OV - exec - Function advancePosition.omp

	Function: advancePosition.omp_outlined	Module: exec	Source: timestep.c:85-94	Coverage (incl. loops): 0.94% \| (excl. loops): 0.00%

/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/timestep.c: 85 - 94

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

85:    #pragma omp parallel for

86:    for (int iBox=0; iBox<nBoxes; iBox++)

87:    {

88:       for (int iOff=MAXATOMS*iBox,ii=0; ii<s->boxes->nAtoms[iBox]; ii++,iOff++)

89:       {

90:          int iSpecies = s->atoms->iSpecies[iOff];

91:          real_t invMass = 1.0/s->species[iSpecies].mass;

92:          s->atoms->r[iOff][0] += dt*s->atoms->p[iOff][0]*invMass;

93:          s->atoms->r[iOff][1] += dt*s->atoms->p[iOff][1]*invMass;

94:          s->atoms->r[iOff][2] += dt*s->atoms->p[iOff][2]*invMass;

0x212480 PUSH	%RBP

0x212481 MOV	%RSP,%RBP

0x212484 PUSH	%R15

0x212486 PUSH	%R14

0x212488 PUSH	%R13

0x21248a PUSH	%R12

0x21248c PUSH	%RBX

0x21248d SUB	$0x18,%RSP

0x212491 MOV	(%RDX),%R12D

0x212494 TEST	%R12D,%R12D

0x212497 JLE	212514

0x212499 MOV	(%RDI),%ESI

0x21249b DEC	%R12D

0x21249e MOV	%R8,%RBX

0x2124a1 MOV	%RCX,%R15

0x2124a4 MOVL	$0,-0x30(%RBP)

0x2124ab MOVL	$0x1,-0x3c(%RBP)

0x2124b2 MOVL	$0,-0x38(%RBP)

0x2124b9 MOV	%R12D,-0x2c(%RBP)

0x2124bd SUB	$0x8,%RSP

0x2124c1 LEA	-0x3c(%RBP),%RAX

0x2124c5 LEA	0x1e54(%RIP),%RDI

0x2124cc LEA	-0x38(%RBP),%RCX

0x2124d0 LEA	-0x30(%RBP),%R8

0x2124d4 LEA	-0x2c(%RBP),%R9

0x2124d8 MOV	%ESI,-0x34(%RBP)

0x2124db MOV	$0x22,%EDX

0x2124e0 PUSH	$0x1

0x2124e2 PUSH	$0x1

0x2124e4 PUSH	%RAX

0x2124e5 CALL	212de0 <@plt_start@+0x180>

0x2124ea ADD	$0x20,%RSP

0x2124ee MOV	-0x2c(%RBP),%EAX

0x2124f1 CMP	%R12D,%EAX

0x2124f4 CMOVL	%EAX,%R12D

0x2124f8 MOVSXD	-0x30(%RBP),%RAX

0x2124fc MOV	%R12D,-0x2c(%RBP)

0x212500 CMP	%R12D,%EAX

0x212503 JLE	212523

0x212505 MOV	-0x34(%RBP),%ESI

0x212508 LEA	0x1e29(%RIP),%RDI

0x21250f CALL	212df0 <@plt_start@+0x190>

0x212514 ADD	$0x18,%RSP

0x212518 POP	%RBX

0x212519 POP	%R12

0x21251b POP	%R13

0x21251d POP	%R14

0x21251f POP	%R15

0x212521 POP	%RBP

0x212522 RET

0x212523 MOV	(%R15),%RCX

0x212526 VMOVSD	-0xd4ae(%RIP),%XMM0

0x21252e MOV	%EAX,%ESI

0x212530 SAL	$0x6,%ESI

0x212533 MOVSXD	%R12D,%RDI

0x212536 MOV	0x18(%RCX),%RDX

0x21253a MOV	0x78(%RDX),%RDX

0x21253e JMP	21254f

(110) 0x212540 ADD	$0x40,%ESI

(110) 0x212543 LEA	0x1(%RAX),%R8

(110) 0x212547 CMP	%RDI,%RAX

(110) 0x21254a MOV	%R8,%RAX

(110) 0x21254d JGE	212505

(110) 0x21254f MOV	(%RDX,%RAX,4),%R8D

(110) 0x212553 TEST	%R8D,%R8D

(110) 0x212556 JLE	212540

(110) 0x212558 MOV	0x20(%RCX),%R13

(110) 0x21255c MOVSXD	%ESI,%R9

(110) 0x21255f MOV	0x28(%RCX),%R11

(110) 0x212563 LEA	(%R9,%R9,2),%R10

(110) 0x212567 SAL	$0x2,%R9

(110) 0x21256b LEA	0x10(,%R10,8),%R10

(110) 0x212573 MOV	0x18(%R13),%R15

(110) 0x212577 MOV	0x20(%R13),%R12

(110) 0x21257b ADD	0x10(%R13),%R9

(110) 0x21257f XOR	%R13D,%R13D

(110) 0x212582 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

  (111) 0x212590 MOVSXD	(%R9,%R13,4),%R14

  (111) 0x212594 VMOVSD	(%RBX),%XMM2

  (111) 0x212598 INC	%R13

  (111) 0x21259b VMULSD	-0x10(%R12,%R10,1),%XMM2,%XMM2

  (111) 0x2125a2 SAL	$0x4,%R14

  (111) 0x2125a6 VDIVSD	0x8(%R11,%R14,1),%XMM0,%XMM1

  (111) 0x2125ad VFMADD213SD	-0x10(%R15,%R10,1),%XMM1,%XMM2

  (111) 0x2125b4 VMOVSD	%XMM2,-0x10(%R15,%R10,1)

  (111) 0x2125bb VMOVSD	(%RBX),%XMM2

  (111) 0x2125bf VMULSD	-0x8(%R12,%R10,1),%XMM2,%XMM2

  (111) 0x2125c6 VFMADD213SD	-0x8(%R15,%R10,1),%XMM1,%XMM2

  (111) 0x2125cd VMOVSD	%XMM2,-0x8(%R15,%R10,1)

  (111) 0x2125d4 VMOVSD	(%RBX),%XMM2

  (111) 0x2125d8 VMULSD	(%R12,%R10,1),%XMM2,%XMM2

  (111) 0x2125de VFMADD213SD	(%R15,%R10,1),%XMM1,%XMM2

  (111) 0x2125e4 VMOVSD	%XMM2,(%R15,%R10,1)

  (111) 0x2125ea ADD	$0x18,%R10

  (111) 0x2125ee CMP	%R13D,%R8D

  (111) 0x2125f1 JNE	212590

(110) 0x2125f3 JMP	212540

0x2125f8 NOPL	(%RAX,%RAX,1)

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run orig_0

Source file and lines	timestep.c:85-94
Module	exec

The function is defined in /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/timestep.c:85-94.

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.63 to 1.33 cycles (5.72x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your function is not vectorized. Only 6% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions). By vectorizing your function, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.63 to 0.48 cycles (15.73x speedup).

Details

All SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized function can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

No data for this section

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

Calling (and then returning from) a function prevents many compiler optimizations (like vectorization), breaks control flow (which reduces pipeline performance) and executes extra instructions to save/restore the registers used inside it, which is very expensive (dozens of cycles). Consider to inline small functions.

unknown: 2 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/timestep.c:85
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/timestep.c:85

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

CMOVL: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/timestep.c:86

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 52 bytes. The binary function is storing 24 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	59
nb uops	61
loop length	200
used x86 registers	14
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	1
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	5

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	7.63 cycles
front end	7.63 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	4.33	4.33	4.33	4.33	4.33	4.33	4.25	4.25	4.25	4.25	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	4.33	4.33	4.33	4.33	4.33	4.33	4.25	4.25	4.25	4.25	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	7.63
Dispatch	4.33
Overall L1	7.63

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	6%
load	6%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	6%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	7%

all	12%
load	12%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	6%
load	7%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	6%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	7%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 7.63 cycles. At this rate:

2% of peak load performance is reached (6.82 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
2% of peak store performance is reached (3.15 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Performance is limited by instruction throughput (loading/decoding program instructions to execution core) (front-end is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.63 to 4.33 cycles (1.76x speedup).

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 212480

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x18,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV (%RDX),%R12D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (6.3%)
TEST %R12D,%R12D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
JLE 212514 <advancePosition.omp_outlined+0x94>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
MOV (%RDI),%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (6.3%)
DEC %R12D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV %R8,%RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RCX,%R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOVL $0,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVL $0x1,-0x3c(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVL $0,-0x38(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV %R12D,-0x2c(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x3c(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA 0x1e54(%RIP),%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x38(%RBP),%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x30(%RBP),%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x2c(%RBP),%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %ESI,-0x34(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
CALL 212de0 <@plt_start@+0x180>	2	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0.50	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x2c(%RBP),%EAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
CMP %R12D,%EAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
CMOVL %EAX,%R12D	2	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOVSXD -0x30(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %R12D,-0x2c(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
CMP %R12D,%EAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
JLE 212523 <advancePosition.omp_outlined+0xa3>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
MOV -0x34(%RBP),%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (6.3%)
LEA 0x1e29(%RIP),%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CALL 212df0 <@plt_start@+0x190>	2	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0.50	N/A
ADD $0x18,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
RET	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV (%R15),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
VMOVSD -0xd4ae(%RIP),%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV %EAX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
SAL $0x6,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOVSXD %R12D,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV 0x18(%RCX),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
MOV 0x78(%RDX),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
JMP 21254f <advancePosition.omp_outlined+0xcf>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
NOPL (%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run orig_0

Source file and lines	timestep.c:85-94
Module	exec

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.63 to 1.33 cycles (5.72x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

No data for this section

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

unknown: 2 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/timestep.c:85
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/timestep.c:85

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

CMOVL: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/timestep.c:86

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 52 bytes. The binary function is storing 24 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	59
nb uops	61
loop length	200
used x86 registers	14
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	1
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	5

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	7.63 cycles
front end	7.63 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	4.33	4.33	4.33	4.33	4.33	4.33	4.25	4.25	4.25	4.25	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	4.33	4.33	4.33	4.33	4.33	4.33	4.25	4.25	4.25	4.25	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	7.63
Dispatch	4.33
Overall L1	7.63

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	6%
load	6%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	6%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	7%

all	12%
load	12%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	6%
load	7%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	6%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	7%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 7.63 cycles. At this rate:

2% of peak load performance is reached (6.82 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
2% of peak store performance is reached (3.15 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 212480

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x18,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV (%RDX),%R12D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (6.3%)
TEST %R12D,%R12D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
JLE 212514 <advancePosition.omp_outlined+0x94>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
MOV (%RDI),%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (6.3%)
DEC %R12D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV %R8,%RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RCX,%R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOVL $0,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVL $0x1,-0x3c(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVL $0,-0x38(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV %R12D,-0x2c(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x3c(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA 0x1e54(%RIP),%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x38(%RBP),%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x30(%RBP),%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x2c(%RBP),%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %ESI,-0x34(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
CALL 212de0 <@plt_start@+0x180>	2	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0.50	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x2c(%RBP),%EAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
CMP %R12D,%EAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
CMOVL %EAX,%R12D	2	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOVSXD -0x30(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %R12D,-0x2c(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
CMP %R12D,%EAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
JLE 212523 <advancePosition.omp_outlined+0xa3>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
MOV -0x34(%RBP),%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (6.3%)
LEA 0x1e29(%RIP),%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CALL 212df0 <@plt_start@+0x190>	2	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0.50	N/A
ADD $0x18,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
RET	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV (%R15),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
VMOVSD -0xd4ae(%RIP),%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV %EAX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
SAL $0x6,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOVSXD %R12D,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV 0x18(%RCX),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
MOV 0x78(%RDX),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
JMP 21254f <advancePosition.omp_outlined+0xcf>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
NOPL (%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A

Name	Coverage (%)	Time (s)
▼advancePosition.omp_outlined–	0.94	0.07
▼Loop 110 - timestep.c:86-94 - exec–	0.00	0.00
○Loop 111 - timestep.c:88-94 - exec	0.94	0.07

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code