OV - exec - Function ljForce.omp

	Function: ljForce.omp_outlined	Module: exec	Source: ljForce.c:157-161 [...]	Coverage (incl. loops): 1.63% \| (excl. loops): 0.00%

/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/ljForce.c: 157 - 161

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

157:    #pragma omp parallel for

158:    for (int ii=0; ii<fSize; ++ii)

159:    {

160:       zeroReal3(s->atoms->f[ii]);

161:       s->atoms->U[ii] = 0.;

/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/mytype.h: 23 - 23

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

23:    a[1] = 0.0;

0x210280 PUSH	%RBP

0x210281 MOV	%RSP,%RBP

0x210284 PUSH	%R15

0x210286 PUSH	%R14

0x210288 PUSH	%R12

0x21028a PUSH	%RBX

0x21028b SUB	$0x10,%RSP

0x21028f MOV	(%RDX),%R12D

0x210292 TEST	%R12D,%R12D

0x210295 JLE	210379

0x21029b MOV	(%RDI),%R14D

0x21029e LEA	0x6813(%RIP),%RBX

0x2102a5 DEC	%R12D

0x2102a8 MOV	%RCX,%R15

0x2102ab MOVL	$0,-0x28(%RBP)

0x2102b2 MOVL	$0x1,-0x30(%RBP)

0x2102b9 MOVL	$0,-0x2c(%RBP)

0x2102c0 MOV	%R12D,-0x24(%RBP)

0x2102c4 SUB	$0x8,%RSP

0x2102c8 MOV	$0x1488,%RDI

0x2102d2 LEA	-0x30(%RBP),%RAX

0x2102d6 LEA	-0x2c(%RBP),%RCX

0x2102da LEA	-0x28(%RBP),%R8

0x2102de LEA	-0x24(%RBP),%R9

0x2102e2 MOV	%R14D,%ESI

0x2102e5 MOV	$0x22,%EDX

0x2102ea ADD	%RBX,%RDI

0x2102ed PUSH	$0x1

0x2102ef PUSH	$0x1

0x2102f1 PUSH	%RAX

0x2102f2 CALL	214700 <@plt_start@+0x180>

0x2102f7 ADD	$0x20,%RSP

0x2102fb MOV	-0x24(%RBP),%EAX

0x2102fe CMP	%R12D,%EAX

0x210301 CMOVL	%EAX,%R12D

0x210305 MOVSXD	-0x28(%RBP),%RAX

0x210309 MOV	%R12D,-0x24(%RBP)

0x21030d CMP	%R12D,%EAX

0x210310 JG	210361

0x210312 MOV	(%R15),%RCX

0x210315 LEA	(%RAX,%RAX,2),%RSI

0x210319 MOVSXD	%R12D,%RDX

0x21031c DEC	%RAX

0x21031f VXORPS	%XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM0

0x210323 SAL	$0x3,%RSI

0x210327 MOV	0x20(%RCX),%RDI

0x21032b MOV	0x30(%RDI),%RCX

0x21032f ADD	0x28(%RDI),%RSI

0x210333 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

(96) 0x210340 VMOVUPS	%XMM0,(%RSI)

(96) 0x210344 MOVQ	$0,0x10(%RSI)

(96) 0x21034c MOVQ	$0,0x8(%RCX,%RAX,8)

(96) 0x210355 INC	%RAX

(96) 0x210358 ADD	$0x18,%RSI

(96) 0x21035c CMP	%RDX,%RAX

(96) 0x21035f JL	210340

0x210361 MOV	$0x14a0,%RAX

0x21036b MOV	%R14D,%ESI

0x21036e ADD	%RAX,%RBX

0x210371 MOV	%RBX,%RDI

0x210374 CALL	214710 <@plt_start@+0x190>

0x210379 ADD	$0x10,%RSP

0x21037d POP	%RBX

0x21037e POP	%R12

0x210380 POP	%R14

0x210382 POP	%R15

0x210384 POP	%RBP

0x210385 RET

0x210386 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run aocc_2

Source file and lines	ljForce.c:157-161
Module	exec

The function is defined in:

/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/ljForce.c:157-161
/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/mytype.h:23

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.88 to 1.33 cycles (5.91x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your function is probably not vectorized. Only 8% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions). By vectorizing your function, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.88 to 0.52 cycles (15.26x speedup).

Details

Store and arithmetical SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized function can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

No data for this section

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

Calling (and then returning from) a function prevents many compiler optimizations (like vectorization), breaks control flow (which reduces pipeline performance) and executes extra instructions to save/restore the registers used inside it, which is very expensive (dozens of cycles). Consider to inline small functions.

unknown: 2 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/ljForce.c:157
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/ljForce.c:157

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

CMOVL: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/ljForce.c:158

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 48 bytes. The binary function is storing 20 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	62
nb uops	63
loop length	239
used x86 registers	13
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	1
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	7.88 cycles
front end	7.88 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	5.17	5.17	5.17	5.17	5.17	5.17	3.75	3.75	3.75	3.75	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	5.17	5.17	5.17	5.17	5.17	5.17	3.75	3.75	3.75	3.75	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	7.88
Dispatch	5.17
Overall L1	7.88

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	100%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	100%

INT+FP

all	5%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	12%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	7%
load	8%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	10%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	7%

all	25%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	25%

INT+FP

all	8%
load	8%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	10%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	9%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 7.88 cycles. At this rate:

2% of peak load performance is reached (6.10 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
1% of peak store performance is reached (2.54 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Performance is limited by instruction throughput (loading/decoding program instructions to execution core) (front-end is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.88 to 5.17 cycles (1.52x speedup).

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 210280

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x10,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV (%RDX),%R12D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (6.3%)
TEST %R12D,%R12D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
JLE 210379 <ljForce.omp_outlined+0xf9>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
MOV (%RDI),%R14D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (6.3%)
LEA 0x6813(%RIP),%RBX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
DEC %R12D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV %RCX,%R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOVL $0,-0x28(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVL $0x1,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVL $0,-0x2c(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV %R12D,-0x24(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x1488,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x30(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x2c(%RBP),%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x28(%RBP),%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x24(%RBP),%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %R14D,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD %RBX,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
CALL 214700 <@plt_start@+0x180>	2	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0.50	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x24(%RBP),%EAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
CMP %R12D,%EAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
CMOVL %EAX,%R12D	2	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOVSXD -0x28(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %R12D,-0x24(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
CMP %R12D,%EAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
JG 210361 <ljForce.omp_outlined+0xe1>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
MOV (%R15),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
LEA (%RAX,%RAX,2),%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSXD %R12D,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
DEC %RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
VXORPS %XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	vect (25.0%)
SAL $0x3,%RSI	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x20(%RCX),%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
MOV 0x30(%RDI),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
ADD 0x28(%RDI),%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A
MOV $0x14a0,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %R14D,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
ADD %RAX,%RBX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RBX,%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
CALL 214710 <@plt_start@+0x190>	2	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0.50	N/A
ADD $0x10,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
RET	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run aocc_2

Source file and lines	ljForce.c:157-161
Module	exec

The function is defined in:

/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/ljForce.c:157-161
/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/mytype.h:23

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.88 to 1.33 cycles (5.91x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

No data for this section

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

unknown: 2 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/ljForce.c:157
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/ljForce.c:157

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

CMOVL: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/ljForce.c:158

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 48 bytes. The binary function is storing 20 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	62
nb uops	63
loop length	239
used x86 registers	13
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	1
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	7.88 cycles
front end	7.88 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	5.17	5.17	5.17	5.17	5.17	5.17	3.75	3.75	3.75	3.75	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	5.17	5.17	5.17	5.17	5.17	5.17	3.75	3.75	3.75	3.75	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	7.88
Dispatch	5.17
Overall L1	7.88

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	100%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	100%

INT+FP

all	5%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	12%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	7%
load	8%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	10%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	7%

all	25%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	25%

INT+FP

all	8%
load	8%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	10%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	9%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 7.88 cycles. At this rate:

2% of peak load performance is reached (6.10 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
1% of peak store performance is reached (2.54 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 210280

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x10,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV (%RDX),%R12D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (6.3%)
TEST %R12D,%R12D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
JLE 210379 <ljForce.omp_outlined+0xf9>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
MOV (%RDI),%R14D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (6.3%)
LEA 0x6813(%RIP),%RBX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
DEC %R12D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV %RCX,%R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOVL $0,-0x28(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVL $0x1,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVL $0,-0x2c(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV %R12D,-0x24(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x1488,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x30(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x2c(%RBP),%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x28(%RBP),%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x24(%RBP),%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %R14D,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD %RBX,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
CALL 214700 <@plt_start@+0x180>	2	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0.50	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x24(%RBP),%EAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
CMP %R12D,%EAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
CMOVL %EAX,%R12D	2	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOVSXD -0x28(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %R12D,-0x24(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
CMP %R12D,%EAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
JG 210361 <ljForce.omp_outlined+0xe1>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
MOV (%R15),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
LEA (%RAX,%RAX,2),%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSXD %R12D,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
DEC %RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
VXORPS %XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	vect (25.0%)
SAL $0x3,%RSI	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x20(%RCX),%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
MOV 0x30(%RDI),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
ADD 0x28(%RDI),%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A
MOV $0x14a0,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %R14D,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
ADD %RAX,%RBX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RBX,%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
CALL 214710 <@plt_start@+0x190>	2	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0.50	N/A
ADD $0x10,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
RET	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A

Name	Coverage (%)	Time (s)
▼ljForce.omp_outlined–	1.63	0.12
○Loop 96 - ljForce.c:158-161 - exec	1.63	0.12

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code