OV - exec - Function ljForce.omp

	Function: ljForce.omp_outlined	Module: exec	Source: ljForce.c:157-161 [...]	Coverage (incl. loops): 2.04% \| (excl. loops): 0.00%

/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/ljForce.c: 157 - 161

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

157:    #pragma omp parallel for

158:    for (int ii=0; ii<fSize; ++ii)

159:    {

160:       zeroReal3(s->atoms->f[ii]);

161:       s->atoms->U[ii] = 0.;

/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/mytype.h: 23 - 23

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

23:    a[1] = 0.0;

0x20f3e0 PUSH	%RBP

0x20f3e1 MOV	%RSP,%RBP

0x20f3e4 PUSH	%R15

0x20f3e6 PUSH	%R14

0x20f3e8 PUSH	%RBX

0x20f3e9 SUB	$0x18,%RSP

0x20f3ed MOV	(%RDX),%R15D

0x20f3f0 TEST	%R15D,%R15D

0x20f3f3 JLE	20f4bf

0x20f3f9 MOV	(%RDI),%EBX

0x20f3fb DEC	%R15D

0x20f3fe MOV	%RCX,%R14

0x20f401 MOVL	$0,-0x20(%RBP)

0x20f408 MOVL	$0x1,-0x28(%RBP)

0x20f40f MOVL	$0,-0x24(%RBP)

0x20f416 MOV	%R15D,-0x1c(%RBP)

0x20f41a SUB	$0x8,%RSP

0x20f41e LEA	-0x28(%RBP),%RAX

0x20f422 LEA	0x4e07(%RIP),%RDI

0x20f429 LEA	-0x24(%RBP),%RCX

0x20f42d LEA	-0x20(%RBP),%R8

0x20f431 LEA	-0x1c(%RBP),%R9

0x20f435 MOV	%EBX,%ESI

0x20f437 MOV	$0x22,%EDX

0x20f43c PUSH	$0x1

0x20f43e PUSH	$0x1

0x20f440 PUSH	%RAX

0x20f441 CALL	212de0 <@plt_start@+0x180>

0x20f446 ADD	$0x20,%RSP

0x20f44a MOV	-0x1c(%RBP),%EAX

0x20f44d CMP	%R15D,%EAX

0x20f450 CMOVL	%EAX,%R15D

0x20f454 MOVSXD	-0x20(%RBP),%RAX

0x20f458 MOV	%R15D,-0x1c(%RBP)

0x20f45c CMP	%R15D,%EAX

0x20f45f JG	20f4b1

0x20f461 MOV	(%R14),%RCX

0x20f464 LEA	(%RAX,%RAX,2),%RSI

0x20f468 MOVSXD	%R15D,%RDX

0x20f46b DEC	%RAX

0x20f46e VXORPS	%XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM0

0x20f472 SAL	$0x3,%RSI

0x20f476 MOV	0x20(%RCX),%RDI

0x20f47a MOV	0x30(%RDI),%RCX

0x20f47e ADD	0x28(%RDI),%RSI

0x20f482 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

(95) 0x20f490 VMOVUPS	%XMM0,(%RSI)

(95) 0x20f494 MOVQ	$0,0x10(%RSI)

(95) 0x20f49c MOVQ	$0,0x8(%RCX,%RAX,8)

(95) 0x20f4a5 INC	%RAX

(95) 0x20f4a8 ADD	$0x18,%RSI

(95) 0x20f4ac CMP	%RDX,%RAX

(95) 0x20f4af JL	20f490

0x20f4b1 LEA	0x4d90(%RIP),%RDI

0x20f4b8 MOV	%EBX,%ESI

0x20f4ba CALL	212df0 <@plt_start@+0x190>

0x20f4bf ADD	$0x18,%RSP

0x20f4c3 POP	%RBX

0x20f4c4 POP	%R14

0x20f4c6 POP	%R15

0x20f4c8 POP	%RBP

0x20f4c9 RET

0x20f4ca NOPW	(%RAX,%RAX,1)

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►99.64+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run orig_0

Source file and lines	ljForce.c:157-161
Module	exec

The function is defined in:

/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/ljForce.c:157-161
/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/mytype.h:23

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.13 to 1.33 cycles (5.34x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your function is probably not vectorized. Only 8% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions). By vectorizing your function, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.13 to 0.46 cycles (15.45x speedup).

Details

Store and arithmetical SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized function can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

No data for this section

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

Calling (and then returning from) a function prevents many compiler optimizations (like vectorization), breaks control flow (which reduces pipeline performance) and executes extra instructions to save/restore the registers used inside it, which is very expensive (dozens of cycles). Consider to inline small functions.

unknown: 2 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/ljForce.c:157
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/ljForce.c:157

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

CMOVL: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/ljForce.c:158

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 48 bytes. The binary function is storing 20 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	56
nb uops	57
loop length	207
used x86 registers	12
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	1
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	7.13 cycles
front end	7.13 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	3.75	3.75	3.75	3.75	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	3.75	3.75	3.75	3.75	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	7.13
Dispatch	4.67
Overall L1	7.13

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	100%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	100%

INT+FP

all	5%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	12%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	7%
load	8%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	9%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	7%

all	25%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	25%

INT+FP

all	8%
load	8%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	9%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	9%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 7.13 cycles. At this rate:

2% of peak load performance is reached (6.74 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
2% of peak store performance is reached (2.81 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Performance is limited by instruction throughput (loading/decoding program instructions to execution core) (front-end is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.13 to 4.67 cycles (1.53x speedup).

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 20f3e0

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x18,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV (%RDX),%R15D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (6.3%)
TEST %R15D,%R15D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
JLE 20f4bf <ljForce.omp_outlined+0xdf>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
MOV (%RDI),%EBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (6.3%)
DEC %R15D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV %RCX,%R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOVL $0,-0x20(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVL $0x1,-0x28(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVL $0,-0x24(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV %R15D,-0x1c(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x28(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA 0x4e07(%RIP),%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x24(%RBP),%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x20(%RBP),%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x1c(%RBP),%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
CALL 212de0 <@plt_start@+0x180>	2	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0.50	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x1c(%RBP),%EAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
CMP %R15D,%EAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
CMOVL %EAX,%R15D	2	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOVSXD -0x20(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %R15D,-0x1c(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
CMP %R15D,%EAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
JG 20f4b1 <ljForce.omp_outlined+0xd1>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
MOV (%R14),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
LEA (%RAX,%RAX,2),%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSXD %R15D,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
DEC %RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
VXORPS %XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	vect (25.0%)
SAL $0x3,%RSI	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x20(%RCX),%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
MOV 0x30(%RDI),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
ADD 0x28(%RDI),%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A
LEA 0x4d90(%RIP),%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
CALL 212df0 <@plt_start@+0x190>	2	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0.50	N/A
ADD $0x18,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
RET	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
NOPW (%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run orig_0

Source file and lines	ljForce.c:157-161
Module	exec

The function is defined in:

/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/ljForce.c:157-161
/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/mytype.h:23

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.13 to 1.33 cycles (5.34x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

No data for this section

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

unknown: 2 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/ljForce.c:157
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/ljForce.c:157

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

CMOVL: 1 occurrences►
- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_test/gmz12.benchmarkcenter.megware.com/177-374-1600/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/ljForce.c:158

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 48 bytes. The binary function is storing 20 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	56
nb uops	57
loop length	207
used x86 registers	12
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	1
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	7.13 cycles
front end	7.13 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	3.75	3.75	3.75	3.75	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	3.75	3.75	3.75	3.75	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	7.13
Dispatch	4.67
Overall L1	7.13

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	100%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	100%

INT+FP

all	5%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	12%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	7%
load	8%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	9%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	7%

all	25%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	25%

INT+FP

all	8%
load	8%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	9%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	9%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 7.13 cycles. At this rate:

2% of peak load performance is reached (6.74 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
2% of peak store performance is reached (2.81 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 20f3e0

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x18,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV (%RDX),%R15D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (6.3%)
TEST %R15D,%R15D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
JLE 20f4bf <ljForce.omp_outlined+0xdf>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
MOV (%RDI),%EBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (6.3%)
DEC %R15D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV %RCX,%R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOVL $0,-0x20(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVL $0x1,-0x28(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVL $0,-0x24(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV %R15D,-0x1c(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x28(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA 0x4e07(%RIP),%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x24(%RBP),%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x20(%RBP),%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x1c(%RBP),%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
CALL 212de0 <@plt_start@+0x180>	2	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0.50	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x1c(%RBP),%EAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
CMP %R15D,%EAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
CMOVL %EAX,%R15D	2	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOVSXD -0x20(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %R15D,-0x1c(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
CMP %R15D,%EAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
JG 20f4b1 <ljForce.omp_outlined+0xd1>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
MOV (%R14),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
LEA (%RAX,%RAX,2),%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSXD %R15D,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
DEC %RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
VXORPS %XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	vect (25.0%)
SAL $0x3,%RSI	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x20(%RCX),%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
MOV 0x30(%RDI),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
ADD 0x28(%RDI),%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A
LEA 0x4d90(%RIP),%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
CALL 212df0 <@plt_start@+0x190>	2	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0.50	N/A
ADD $0x18,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
RET	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
NOPW (%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A

Name	Coverage (%)	Time (s)
▼ljForce.omp_outlined–	2.04	0.15
○Loop 95 - ljForce.c:158-161 - exec	2.04	0.15

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code