OV - exec - Function main.extracted.55

	Function: main.extracted.55	Module: exec	Source: stream.c:330-332	Coverage (incl. loops): 19.01% \| (excl. loops): 0.00%

/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/isix02.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-373-7005/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c: 330 - 332

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

330: #pragma omp parallel for

331: 	for (j=0; j<STREAM_ARRAY_SIZE; j++)

332: 	    b[j] = scalar*c[j];

0x402f60 PUSH	%RBP

0x402f61 MOV	%RSP,%RBP

0x402f64 PUSH	%RBX

0x402f65 SUB	$0x28,%RSP

0x402f69 MOVL	$0,-0xc(%RBP)

0x402f70 MOV	(%RDI),%EBX

0x402f72 MOVQ	$0,-0x20(%RBP)

0x402f7a MOVQ	$0x3344ffff,-0x18(%RBP)

0x402f82 MOVQ	$0x1,-0x28(%RBP)

0x402f8a SUB	$0x8,%RSP

0x402f8e LEA	-0x28(%RBP),%RAX

0x402f92 MOV	$0x4ceb89180,%RDI

0x402f9c MOV	$0x401050,%R10

0x402fa6 LEA	-0xc(%RBP),%RCX

0x402faa LEA	-0x20(%RBP),%R8

0x402fae LEA	-0x18(%RBP),%R9

0x402fb2 MOV	%EBX,%ESI

0x402fb4 MOV	$0x22,%EDX

0x402fb9 PUSH	$0x1

0x402fbb PUSH	$0x1

0x402fbd PUSH	%RAX

0x402fbe CALL	%R10

0x402fc1 ADD	$0x20,%RSP

0x402fc5 MOV	-0x20(%RBP),%RAX

0x402fc9 MOV	-0x18(%RBP),%R8

0x402fcd CMP	%R8,%RAX

0x402fd0 JA	4030bc

0x402fd6 SUB	%RAX,%R8

0x402fd9 INC	%R8

0x402fdc MOV	%R8,%RDI

0x402fdf MOV	$0x334906060,%RCX

0x402fe9 MOV	$0x4040d0,%RDX

0x402ff3 MOV	$0x19a686060,%RSI

0x402ffd AND	$0x7ffffff8,%RDI

0x403004 JE	403080

0x403006 LEA	(,%RAX,8),%R9

0x40300e XOR	%R10D,%R10D

0x403011 VBROADCASTSD	(%RDX),%ZMM0

0x403017 NOPW	(%RAX,%RAX,1)

(15) 0x403020 LEA	(%R9,%R10,8),%R11

(15) 0x403024 VMULPD	(%RCX,%R11,1),%ZMM0,%ZMM1

(15) 0x40302b VMOVUPD	%ZMM1,(%RSI,%R11,1)

(15) 0x403032 ADD	$0x8,%R10

(15) 0x403036 CMP	%RDI,%R10

(15) 0x403039 JB	403020

0x40303b CMP	%RDI,%R8

0x40303e JE	4030bc

0x403040 VPBROADCASTQ	%R8,%ZMM0

0x403046 JMP	403088

0x403048 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

0x403057 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

0x403066 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

0x403075 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

0x403080 VPBROADCASTQ	%R8,%ZMM0

0x403086 XOR	%EDI,%EDI

0x403088 VPBROADCASTQ	%RDI,%ZMM1

0x40308e VPSUBQ	%ZMM1,%ZMM0,%ZMM0

0x403094 MOV	$0x4041c0,%R8

0x40309e VPCMPNLEUQ	(%R8),%ZMM0,%K1

0x4030a5 ADD	%RDI,%RAX

0x4030a8 VMOVUPD	(%RCX,%RAX,8),%ZMM0{%K1}{z}

0x4030af VMULPD	(%RDX){1to8},%ZMM0,%ZMM0

0x4030b5 VMOVUPD	%ZMM0,(%RSI,%RAX,8){%K1}

0x4030bc MOV	$0x4ceb891a0,%RDI

0x4030c6 MOV	$0x401030,%RAX

0x4030d0 MOV	%EBX,%ESI

0x4030d2 ADD	$0x28,%RSP

0x4030d6 POP	%RBX

0x4030d7 POP	%RBP

0x4030d8 VZEROUPPER

0x4030db JMP	%RAX

0x4030dd NOPL	(%RAX)

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libiomp5.so

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run icx_2

Source file and lines	stream.c:330-332
Module	exec

The function is defined in /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/isix02.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-373-7005/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:330-332.

Warnings:
get_cqa_results:

Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 11.17 to 3.50 cycles (3.19x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your function is poorly vectorized. Only 34% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions). By fully vectorizing your function, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 11.17 to 9.36 cycles (1.19x speedup).

Details

31% of SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

60% of SSE/AVX loads are used in vector version.
20% of SSE/AVX stores are used in vector version.
20% of SSE/AVX instructions that are not load, store, addition, subtraction nor multiply instructions are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized function can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

Masked instructions

Detected masked instructions.

Details

Vector registers are partially exploited, which is expected if your function is irregular or mixes elements of different sizes.

Workaround

If your function is irregular, try to remove or hoist conditional structures out of your function. If it mixes elements of different sizes, try to uniformize them.

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

Calling (and then returning from) a function prevents many compiler optimizations (like vectorization), breaks control flow (which reduces pipeline performance) and executes extra instructions to save/restore the registers used inside it, which is very expensive (dozens of cycles). Consider to inline small functions.

unknown: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/isix02.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-373-7005/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:330

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

VZEROUPPER: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/isix02.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-373-7005/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:330

Type of elements and instruction set

1 AVX-512 instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in vector mode (eight at a time).

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function is composed of 8 FP arithmetical operations:

8: multiply

The binary function is loading 164 bytes (20 double precision FP elements). The binary function is storing 92 bytes (11 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.03 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	66
nb uops	67
loop length	357
used x86 registers	11
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	0
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	2
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	11.17 cycles
front end	11.17 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11
uops	4.90	4.80	2.67	2.67	5.50	4.70	4.80	5.50	5.50	5.50	4.80	2.67
cycles	4.90	4.80	2.67	2.67	5.50	4.70	4.80	5.50	5.50	5.50	4.80	2.67

Execution ports to units layout:

P0 (256 bits): VPU, BRU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P1 (256 bits): ALU, VPU
P2 (512 bits): load
P3 (512 bits): load
P4 (512 bits): store data
P5 (512 bits): ALU, VPU
P6: ALU, BRU
P7: store address
P8: store address
P9 (512 bits): store data
P10: ALU
P11 (512 bits): load

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	11.17
Dispatch	5.50
Overall L1	11.17

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	20%
load	50%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	22%

all	75%
load	66%
store	100%
mul	100%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

INT+FP

all	31%
load	60%
store	20%
mul	100%
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	20%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	22%
load	53%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	22%

all	78%
load	70%
store	100%
mul	100%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	12%

INT+FP

all	34%
load	63%
store	25%
mul	100%
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	21%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Detected masked instructions: assuming all mask elements are active. Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 11.17 cycles. At this rate:

7% of peak load performance is reached (14.69 out of 192.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
6% of peak store performance is reached (8.24 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Performance is limited by instruction throughput (loading/decoding program instructions to execution core) (front-end is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 11.17 to 5.50 cycles (2.03x speedup).

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 402f60

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x28,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVL $0,-0xc(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV (%RDI),%EBX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0,-0x20(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x3344ffff,-0x18(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x28(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x28(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x4ceb89180,%RDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV $0x401050,%R10	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	scal (12.5%)
LEA -0xc(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x20(%RBP),%R8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x18(%RBP),%R9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
CALL %R10	2	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	2.14	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x20(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	N/A
MOV -0x18(%RBP),%R8	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	N/A
CMP %R8,%RAX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JA 4030bc <main.extracted.55+0x15c>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
SUB %RAX,%R8	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
INC %R8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %R8,%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x334906060,%RCX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV $0x4040d0,%RDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV $0x19a686060,%RSI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
AND $0x7ffffff8,%RDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1-2	0.20	N/A
JE 403080 <main.extracted.55+0x120>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
LEA (,%RAX,8),%R9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
XOR %R10D,%R10D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
VBROADCASTSD (%RDX),%ZMM0	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	3	0.33	scal (12.5%)
NOPW (%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
CMP %RDI,%R8	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JE 4030bc <main.extracted.55+0x15c>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %R8,%ZMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	scal (12.5%)
JMP 403088 <main.extracted.55+0x128>	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5.84	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %R8,%ZMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	scal (12.5%)
XOR %EDI,%EDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %RDI,%ZMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	scal (12.5%)
VPSUBQ %ZMM1,%ZMM0,%ZMM0	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-1	0.50	vect (100.0%)
MOV $0x4041c0,%R8	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
VPCMPNLEUQ (%R8),%ZMM0,%K1																vect (100.0%)
ADD %RDI,%RAX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
VMOVUPD (%RCX,%RAX,8),%ZMM0{%K1}{z}	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0-1	0.50	vect (100.0%)
VMULPD (%RDX){1to8},%ZMM0,%ZMM0	1	0.50	0	0.33	0.33	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	4	0.50	vect (100.0%)
VMOVUPD %ZMM0,(%RSI,%RAX,8){%K1}	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0-1	1	vect (100.0%)
MOV $0x4ceb891a0,%RDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV $0x401030,%RAX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD $0x28,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
VZEROUPPER	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	vect (25.0%)
JMP %RAX	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	1.75	N/A
NOPL (%RAX)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run icx_2

Source file and lines	stream.c:330-332
Module	exec

The function is defined in /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/isix02.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-373-7005/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:330-332.

Warnings:
get_cqa_results:

Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 11.17 to 3.50 cycles (3.19x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Details

31% of SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

60% of SSE/AVX loads are used in vector version.
20% of SSE/AVX stores are used in vector version.
20% of SSE/AVX instructions that are not load, store, addition, subtraction nor multiply instructions are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized function can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

Masked instructions

Detected masked instructions.

Details

Vector registers are partially exploited, which is expected if your function is irregular or mixes elements of different sizes.

Workaround

If your function is irregular, try to remove or hoist conditional structures out of your function. If it mixes elements of different sizes, try to uniformize them.

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

unknown: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/isix02.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-373-7005/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:330

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

VZEROUPPER: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/isix02.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-373-7005/stream/build/stream/src/stream.c:330

Type of elements and instruction set

1 AVX-512 instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in vector mode (eight at a time).

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function is composed of 8 FP arithmetical operations:

8: multiply

The binary function is loading 164 bytes (20 double precision FP elements). The binary function is storing 92 bytes (11 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.03 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	66
nb uops	67
loop length	357
used x86 registers	11
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	0
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	2
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	11.17 cycles
front end	11.17 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11
uops	4.90	4.80	2.67	2.67	5.50	4.70	4.80	5.50	5.50	5.50	4.80	2.67
cycles	4.90	4.80	2.67	2.67	5.50	4.70	4.80	5.50	5.50	5.50	4.80	2.67

Execution ports to units layout:

P0 (256 bits): VPU, BRU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P1 (256 bits): ALU, VPU
P2 (512 bits): load
P3 (512 bits): load
P4 (512 bits): store data
P5 (512 bits): ALU, VPU
P6: ALU, BRU
P7: store address
P8: store address
P9 (512 bits): store data
P10: ALU
P11 (512 bits): load

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	11.17
Dispatch	5.50
Overall L1	11.17

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	20%
load	50%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	22%

all	75%
load	66%
store	100%
mul	100%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

INT+FP

all	31%
load	60%
store	20%
mul	100%
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	20%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	22%
load	53%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	22%

all	78%
load	70%
store	100%
mul	100%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	12%

INT+FP

all	34%
load	63%
store	25%
mul	100%
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	21%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Detected masked instructions: assuming all mask elements are active. Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 11.17 cycles. At this rate:

7% of peak load performance is reached (14.69 out of 192.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
6% of peak store performance is reached (8.24 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 402f60

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x28,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVL $0,-0xc(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV (%RDI),%EBX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0,-0x20(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x3344ffff,-0x18(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x28(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x28(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x4ceb89180,%RDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV $0x401050,%R10	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	scal (12.5%)
LEA -0xc(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x20(%RBP),%R8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x18(%RBP),%R9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
CALL %R10	2	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	2.14	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x20(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	N/A
MOV -0x18(%RBP),%R8	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	N/A
CMP %R8,%RAX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JA 4030bc <main.extracted.55+0x15c>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
SUB %RAX,%R8	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
INC %R8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %R8,%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x334906060,%RCX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV $0x4040d0,%RDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV $0x19a686060,%RSI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
AND $0x7ffffff8,%RDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1-2	0.20	N/A
JE 403080 <main.extracted.55+0x120>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
LEA (,%RAX,8),%R9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
XOR %R10D,%R10D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
VBROADCASTSD (%RDX),%ZMM0	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	3	0.33	scal (12.5%)
NOPW (%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
CMP %RDI,%R8	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JE 4030bc <main.extracted.55+0x15c>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %R8,%ZMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	scal (12.5%)
JMP 403088 <main.extracted.55+0x128>	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5.84	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %R8,%ZMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	scal (12.5%)
XOR %EDI,%EDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %RDI,%ZMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	scal (12.5%)
VPSUBQ %ZMM1,%ZMM0,%ZMM0	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-1	0.50	vect (100.0%)
MOV $0x4041c0,%R8	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
VPCMPNLEUQ (%R8),%ZMM0,%K1																vect (100.0%)
ADD %RDI,%RAX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
VMOVUPD (%RCX,%RAX,8),%ZMM0{%K1}{z}	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0-1	0.50	vect (100.0%)
VMULPD (%RDX){1to8},%ZMM0,%ZMM0	1	0.50	0	0.33	0.33	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	4	0.50	vect (100.0%)
VMOVUPD %ZMM0,(%RSI,%RAX,8){%K1}	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0-1	1	vect (100.0%)
MOV $0x4ceb891a0,%RDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV $0x401030,%RAX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.28	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD $0x28,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
VZEROUPPER	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	vect (25.0%)
JMP %RAX	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	1.75	N/A
NOPL (%RAX)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A

Name	Coverage (%)	Time (s)
▼main.extracted.55–	19.01	3.10
○Loop 15 - stream.c:331-332 - exec	19.01	2.88

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Masked instructions

Details

Workaround

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Masked instructions

Details

Workaround

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code