OV - exec - Function main.extracted.50

	Function: main.extracted.50	Module: exec	Source: stream.c:330-332	Coverage (incl. loops): 88.35% \| (excl. loops): 0.00%

/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/isix04.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-373-8011/stream-scale/build/stream-scale/src/stream.c: 330 - 332

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

330: #pragma omp parallel for

331: 	for (j=0; j<STREAM_ARRAY_SIZE; j++)

332: 	    b[j] = scalar*c[j];

0x402d60 PUSH	%RBP

0x402d61 MOV	%RSP,%RBP

0x402d64 PUSH	%RBX

0x402d65 SUB	$0x28,%RSP

0x402d69 MOVL	$0,-0xc(%RBP)

0x402d70 MOV	(%RDI),%EBX

0x402d72 MOVQ	$0,-0x20(%RBP)

0x402d7a MOVQ	$0x3344ffff,-0x18(%RBP)

0x402d82 MOVQ	$0x1,-0x28(%RBP)

0x402d8a SUB	$0x8,%RSP

0x402d8e LEA	-0x28(%RBP),%RAX

0x402d92 MOV	$0x4ceb87e20,%RDI

0x402d9c MOV	$0x401050,%R10

0x402da6 LEA	-0xc(%RBP),%RCX

0x402daa LEA	-0x20(%RBP),%R8

0x402dae LEA	-0x18(%RBP),%R9

0x402db2 MOV	%EBX,%ESI

0x402db4 MOV	$0x22,%EDX

0x402db9 PUSH	$0x1

0x402dbb PUSH	$0x1

0x402dbd PUSH	%RAX

0x402dbe CALL	%R10

0x402dc1 ADD	$0x20,%RSP

0x402dc5 MOV	-0x20(%RBP),%RAX

0x402dc9 MOV	-0x18(%RBP),%R8

0x402dcd CMP	%R8,%RAX

0x402dd0 JA	402ebc

0x402dd6 SUB	%RAX,%R8

0x402dd9 INC	%R8

0x402ddc MOV	%R8,%RDI

0x402ddf MOV	$0x334905060,%RCX

0x402de9 MOV	$0x4030d0,%RDX

0x402df3 MOV	$0x19a685060,%RSI

0x402dfd AND	$0x7ffffff8,%RDI

0x402e04 JE	402e80

0x402e06 LEA	(,%RAX,8),%R9

0x402e0e XOR	%R10D,%R10D

0x402e11 VBROADCASTSD	(%RDX),%ZMM0

0x402e17 NOPW	(%RAX,%RAX,1)

(14) 0x402e20 LEA	(%R9,%R10,8),%R11

(14) 0x402e24 VMULPD	(%RCX,%R11,1),%ZMM0,%ZMM1

(14) 0x402e2b VMOVUPD	%ZMM1,(%RSI,%R11,1)

(14) 0x402e32 ADD	$0x8,%R10

(14) 0x402e36 CMP	%RDI,%R10

(14) 0x402e39 JB	402e20

0x402e3b CMP	%RDI,%R8

0x402e3e JE	402ebc

0x402e40 VPBROADCASTQ	%R8,%ZMM0

0x402e46 JMP	402e88

0x402e48 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

0x402e57 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

0x402e66 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

0x402e75 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

0x402e80 VPBROADCASTQ	%R8,%ZMM0

0x402e86 XOR	%EDI,%EDI

0x402e88 VPBROADCASTQ	%RDI,%ZMM1

0x402e8e VPSUBQ	%ZMM1,%ZMM0,%ZMM0

0x402e94 MOV	$0x403180,%R8

0x402e9e VPCMPNLEUQ	(%R8),%ZMM0,%K1

0x402ea5 ADD	%RDI,%RAX

0x402ea8 VMOVUPD	(%RCX,%RAX,8),%ZMM0{%K1}{z}

0x402eaf VMULPD	(%RDX){1to8},%ZMM0,%ZMM0

0x402eb5 VMOVUPD	%ZMM0,(%RSI,%RAX,8){%K1}

0x402ebc MOV	$0x4ceb87e40,%RDI

0x402ec6 MOV	$0x401030,%RAX

0x402ed0 MOV	%EBX,%ESI

0x402ed2 ADD	$0x28,%RSP

0x402ed6 POP	%RBX

0x402ed7 POP	%RBP

0x402ed8 VZEROUPPER

0x402edb JMP	%RAX

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libiomp5.so

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run icx_2

Source file and lines	stream.c:330-332
Module	exec

The function is defined in /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/isix04.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-373-8011/stream-scale/build/stream-scale/src/stream.c:330-332.

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 11.00 to 3.50 cycles (3.14x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your function is poorly vectorized. Only 34% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions). By fully vectorizing your function, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 11.00 to 9.19 cycles (1.20x speedup).

Details

31% of SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

60% of SSE/AVX loads are used in vector version.
20% of SSE/AVX stores are used in vector version.
20% of SSE/AVX instructions that are not load, store, addition, subtraction nor multiply instructions are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized function can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

Masked instructions

Detected masked instructions.

Details

Vector registers are partially exploited, which is expected if your function is irregular or mixes elements of different sizes.

Workaround

If your function is irregular, try to remove or hoist conditional structures out of your function. If it mixes elements of different sizes, try to uniformize them.

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

Calling (and then returning from) a function prevents many compiler optimizations (like vectorization), breaks control flow (which reduces pipeline performance) and executes extra instructions to save/restore the registers used inside it, which is very expensive (dozens of cycles). Consider to inline small functions.

unknown: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/isix04.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-373-8011/stream-scale/build/stream-scale/src/stream.c:330

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

VZEROUPPER: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/isix04.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-373-8011/stream-scale/build/stream-scale/src/stream.c:330

Type of elements and instruction set

1 AVX-512 instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in vector mode (eight at a time).

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function is composed of 8 FP arithmetical operations:

8: multiply

The binary function is loading 164 bytes (20 double precision FP elements). The binary function is storing 92 bytes (11 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.03 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	65
nb uops	66
loop length	354
used x86 registers	11
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	0
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	2
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	11.00 cycles
front end	11.00 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11
uops	4.90	4.80	2.67	2.67	5.50	4.70	4.80	5.50	5.50	5.50	4.80	2.67
cycles	4.90	4.80	2.67	2.67	5.50	4.70	4.80	5.50	5.50	5.50	4.80	2.67

Execution ports to units layout:

P0 (256 bits): VPU, BRU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P1 (256 bits): ALU, VPU
P2 (512 bits): load
P3 (512 bits): load
P4 (512 bits): store data
P5 (512 bits): ALU, VPU
P6: ALU, BRU
P7: store address
P8: store address
P9 (512 bits): store data
P10: ALU
P11 (512 bits): load

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	11.00
Dispatch	5.50
Overall L1	11.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	20%
load	50%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	22%

all	75%
load	66%
store	100%
mul	100%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

INT+FP

all	31%
load	60%
store	20%
mul	100%
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	20%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	22%
load	53%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	22%

all	78%
load	70%
store	100%
mul	100%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	12%

INT+FP

all	34%
load	63%
store	25%
mul	100%
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	21%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Detected masked instructions: assuming all mask elements are active. Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 11.00 cycles. At this rate:

7% of peak load performance is reached (14.91 out of 192.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
6% of peak store performance is reached (8.36 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Performance is limited by instruction throughput (loading/decoding program instructions to execution core) (front-end is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 11.00 to 5.50 cycles (2.00x speedup).

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 402d60

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x28,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVL $0,-0xc(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV (%RDI),%EBX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0,-0x20(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x3344ffff,-0x18(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x28(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x28(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x4ceb87e20,%RDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV $0x401050,%R10	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	scal (12.5%)
LEA -0xc(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x20(%RBP),%R8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x18(%RBP),%R9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
CALL %R10	2	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	2.14	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x20(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	N/A
MOV -0x18(%RBP),%R8	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	N/A
CMP %R8,%RAX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JA 402ebc <main.extracted.50+0x15c>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
SUB %RAX,%R8	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
INC %R8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %R8,%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x334905060,%RCX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV $0x4030d0,%RDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV $0x19a685060,%RSI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
AND $0x7ffffff8,%RDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1-2	0.20	N/A
JE 402e80 <main.extracted.50+0x120>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
LEA (,%RAX,8),%R9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
XOR %R10D,%R10D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
VBROADCASTSD (%RDX),%ZMM0	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	3	0.33	scal (12.5%)
NOPW (%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
CMP %RDI,%R8	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JE 402ebc <main.extracted.50+0x15c>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %R8,%ZMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	scal (12.5%)
JMP 402e88 <main.extracted.50+0x128>	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5.84	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %R8,%ZMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	scal (12.5%)
XOR %EDI,%EDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %RDI,%ZMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	scal (12.5%)
VPSUBQ %ZMM1,%ZMM0,%ZMM0	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-1	0.50	vect (100.0%)
MOV $0x403180,%R8	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
VPCMPNLEUQ (%R8),%ZMM0,%K1																vect (100.0%)
ADD %RDI,%RAX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
VMOVUPD (%RCX,%RAX,8),%ZMM0{%K1}{z}	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0-1	0.50	vect (100.0%)
VMULPD (%RDX){1to8},%ZMM0,%ZMM0	1	0.50	0	0.33	0.33	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	4	0.50	vect (100.0%)
VMOVUPD %ZMM0,(%RSI,%RAX,8){%K1}	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0-1	1	vect (100.0%)
MOV $0x4ceb87e40,%RDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV $0x401030,%RAX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD $0x28,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
VZEROUPPER	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	vect (25.0%)
JMP %RAX	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	1.75	N/A

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run icx_2

Source file and lines	stream.c:330-332
Module	exec

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 11.00 to 3.50 cycles (3.14x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Details

31% of SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

60% of SSE/AVX loads are used in vector version.
20% of SSE/AVX stores are used in vector version.
20% of SSE/AVX instructions that are not load, store, addition, subtraction nor multiply instructions are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized function can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

Masked instructions

Detected masked instructions.

Details

Vector registers are partially exploited, which is expected if your function is irregular or mixes elements of different sizes.

Workaround

If your function is irregular, try to remove or hoist conditional structures out of your function. If it mixes elements of different sizes, try to uniformize them.

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

unknown: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/isix04.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-373-8011/stream-scale/build/stream-scale/src/stream.c:330

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

VZEROUPPER: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/isix04.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-373-8011/stream-scale/build/stream-scale/src/stream.c:330

Type of elements and instruction set

1 AVX-512 instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in vector mode (eight at a time).

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function is composed of 8 FP arithmetical operations:

8: multiply

The binary function is loading 164 bytes (20 double precision FP elements). The binary function is storing 92 bytes (11 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.03 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	65
nb uops	66
loop length	354
used x86 registers	11
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	0
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	2
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	11.00 cycles
front end	11.00 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11
uops	4.90	4.80	2.67	2.67	5.50	4.70	4.80	5.50	5.50	5.50	4.80	2.67
cycles	4.90	4.80	2.67	2.67	5.50	4.70	4.80	5.50	5.50	5.50	4.80	2.67

Execution ports to units layout:

P0 (256 bits): VPU, BRU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P1 (256 bits): ALU, VPU
P2 (512 bits): load
P3 (512 bits): load
P4 (512 bits): store data
P5 (512 bits): ALU, VPU
P6: ALU, BRU
P7: store address
P8: store address
P9 (512 bits): store data
P10: ALU
P11 (512 bits): load

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	11.00
Dispatch	5.50
Overall L1	11.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	20%
load	50%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	22%

all	75%
load	66%
store	100%
mul	100%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

INT+FP

all	31%
load	60%
store	20%
mul	100%
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	20%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	22%
load	53%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	22%

all	78%
load	70%
store	100%
mul	100%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	12%

INT+FP

all	34%
load	63%
store	25%
mul	100%
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	21%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Detected masked instructions: assuming all mask elements are active. Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 11.00 cycles. At this rate:

7% of peak load performance is reached (14.91 out of 192.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
6% of peak store performance is reached (8.36 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 402d60

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x28,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVL $0,-0xc(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV (%RDI),%EBX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0,-0x20(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x3344ffff,-0x18(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x28(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x28(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x4ceb87e20,%RDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV $0x401050,%R10	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	scal (12.5%)
LEA -0xc(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x20(%RBP),%R8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x18(%RBP),%R9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
CALL %R10	2	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	2.14	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x20(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	N/A
MOV -0x18(%RBP),%R8	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	N/A
CMP %R8,%RAX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JA 402ebc <main.extracted.50+0x15c>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
SUB %RAX,%R8	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
INC %R8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %R8,%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x334905060,%RCX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV $0x4030d0,%RDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV $0x19a685060,%RSI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
AND $0x7ffffff8,%RDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1-2	0.20	N/A
JE 402e80 <main.extracted.50+0x120>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
LEA (,%RAX,8),%R9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
XOR %R10D,%R10D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
VBROADCASTSD (%RDX),%ZMM0	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	3	0.33	scal (12.5%)
NOPW (%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
CMP %RDI,%R8	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JE 402ebc <main.extracted.50+0x15c>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %R8,%ZMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	scal (12.5%)
JMP 402e88 <main.extracted.50+0x128>	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5.84	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %R8,%ZMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	scal (12.5%)
XOR %EDI,%EDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %RDI,%ZMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	scal (12.5%)
VPSUBQ %ZMM1,%ZMM0,%ZMM0	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-1	0.50	vect (100.0%)
MOV $0x403180,%R8	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
VPCMPNLEUQ (%R8),%ZMM0,%K1																vect (100.0%)
ADD %RDI,%RAX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
VMOVUPD (%RCX,%RAX,8),%ZMM0{%K1}{z}	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0-1	0.50	vect (100.0%)
VMULPD (%RDX){1to8},%ZMM0,%ZMM0	1	0.50	0	0.33	0.33	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	4	0.50	vect (100.0%)
VMOVUPD %ZMM0,(%RSI,%RAX,8){%K1}	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0-1	1	vect (100.0%)
MOV $0x4ceb87e40,%RDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV $0x401030,%RAX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD $0x28,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
VZEROUPPER	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	vect (25.0%)
JMP %RAX	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	1.75	N/A

Name	Coverage (%)	Time (s)
▼main.extracted.50–	88.35	2.94
○Loop 14 - stream.c:331-332 - exec	88.35	2.83

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Masked instructions

Details

Workaround

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Masked instructions

Details

Workaround

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code