OV - exec - Function main.extracted.50

	Function: main.extracted.50	Module: exec	Source: stream.c:330-332	Coverage (incl. loops): 90.05% \| (excl. loops): 0.00%

/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/isix04.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-373-8011/stream-scale/build/stream-scale/src/stream.c: 330 - 332

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

330: #pragma omp parallel for

331: 	for (j=0; j<STREAM_ARRAY_SIZE; j++)

332: 	    b[j] = scalar*c[j];

0x402e50 PUSH	%RBP

0x402e51 MOV	%RSP,%RBP

0x402e54 PUSH	%R14

0x402e56 PUSH	%RBX

0x402e57 SUB	$0x20,%RSP

0x402e5b MOVL	$0,-0x14(%RBP)

0x402e62 MOV	(%RDI),%EBX

0x402e64 MOVQ	$0,-0x28(%RBP)

0x402e6c MOVQ	$0x3344ffff,-0x20(%RBP)

0x402e74 MOVQ	$0x1,-0x30(%RBP)

0x402e7c SUB	$0x8,%RSP

0x402e80 LEA	-0x30(%RBP),%RAX

0x402e84 MOV	$0x4ceb87e20,%RDI

0x402e8e MOV	$0x401050,%R10

0x402e98 LEA	-0x14(%RBP),%RCX

0x402e9c LEA	-0x28(%RBP),%R8

0x402ea0 LEA	-0x20(%RBP),%R9

0x402ea4 MOV	%EBX,%ESI

0x402ea6 MOV	$0x22,%EDX

0x402eab PUSH	$0x1

0x402ead PUSH	$0x1

0x402eaf PUSH	%RAX

0x402eb0 CALL	%R10

0x402eb3 ADD	$0x20,%RSP

0x402eb7 MOV	-0x28(%RBP),%RDI

0x402ebb MOV	-0x20(%RBP),%RAX

0x402ebf CMP	%RAX,%RDI

0x402ec2 JA	402f68

0x402ec8 MOV	%RAX,%R9

0x402ecb SUB	%RDI,%R9

0x402ece INC	%R9

0x402ed1 MOV	%R9,%RCX

0x402ed4 MOV	$0x334905060,%RDX

0x402ede MOV	$0x4030d0,%R8

0x402ee8 MOV	$0x19a685060,%RSI

0x402ef2 AND	$0x7ffffffc,%RCX

0x402ef9 JE	402f30

0x402efb LEA	(,%RDI,8),%R10

0x402f03 XOR	%R11D,%R11D

0x402f06 VBROADCASTSD	(%R8),%YMM0

0x402f0b NOPL	(%RAX,%RAX,1)

(16) 0x402f10 LEA	(%R10,%R11,8),%R14

(16) 0x402f14 VMULPD	(%RDX,%R14,1),%YMM0,%YMM1

(16) 0x402f1a VMOVUPD	%YMM1,(%RSI,%R14,1)

(16) 0x402f20 ADD	$0x4,%R11

(16) 0x402f24 CMP	%RCX,%R11

(16) 0x402f27 JB	402f10

0x402f29 CMP	%RCX,%R9

0x402f2c JNE	402f32

0x402f2e JMP	402f68

0x402f30 XOR	%ECX,%ECX

0x402f32 SUB	%RCX,%RAX

0x402f35 SUB	%RDI,%RAX

0x402f38 INC	%RAX

0x402f3b ADD	%RDI,%RCX

0x402f3e SAL	$0x3,%RCX

0x402f42 XOR	%EDI,%EDI

0x402f44 VMOVSD	(%R8),%XMM0

0x402f49 NOPL	(%RAX)

(15) 0x402f50 LEA	(%RCX,%RDI,8),%R8

(15) 0x402f54 VMULSD	(%RDX,%R8,1),%XMM0,%XMM1

(15) 0x402f5a VMOVSD	%XMM1,(%RSI,%R8,1)

(15) 0x402f60 INC	%RDI

(15) 0x402f63 CMP	%RDI,%RAX

(15) 0x402f66 JNE	402f50

0x402f68 MOV	$0x4ceb87e40,%RDI

0x402f72 MOV	$0x401030,%RAX

0x402f7c MOV	%EBX,%ESI

0x402f7e ADD	$0x20,%RSP

0x402f82 POP	%RBX

0x402f83 POP	%R14

0x402f85 POP	%RBP

0x402f86 VZEROUPPER

0x402f89 JMP	%RAX

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libiomp5.so

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run orig_0

Source file and lines	stream.c:330-332
Module	exec

The function is defined in /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/isix04.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-373-8011/stream-scale/build/stream-scale/src/stream.c:330-332.

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 10.67 to 1.83 cycles (5.82x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your function is probably not vectorized. Only 10% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions).

Details

Store and arithmetical SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers).

Workaround

Read the "512-bits vectorization" report at "Potential" confidence level.

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

512-bits vectorization

On some x86 processors supporting 512-bits vectorization, compilers are often too conservative and limit vectorization to 256 bits. Performance can then be improved by enforcing 512-bits vectorization, especially with many vectorized and high trip count loops. 512-bits vectorization performance overhead (compared to 256-bits) is generally lower on newer processors.

Workaround

Recompile with -mprefer-vector-width=512

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

Calling (and then returning from) a function prevents many compiler optimizations (like vectorization), breaks control flow (which reduces pipeline performance) and executes extra instructions to save/restore the registers used inside it, which is very expensive (dozens of cycles). Consider to inline small functions.

unknown: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/isix04.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-373-8011/stream-scale/build/stream-scale/src/stream.c:330

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

VZEROUPPER: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/isix04.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-373-8011/stream-scale/build/stream-scale/src/stream.c:330

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 36 bytes. The binary function is storing 28 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	62
nb uops	64
loop length	266
used x86 registers	13
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	1
used ymm registers	1
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	10.67 cycles
front end	10.67 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11
uops	4.20	4.20	2.67	2.67	5.50	4.20	4.20	5.50	5.50	5.50	4.20	2.67
cycles	4.20	4.20	2.67	2.67	5.50	4.20	4.20	5.50	5.50	5.50	4.20	2.67

Execution ports to units layout:

P0 (256 bits): VPU, BRU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P1 (256 bits): ALU, VPU
P2 (512 bits): load
P3 (512 bits): load
P4 (512 bits): store data
P5 (512 bits): ALU, VPU
P6: ALU, BRU
P7: store address
P8: store address
P9 (512 bits): store data
P10: ALU
P11 (512 bits): load

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	10.67
Dispatch	5.50
Overall L1	10.67

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	4%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	6%

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

INT+FP

all	4%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	6%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	10%
load	6%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	11%

all	12%
load	12%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	12%

INT+FP

all	10%
load	10%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	11%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 10.67 cycles. At this rate:

1% of peak load performance is reached (3.38 out of 192.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
2% of peak store performance is reached (2.63 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Performance is limited by instruction throughput (loading/decoding program instructions to execution core) (front-end is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 10.67 to 5.50 cycles (1.94x speedup).

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 402e50

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x20,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVL $0,-0x14(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV (%RDI),%EBX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0,-0x28(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x3344ffff,-0x20(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x30(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x4ceb87e20,%RDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV $0x401050,%R10	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	scal (12.5%)
LEA -0x14(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x28(%RBP),%R8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x20(%RBP),%R9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (6.3%)
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
CALL %R10	2	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	2.14	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x28(%RBP),%RDI	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	N/A
MOV -0x20(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	N/A
CMP %RAX,%RDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JA 402f68 <main.extracted.50+0x118>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
MOV %RAX,%R9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
SUB %RDI,%R9	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
INC %R9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV %R9,%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x334905060,%RDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x4030d0,%R8	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV $0x19a685060,%RSI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	scal (12.5%)
AND $0x7ffffffc,%RCX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1-2	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JE 402f30 <main.extracted.50+0xe0>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
LEA (,%RDI,8),%R10	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
XOR %R11D,%R11D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
VBROADCASTSD (%R8),%YMM0	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	3	0.33	scal (12.5%)
NOPL (%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
CMP %RCX,%R9	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JNE 402f32 <main.extracted.50+0xe2>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
JMP 402f68 <main.extracted.50+0x118>	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5.84	N/A
XOR %ECX,%ECX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
SUB %RCX,%RAX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
SUB %RDI,%RAX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
INC %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD %RDI,%RCX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
SAL $0x3,%RCX	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0-2	0.50	scal (12.5%)
XOR %EDI,%EDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
VMOVSD (%R8),%XMM0	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
NOPL (%RAX)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x4ceb87e40,%RDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV $0x401030,%RAX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
VZEROUPPER	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	vect (25.0%)
JMP %RAX	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	1.75	N/A

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run orig_0

Source file and lines	stream.c:330-332
Module	exec

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 10.67 to 1.83 cycles (5.82x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your function is probably not vectorized. Only 10% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions).

Details

Store and arithmetical SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers).

Workaround

Read the "512-bits vectorization" report at "Potential" confidence level.

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

512-bits vectorization

Workaround

Recompile with -mprefer-vector-width=512

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

unknown: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/isix04.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-373-8011/stream-scale/build/stream-scale/src/stream.c:330

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

VZEROUPPER: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/isix04.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-373-8011/stream-scale/build/stream-scale/src/stream.c:330

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 36 bytes. The binary function is storing 28 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	62
nb uops	64
loop length	266
used x86 registers	13
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	1
used ymm registers	1
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	10.67 cycles
front end	10.67 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11
uops	4.20	4.20	2.67	2.67	5.50	4.20	4.20	5.50	5.50	5.50	4.20	2.67
cycles	4.20	4.20	2.67	2.67	5.50	4.20	4.20	5.50	5.50	5.50	4.20	2.67

Execution ports to units layout:

P0 (256 bits): VPU, BRU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P1 (256 bits): ALU, VPU
P2 (512 bits): load
P3 (512 bits): load
P4 (512 bits): store data
P5 (512 bits): ALU, VPU
P6: ALU, BRU
P7: store address
P8: store address
P9 (512 bits): store data
P10: ALU
P11 (512 bits): load

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	10.67
Dispatch	5.50
Overall L1	10.67

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	4%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	6%

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

INT+FP

all	4%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	6%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	10%
load	6%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	11%

all	12%
load	12%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	12%

INT+FP

all	10%
load	10%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	11%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 10.67 cycles. At this rate:

1% of peak load performance is reached (3.38 out of 192.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
2% of peak store performance is reached (2.63 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 402e50

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x20,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVL $0,-0x14(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV (%RDI),%EBX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0,-0x28(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x3344ffff,-0x20(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x30(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x4ceb87e20,%RDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV $0x401050,%R10	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	scal (12.5%)
LEA -0x14(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x28(%RBP),%R8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x20(%RBP),%R9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (6.3%)
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
CALL %R10	2	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	2.14	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x28(%RBP),%RDI	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	N/A
MOV -0x20(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	N/A
CMP %RAX,%RDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JA 402f68 <main.extracted.50+0x118>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
MOV %RAX,%R9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
SUB %RDI,%R9	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
INC %R9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV %R9,%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x334905060,%RDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x4030d0,%R8	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV $0x19a685060,%RSI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	scal (12.5%)
AND $0x7ffffffc,%RCX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1-2	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JE 402f30 <main.extracted.50+0xe0>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
LEA (,%RDI,8),%R10	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
XOR %R11D,%R11D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
VBROADCASTSD (%R8),%YMM0	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	3	0.33	scal (12.5%)
NOPL (%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
CMP %RCX,%R9	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JNE 402f32 <main.extracted.50+0xe2>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
JMP 402f68 <main.extracted.50+0x118>	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5.84	N/A
XOR %ECX,%ECX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
SUB %RCX,%RAX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
SUB %RDI,%RAX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
INC %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD %RDI,%RCX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
SAL $0x3,%RCX	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0-2	0.50	scal (12.5%)
XOR %EDI,%EDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
VMOVSD (%R8),%XMM0	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
NOPL (%RAX)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x4ceb87e40,%RDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV $0x401030,%RAX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
VZEROUPPER	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	vect (25.0%)
JMP %RAX	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	1.75	N/A

Name	Coverage (%)	Time (s)
▼main.extracted.50–	90.05	2.94
○Loop 16 - stream.c:331-332 - exec	90.05	2.83
○Loop 15 - stream.c:331-332 - exec	0.00	0.00

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

512-bits vectorization

Workaround

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

512-bits vectorization

Workaround

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code