OV - exec - Function gasdev

	Function: gasdev	Module: exec	Source: random.c:22-48 [...]	Coverage (incl. loops): 0.02% \| (excl. loops): 0.01%

/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/random.c: 22 - 48

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

22: {

23:    real_t rsq,v1,v2;

24:    do

25:    {

26:       v1 = 2.0*lcg61(seed)-1.0;

27:       v2 = 2.0*lcg61(seed)-1.0;

28:       rsq = v1*v1+v2*v2;

29:    } while (rsq >= 1.0 || rsq == 0.0);

30:

31:    return v2 * sqrt(-2.0*log(rsq)/rsq);

[...]

45:    *seed *= UINT64_C(437799614237992725);

46:    *seed %= UINT64_C(2305843009213693951);

47:

48:    return *seed*convertToDouble;

0x2110f0 VMOVSD	-0xc8b8(%RIP),%XMM7

0x2110f8 VMOVSD	-0xc910(%RIP),%XMM1

0x211100 VMOVSD	-0xc908(%RIP),%XMM2

0x211108 VMOVSD	-0xc8e0(%RIP),%XMM3

0x211110 MOV	(%RDI),%RDX

0x211113 MOV	$0x613606df9756715,%RCX

0x21111d MOV	$0x9,%ESI

0x211122 VXORPD	%XMM4,%XMM4,%XMM4

0x211126 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

(104) 0x211130 IMUL	%RCX,%RDX

(104) 0x211134 MULX	%RSI,%R8,%R8

(104) 0x211139 MOV	%RDX,%RAX

(104) 0x21113c SUB	%R8,%RAX

(104) 0x21113f SHR	$0x1,%RAX

(104) 0x211142 ADD	%R8,%RAX

(104) 0x211145 SHR	$0x3c,%RAX

(104) 0x211149 MOV	%RAX,%R8

(104) 0x21114c SAL	$0x3d,%R8

(104) 0x211150 SUB	%R8,%RAX

(104) 0x211153 ADD	%RDX,%RAX

(104) 0x211156 VCVTSI2SD	%RAX,%XMM8,%XMM5

(104) 0x21115b IMUL	%RCX,%RAX

(104) 0x21115f MOV	%RAX,%RDX

(104) 0x211162 MULX	%RSI,%R8,%R8

(104) 0x211167 VMULSD	%XMM7,%XMM5,%XMM5

(104) 0x21116b SUB	%R8,%RDX

(104) 0x21116e SHR	$0x1,%RDX

(104) 0x211171 VFMADD213SD	%XMM1,%XMM2,%XMM5

(104) 0x211176 ADD	%R8,%RDX

(104) 0x211179 SHR	$0x3c,%RDX

(104) 0x21117d MOV	%RDX,%R8

(104) 0x211180 SAL	$0x3d,%R8

(104) 0x211184 SUB	%R8,%RDX

(104) 0x211187 ADD	%RAX,%RDX

(104) 0x21118a VCVTSI2SD	%RDX,%XMM8,%XMM6

(104) 0x21118f VMULSD	%XMM7,%XMM6,%XMM6

(104) 0x211193 VFMADD213SD	%XMM1,%XMM2,%XMM6

(104) 0x211198 VMULSD	%XMM6,%XMM6,%XMM0

(104) 0x21119c VFMADD231SD	%XMM5,%XMM5,%XMM0

(104) 0x2111a1 VUCOMISD	%XMM3,%XMM0

(104) 0x2111a5 JAE	211130

(104) 0x2111a7 VUCOMISD	%XMM4,%XMM0

(104) 0x2111ab JNE	2111af

(104) 0x2111ad JNP	211130

0x2111af PUSH	%RBP

0x2111b0 MOV	%RSP,%RBP

0x2111b3 SUB	$0x10,%RSP

0x2111b7 VMOVSD	%XMM6,-0x10(%RBP)

0x2111bc MOV	%RDX,(%RDI)

0x2111bf VMOVSD	%XMM0,-0x8(%RBP)

0x2111c4 CALL	2126b0 <@plt_start@+0x2b0>

0x2111c9 VMULSD	-0xc9a9(%RIP),%XMM0,%XMM0

0x2111d1 VXORPD	%XMM1,%XMM1,%XMM1

0x2111d5 VDIVSD	-0x8(%RBP),%XMM0,%XMM0

0x2111da VUCOMISD	%XMM1,%XMM0

0x2111de JB	2111ef

0x2111e0 VSQRTSD	%XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM0

0x2111e4 VMULSD	-0x10(%RBP),%XMM0,%XMM0

0x2111e9 ADD	$0x10,%RSP

0x2111ed POP	%RBP

0x2111ee RET

0x2111ef CALL	2125c0 <@plt_start@+0x1c0>

0x2111f4 VMULSD	-0x10(%RBP),%XMM0,%XMM0

0x2111f9 ADD	$0x10,%RSP

0x2111fd POP	%RBP

0x2111fe RET

0x2111ff NOP

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.01% of application time for run orig_0

Source file and lines	random.c:22-48
Module	exec

The function is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/random.c:22-31,45-48.

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your function is probably not vectorized. Only 13% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions). By vectorizing your function, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 12.50 to 1.56 cycles (8.00x speedup).

Details

Store and arithmetical SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized function can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Performance is limited by execution of divide and square root operations (the divide/square root unit is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 12.50 to 4.13 cycles (3.03x speedup).

Workaround

Reduce the number of division or square root instructions:
- If denominator is constant over iterations, use reciprocal (replace x/y with x*(1/y)). Check precision impact. This will be done by your compiler with ffast-math or Ofast
Check whether you really need double precision. If not, switch to single precision to speedup execution

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

Detected performance impact from expensive FP math instructions/calls. By removing/reexpressing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 12.50 to 4.13 cycles (3.03x speedup).

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

Calling (and then returning from) a function prevents many compiler optimizations (like vectorization), breaks control flow (which reduces pipeline performance) and executes extra instructions to save/restore the registers used inside it, which is very expensive (dozens of cycles). Consider to inline small functions.

unknown: 2 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/random.c:31
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/random.c:31

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

VUCOMISD: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/random.c:31

Type of elements and instruction set

6 SSE or AVX instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in scalar mode (one at a time).

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function is composed of 5 FP arithmetical operations:

3: multiply
1: divide
1: square root

The binary function is loading 72 bytes (9 double precision FP elements). The binary function is storing 24 bytes (3 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.05 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	32
nb uops	33
loop length	145
used x86 registers	7
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	7
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	2

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	4.13 cycles
front end	4.13 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	1.67	1.67	1.67	1.67	1.67	1.67	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	2.50	2.50	0.50	0.50	1.50	1.50
cycles	1.67	1.67	1.67	1.67	1.67	1.67	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	2.50	2.50	0.50	0.50	1.50	1.50

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

12.50

Cycles summary

Front-end	4.13
Dispatch	3.50
DIV/SQRT	12.50
Overall L1	12.50

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	14%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	0%
other	66%

INT+FP

all	11%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	0%
other	40%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	10%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	9%

all	14%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	12%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	12%
other	20%

INT+FP

all	13%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	12%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	12%
other	16%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 12.50 cycles. At this rate:

2% of peak load performance is reached (5.76 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
1% of peak store performance is reached (1.92 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 2110f0

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
VMOVSD -0xc8b8(%RIP),%XMM7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD -0xc910(%RIP),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD -0xc908(%RIP),%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD -0xc8e0(%RIP),%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV (%RDI),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x613606df9756715,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x9,%ESI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
VXORPD %XMM4,%XMM4,%XMM4	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	vect (25.0%)
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
SUB $0x10,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
VMOVSD %XMM6,-0x10(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RDX,(%RDI)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM0,-0x8(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
CALL 2126b0 <@plt_start@+0x2b0>	2	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
VMULSD -0xc9a9(%RIP),%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VXORPD %XMM1,%XMM1,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	vect (25.0%)
VDIVSD -0x8(%RBP),%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	13	4	scal (12.5%)
VUCOMISD %XMM1,%XMM0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	scal (12.5%)
JB 2111ef <gasdev+0xff>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
VSQRTSD %XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	21	8.50	scal (12.5%)
VMULSD -0x10(%RBP),%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
ADD $0x10,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
RET	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
CALL 2125c0 <@plt_start@+0x1c0>	2	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
VMULSD -0x10(%RBP),%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
ADD $0x10,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
RET	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
NOP	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.01% of application time for run orig_0

Source file and lines	random.c:22-48
Module	exec

The function is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/random.c:22-31,45-48.

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Workaround

Reduce the number of division or square root instructions:
- If denominator is constant over iterations, use reciprocal (replace x/y with x*(1/y)). Check precision impact. This will be done by your compiler with ffast-math or Ofast
Check whether you really need double precision. If not, switch to single precision to speedup execution

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

Detected performance impact from expensive FP math instructions/calls. By removing/reexpressing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 12.50 to 4.13 cycles (3.03x speedup).

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

unknown: 2 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/random.c:31
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/random.c:31

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

VUCOMISD: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/random.c:31

Type of elements and instruction set

6 SSE or AVX instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in scalar mode (one at a time).

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function is composed of 5 FP arithmetical operations:

3: multiply
1: divide
1: square root

The binary function is loading 72 bytes (9 double precision FP elements). The binary function is storing 24 bytes (3 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.05 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	32
nb uops	33
loop length	145
used x86 registers	7
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	7
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	2

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	4.13 cycles
front end	4.13 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	1.67	1.67	1.67	1.67	1.67	1.67	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	2.50	2.50	0.50	0.50	1.50	1.50
cycles	1.67	1.67	1.67	1.67	1.67	1.67	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	2.50	2.50	0.50	0.50	1.50	1.50

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

12.50

Cycles summary

Front-end	4.13
Dispatch	3.50
DIV/SQRT	12.50
Overall L1	12.50

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	14%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	0%
other	66%

INT+FP

all	11%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	0%
other	40%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	10%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	9%

all	14%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	12%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	12%
other	20%

INT+FP

all	13%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	12%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	12%
other	16%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 12.50 cycles. At this rate:

2% of peak load performance is reached (5.76 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
1% of peak store performance is reached (1.92 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 2110f0

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
VMOVSD -0xc8b8(%RIP),%XMM7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD -0xc910(%RIP),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD -0xc908(%RIP),%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD -0xc8e0(%RIP),%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV (%RDI),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x613606df9756715,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV $0x9,%ESI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
VXORPD %XMM4,%XMM4,%XMM4	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	vect (25.0%)
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
SUB $0x10,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
VMOVSD %XMM6,-0x10(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RDX,(%RDI)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM0,-0x8(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
CALL 2126b0 <@plt_start@+0x2b0>	2	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
VMULSD -0xc9a9(%RIP),%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VXORPD %XMM1,%XMM1,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	vect (25.0%)
VDIVSD -0x8(%RBP),%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	13	4	scal (12.5%)
VUCOMISD %XMM1,%XMM0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	scal (12.5%)
JB 2111ef <gasdev+0xff>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
VSQRTSD %XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	21	8.50	scal (12.5%)
VMULSD -0x10(%RBP),%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
ADD $0x10,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
RET	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
CALL 2125c0 <@plt_start@+0x1c0>	2	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
VMULSD -0x10(%RBP),%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
ADD $0x10,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
RET	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
NOP	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A

Name	Coverage (%)	Time (s)
▼gasdev–	0.02	0.01
○Loop 104 - random.c:26-48 - exec	0.01	0.01

Report Configuration

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Workaround

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Workaround

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code