OV - exec - Loop 47

	Loop Id: 47	Module: exec	Source: haloExchange.c:414-424	Coverage: 0.02%

0x407a20 MOV	(%RBX,%R12,1),%EDX    [1]

0x407a24 MOV	0x4(%RBX,%R12,1),%ECX    [1]

0x407a29 VMOVSD	0x8(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM0    [1]

0x407a30 VMOVSD	0x10(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM1    [1]

0x407a37 VMOVSD	0x18(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM2    [1]

0x407a3e VMOVSD	0x20(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM3    [1]

0x407a45 VMOVSD	0x28(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM4    [1]

0x407a4c VMOVSD	0x30(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM5    [1]

0x407a53 MOV	%R14,%RDI

0x407a56 MOV	%R15,%RSI

0x407a59 CALL	40baa0 <putAtomInBox>

0x407a5e MOV	0x38(%RBX,%R12,1),%EDX    [1]

0x407a63 MOV	0x3c(%RBX,%R12,1),%ECX    [1]

0x407a68 VMOVSD	0x40(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM0    [1]

0x407a6f VMOVSD	0x48(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM1    [1]

0x407a76 VMOVSD	0x50(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM2    [1]

0x407a7d VMOVSD	0x58(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM3    [1]

0x407a84 VMOVSD	0x60(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM4    [1]

0x407a8b VMOVSD	0x68(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM5    [1]

0x407a92 MOV	%R14,%RDI

0x407a95 MOV	%R15,%RSI

0x407a98 CALL	40baa0 <putAtomInBox>

0x407a9d ADD	$0x70,%R12

0x407aa1 CMP	%R12,%R13

0x407aa4 JNE	407a20

/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-814-1858/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/haloExchange.c: 414 - 424

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

414:    for (int ii=0; ii<nBuf; ++ii)

415:    {

416:       int gid   = buf[ii].gid;

417:       int type  = buf[ii].type;

418:       real_t rx = buf[ii].rx;

419:       real_t ry = buf[ii].ry;

420:       real_t rz = buf[ii].rz;

421:       real_t px = buf[ii].px;

422:       real_t py = buf[ii].py;

423:       real_t pz = buf[ii].pz;

424:       putAtomInBox(s->boxes, s->atoms, gid, type, rx, ry, rz, px, py, pz);

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►23.91+	haloExchange	haloExchange.c:302	exec
○	timestep	timestep.c:150	exec
○	main	CoMD.c:125	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
►17.39+	haloExchange	memUtils.h:28	exec
○	timestep	timestep.c:150	exec
○	main	CoMD.c:125	exec
►15.22+	haloExchange	memUtils.h:28	exec
○	timestep	timestep.c:150	exec
○	main	CoMD.c:125	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
►10.87+	haloExchange	memUtils.h:28	exec
○	timestep	timestep.c:150	exec
○	main	CoMD.c:125	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
►8.69+	haloExchange	haloExchange.c:302	exec
○	timestep	timestep.c:150	exec
○	main	CoMD.c:125	exec
►6.52+	haloExchange	memUtils.h:28	exec
○	timestep	timestep.c:150	exec
○	main	CoMD.c:125	exec
►4.35+	haloExchange	memUtils.h:28	exec
○	timestep	timestep.c:150	exec
○	main	CoMD.c:125	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
►4.35+	haloExchange	haloExchange.c:302	exec
○	timestep	timestep.c:150	exec
○	main	CoMD.c:125	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
►2.17+	haloExchange	haloExchange.c:302	exec
○	timestep	timestep.c:150	exec
○	main	CoMD.c:125	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
►2.17+	haloExchange	haloExchange.c:302	exec
○	timestep	timestep.c:150	exec
○	main	CoMD.c:125	exec
►2.17+	haloExchange	memUtils.h:28	exec
○	timestep	timestep.c:150	exec
○	main	CoMD.c:125	exec
►2.17+	haloExchange	haloExchange.c:302	exec
○	timestep	timestep.c:150	exec
○	main	CoMD.c:125	exec

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.33
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	9.14
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.23
Bottlenecks	P2, P3, P11,
Function	unloadAtomsBuffer
Source	haloExchange.c:414-424
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	5.33
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	4.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	5.33
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.58
Front-end cycles	4.33
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.00
P2 cycles	5.33
P3 cycles	5.33
P4 cycles	1.00
P5 cycles	0.00
P6 cycles	0.50
P7 cycles	1.00
P8 cycles	1.00
P9 cycles	1.00
P10 cycles	0.00
P11 cycles	5.33
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	25.00
Nb uops	26.00
Nb loads	16.00
Nb stores	0.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	21.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	112.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	1.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	NA
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	NA
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	11.25
Vector-efficiency ratio load	10.94
Vector-efficiency ratio store	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	12.50

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.33
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	9.14
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.23
Bottlenecks	P2, P3, P11,
Function	unloadAtomsBuffer
Source	haloExchange.c:414-424
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	5.33
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	4.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	5.33
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.58
Front-end cycles	4.33
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.00
P2 cycles	5.33
P3 cycles	5.33
P4 cycles	1.00
P5 cycles	0.00
P6 cycles	0.50
P7 cycles	1.00
P8 cycles	1.00
P9 cycles	1.00
P10 cycles	0.00
P11 cycles	5.33
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	25.00
Nb uops	26.00
Nb loads	16.00
Nb stores	0.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	21.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	112.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	1.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	NA
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	NA
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	11.25
Vector-efficiency ratio load	10.94
Vector-efficiency ratio store	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	12.50

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	unloadAtomsBuffer
Source file and lines	haloExchange.c:414-424
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-814-1858/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/haloExchange.c:414-424.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 5.33 to 4.00 cycles (1.33x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. Only 11% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions). By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 5.33 to 0.58 cycles (9.14x speedup).

Details

All SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ffast-math (included in Ofast) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Performance is limited by reading data from caches/RAM (load units are a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 5.33 to 4.33 cycles (1.23x speedup).

Workaround

Read less array elements
Provide more information to your compiler:
- hardcode the bounds of the corresponding 'for' loop
- use the 'restrict' C99 keyword

No data for this section

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

Calling (and then returning from) a function prevents many compiler optimizations (like vectorization), breaks control flow (which reduces pipeline performance) and executes extra instructions to save/restore the registers used inside it, which is very expensive (dozens of cycles). Consider to inline small functions.

putAtomInBox: 2 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-814-1858/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/haloExchange.c:424
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-814-1858/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/haloExchange.c:424

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This loop is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop is loading 112 bytes.

Unroll opportunity

Loop is data access bound.

Workaround

Unroll your loop if trip count is significantly higher than target unroll factor and if some data references are common to consecutive iterations. This can be done manually. Or with the unroll (resp. unroll_and_jam) directive on top of the inner (resp. surrounding) loop. You can enforce an unroll factor: #pragma unroll_and_jam N, unroll_and_jam(N), unroll N or unroll(N)

General properties

nb instructions	25
nb uops	26
loop length	138
used x86 registers	9
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	6
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	0

Front-end

ASSUMED MACRO FUSION FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	4.33 cycles
front end	4.33 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11
uops	0.50	0.00	5.33	5.33	1.00	0.00	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.00	5.33
cycles	0.50	0.00	5.33	5.33	1.00	0.00	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.00	5.33

Execution ports to units layout:

P0 (256 bits): VPU, BRU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P1 (256 bits): ALU, VPU
P2 (512 bits): load
P3 (512 bits): load
P4 (512 bits): store data
P5 (512 bits): ALU, VPU
P6: ALU, BRU
P7: store address
P8: store address
P9 (512 bits): store data
P10: ALU
P11 (512 bits): load

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	4.33
Dispatch	5.33
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	5.33

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	9%
load	6%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	12%

all	12%
load	12%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	11%
load	10%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	12%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 5.33 cycles. At this rate:

10% of peak load performance is reached (21.00 out of 192.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 407a20

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
MOV (%RBX,%R12,1),%EDX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOV 0x4(%RBX,%R12,1),%ECX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
VMOVSD 0x8(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM0	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x10(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM1	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x18(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM2	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x20(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM3	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x28(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM4	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x30(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM5	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
MOV %R14,%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV %R15,%RSI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
CALL 40baa0 <putAtomInBox>	2	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	1	N/A
MOV 0x38(%RBX,%R12,1),%EDX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOV 0x3c(%RBX,%R12,1),%ECX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
VMOVSD 0x40(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM0	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x48(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM1	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x50(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM2	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x58(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM3	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x60(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM4	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x68(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM5	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
MOV %R14,%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV %R15,%RSI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
CALL 40baa0 <putAtomInBox>	2	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	1	N/A
ADD $0x70,%R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CMP %R12,%R13	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
JNE 407a20 <unloadAtomsBuffer+0x90>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A

Function	unloadAtomsBuffer
Source file and lines	haloExchange.c:414-424
Module	exec

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 5.33 to 4.00 cycles (1.33x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Details

All SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ffast-math (included in Ofast) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Workaround

Read less array elements
Provide more information to your compiler:
- hardcode the bounds of the corresponding 'for' loop
- use the 'restrict' C99 keyword

No data for this section

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

putAtomInBox: 2 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-814-1858/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/haloExchange.c:424
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-814-1858/intel/CoMD/build/CoMD/CoMD/src-openmp/haloExchange.c:424

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This loop is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop is loading 112 bytes.

Unroll opportunity

Loop is data access bound.

Workaround

General properties

nb instructions	25
nb uops	26
loop length	138
used x86 registers	9
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	6
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	0

Front-end

ASSUMED MACRO FUSION FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	4.33 cycles
front end	4.33 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11
uops	0.50	0.00	5.33	5.33	1.00	0.00	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.00	5.33
cycles	0.50	0.00	5.33	5.33	1.00	0.00	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.00	5.33

Execution ports to units layout:

P0 (256 bits): VPU, BRU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P1 (256 bits): ALU, VPU
P2 (512 bits): load
P3 (512 bits): load
P4 (512 bits): store data
P5 (512 bits): ALU, VPU
P6: ALU, BRU
P7: store address
P8: store address
P9 (512 bits): store data
P10: ALU
P11 (512 bits): load

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	4.33
Dispatch	5.33
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	5.33

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	9%
load	6%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	12%

all	12%
load	12%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	11%
load	10%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	12%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 5.33 cycles. At this rate:

10% of peak load performance is reached (21.00 out of 192.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 407a20

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
MOV (%RBX,%R12,1),%EDX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOV 0x4(%RBX,%R12,1),%ECX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
VMOVSD 0x8(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM0	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x10(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM1	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x18(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM2	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x20(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM3	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x28(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM4	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x30(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM5	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
MOV %R14,%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV %R15,%RSI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
CALL 40baa0 <putAtomInBox>	2	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	1	N/A
MOV 0x38(%RBX,%R12,1),%EDX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOV 0x3c(%RBX,%R12,1),%ECX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
VMOVSD 0x40(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM0	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x48(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM1	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x50(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM2	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x58(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM3	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x60(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM4	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x68(%RBX,%R12,1),%XMM5	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
MOV %R14,%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV %R15,%RSI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
CALL 40baa0 <putAtomInBox>	2	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	1	N/A
ADD $0x70,%R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CMP %R12,%R13	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
JNE 407a20 <unloadAtomsBuffer+0x90>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Workaround

CALL instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Unroll opportunity

Workaround

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Workaround

CALL instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Unroll opportunity

Workaround

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code