OV - exec - Loop 145

0x40d700 LDRSW	X13, [X8, X4,LSL #2]    [2]

0x40d704 ADD	X1, X4, #1

0x40d708 ADD	X2, X19, #24

0x40d70c ORR	X0, XZR, X21

0x40d710 ADD	X4, X4, #2

0x40d714 LDR	D17, [X21]    [4]

0x40d718 ADD	X21, X21, #48

0x40d71c LDP	D16, D24, [X19]    [9]

0x40d720 ADD	X3, X7, X13,LSL #4

0x40d724 LDRSW	X6, [X8, X1,LSL #2]    [2]

0x40d728 LDR	D26, [X3, #8]    [7]

0x40d72c FMUL	D7, D31, D17

0x40d730 LDP	D25, D27, [X19, #16]    [9]

0x40d734 ADD	X19, X19, #48

0x40d738 ADD	X5, X7, X6,LSL #4

0x40d73c FDIV	D28, D30, D26

0x40d740 FMADD	D23, D28, D7, D16

0x40d744 STUR	D23, [X19, #464]    [8]

0x40d748 LDUR	D22, [X21, #472]    [3]

0x40d74c FMUL	D0, D31, D22

0x40d750 FMADD	D29, D28, D0, D24

0x40d754 STUR	D29, [X19, #472]    [8]

0x40d758 LDUR	D1, [X21, #480]    [3]

0x40d75c FMUL	D2, D31, D1

0x40d760 FMADD	D20, D28, D2, D25

0x40d764 STUR	D20, [X19, #480]    [8]

0x40d768 LDR	D3, [X5, #8]    [1]

0x40d76c LDUR	D18, [X21, #488]    [3]

0x40d770 FDIV	D4, D30, D3

0x40d774 FMUL	D21, D31, D18

0x40d778 FMADD	D19, D4, D21, D27

0x40d77c STUR	D19, [X19, #488]    [8]

0x40d780 LDUR	D16, [X21, #496]    [3]

0x40d784 LDP	D5, D6, [X2, #8]    [6]

0x40d788 FMUL	D24, D31, D16

0x40d78c FMADD	D25, D4, D24, D5

0x40d790 STR	D25, [X2, #8]    [6]

0x40d794 LDR	D27, [X0, #40]    [5]

0x40d798 FMUL	D17, D31, D27

0x40d79c FMADD	D7, D4, D17, D6

0x40d7a0 STR	D7, [X2, #16]    [6]

0x40d7a4 CMP	X10, X4

0x40d7a8 B.NE	40d700

/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/timestep.c: 88 - 94

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

88:       for (int iOff=MAXATOMS*iBox,ii=0; ii<s->boxes->nAtoms[iBox]; ii++,iOff++)

89:       {

90:          int iSpecies = s->atoms->iSpecies[iOff];

91:          real_t invMass = 1.0/s->species[iSpecies].mass;

92:          s->atoms->r[iOff][0] += dt*s->atoms->p[iOff][0]*invMass;

93:          s->atoms->r[iOff][1] += dt*s->atoms->p[iOff][1]*invMass;

94:          s->atoms->r[iOff][2] += dt*s->atoms->p[iOff][2]*invMass;

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	GOMP_parallel	libgomp.h:980	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	timestep	timestep.c:43	exec
○	main	CoMD.c:125	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	CoMD.c:266	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►51.24+	GOMP_parallel	libgomp.h:980	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	timestep	timestep.c:43	exec
○	main	CoMD.c:125	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	CoMD.c:266	exec
►48.76+	gomp_thread_start	team.c:130	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►75.16+	gomp_thread_start	team.c:130	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►24.84+	GOMP_parallel	libgomp.h:980	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	timestep	timestep.c:43	exec
○	main	CoMD.c:125	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	CoMD.c:266	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►88.76+	gomp_thread_start	team.c:130	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►11.24+	GOMP_parallel	libgomp.h:980	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	timestep	timestep.c:43	exec
○	main	CoMD.c:125	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	CoMD.c:266	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►93.78+	gomp_thread_start	team.c:130	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►6.22+	GOMP_parallel	libgomp.h:980	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	timestep	timestep.c:43	exec
○	main	CoMD.c:125	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	CoMD.c:266	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►96.58+	gomp_thread_start	team.c:130	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►3.42+	GOMP_parallel	libgomp.h:980	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	timestep	timestep.c:43	exec
○	main	CoMD.c:125	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	CoMD.c:266	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►97.46+	gomp_thread_start	team.c:130	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►2.54+	GOMP_parallel	libgomp.h:980	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	timestep	timestep.c:43	exec
○	main	CoMD.c:125	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	CoMD.c:266	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►98.30+	gomp_thread_start	team.c:130	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►1.70+	GOMP_parallel	libgomp.h:980	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	timestep	timestep.c:43	exec
○	main	CoMD.c:125	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	CoMD.c:266	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►97.65+	gomp_thread_start	team.c:130	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►2.35+	GOMP_parallel	libgomp.h:980	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	timestep	timestep.c:43	exec
○	main	CoMD.c:125	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	CoMD.c:266	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►97.83+	gomp_thread_start	team.c:130	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►2.17+	GOMP_parallel	libgomp.h:980	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	timestep	timestep.c:43	exec
○	main	CoMD.c:125	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	CoMD.c:266	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►98.59+	gomp_thread_start	team.c:130	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►1.41+	GOMP_parallel	libgomp.h:980	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	timestep	timestep.c:43	exec
○	main	CoMD.c:125	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	CoMD.c:266	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►99.09+	gomp_thread_start	team.c:130	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►98.93+	gomp_thread_start	team.c:130	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►1.07+	GOMP_parallel	libgomp.h:980	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	timestep	timestep.c:43	exec
○	main	CoMD.c:125	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	CoMD.c:266	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►99.20+	gomp_thread_start	team.c:130	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►99.00+	gomp_thread_start	team.c:130	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►1.00+	GOMP_parallel	libgomp.h:980	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	timestep	timestep.c:43	exec
○	main	CoMD.c:125	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	CoMD.c:266	exec

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.12 - 1.23
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.20
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	1.77 - 1.95
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.18 - 1.10
Bottlenecks	P8, P10,
Function	advancePosition._omp_fn.0
Source	timestep.c:88-94
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	6.33 - 6.99
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	5.67
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	5.83
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	3.58
Front-end cycles	5.38
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.50
P2 cycles	1.58
P3 cycles	1.58
P4 cycles	1.50
P5 cycles	1.50
P6 cycles	1.42
P7 cycles	1.42
P8 cycles	5.00
P9 cycles	5.00
P10 cycles	5.00
P11 cycles	5.00
P12 cycles	6.33
P13 cycles	6.33
P14 cycles	6.33
P15 cycles	0.00
P16 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	3.50 - 6.99
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	43.00
Nb uops	43.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	6.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	3.16 - 2.86
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	6.00
Nb FLOP fma	6.00
Nb FLOP div	2.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	24.02 - 26.53
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	120.00
Bytes stored	48.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	4.00
Stride unknown	4.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	9.09
Vectorization ratio load	23.08
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	0.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	NA
Vectorization ratio fma	0.00
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	0.00
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	53.03
Vector-efficiency ratio load	57.69
Vector-efficiency ratio store	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.12 - 1.23
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.20
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	1.77 - 1.95
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.18 - 1.10
Bottlenecks	P8, P10,
Function	advancePosition._omp_fn.0
Source	timestep.c:88-94
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	6.33 - 6.99
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	5.67
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	5.83
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	3.58
Front-end cycles	5.38
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.50
P2 cycles	1.58
P3 cycles	1.58
P4 cycles	1.50
P5 cycles	1.50
P6 cycles	1.42
P7 cycles	1.42
P8 cycles	5.00
P9 cycles	5.00
P10 cycles	5.00
P11 cycles	5.00
P12 cycles	6.33
P13 cycles	6.33
P14 cycles	6.33
P15 cycles	0.00
P16 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	3.50 - 6.99
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	43.00
Nb uops	43.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	6.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	3.16 - 2.86
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	6.00
Nb FLOP fma	6.00
Nb FLOP div	2.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	24.02 - 26.53
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	120.00
Bytes stored	48.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	4.00
Stride unknown	4.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	9.09
Vectorization ratio load	23.08
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	0.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	NA
Vectorization ratio fma	0.00
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	0.00
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	53.03
Vector-efficiency ratio load	57.69
Vector-efficiency ratio store	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	advancePosition._omp_fn.0
Source file and lines	timestep.c:88-94
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/timestep.c:88-94.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 6.99 to 5.67 cycles (1.23x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. Only 53% of vector register length is used (average across all VPU instructions). By fully vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 6.99 to 3.58 cycles (1.95x speedup).

Details

9% of VPU instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

23% of VPU loads are used in vector version.
0% of VPU stores are used in vector version.
0% of VPU multiply instructions are used in vector version.
0% of VPU fused multiply-add instructions are used in vector version.
0% of VPU divide and square root instructions are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

FMA

Detected 6 FMA (fused multiply-add) operations.

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 20 FP arithmetical operations:

6: addition or subtraction (all inside FMA instructions)
12: multiply (6 inside FMA instructions)
2: divide

The binary loop is loading 120 bytes. The binary loop is storing 48 bytes.

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.12 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	43
loop length	172
nb stack references	0

Front-end

FIT IN UOP CACHE

front end

5.38 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	P16
uops	0.50	0.50	1.58	1.58	1.50	1.50	1.42	1.42	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	6.33	6.33	6.33	0.00	0.00
cycles	0.50	0.50	1.58	1.58	1.50	1.50	1.42	1.42	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	6.33	6.33	6.33	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6: ALU
P7: ALU
P8 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P10 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P12 (256 bits): store address, load
P13 (256 bits): store address, load
P14 (256 bits): load
P15 (64 bits): store data
P16 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	3.50-6.99
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	5.38
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	6.33-6.99

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	15%
load	23%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

FP

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	0%
div/sqrt	0%
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	9%
load	23%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	0%
div/sqrt	0%
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 6.99 cycles. At this rate:

17% of peak load performance is reached (17.16 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
14% of peak store performance is reached (6.86 out of 48.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 40d700

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LDRSW X13, [X8, X4,LSL #2]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	scal (25.0%)
ADD X1, X4, #1	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD X2, X19, #24	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ORR X0, XZR, X21	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD X4, X4, #2	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LDR D17, [X21]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
ADD X21, X21, #48	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LDP D16, D24, [X19]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	vect (100.0%)
ADD X3, X7, X13,LSL #4	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LDRSW X6, [X8, X1,LSL #2]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D26, [X3, #8]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
FMUL D7, D31, D17	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (50.0%)
LDP D25, D27, [X19, #16]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	vect (100.0%)
ADD X19, X19, #48	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD X5, X7, X6,LSL #4	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
FDIV D28, D30, D26	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	7-15	1.75-3.50	scal (50.0%)
FMADD D23, D28, D7, D16	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (50.0%)
STUR D23, [X19, #464]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (50.0%)
LDUR D22, [X21, #472]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
FMUL D0, D31, D22	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (50.0%)
FMADD D29, D28, D0, D24	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (50.0%)
STUR D29, [X19, #472]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (50.0%)
LDUR D1, [X21, #480]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
FMUL D2, D31, D1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (50.0%)
FMADD D20, D28, D2, D25	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (50.0%)
STUR D20, [X19, #480]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (50.0%)
LDR D3, [X5, #8]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
LDUR D18, [X21, #488]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
FDIV D4, D30, D3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	7-15	1.75-3.50	scal (50.0%)
FMUL D21, D31, D18	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (50.0%)
FMADD D19, D4, D21, D27	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (50.0%)
STUR D19, [X19, #488]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (50.0%)
LDUR D16, [X21, #496]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
LDP D5, D6, [X2, #8]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	vect (100.0%)
FMUL D24, D31, D16	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (50.0%)
FMADD D25, D4, D24, D5	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (50.0%)
STR D25, [X2, #8]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (50.0%)
LDR D27, [X0, #40]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
FMUL D17, D31, D27	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (50.0%)
FMADD D7, D4, D17, D6	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (50.0%)
STR D7, [X2, #16]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (50.0%)
CMP X10, X4	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
B.NE 40d700 <advancePosition._omp_fn.0+0x100>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

Function	advancePosition._omp_fn.0
Source file and lines	timestep.c:88-94
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/timestep.c:88-94.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 6.99 to 5.67 cycles (1.23x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. Only 53% of vector register length is used (average across all VPU instructions). By fully vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 6.99 to 3.58 cycles (1.95x speedup).

Details

9% of VPU instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

23% of VPU loads are used in vector version.
0% of VPU stores are used in vector version.
0% of VPU multiply instructions are used in vector version.
0% of VPU fused multiply-add instructions are used in vector version.
0% of VPU divide and square root instructions are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

FMA

Detected 6 FMA (fused multiply-add) operations.

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 20 FP arithmetical operations:

6: addition or subtraction (all inside FMA instructions)
12: multiply (6 inside FMA instructions)
2: divide

The binary loop is loading 120 bytes. The binary loop is storing 48 bytes.

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.12 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	43
loop length	172
nb stack references	0

Front-end

FIT IN UOP CACHE

front end

5.38 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	P16
uops	0.50	0.50	1.58	1.58	1.50	1.50	1.42	1.42	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	6.33	6.33	6.33	0.00	0.00
cycles	0.50	0.50	1.58	1.58	1.50	1.50	1.42	1.42	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	6.33	6.33	6.33	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6: ALU
P7: ALU
P8 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P10 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P12 (256 bits): store address, load
P13 (256 bits): store address, load
P14 (256 bits): load
P15 (64 bits): store data
P16 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	3.50-6.99
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	5.38
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	6.33-6.99

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	15%
load	23%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

FP

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	0%
div/sqrt	0%
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	9%
load	23%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	0%
div/sqrt	0%
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 6.99 cycles. At this rate:

17% of peak load performance is reached (17.16 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
14% of peak store performance is reached (6.86 out of 48.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 40d700

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LDRSW X13, [X8, X4,LSL #2]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	scal (25.0%)
ADD X1, X4, #1	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD X2, X19, #24	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ORR X0, XZR, X21	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD X4, X4, #2	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LDR D17, [X21]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
ADD X21, X21, #48	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LDP D16, D24, [X19]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	vect (100.0%)
ADD X3, X7, X13,LSL #4	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LDRSW X6, [X8, X1,LSL #2]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D26, [X3, #8]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
FMUL D7, D31, D17	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (50.0%)
LDP D25, D27, [X19, #16]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	vect (100.0%)
ADD X19, X19, #48	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD X5, X7, X6,LSL #4	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
FDIV D28, D30, D26	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	7-15	1.75-3.50	scal (50.0%)
FMADD D23, D28, D7, D16	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (50.0%)
STUR D23, [X19, #464]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (50.0%)
LDUR D22, [X21, #472]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
FMUL D0, D31, D22	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (50.0%)
FMADD D29, D28, D0, D24	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (50.0%)
STUR D29, [X19, #472]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (50.0%)
LDUR D1, [X21, #480]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
FMUL D2, D31, D1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (50.0%)
FMADD D20, D28, D2, D25	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (50.0%)
STUR D20, [X19, #480]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (50.0%)
LDR D3, [X5, #8]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
LDUR D18, [X21, #488]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
FDIV D4, D30, D3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	7-15	1.75-3.50	scal (50.0%)
FMUL D21, D31, D18	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (50.0%)
FMADD D19, D4, D21, D27	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (50.0%)
STUR D19, [X19, #488]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (50.0%)
LDUR D16, [X21, #496]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
LDP D5, D6, [X2, #8]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	vect (100.0%)
FMUL D24, D31, D16	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (50.0%)
FMADD D25, D4, D24, D5	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (50.0%)
STR D25, [X2, #8]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (50.0%)
LDR D27, [X0, #40]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
FMUL D17, D31, D27	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (50.0%)
FMADD D7, D4, D17, D6	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (50.0%)
STR D7, [X2, #16]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (50.0%)
CMP X10, X4	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
B.NE 40d700 <advancePosition._omp_fn.0+0x100>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

▶Scalability Runs Description

Run 1x1	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -x 100 -y 100 -z 100MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1741097920OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_NUM_THREADS: 1OMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x2	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -x 100 -y 100 -z 100MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1741097920OMP_NUM_THREADS: 2OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x4	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -x 100 -y 100 -z 100MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1741097920OMP_NUM_THREADS: 4OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x8	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -x 100 -y 100 -z 100MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1741097920OMP_NUM_THREADS: 8OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x16	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -x 100 -y 100 -z 100MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1741097920OMP_NUM_THREADS: 16OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x24	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -x 100 -y 100 -z 100MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1741097920OMP_NUM_THREADS: 24OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x32	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -x 100 -y 100 -z 100MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1741097920OMP_NUM_THREADS: 32OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x40	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -x 100 -y 100 -z 100MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1741097920OMP_NUM_THREADS: 40OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x48	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -x 100 -y 100 -z 100MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1741097920OMP_NUM_THREADS: 48OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x56	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -x 100 -y 100 -z 100MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1741097920OMP_NUM_THREADS: 56OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x64	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -x 100 -y 100 -z 100MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1741097920OMP_NUM_THREADS: 64OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x72	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -x 100 -y 100 -z 100MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1741097920OMP_NUM_THREADS: 72OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x80	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -x 100 -y 100 -z 100MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1741097920OMP_NUM_THREADS: 80OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x88	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -x 100 -y 100 -z 100MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1741097920OMP_NUM_THREADS: 88OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x96	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -x 100 -y 100 -z 100MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1741097920OMP_NUM_THREADS: 96OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads

(1x1) Efficiency	(1x1) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x2) Efficiency	(1x2) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x4) Efficiency	(1x4) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x8) Efficiency	(1x8) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x16) Efficiency	(1x16) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x24) Efficiency	(1x24) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x32) Efficiency	(1x32) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x40) Efficiency	(1x40) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x48) Efficiency	(1x48) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x56) Efficiency	(1x56) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x64) Efficiency	(1x64) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x72) Efficiency	(1x72) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x80) Efficiency	(1x80) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x88) Efficiency	(1x88) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x96) Efficiency	(1x96) Potential Speed-Up (%)
1	0	0.98	0	0.89	0.03	0.75	0.08	0.47	0.27	0.37	0.39	0.34	0.45	0.3	0.52	0.26	0.62	0.24	0.69	0.22	0.74	0.21	0.76	0.18	0.86	0.17	0.9	0.17	0.94

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency

Run	Number of threads	Efficiency (ideal is 1)	Speedup	Ideal Speedup	Time (s)	Coverage (%)
1x1	1	1	1	1	1.3999998569489	0.26087027788162
1x2	2	0.98	1.97	2	0.72499984502792	0.26449829339981
1x4	4	0.89	3.56	4	0.39999994635582	0.28918185830116
1x8	8	0.75	6.03	8	0.27500000596046	0.33127388358116
1x16	16	0.47	7.55	16	0.24500003457069	0.50583535432816
1x24	24	0.37	8.93	24	0.19499996304512	0.61497414112091
1x32	32	0.34	10.93	32	0.16499999165535	0.68012398481369
1x40	40	0.3	12	40	0.1499999910593	0.74451738595963
1x48	48	0.26	12.58	48	0.12999998033047	0.83937221765518
1x56	56	0.24	13.24	56	0.15499998629093	0.901711165905
1x64	64	0.22	13.93	64	0.13999998569489	0.9420639872551
1x72	72	0.21	15.06	72	0.11999998241663	0.96496492624283
1x80	80	0.18	14.67	80	0.10999996960163	1.0565711259842
1x88	88	0.17	15.16	88	0.14499996602535	1.0877306461334
1x96	96	0.17	15.87	96	0.13999997079372	1.1237895488739

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

FMA

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

FMA

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

ASM code

▶Scalability Runs Description

▼Columns Filter

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency