OV - exec - Loop 59

	Loop Id: 59	Module: exec	Source: haloExchange.c:633-642	Coverage: 0.04%

0x408420 MOV	(%RBX),%ECX    [4]

0x408422 MOV	%ECX,(%RDX,%R14,4)    [5]

0x408426 MOV	0x4(%RBX),%ECX    [4]

0x408429 MOV	%ECX,(%RSI,%R14,4)    [1]

0x40842d VMOVUPS	0x8(%RBX),%XMM0    [4]

0x408432 VMOVUPS	%XMM0,-0x10(%R12,%RAX,1)    [2]

0x408439 VMOVSD	0x18(%RBX),%XMM0    [4]

0x40843e VMOVSD	%XMM0,(%R12,%RAX,1)    [2]

0x408444 VMOVUPS	0x20(%RBX),%XMM0    [4]

0x408449 VMOVUPS	%XMM0,-0x10(%R13,%RAX,1)    [3]

0x408450 VMOVSD	0x30(%RBX),%XMM0    [4]

0x408455 VMOVSD	%XMM0,(%R13,%RAX,1)    [3]

0x40845c INC	%R14

0x40845f ADD	$0x18,%RAX

0x408463 ADD	$0x38,%RBX

0x408467 CMP	%R15,%R14

0x40846a JL	408420

/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-814-1858/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/haloExchange.c: 633 - 642

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

633:    for (int ii=begin, iTmp=0; ii<end; ++ii, ++iTmp)

634:    {

635:       atoms->gid[ii]   = tmp[iTmp].gid;

636:       atoms->iSpecies[ii] = tmp[iTmp].type;

637:       atoms->r[ii][0]  = tmp[iTmp].rx;

638:       atoms->r[ii][1]  = tmp[iTmp].ry;

639:       atoms->r[ii][2]  = tmp[iTmp].rz;

640:       atoms->p[ii][0]  = tmp[iTmp].px;

641:       atoms->p[ii][1]  = tmp[iTmp].py;

642:       atoms->p[ii][2]  = tmp[iTmp].pz;

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►17.78+	redistributeAtoms.extracted	timestep.c:154	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libiomp5.so
►14.44+	redistributeAtoms.extracted	timestep.c:154	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libiomp5.so
►13.33+	redistributeAtoms.extracted	timestep.c:154	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libiomp5.so
►12.22+	redistributeAtoms.extracted	timestep.c:154	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libiomp5.so
►11.11+	redistributeAtoms.extracted	timestep.c:154	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libiomp5.so
►11.11+	redistributeAtoms.extracted	timestep.c:153	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libiomp5.so
►10.00+	redistributeAtoms.extracted	timestep.c:154	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libiomp5.so
►8.89+	redistributeAtoms.extracted	timestep.c:154	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libiomp5.so
►1.11+	redistributeAtoms.extracted	timestep.c:153	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libiomp5.so

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.50
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	6.86
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.12
Bottlenecks	P4, P7, P8, P9,
Function	sortAtomsInCell
Source	haloExchange.c:633-642
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	3.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	2.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	3.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.44
Front-end cycles	2.67
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.00
P2 cycles	2.00
P3 cycles	2.00
P4 cycles	3.00
P5 cycles	0.00
P6 cycles	0.50
P7 cycles	3.00
P8 cycles	3.00
P9 cycles	3.00
P10 cycles	0.00
P11 cycles	2.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	17.00
Nb uops	16.00
Nb loads	6.00
Nb stores	6.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	37.33
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	56.00
Bytes stored	56.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	5.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	33.33
Vectorization ratio load	33.33
Vectorization ratio store	33.33
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	NA
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	14.58
Vector-efficiency ratio load	14.58
Vector-efficiency ratio store	14.58
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.50
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	6.86
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.12
Bottlenecks	P4, P7, P8, P9,
Function	sortAtomsInCell
Source	haloExchange.c:633-642
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	3.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	2.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	3.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.44
Front-end cycles	2.67
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.00
P2 cycles	2.00
P3 cycles	2.00
P4 cycles	3.00
P5 cycles	0.00
P6 cycles	0.50
P7 cycles	3.00
P8 cycles	3.00
P9 cycles	3.00
P10 cycles	0.00
P11 cycles	2.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	17.00
Nb uops	16.00
Nb loads	6.00
Nb stores	6.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	37.33
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	56.00
Bytes stored	56.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	5.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	33.33
Vectorization ratio load	33.33
Vectorization ratio store	33.33
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	NA
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	14.58
Vector-efficiency ratio load	14.58
Vector-efficiency ratio store	14.58
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	sortAtomsInCell
Source file and lines	haloExchange.c:633-642
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-814-1858/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/haloExchange.c:633-642.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 3.00 to 2.00 cycles (1.50x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your loop is poorly vectorized. Only 14% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions). By fully vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 3.00 to 0.44 cycles (6.86x speedup).

Details

33% of SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

33% of SSE/AVX loads are used in vector version.
33% of SSE/AVX stores are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ffast-math (included in Ofast) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Performance is limited by writing data to caches/RAM (the store unit is a bottleneck).

Workaround

Write less array elements
Provide more information to your compiler:
- hardcode the bounds of the corresponding 'for' loop
- use the 'restrict' C99 keyword

No data for this section

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This loop is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop is loading 56 bytes. The binary loop is storing 56 bytes.

Unroll opportunity

Loop is data access bound.

Workaround

Unroll your loop if trip count is significantly higher than target unroll factor and if some data references are common to consecutive iterations. This can be done manually. Or with the unroll (resp. unroll_and_jam) directive on top of the inner (resp. surrounding) loop. You can enforce an unroll factor: #pragma unroll_and_jam N, unroll_and_jam(N), unroll N or unroll(N)

General properties

nb instructions	17
nb uops	16
loop length	76
used x86 registers	9
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	1
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	0

Front-end

ASSUMED MACRO FUSION FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	2.67 cycles
front end	2.67 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11
uops	0.50	0.00	2.00	2.00	3.00	0.00	0.50	3.00	3.00	3.00	0.00	2.00
cycles	0.50	0.00	2.00	2.00	3.00	0.00	0.50	3.00	3.00	3.00	0.00	2.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0 (256 bits): VPU, BRU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P1 (256 bits): ALU, VPU
P2 (512 bits): load
P3 (512 bits): load
P4 (512 bits): store data
P5 (512 bits): ALU, VPU
P6: ALU, BRU
P7: store address
P8: store address
P9 (512 bits): store data
P10: ALU
P11 (512 bits): load

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	2.67
Dispatch	3.00
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	3.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	50%
load	50%
store	50%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	33%
load	33%
store	33%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	6%
load	6%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	18%
load	18%
store	18%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	14%
load	14%
store	14%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 3.00 cycles. At this rate:

9% of peak load performance is reached (18.67 out of 192.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
14% of peak store performance is reached (18.67 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 408420

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
MOV (%RBX),%ECX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOV %ECX,(%RDX,%R14,4)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV 0x4(%RBX),%ECX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOV %ECX,(%RSI,%R14,4)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
VMOVUPS 0x8(%RBX),%XMM0	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0-1	0.33	vect (25.0%)
VMOVUPS %XMM0,-0x10(%R12,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0-1	0.50	vect (25.0%)
VMOVSD 0x18(%RBX),%XMM0	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM0,(%R12,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVUPS 0x20(%RBX),%XMM0	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0-1	0.33	vect (25.0%)
VMOVUPS %XMM0,-0x10(%R13,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0-1	0.50	vect (25.0%)
VMOVSD 0x30(%RBX),%XMM0	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM0,(%R13,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
INC %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD $0x18,%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD $0x38,%RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CMP %R15,%R14	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
JL 408420 <sortAtomsInCell+0xf0>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A

Function	sortAtomsInCell
Source file and lines	haloExchange.c:633-642
Module	exec

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 3.00 to 2.00 cycles (1.50x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Details

33% of SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

33% of SSE/AVX loads are used in vector version.
33% of SSE/AVX stores are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ffast-math (included in Ofast) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Performance is limited by writing data to caches/RAM (the store unit is a bottleneck).

Workaround

Write less array elements
Provide more information to your compiler:
- hardcode the bounds of the corresponding 'for' loop
- use the 'restrict' C99 keyword

No data for this section

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This loop is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop is loading 56 bytes. The binary loop is storing 56 bytes.

Unroll opportunity

Loop is data access bound.

Workaround

General properties

nb instructions	17
nb uops	16
loop length	76
used x86 registers	9
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	1
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	0

Front-end

ASSUMED MACRO FUSION FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	2.67 cycles
front end	2.67 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11
uops	0.50	0.00	2.00	2.00	3.00	0.00	0.50	3.00	3.00	3.00	0.00	2.00
cycles	0.50	0.00	2.00	2.00	3.00	0.00	0.50	3.00	3.00	3.00	0.00	2.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0 (256 bits): VPU, BRU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P1 (256 bits): ALU, VPU
P2 (512 bits): load
P3 (512 bits): load
P4 (512 bits): store data
P5 (512 bits): ALU, VPU
P6: ALU, BRU
P7: store address
P8: store address
P9 (512 bits): store data
P10: ALU
P11 (512 bits): load

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	2.67
Dispatch	3.00
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	3.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	50%
load	50%
store	50%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	33%
load	33%
store	33%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	6%
load	6%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	18%
load	18%
store	18%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	14%
load	14%
store	14%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 3.00 cycles. At this rate:

9% of peak load performance is reached (18.67 out of 192.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
14% of peak store performance is reached (18.67 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 408420

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
MOV (%RBX),%ECX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOV %ECX,(%RDX,%R14,4)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV 0x4(%RBX),%ECX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOV %ECX,(%RSI,%R14,4)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
VMOVUPS 0x8(%RBX),%XMM0	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0-1	0.33	vect (25.0%)
VMOVUPS %XMM0,-0x10(%R12,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0-1	0.50	vect (25.0%)
VMOVSD 0x18(%RBX),%XMM0	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM0,(%R12,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVUPS 0x20(%RBX),%XMM0	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0-1	0.33	vect (25.0%)
VMOVUPS %XMM0,-0x10(%R13,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0-1	0.50	vect (25.0%)
VMOVSD 0x30(%RBX),%XMM0	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD %XMM0,(%R13,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
INC %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD $0x18,%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD $0x38,%RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CMP %R15,%R14	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
JL 408420 <sortAtomsInCell+0xf0>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Unroll opportunity

Workaround

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Unroll opportunity

Workaround

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code