OV - exec - Function main.omp

	Function: main.omp_outlined.18	Module: exec	Source: stream.c:294-296	Coverage (incl. loops): 0.21% \| (excl. loops): 0.00%

/home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-491-9774/intel/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c: 294 - 296

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

294: #pragma omp parallel for

295:     for (j = 0; j < STREAM_ARRAY_SIZE; j++)

296: 		a[j] = 2.0E0 * a[j];

0x401340 SUB	SP, SP, #80

0x401344 STP	X29, X30, [SP, #48]

0x401348 STP	X20, X19, [SP, #64]

0x40134c ADD	X29, SP, #48

0x401350 LDR	W19, [X0]

0x401354 MOVN	W20, #52411

0x401358 MOVZ	W8, #1

0x40135c ADRP	X0,

0x401360 ADD	X0, X0, #3136

0x401364 STR	WZR, [SP, #20]

0x401368 STP	X20, XZR, [X29, #1008]

0x40136c ADD	X3, SP, #20

0x401370 SUB	X4, X29, #8

0x401374 SUB	X5, X29, #16

0x401378 ADD	X6, SP, #24

0x40137c STR	X8, [SP, #24]

0x401380 STR	X8, [SP]

0x401384 MOVZ	W2, #34

0x401388 MOVZ	W7, #1

0x40138c ORR	W1, WZR, W19

0x401390 BL	4008e0

0x401394 LDP	X8, X15, [X29, #1008]

0x401398 CMP	X8, X20

0x40139c CSEL	X8, X8, X20, #11

0x4013a0 CMP	X15, X8

0x4013a4 B.GT	401438

0x4013a8 ADRP	X9,

0x4013ac SUB	X10, X8, X15

0x4013b0 CNTW	X12, ALL

0x4013b4 LDR	X9, [X9, #184]

0x4013b8 ADD	X11, X10, #1

0x4013bc ORR	X10, XZR, X15

0x4013c0 CMP	X11, X12

0x4013c4 B.CC	401418

0x4013c8 SUB	X10, XZR, X12

0x4013cc RDVL	X17, #1

0x4013d0 ADD	X16, X9, X15,LSL #3

0x4013d4 ORR	X13, XZR, XZR

0x4013d8 AND	X14, X11, X10

0x4013dc PTRUE	P0.D, ALL

0x4013e0 ADD	X10, X15, X14

0x4013e4 ADD	X15, X17, X15,LSL #3

0x4013e8 ADD	X15, X9, X15

(5) 0x4013ec LD1D	{Z0.D}, P0/Z, [X16, X13,LSL #3]

(5) 0x4013f0 LD1D	{Z1.D}, P0/Z, [X15, X13,LSL #3]

(5) 0x4013f4 FADD	Z0.D, Z0.D, Z0.D

(5) 0x4013f8 FADD	Z1.D, Z1.D, Z1.D

(5) 0x4013fc ST1D	{Z0.D}, P0, [X16, X13,LSL #3]

(5) 0x401400 ST1D	{Z1.D}, P0, [X15, X13,LSL #3]

(5) 0x401404 ADD	X13, X13, X12

(5) 0x401408 CMP	X14, X13

(5) 0x40140c B.NE	4013ec

0x401410 CMP	X11, X14

0x401414 B.EQ	401438

0x401418 SUB	X8, X8, X10

0x40141c ADD	X9, X9, X10,LSL #3

0x401420 ADD	X8, X8, #1

(4) 0x401424 LDR	D0, [X9]

(4) 0x401428 SUBS	X8, X8, #1

(4) 0x40142c FADD	D0, D0, D0

(4) 0x401430 STR	D0, [X9], #8

(4) 0x401434 B.NE	401424

0x401438 ADRP	X0,

0x40143c ADD	X0, X0, #3160

0x401440 ORR	W1, WZR, W19

0x401444 LDP	X20, X19, [SP, #64]

0x401448 LDP	X29, X30, [SP, #48]

0x40144c ADD	SP, SP, #80

0x401450 B	4008a0

0x401454 HINT	#0

0x401458 HINT	#0

0x40145c HINT	#0

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run orig_0

Source file and lines	stream.c:294-296
Module	exec

The function is defined in /home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-491-9774/intel/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:294-296.

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 10.00 to 1.00 cycles (10.00x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your function is not vectorized. Only 27% of vector register length is used (average across all VPU instructions). By vectorizing your function, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 10.00 to 5.25 cycles (1.90x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized function can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

Detected performance impact from expensive FP math instructions/calls. By removing/reexpressing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 10.00 to 0.50 cycles (20.00x speedup).

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

Calling (and then returning from) a function prevents many compiler optimizations (like vectorization), breaks control flow (which reduces pipeline performance) and executes extra instructions to save/restore the registers used inside it, which is very expensive (dozens of cycles). Consider to inline small functions.

unknown: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-491-9774/intel/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:294

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 60 bytes. The binary function is storing 68 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	58
nb uops	55
loop length	232
used w registers	7
used x registers	20
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	1
used d registers	0
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	0
nb stack references	7

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	6.88 cycles
front end	6.88 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	2.50	2.50	10.00	10.00	10.00	10.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	3.67	3.67	3.67	3.00	3.00
cycles	2.50	2.50	10.00	10.00	10.00	10.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	3.67	3.67	3.67	3.00	3.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	6.88
Dispatch	10.00
Overall L1	10.00

Vectorization ratios

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

all	27%
load	37%
store	35%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	25%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 10.00 cycles. At this rate:

6% of peak load performance is reached (6.00 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
14% of peak store performance is reached (6.80 out of 48.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 401340

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
SUB SP, SP, #80	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
STP X29, X30, [SP, #48]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (50.0%)
STP X20, X19, [SP, #64]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (50.0%)
ADD X29, SP, #48	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LDR W19, [X0]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	scal (12.5%)
MOVN W20, #52411	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOVZ W8, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
ADRP X0, <41f35c>	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADD X0, X0, #3136	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
STR WZR, [SP, #20]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
STP X20, XZR, [X29, #1008]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (50.0%)
ADD X3, SP, #20	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
SUB X4, X29, #8	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
SUB X5, X29, #16	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
ADD X6, SP, #24	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
STR X8, [SP, #24]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (25.0%)
STR X8, [SP]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (25.0%)
MOVZ W2, #34	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOVZ W7, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
ORR W1, WZR, W19	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
BL 4008e0 <@plt_start@+0x80>	1	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
LDP X8, X15, [X29, #1008]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	1	scal (50.0%)
CMP X8, X20	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (25.0%)
CSEL X8, X8, X20, #11	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
CMP X15, X8	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (25.0%)
B.GT 401438 <main.omp_outlined.18+0xf8>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
ADRP X9, <4203a8>	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
SUB X10, X8, X15	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
CNTW X12, ALL	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	scal (25.0%)
LDR X9, [X9, #184]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	N/A
ADD X11, X10, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
ORR X10, XZR, X15	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
CMP X11, X12	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (25.0%)
B.CC 401418 <main.omp_outlined.18+0xd8>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB X10, XZR, X12	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
RDVL X17, #1	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	scal (25.0%)
ADD X16, X9, X15,LSL #3	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
ORR X13, XZR, XZR	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
AND X14, X11, X10	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
PTRUE P0.D, ALL	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	scal (100.0%)
ADD X10, X15, X14	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
ADD X15, X17, X15,LSL #3	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
ADD X15, X9, X15	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
CMP X11, X14	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (25.0%)
B.EQ 401438 <main.omp_outlined.18+0xf8>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB X8, X8, X10	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
ADD X9, X9, X10,LSL #3	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADD X8, X8, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
ADRP X0, <41f438>	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADD X0, X0, #3160	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ORR W1, WZR, W19	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
LDP X20, X19, [SP, #64]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	1	scal (50.0%)
LDP X29, X30, [SP, #48]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	1	N/A
ADD SP, SP, #80	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
B 4008a0 <@plt_start@+0x40>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
HINT #0																			N/A
HINT #0																			N/A
HINT #0																			N/A

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run orig_0

Source file and lines	stream.c:294-296
Module	exec

The function is defined in /home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-491-9774/intel/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:294-296.

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized function can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

Detected performance impact from expensive FP math instructions/calls. By removing/reexpressing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 10.00 to 0.50 cycles (20.00x speedup).

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

unknown: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-491-9774/intel/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:294

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 60 bytes. The binary function is storing 68 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	58
nb uops	55
loop length	232
used w registers	7
used x registers	20
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	1
used d registers	0
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	0
nb stack references	7

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	6.88 cycles
front end	6.88 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	2.50	2.50	10.00	10.00	10.00	10.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	3.67	3.67	3.67	3.00	3.00
cycles	2.50	2.50	10.00	10.00	10.00	10.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	3.67	3.67	3.67	3.00	3.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	6.88
Dispatch	10.00
Overall L1	10.00

Vectorization ratios

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

all	27%
load	37%
store	35%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	25%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 10.00 cycles. At this rate:

6% of peak load performance is reached (6.00 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
14% of peak store performance is reached (6.80 out of 48.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 401340

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
SUB SP, SP, #80	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
STP X29, X30, [SP, #48]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (50.0%)
STP X20, X19, [SP, #64]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (50.0%)
ADD X29, SP, #48	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LDR W19, [X0]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	scal (12.5%)
MOVN W20, #52411	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOVZ W8, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
ADRP X0, <41f35c>	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADD X0, X0, #3136	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
STR WZR, [SP, #20]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
STP X20, XZR, [X29, #1008]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (50.0%)
ADD X3, SP, #20	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
SUB X4, X29, #8	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
SUB X5, X29, #16	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
ADD X6, SP, #24	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
STR X8, [SP, #24]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (25.0%)
STR X8, [SP]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (25.0%)
MOVZ W2, #34	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOVZ W7, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
ORR W1, WZR, W19	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
BL 4008e0 <@plt_start@+0x80>	1	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
LDP X8, X15, [X29, #1008]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	1	scal (50.0%)
CMP X8, X20	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (25.0%)
CSEL X8, X8, X20, #11	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
CMP X15, X8	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (25.0%)
B.GT 401438 <main.omp_outlined.18+0xf8>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
ADRP X9, <4203a8>	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
SUB X10, X8, X15	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
CNTW X12, ALL	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	scal (25.0%)
LDR X9, [X9, #184]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	N/A
ADD X11, X10, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
ORR X10, XZR, X15	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
CMP X11, X12	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (25.0%)
B.CC 401418 <main.omp_outlined.18+0xd8>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB X10, XZR, X12	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
RDVL X17, #1	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	scal (25.0%)
ADD X16, X9, X15,LSL #3	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
ORR X13, XZR, XZR	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
AND X14, X11, X10	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
PTRUE P0.D, ALL	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	scal (100.0%)
ADD X10, X15, X14	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
ADD X15, X17, X15,LSL #3	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
ADD X15, X9, X15	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
CMP X11, X14	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (25.0%)
B.EQ 401438 <main.omp_outlined.18+0xf8>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB X8, X8, X10	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
ADD X9, X9, X10,LSL #3	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADD X8, X8, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
ADRP X0, <41f438>	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADD X0, X0, #3160	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ORR W1, WZR, W19	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
LDP X20, X19, [SP, #64]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	1	scal (50.0%)
LDP X29, X30, [SP, #48]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	1	N/A
ADD SP, SP, #80	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
B 4008a0 <@plt_start@+0x40>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
HINT #0																			N/A
HINT #0																			N/A
HINT #0																			N/A

Name	Coverage (%)	Time (s)
▼main.omp_outlined.18–	0.21	0.06
○Loop 5 - stream.c:296-296 - exec	0.21	0.06
○Loop 4 - stream.c:295-296 - exec	0.00	0.00

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

CALL instructions

Details

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

CALL instructions

Details

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code