store, addition, subtraction nor multiply instructions are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized function can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

Masked instructions

Detected masked instructions.

Details

Vector registers are partially exploited, which is expected if your function is irregular or mixes elements of different sizes.

Workaround

If your function is irregular, try to remove or hoist conditional structures out of your function. If it mixes elements of different sizes, try to uniformize them.

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

unknown: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/ins01.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0012/stream-copy/build/stream-copy/src/stream.c:318

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

VMOVUPD: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/ins01.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0012/stream-copy/build/stream-copy/src/stream.c:320
VPBROADCASTQ: 3 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/ins01.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0012/stream-copy/build/stream-copy/src/stream.c:319
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/ins01.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0012/stream-copy/build/stream-copy/src/stream.c:319
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/ins01.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0012/stream-copy/build/stream-copy/src/stream.c:318

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 148 bytes. The binary function is storing 92 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	58
nb uops	61
loop length	276
used x86 registers	11
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	0
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	2
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	10.17 cycles
front end	10.17 cycles

Back-end

	ALU0/BRU0	ALU1	ALU2	ALU3	BRU1	AGU0	AGU1	AGU2	FP0	FP1	FP2	FP3	FP4	FP5
uops	6.50	6.50	6.50	6.50	3.00	3.33	3.33	3.33	0.50	3.00	3.00	0.50	1.00	1.00
cycles	6.50	6.50	6.50	6.50	3.00	3.67	3.67	3.67	0.50	3.00	3.00	0.50	1.00	1.00

Execution ports to units layout:

ALU0/BRU0: ALU, BRU
ALU1: ALU
ALU2: ALU
ALU3: ALU
BRU1: BRU
AGU0 (256 bits): store address, load
AGU1 (256 bits): store address, load
AGU2 (256 bits): store address, load
FP0 (256 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
FP1 (256 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
FP2 (256 bits): VPU
FP3 (256 bits): VPU
FP4 (256 bits): FP store data
FP5 (256 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	10.17
Dispatch	6.50
Overall L1	10.17

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	15%
load	50%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	14%

all	100%
load	100%
store	100%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	22%
load	66%
store	20%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	14%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	19%
load	53%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	17%

all	100%
load	100%
store	100%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	26%
load	68%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	17%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Detected masked instructions: assuming all mask elements are active. Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 10.17 cycles. At this rate:

15% of peak load performance is reached (14.56 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
14% of peak store performance is reached (9.05 out of 64.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 4032a0

Instruction	Nb FU	ALU0/BRU0	ALU1	ALU2	ALU3	BRU1	AGU0	AGU1	AGU2	FP0	FP1	FP2	FP3	FP4	FP5	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x28,%RSP	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOVL $0,-0xc(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV (%RDI),%EBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0,-0x20(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x3344ffff,-0x18(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x28(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x28(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV $0x4ceb88e20,%RDI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOV $0x401050,%R10	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
LEA -0xc(%RBP),%RCX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x20(%RBP),%R8	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x18(%RBP),%R9	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
CALL %R10	2	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV -0x20(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
MOV -0x18(%RBP),%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
CMP %RDI,%RAX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
JA 4033ae <main.extracted.50+0x10e>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
SUB %RAX,%RDI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV $0x406060,%RCX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOV $0x334906060,%RDX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
INC %RDI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %RDI,%RSI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (12.5%)
AND $0x7ffffff8,%RSI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
JE 403378 <main.extracted.50+0xd8>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
LEA (,%RAX,8),%R8	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
XOR %R9D,%R9D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	scal (6.3%)
NOPW (%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
CMP %RSI,%RDI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
JE 4033ae <main.extracted.50+0x10e>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %RDI,%ZMM0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	1	1	scal (12.5%)
JMP 403380 <main.extracted.50+0xe0>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %RDI,%ZMM0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	1	1	scal (12.5%)
XOR %ESI,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	scal (6.3%)
VPBROADCASTQ %RSI,%ZMM1	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	1	1	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x404180,%RDI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
ADD %RSI,%RAX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
VPSUBQ %ZMM1,%ZMM0,%ZMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.50	vect (100.0%)
VPCMPNLEUQ (%RDI),%ZMM0,%K1																		vect (100.0%)
VMOVUPD (%RCX,%RAX,8),%ZMM0{%K1}{z}	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	vect (100.0%)
VMOVUPD %ZMM0,(%RDX,%RAX,8){%K1}	2	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	1	5	2	vect (100.0%)
MOV $0x4ceb88e40,%RDI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOV $0x401030,%RAX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
ADD $0x28,%RSP	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
VZEROUPPER	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	vect (25.0%)
JMP %RAX	1	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	N/A

Name	Coverage (%)	Time (s)
▼main.extracted.50–	94.11	5.66
○Loop 13 - stream.c:319-320 - exec	94.11	5.59

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Masked instructions

Details

Workaround

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Masked instructions

Details

Workaround

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code