OV - exec - Function main.extracted.65

	Function: main.extracted.65	Module: exec	Source: stream.c:354-356	Coverage (incl. loops): 27.30% \| (excl. loops): 0.00%

/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz16.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0958/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c: 354 - 356

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

354: #pragma omp parallel for

355: 	for (j=0; j<STREAM_ARRAY_SIZE; j++)

356: 	    a[j] = b[j]+scalar*c[j];

0x403720 PUSH	%RBP

0x403721 MOV	%RSP,%RBP

0x403724 PUSH	%R14

0x403726 PUSH	%RBX

0x403727 SUB	$0x20,%RSP

0x40372b MOVL	$0,-0x14(%RBP)

0x403732 MOV	(%RDI),%EBX

0x403734 MOVQ	$0,-0x28(%RBP)

0x40373c MOVQ	$0x3344ffff,-0x20(%RBP)

0x403744 MOVQ	$0x1,-0x30(%RBP)

0x40374c SUB	$0x8,%RSP

0x403750 LEA	-0x30(%RBP),%RAX

0x403754 LEA	-0x20(%RBP),%R9

0x403758 MOV	$0x4ceb89240,%RDI

0x403762 MOV	$0x401050,%R10

0x40376c LEA	-0x14(%RBP),%RCX

0x403770 LEA	-0x28(%RBP),%R8

0x403774 MOV	%EBX,%ESI

0x403776 MOV	$0x22,%EDX

0x40377b PUSH	$0x1

0x40377d PUSH	$0x1

0x40377f PUSH	%RAX

0x403780 CALL	%R10

0x403783 ADD	$0x20,%RSP

0x403787 MOV	-0x28(%RBP),%RAX

0x40378b MOV	-0x20(%RBP),%R9

0x40378f CMP	%R9,%RAX

0x403792 JA	403863

0x403798 SUB	%RAX,%R9

0x40379b MOV	$0x334906060,%RSI

0x4037a5 MOV	$0x19a686060,%RDI

0x4037af MOV	$0x4040d0,%RCX

0x4037b9 MOV	$0x406060,%RDX

0x4037c3 INC	%R9

0x4037c6 MOV	%R9,%R8

0x4037c9 AND	$0x7ffffff8,%R8

0x4037d0 JE	40381f

0x4037d2 VBROADCASTSD	(%RCX),%ZMM0

0x4037d8 LEA	(,%RAX,8),%R10

0x4037e0 XOR	%R11D,%R11D

0x4037e3 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

(16) 0x4037f0 LEA	(%R10,%R11,8),%R14

(16) 0x4037f4 ADD	$0x8,%R11

(16) 0x4037f8 VMOVUPD	(%RSI,%R14,1),%ZMM1

(16) 0x4037ff VFMADD213PD	(%RDI,%R14,1),%ZMM0,%ZMM1

(16) 0x403806 VMOVUPD	%ZMM1,(%RDX,%R14,1)

(16) 0x40380d CMP	%R8,%R11

(16) 0x403810 JB	4037f0

0x403812 CMP	%R8,%R9

0x403815 JE	403863

0x403817 VPBROADCASTQ	%R9,%ZMM0

0x40381d JMP	403828

0x40381f VPBROADCASTQ	%R9,%ZMM0

0x403825 XOR	%R8D,%R8D

0x403828 VPBROADCASTQ	%R8,%ZMM1

0x40382e MOV	$0x404240,%R9

0x403838 ADD	%R8,%RAX

0x40383b VPSUBQ	%ZMM1,%ZMM0,%ZMM0

0x403841 VPCMPNLEUQ	(%R9),%ZMM0,%K1

0x403848 VMOVUPD	(%RSI,%RAX,8),%ZMM0{%K1}{z}

0x40384f VMOVUPD	(%RDI,%RAX,8),%ZMM1{%K1}{z}

0x403856 VFMADD231PD	(%RCX){1to8},%ZMM0,%ZMM1

0x40385c VMOVUPD	%ZMM1,(%RDX,%RAX,8){%K1}

0x403863 MOV	$0x4ceb89260,%RDI

0x40386d MOV	$0x401030,%RAX

0x403877 MOV	%EBX,%ESI

0x403879 ADD	$0x20,%RSP

0x40387d POP	%RBX

0x40387e POP	%R14

0x403880 POP	%RBP

0x403881 VZEROUPPER

0x403884 JMP	%RAX

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libiomp5.so

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run icx_0

Source file and lines	stream.c:354-356
Module	exec

The function is defined in /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz16.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0958/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:354-356.

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 11.33 to 3.50 cycles (3.24x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your function is poorly vectorized. Only 33% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions). By fully vectorizing your function, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 11.33 to 9.32 cycles (1.22x speedup).

Details

30% of SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

66% of SSE/AVX loads are used in vector version.
20% of SSE/AVX stores are used in vector version.
15% of SSE/AVX instructions that are not load, store, addition, subtraction nor multiply instructions are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized function can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

Masked instructions

Detected masked instructions.

Details

Vector registers are partially exploited, which is expected if your function is irregular or mixes elements of different sizes.

Workaround

If your function is irregular, try to remove or hoist conditional structures out of your function. If it mixes elements of different sizes, try to uniformize them.

FMA

Detected 8 FMA (fused multiply-add) operations.

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

Calling (and then returning from) a function prevents many compiler optimizations (like vectorization), breaks control flow (which reduces pipeline performance) and executes extra instructions to save/restore the registers used inside it, which is very expensive (dozens of cycles). Consider to inline small functions.

unknown: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz16.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0958/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:354

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

VMOVUPD: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz16.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0958/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:356
VPBROADCASTQ: 3 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz16.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0958/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:355
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz16.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0958/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:355
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz16.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0958/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:354

Type of elements and instruction set

1 AVX-512 instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in vector mode (eight at a time).

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function is composed of 16 FP arithmetical operations:

8: addition or subtraction (all inside FMA instructions)
8: multiply (all inside FMA instructions)

The binary function is loading 228 bytes (28 double precision FP elements). The binary function is storing 92 bytes (11 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.05 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	65
nb uops	68
loop length	324
used x86 registers	13
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	0
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	2
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	11.33 cycles
front end	11.33 cycles

Back-end

	ALU0/BRU0	ALU1	ALU2	ALU3	BRU1	AGU0	AGU1	AGU2	FP0	FP1	FP2	FP3	FP4	FP5
uops	7.00	7.00	7.00	7.00	3.00	4.33	4.33	4.33	1.00	3.50	3.50	1.00	1.00	1.00
cycles	7.00	7.00	7.00	7.00	3.00	5.33	5.33	5.33	2.00	3.50	3.50	1.00	1.00	1.00

Execution ports to units layout:

ALU0/BRU0: ALU, BRU
ALU1: ALU
ALU2: ALU
ALU3: ALU
BRU1: BRU
AGU0 (256 bits): store address, load
AGU1 (256 bits): store address, load
AGU2 (256 bits): store address, load
FP0 (256 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
FP1 (256 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
FP2 (256 bits): VPU
FP3 (256 bits): VPU
FP4 (256 bits): FP store data
FP5 (256 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	11.33
Dispatch	7.00
Overall L1	11.33

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	16%
load	50%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	16%

all	80%
load	75%
store	100%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	100%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

INT+FP

all	30%
load	66%
store	20%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	100%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	15%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	20%
load	53%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	19%

all	82%
load	78%
store	100%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	100%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	12%

INT+FP

all	33%
load	69%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	100%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	19%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Detected masked instructions: assuming all mask elements are active. Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 11.33 cycles. At this rate:

20% of peak load performance is reached (20.12 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
12% of peak store performance is reached (8.12 out of 64.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Performance is limited by instruction throughput (loading/decoding program instructions to execution core) (front-end is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 11.33 to 7.00 cycles (1.62x speedup).

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 403720

Instruction	Nb FU	ALU0/BRU0	ALU1	ALU2	ALU3	BRU1	AGU0	AGU1	AGU2	FP0	FP1	FP2	FP3	FP4	FP5	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x20,%RSP	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOVL $0,-0x14(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV (%RDI),%EBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0,-0x28(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x3344ffff,-0x20(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x30(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x20(%RBP),%R9	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV $0x4ceb89240,%RDI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOV $0x401050,%R10	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
LEA -0x14(%RBP),%RCX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x28(%RBP),%R8	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
CALL %R10	2	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV -0x28(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
MOV -0x20(%RBP),%R9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
CMP %R9,%RAX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
JA 403863 <main.extracted.65+0x143>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
SUB %RAX,%R9	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV $0x334906060,%RSI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOV $0x19a686060,%RDI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOV $0x4040d0,%RCX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOV $0x406060,%RDX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
INC %R9	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %R9,%R8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (12.5%)
AND $0x7ffffff8,%R8	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
JE 40381f <main.extracted.65+0xff>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
VBROADCASTSD (%RCX),%ZMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	5	1	scal (12.5%)
LEA (,%RAX,8),%R10	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
XOR %R11D,%R11D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	scal (6.3%)
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
CMP %R8,%R9	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
JE 403863 <main.extracted.65+0x143>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %R9,%ZMM0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	1	1	scal (12.5%)
JMP 403828 <main.extracted.65+0x108>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %R9,%ZMM0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	1	1	scal (12.5%)
XOR %R8D,%R8D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	scal (6.3%)
VPBROADCASTQ %R8,%ZMM1	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	1	1	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x404240,%R9	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
ADD %R8,%RAX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
VPSUBQ %ZMM1,%ZMM0,%ZMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.50	vect (100.0%)
VPCMPNLEUQ (%R9),%ZMM0,%K1																		vect (100.0%)
VMOVUPD (%RSI,%RAX,8),%ZMM0{%K1}{z}	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	vect (100.0%)
VMOVUPD (%RDI,%RAX,8),%ZMM1{%K1}{z}	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	vect (100.0%)
VFMADD231PD (%RCX){1to8},%ZMM0,%ZMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	4	1	vect (100.0%)
VMOVUPD %ZMM1,(%RDX,%RAX,8){%K1}	2	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	1	5	2	vect (100.0%)
MOV $0x4ceb89260,%RDI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOV $0x401030,%RAX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
VZEROUPPER	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	vect (25.0%)
JMP %RAX	1	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	N/A

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run icx_0

Source file and lines	stream.c:354-356
Module	exec

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 11.33 to 3.50 cycles (3.24x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Details

30% of SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

66% of SSE/AVX loads are used in vector version.
20% of SSE/AVX stores are used in vector version.
15% of SSE/AVX instructions that are not load, store, addition, subtraction nor multiply instructions are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized function can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

Masked instructions

Detected masked instructions.

Details

Vector registers are partially exploited, which is expected if your function is irregular or mixes elements of different sizes.

Workaround

If your function is irregular, try to remove or hoist conditional structures out of your function. If it mixes elements of different sizes, try to uniformize them.

FMA

Detected 8 FMA (fused multiply-add) operations.

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

unknown: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz16.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0958/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:354

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

VMOVUPD: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz16.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0958/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:356
VPBROADCASTQ: 3 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz16.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0958/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:355
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz16.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0958/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:355
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz16.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-0958/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:354

Type of elements and instruction set

1 AVX-512 instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in vector mode (eight at a time).

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function is composed of 16 FP arithmetical operations:

8: addition or subtraction (all inside FMA instructions)
8: multiply (all inside FMA instructions)

The binary function is loading 228 bytes (28 double precision FP elements). The binary function is storing 92 bytes (11 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.05 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	65
nb uops	68
loop length	324
used x86 registers	13
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	0
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	2
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	11.33 cycles
front end	11.33 cycles

Back-end

	ALU0/BRU0	ALU1	ALU2	ALU3	BRU1	AGU0	AGU1	AGU2	FP0	FP1	FP2	FP3	FP4	FP5
uops	7.00	7.00	7.00	7.00	3.00	4.33	4.33	4.33	1.00	3.50	3.50	1.00	1.00	1.00
cycles	7.00	7.00	7.00	7.00	3.00	5.33	5.33	5.33	2.00	3.50	3.50	1.00	1.00	1.00

Execution ports to units layout:

ALU0/BRU0: ALU, BRU
ALU1: ALU
ALU2: ALU
ALU3: ALU
BRU1: BRU
AGU0 (256 bits): store address, load
AGU1 (256 bits): store address, load
AGU2 (256 bits): store address, load
FP0 (256 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
FP1 (256 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
FP2 (256 bits): VPU
FP3 (256 bits): VPU
FP4 (256 bits): FP store data
FP5 (256 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	11.33
Dispatch	7.00
Overall L1	11.33

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	16%
load	50%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	16%

all	80%
load	75%
store	100%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	100%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

INT+FP

all	30%
load	66%
store	20%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	100%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	15%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	20%
load	53%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	19%

all	82%
load	78%
store	100%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	100%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	12%

INT+FP

all	33%
load	69%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	100%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	19%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Detected masked instructions: assuming all mask elements are active. Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 11.33 cycles. At this rate:

20% of peak load performance is reached (20.12 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
12% of peak store performance is reached (8.12 out of 64.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 403720

Instruction	Nb FU	ALU0/BRU0	ALU1	ALU2	ALU3	BRU1	AGU0	AGU1	AGU2	FP0	FP1	FP2	FP3	FP4	FP5	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x20,%RSP	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOVL $0,-0x14(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV (%RDI),%EBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0,-0x28(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x3344ffff,-0x20(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x30(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x20(%RBP),%R9	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV $0x4ceb89240,%RDI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOV $0x401050,%R10	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
LEA -0x14(%RBP),%RCX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x28(%RBP),%R8	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
CALL %R10	2	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV -0x28(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
MOV -0x20(%RBP),%R9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
CMP %R9,%RAX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
JA 403863 <main.extracted.65+0x143>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
SUB %RAX,%R9	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV $0x334906060,%RSI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOV $0x19a686060,%RDI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOV $0x4040d0,%RCX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOV $0x406060,%RDX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
INC %R9	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %R9,%R8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (12.5%)
AND $0x7ffffff8,%R8	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
JE 40381f <main.extracted.65+0xff>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
VBROADCASTSD (%RCX),%ZMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	5	1	scal (12.5%)
LEA (,%RAX,8),%R10	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
XOR %R11D,%R11D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	scal (6.3%)
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
CMP %R8,%R9	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
JE 403863 <main.extracted.65+0x143>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %R9,%ZMM0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	1	1	scal (12.5%)
JMP 403828 <main.extracted.65+0x108>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %R9,%ZMM0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	1	1	scal (12.5%)
XOR %R8D,%R8D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	scal (6.3%)
VPBROADCASTQ %R8,%ZMM1	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	1	1	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x404240,%R9	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
ADD %R8,%RAX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
VPSUBQ %ZMM1,%ZMM0,%ZMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.50	vect (100.0%)
VPCMPNLEUQ (%R9),%ZMM0,%K1																		vect (100.0%)
VMOVUPD (%RSI,%RAX,8),%ZMM0{%K1}{z}	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	vect (100.0%)
VMOVUPD (%RDI,%RAX,8),%ZMM1{%K1}{z}	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	vect (100.0%)
VFMADD231PD (%RCX){1to8},%ZMM0,%ZMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	4	1	vect (100.0%)
VMOVUPD %ZMM1,(%RDX,%RAX,8){%K1}	2	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	1	5	2	vect (100.0%)
MOV $0x4ceb89260,%RDI	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOV $0x401030,%RAX	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
VZEROUPPER	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	vect (25.0%)
JMP %RAX	1	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	N/A

Name	Coverage (%)	Time (s)
▼main.extracted.65–	27.30	7.39
○Loop 16 - stream.c:355-356 - exec	27.30	7.27

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Masked instructions

Details

Workaround

FMA

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Masked instructions

Details

Workaround

FMA

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code