OV - exec - Function ljForce.omp

	Function: ljForce.omp_outlined	Module: exec	Source: ljForce.c:157-161 [...]	Coverage (incl. loops): 3.11% \| (excl. loops): 0.00%

/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/ljForce.c: 157 - 161

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

157:    #pragma omp parallel for

158:    for (int ii=0; ii<fSize; ++ii)

159:    {

160:       zeroReal3(s->atoms->f[ii]);

161:       s->atoms->U[ii] = 0.;

/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/mytype.h: 23 - 23

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

23:    a[1] = 0.0;

0x20eba0 PUSH	%RBP

0x20eba1 MOV	%RSP,%RBP

0x20eba4 PUSH	%R15

0x20eba6 PUSH	%R14

0x20eba8 PUSH	%RBX

0x20eba9 SUB	$0x18,%RSP

0x20ebad MOV	(%RDX),%R15D

0x20ebb0 TEST	%R15D,%R15D

0x20ebb3 JLE	20ec7f

0x20ebb9 MOV	(%RDI),%EBX

0x20ebbb DEC	%R15D

0x20ebbe MOV	%RCX,%R14

0x20ebc1 MOVL	$0,-0x20(%RBP)

0x20ebc8 MOVL	$0x1,-0x28(%RBP)

0x20ebcf MOVL	$0,-0x24(%RBP)

0x20ebd6 MOV	%R15D,-0x1c(%RBP)

0x20ebda SUB	$0x8,%RSP

0x20ebde LEA	-0x28(%RBP),%RAX

0x20ebe2 LEA	0x4de7(%RIP),%RDI

0x20ebe9 LEA	-0x24(%RBP),%RCX

0x20ebed LEA	-0x20(%RBP),%R8

0x20ebf1 LEA	-0x1c(%RBP),%R9

0x20ebf5 MOV	%EBX,%ESI

0x20ebf7 MOV	$0x22,%EDX

0x20ebfc PUSH	$0x1

0x20ebfe PUSH	$0x1

0x20ec00 PUSH	%RAX

0x20ec01 CALL	212580 <@plt_start@+0x180>

0x20ec06 ADD	$0x20,%RSP

0x20ec0a MOV	-0x1c(%RBP),%EAX

0x20ec0d CMP	%R15D,%EAX

0x20ec10 CMOVL	%EAX,%R15D

0x20ec14 MOVSXD	-0x20(%RBP),%RAX

0x20ec18 MOV	%R15D,-0x1c(%RBP)

0x20ec1c CMP	%R15D,%EAX

0x20ec1f JG	20ec71

0x20ec21 MOV	(%R14),%RCX

0x20ec24 LEA	(%RAX,%RAX,2),%RSI

0x20ec28 MOVSXD	%R15D,%RDX

0x20ec2b DEC	%RAX

0x20ec2e VXORPS	%XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM0

0x20ec32 SAL	$0x3,%RSI

0x20ec36 MOV	0x20(%RCX),%RDI

0x20ec3a MOV	0x30(%RDI),%RCX

0x20ec3e ADD	0x28(%RDI),%RSI

0x20ec42 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

(95) 0x20ec50 VMOVUPS	%XMM0,(%RSI)

(95) 0x20ec54 MOVQ	$0,0x10(%RSI)

(95) 0x20ec5c MOVQ	$0,0x8(%RCX,%RAX,8)

(95) 0x20ec65 INC	%RAX

(95) 0x20ec68 ADD	$0x18,%RSI

(95) 0x20ec6c CMP	%RDX,%RAX

(95) 0x20ec6f JL	20ec50

0x20ec71 LEA	0x4d70(%RIP),%RDI

0x20ec78 MOV	%EBX,%ESI

0x20ec7a CALL	212590 <@plt_start@+0x190>

0x20ec7f ADD	$0x18,%RSP

0x20ec83 POP	%RBX

0x20ec84 POP	%R14

0x20ec86 POP	%R15

0x20ec88 POP	%RBP

0x20ec89 RET

0x20ec8a NOPW	(%RAX,%RAX,1)

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run orig_0

Source file and lines	ljForce.c:157-161
Module	exec

The function is defined in:

/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/ljForce.c:157-161
/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/mytype.h:23

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.13 to 1.33 cycles (5.34x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your function is probably not vectorized. Only 8% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions). By vectorizing your function, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.13 to 0.46 cycles (15.45x speedup).

Details

Store and arithmetical SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized function can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

No data for this section

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

Calling (and then returning from) a function prevents many compiler optimizations (like vectorization), breaks control flow (which reduces pipeline performance) and executes extra instructions to save/restore the registers used inside it, which is very expensive (dozens of cycles). Consider to inline small functions.

unknown: 2 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/ljForce.c:157
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/ljForce.c:157

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

CMOVL: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/ljForce.c:158

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 48 bytes. The binary function is storing 20 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	56
nb uops	57
loop length	207
used x86 registers	12
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	1
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	7.13 cycles
front end	7.13 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	3.75	3.75	3.75	3.75	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	3.75	3.75	3.75	3.75	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	7.13
Dispatch	4.67
Overall L1	7.13

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	100%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	100%

INT+FP

all	5%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	12%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	7%
load	8%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	9%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	7%

all	25%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	25%

INT+FP

all	8%
load	8%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	9%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	9%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 7.13 cycles. At this rate:

2% of peak load performance is reached (6.74 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
2% of peak store performance is reached (2.81 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Performance is limited by instruction throughput (loading/decoding program instructions to execution core) (front-end is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.13 to 4.67 cycles (1.53x speedup).

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 20eba0

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x18,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV (%RDX),%R15D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (6.3%)
TEST %R15D,%R15D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
JLE 20ec7f <ljForce.omp_outlined+0xdf>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
MOV (%RDI),%EBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (6.3%)
DEC %R15D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV %RCX,%R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOVL $0,-0x20(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVL $0x1,-0x28(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVL $0,-0x24(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV %R15D,-0x1c(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x28(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA 0x4de7(%RIP),%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x24(%RBP),%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x20(%RBP),%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x1c(%RBP),%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
CALL 212580 <@plt_start@+0x180>	2	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0.50	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x1c(%RBP),%EAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
CMP %R15D,%EAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
CMOVL %EAX,%R15D	2	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOVSXD -0x20(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %R15D,-0x1c(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
CMP %R15D,%EAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
JG 20ec71 <ljForce.omp_outlined+0xd1>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
MOV (%R14),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
LEA (%RAX,%RAX,2),%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOVSXD %R15D,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
DEC %RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
VXORPS %XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	vect (25.0%)
SAL $0x3,%RSI	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x20(%RCX),%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
MOV 0x30(%RDI),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
ADD 0x28(%RDI),%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
LEA 0x4d70(%RIP),%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
CALL 212590 <@plt_start@+0x190>	2	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0.50	N/A
ADD $0x18,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
RET	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
NOPW (%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run orig_0

Source file and lines	ljForce.c:157-161
Module	exec

The function is defined in:

/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/ljForce.c:157-161
/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/mytype.h:23

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.13 to 1.33 cycles (5.34x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

No data for this section

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

unknown: 2 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/ljForce.c:157
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/ljForce.c:157

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

CMOVL: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/ljForce.c:158

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 48 bytes. The binary function is storing 20 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	56
nb uops	57
loop length	207
used x86 registers	12
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	1
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	7.13 cycles
front end	7.13 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	3.75	3.75	3.75	3.75	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	3.75	3.75	3.75	3.75	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	7.13
Dispatch	4.67
Overall L1	7.13

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	100%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	100%

INT+FP

all	5%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	12%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	7%
load	8%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	9%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	7%

all	25%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	25%

INT+FP

all	8%
load	8%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	9%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	9%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 7.13 cycles. At this rate:

2% of peak load performance is reached (6.74 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
2% of peak store performance is reached (2.81 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 20eba0

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x18,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV (%RDX),%R15D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (6.3%)
TEST %R15D,%R15D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
JLE 20ec7f <ljForce.omp_outlined+0xdf>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
MOV (%RDI),%EBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (6.3%)
DEC %R15D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV %RCX,%R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOVL $0,-0x20(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVL $0x1,-0x28(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVL $0,-0x24(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV %R15D,-0x1c(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x28(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA 0x4de7(%RIP),%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x24(%RBP),%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x20(%RBP),%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x1c(%RBP),%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
CALL 212580 <@plt_start@+0x180>	2	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0.50	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x1c(%RBP),%EAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
CMP %R15D,%EAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
CMOVL %EAX,%R15D	2	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOVSXD -0x20(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %R15D,-0x1c(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
CMP %R15D,%EAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
JG 20ec71 <ljForce.omp_outlined+0xd1>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
MOV (%R14),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
LEA (%RAX,%RAX,2),%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOVSXD %R15D,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
DEC %RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
VXORPS %XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	vect (25.0%)
SAL $0x3,%RSI	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x20(%RCX),%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
MOV 0x30(%RDI),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
ADD 0x28(%RDI),%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
LEA 0x4d70(%RIP),%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
CALL 212590 <@plt_start@+0x190>	2	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0.50	N/A
ADD $0x18,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
RET	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
NOPW (%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A

Name	Coverage (%)	Time (s)
▼ljForce.omp_outlined–	3.11	0.88
○Loop 95 - ljForce.c:158-161 - exec	3.11	0.88

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code