OV - exec - Function main.extracted.45

	Function: main.extracted.45	Module: exec	Source: stream.c:290-292	Coverage (incl. loops): 0.63% \| (excl. loops): 0.00%

/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/isix05.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-373-7249/stream-triad/build/stream-triad/src/stream.c: 290 - 292

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

290: #pragma omp parallel for

291:     for (j = 0; j < STREAM_ARRAY_SIZE; j++)

292: 		a[j] = 2.0E0 * a[j];

0x402c00 PUSH	%RBP

0x402c01 MOV	%RSP,%RBP

0x402c04 PUSH	%RBX

0x402c05 SUB	$0x28,%RSP

0x402c09 MOVL	$0,-0xc(%RBP)

0x402c10 MOV	(%RDI),%EBX

0x402c12 MOVQ	$0,-0x20(%RBP)

0x402c1a MOVQ	$0x3344ffff,-0x18(%RBP)

0x402c22 MOVQ	$0x1,-0x28(%RBP)

0x402c2a SUB	$0x8,%RSP

0x402c2e LEA	-0x28(%RBP),%RAX

0x402c32 MOV	$0x4ceb87dc0,%RDI

0x402c3c MOV	$0x401050,%R10

0x402c46 LEA	-0xc(%RBP),%RCX

0x402c4a LEA	-0x20(%RBP),%R8

0x402c4e LEA	-0x18(%RBP),%R9

0x402c52 MOV	%EBX,%ESI

0x402c54 MOV	$0x22,%EDX

0x402c59 PUSH	$0x1

0x402c5b PUSH	$0x1

0x402c5d PUSH	%RAX

0x402c5e CALL	%R10

0x402c61 ADD	$0x20,%RSP

0x402c65 MOV	-0x20(%RBP),%RAX

0x402c69 MOV	-0x18(%RBP),%RSI

0x402c6d CMP	%RSI,%RAX

0x402c70 JA	402d3c

0x402c76 SUB	%RAX,%RSI

0x402c79 INC	%RSI

0x402c7c MOV	%RSI,%RDX

0x402c7f MOV	$0x405060,%RCX

0x402c89 AND	$0x7ffffff8,%RDX

0x402c90 JE	402d00

0x402c92 LEA	(,%RAX,8),%RDI

0x402c9a XOR	%R8D,%R8D

0x402c9d NOPL	(%RAX)

(13) 0x402ca0 LEA	(%RDI,%R8,8),%R9

(13) 0x402ca4 VMOVUPD	(%RCX,%R9,1),%ZMM0

(13) 0x402cab VADDPD	%ZMM0,%ZMM0,%ZMM0

(13) 0x402cb1 VMOVUPD	%ZMM0,(%RCX,%R9,1)

(13) 0x402cb8 ADD	$0x8,%R8

(13) 0x402cbc CMP	%RDX,%R8

(13) 0x402cbf JB	402ca0

0x402cc1 CMP	%RDX,%RSI

0x402cc4 JE	402d3c

0x402cc6 VPBROADCASTQ	%RSI,%ZMM0

0x402ccc JMP	402d08

0x402cce NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

0x402cdd NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

0x402cec NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

0x402cfb NOPL	(%RAX,%RAX,1)

0x402d00 VPBROADCASTQ	%RSI,%ZMM0

0x402d06 XOR	%EDX,%EDX

0x402d08 VPBROADCASTQ	%RDX,%ZMM1

0x402d0e VPSUBQ	%ZMM1,%ZMM0,%ZMM0

0x402d14 MOV	$0x403140,%RSI

0x402d1e VPCMPNLEUQ	(%RSI),%ZMM0,%K1

0x402d25 ADD	%RDX,%RAX

0x402d28 VMOVUPD	(%RCX,%RAX,8),%ZMM0{%K1}{z}

0x402d2f VADDPD	%ZMM0,%ZMM0,%ZMM0

0x402d35 VMOVUPD	%ZMM0,(%RCX,%RAX,8){%K1}

0x402d3c MOV	$0x4ceb87de0,%RDI

0x402d46 MOV	$0x401030,%RAX

0x402d50 MOV	%EBX,%ESI

0x402d52 ADD	$0x28,%RSP

0x402d56 POP	%RBX

0x402d57 POP	%RBP

0x402d58 VZEROUPPER

0x402d5b JMP	%RAX

0x402d5d NOPL	(%RAX)

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libiomp5.so

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run icx_2

Source file and lines	stream.c:290-292
Module	exec

The function is defined in /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/isix05.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-373-7249/stream-triad/build/stream-triad/src/stream.c:290-292.

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 10.67 to 3.50 cycles (3.05x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your function is poorly vectorized. Only 30% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions). By fully vectorizing your function, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 10.67 to 8.86 cycles (1.20x speedup).

Details

27% of SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

66% of SSE/AVX loads are used in vector version.
20% of SSE/AVX stores are used in vector version.
15% of SSE/AVX instructions that are not load, store, addition, subtraction nor multiply instructions are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized function can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

Masked instructions

Detected masked instructions.

Details

Vector registers are partially exploited, which is expected if your function is irregular or mixes elements of different sizes.

Workaround

If your function is irregular, try to remove or hoist conditional structures out of your function. If it mixes elements of different sizes, try to uniformize them.

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

Calling (and then returning from) a function prevents many compiler optimizations (like vectorization), breaks control flow (which reduces pipeline performance) and executes extra instructions to save/restore the registers used inside it, which is very expensive (dozens of cycles). Consider to inline small functions.

unknown: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/isix05.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-373-7249/stream-triad/build/stream-triad/src/stream.c:290

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

VZEROUPPER: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/isix05.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-373-7249/stream-triad/build/stream-triad/src/stream.c:290

Type of elements and instruction set

1 AVX-512 instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in vector mode (eight at a time).

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function is composed of 8 FP arithmetical operations:

8: addition or subtraction

The binary function is loading 148 bytes (18 double precision FP elements). The binary function is storing 92 bytes (11 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.03 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	63
nb uops	64
loop length	319
used x86 registers	11
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	0
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	2
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	10.67 cycles
front end	10.67 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11
uops	4.50	4.40	2.00	2.00	5.50	4.30	4.40	5.50	5.50	5.50	4.40	2.00
cycles	4.50	4.40	2.00	2.00	5.50	4.30	4.40	5.50	5.50	5.50	4.40	2.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0 (256 bits): VPU, BRU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P1 (256 bits): ALU, VPU
P2 (512 bits): load
P3 (512 bits): load
P4 (512 bits): store data
P5 (512 bits): ALU, VPU
P6: ALU, BRU
P7: store address
P8: store address
P9 (512 bits): store data
P10: ALU
P11 (512 bits): load

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	10.67
Dispatch	5.50
Overall L1	10.67

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	15%
load	50%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	15%

all	100%
load	100%
store	100%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	27%
load	66%
store	20%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	15%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	19%
load	53%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	18%

all	100%
load	100%
store	100%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	30%
load	68%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	18%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Detected masked instructions: assuming all mask elements are active. Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 10.67 cycles. At this rate:

7% of peak load performance is reached (13.88 out of 192.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
6% of peak store performance is reached (8.63 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Performance is limited by instruction throughput (loading/decoding program instructions to execution core) (front-end is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 10.67 to 5.50 cycles (1.94x speedup).

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 402c00

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x28,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVL $0,-0xc(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV (%RDI),%EBX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0,-0x20(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x3344ffff,-0x18(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x28(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x28(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x4ceb87dc0,%RDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV $0x401050,%R10	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	scal (12.5%)
LEA -0xc(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x20(%RBP),%R8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x18(%RBP),%R9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (6.3%)
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
CALL %R10	2	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	2.14	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x20(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	N/A
MOV -0x18(%RBP),%RSI	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	N/A
CMP %RSI,%RAX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JA 402d3c <main.extracted.45+0x13c>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
SUB %RAX,%RSI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
INC %RSI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %RSI,%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x405060,%RCX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
AND $0x7ffffff8,%RDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1-2	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JE 402d00 <main.extracted.45+0x100>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
LEA (,%RAX,8),%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
XOR %R8D,%R8D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
NOPL (%RAX)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
CMP %RDX,%RSI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JE 402d3c <main.extracted.45+0x13c>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %RSI,%ZMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	scal (12.5%)
JMP 402d08 <main.extracted.45+0x108>	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5.84	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPL (%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %RSI,%ZMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	scal (12.5%)
XOR %EDX,%EDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
VPBROADCASTQ %RDX,%ZMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	scal (12.5%)
VPSUBQ %ZMM1,%ZMM0,%ZMM0	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-1	0.50	vect (100.0%)
MOV $0x403140,%RSI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
VPCMPNLEUQ (%RSI),%ZMM0,%K1																vect (100.0%)
ADD %RDX,%RAX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
VMOVUPD (%RCX,%RAX,8),%ZMM0{%K1}{z}	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0-1	0.50	vect (100.0%)
VADDPD %ZMM0,%ZMM0,%ZMM0	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (100.0%)
VMOVUPD %ZMM0,(%RCX,%RAX,8){%K1}	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0-1	1	vect (100.0%)
MOV $0x4ceb87de0,%RDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV $0x401030,%RAX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD $0x28,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
VZEROUPPER	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	vect (25.0%)
JMP %RAX	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	1.75	N/A
NOPL (%RAX)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run icx_2

Source file and lines	stream.c:290-292
Module	exec

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 10.67 to 3.50 cycles (3.05x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Details

27% of SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

66% of SSE/AVX loads are used in vector version.
20% of SSE/AVX stores are used in vector version.
15% of SSE/AVX instructions that are not load, store, addition, subtraction nor multiply instructions are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized function can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

Masked instructions

Detected masked instructions.

Details

Vector registers are partially exploited, which is expected if your function is irregular or mixes elements of different sizes.

Workaround

If your function is irregular, try to remove or hoist conditional structures out of your function. If it mixes elements of different sizes, try to uniformize them.

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

unknown: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/isix05.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-373-7249/stream-triad/build/stream-triad/src/stream.c:290

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

VZEROUPPER: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/isix05.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-373-7249/stream-triad/build/stream-triad/src/stream.c:290

Type of elements and instruction set

1 AVX-512 instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in vector mode (eight at a time).

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function is composed of 8 FP arithmetical operations:

8: addition or subtraction

The binary function is loading 148 bytes (18 double precision FP elements). The binary function is storing 92 bytes (11 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.03 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	63
nb uops	64
loop length	319
used x86 registers	11
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	0
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	2
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	10.67 cycles
front end	10.67 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11
uops	4.50	4.40	2.00	2.00	5.50	4.30	4.40	5.50	5.50	5.50	4.40	2.00
cycles	4.50	4.40	2.00	2.00	5.50	4.30	4.40	5.50	5.50	5.50	4.40	2.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0 (256 bits): VPU, BRU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P1 (256 bits): ALU, VPU
P2 (512 bits): load
P3 (512 bits): load
P4 (512 bits): store data
P5 (512 bits): ALU, VPU
P6: ALU, BRU
P7: store address
P8: store address
P9 (512 bits): store data
P10: ALU
P11 (512 bits): load

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	10.67
Dispatch	5.50
Overall L1	10.67

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	15%
load	50%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	15%

all	100%
load	100%
store	100%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	27%
load	66%
store	20%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	15%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	19%
load	53%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	18%

all	100%
load	100%
store	100%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	30%
load	68%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	18%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Detected masked instructions: assuming all mask elements are active. Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 10.67 cycles. At this rate:

7% of peak load performance is reached (13.88 out of 192.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
6% of peak store performance is reached (8.63 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 402c00

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x28,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVL $0,-0xc(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV (%RDI),%EBX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0,-0x20(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x3344ffff,-0x18(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x28(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x28(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x4ceb87dc0,%RDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV $0x401050,%R10	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	scal (12.5%)
LEA -0xc(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x20(%RBP),%R8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x18(%RBP),%R9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (6.3%)
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
CALL %R10	2	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	2.14	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x20(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	N/A
MOV -0x18(%RBP),%RSI	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	N/A
CMP %RSI,%RAX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JA 402d3c <main.extracted.45+0x13c>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
SUB %RAX,%RSI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
INC %RSI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %RSI,%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x405060,%RCX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
AND $0x7ffffff8,%RDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1-2	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JE 402d00 <main.extracted.45+0x100>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
LEA (,%RAX,8),%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
XOR %R8D,%R8D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
NOPL (%RAX)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
CMP %RDX,%RSI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JE 402d3c <main.extracted.45+0x13c>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %RSI,%ZMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	scal (12.5%)
JMP 402d08 <main.extracted.45+0x108>	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5.84	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPL (%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %RSI,%ZMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	scal (12.5%)
XOR %EDX,%EDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
VPBROADCASTQ %RDX,%ZMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	scal (12.5%)
VPSUBQ %ZMM1,%ZMM0,%ZMM0	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-1	0.50	vect (100.0%)
MOV $0x403140,%RSI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
VPCMPNLEUQ (%RSI),%ZMM0,%K1																vect (100.0%)
ADD %RDX,%RAX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
VMOVUPD (%RCX,%RAX,8),%ZMM0{%K1}{z}	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0-1	0.50	vect (100.0%)
VADDPD %ZMM0,%ZMM0,%ZMM0	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (100.0%)
VMOVUPD %ZMM0,(%RCX,%RAX,8){%K1}	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0-1	1	vect (100.0%)
MOV $0x4ceb87de0,%RDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV $0x401030,%RAX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD $0x28,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
VZEROUPPER	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	vect (25.0%)
JMP %RAX	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	1.75	N/A
NOPL (%RAX)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A

Name	Coverage (%)	Time (s)
▼main.extracted.45–	0.63	0.03
○Loop 13 - stream.c:291-292 - exec	0.63	0.03

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Masked instructions

Details

Workaround

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Masked instructions

Details

Workaround

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code