OV - exec - Loop 293

	Loop Id: 293	Module: exec	Source: advec_mom.cpp:85-88 [...]	Coverage: 1.30%

0x4311f0 MOV	%RCX,%RAX

0x4311f3 CQTO

0x4311f5 IDIV	%R15

0x4311f8 ADD	%R14D,%ESI

0x4311fb ADD	%EBX,%EDX

0x4311fd MOVSXD	%EDX,%RAX

0x431200 LEA	-0x1(%RSI),%EDX

0x431203 MOVSXD	%EDX,%RDX

0x431206 IMUL	%R8,%RDX

0x43120a MOVSXD	%ESI,%RSI

0x43120d MOV	%R8,%R12

0x431210 IMUL	%RSI,%R12

0x431214 LEA	(%R12,%RAX,1),%R13

0x431218 MOVSD	(%R9,%R13,8),%XMM1    [1]

0x43121e LEA	(%RDX,%RAX,1),%R13

0x431222 ADDSD	(%R9,%R13,8),%XMM1    [1]

0x431228 LEA	0x1(%RDX,%RAX,1),%RDX

0x43122d ADDSD	(%R9,%RDX,8),%XMM1    [1]

0x431233 LEA	(%R12,%RAX,1),%RDX

0x431237 INC	%RDX

0x43123a ADDSD	(%R9,%RDX,8),%XMM1    [1]

0x431240 IMUL	%R10,%RSI

0x431244 ADD	%RAX,%RSI

0x431247 MULSD	%XMM0,%XMM1

0x43124b MOVSD	%XMM1,(%R11,%RSI,8)    [2]

0x431251 INC	%RCX

0x431254 CMP	%RCX,%RDI

0x431257 JE	4311a3

0x43125d MOV	%RCX,%R12

0x431260 SHR	$0x20,%R12

0x431264 JE	431280

0x431266 MOV	%RCX,%RAX

0x431269 XOR	%EDX,%EDX

0x43126b DIV	%R15

0x43126e MOV	%RAX,%RSI

0x431271 TEST	%R12,%R12

0x431274 JNE	4311f0

0x43127a JMP	431292

0x431280 MOV	%ECX,%EAX

0x431282 XOR	%EDX,%EDX

0x431284 DIV	%R15D

0x431287 MOV	%EAX,%ESI

0x431289 TEST	%R12,%R12

0x43128c JNE	4311f0

0x431292 MOV	%ECX,%EAX

0x431294 XOR	%EDX,%EDX

0x431296 DIV	%R15D

0x431299 JMP	4311f8

/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/context.h: 69 - 69

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

69:   T &operator()(size_t i, size_t j) const { return data[i + j * sizeX]; }

/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp: 85 - 88

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

85: #pragma omp parallel for simd collapse(2)

86:       for (int j = (y_min + 1); j < (y_max + 1 + 2); j++) {

87:         for (int i = (x_min - 2 + 1); i < (x_max + 2 + 2); i++) {

88:           node_flux(i, j) = 0.25 * (mass_flux_x(i + 0, j - 1) + mass_flux_x(i, j) + mass_flux_x(i + 1, j - 1) + mass_flux_x(i + 1, j + 0));

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►47.23+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread		libiomp5.so
○	_INTERNALea951ae6::__kmp_launc[...]		libiomp5.so
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	__GI___clone3		libc.so.6
►40.29+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread		libiomp5.so
○	_INTERNALea951ae6::__kmp_launc[...]		libiomp5.so
►6.25+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread		libiomp5.so
○	_INTERNALea951ae6::__kmp_launc[...]		libiomp5.so
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
►3.09+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread		libiomp5.so
►1.44+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_fork_call		libiomp5.so
○	__kmpc_fork_call		libiomp5.so
○	advec_mom_kernel(int, int, int[...]	advec_mom.cpp:85	exec
○	advec_mom_driver(global_variab[...]	advec_mom.cpp:244	exec
○	advection	advection.cpp:70	exec
○	hydro	basic_string.h:1024	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.cpp:208	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	definitions.cpp:0	exec
►1.36+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_fork_call		libiomp5.so
○	__kmpc_fork_call		libiomp5.so
○	advec_mom_kernel(int, int, int[...]	advec_mom.cpp:85	exec
○	advec_mom_driver(global_variab[...]	advec_mom.cpp:244	exec
○	advection	advection.cpp:101	exec
○	hydro	basic_string.h:1024	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.cpp:208	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	definitions.cpp:0	exec

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	6.50 - 9.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	10.40 - 9.60
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	2.62 - 3.62
Bottlenecks
Function	advec_mom_kernel(int, int, int, int, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer1D&, clover::Buffer1D&, int, int, int) [clone .extracted.37]
Source	context.h:69-69,advec_mom.cpp:85-88
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	13.00 - 18.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	2.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	13.00 - 18.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	1.25 - 1.88
Front-end cycles	4.97
P0 cycles	4.38
P1 cycles	4.38
P2 cycles	4.38
P3 cycles	4.38
P4 cycles	4.38
P5 cycles	4.38
P6 cycles	1.50
P7 cycles	1.50
P8 cycles	1.50
P9 cycles	1.50
P10 cycles	0.50
P11 cycles	0.50
P12 cycles	1.50
P13 cycles	1.50
P14 cycles	0.50
P15 cycles	0.50
DIV/SQRT cycles	13.00 - 18.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	0
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	37.75
Nb uops	39.75
Nb loads	4.00
Nb stores	1.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.31 - 0.22
Nb FLOP add-sub	3.00
Nb FLOP mul	1.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	2.36 - 3.09
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	32.00
Bytes stored	8.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	2.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	0.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	0.00
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	11.89
Vector-efficiency ratio load	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio store	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	9.38
Vector-efficiency ratio other	12.50

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	6.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	16.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	2.34
Bottlenecks	P10, P11,
Function	advec_mom_kernel(int, int, int, int, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer1D&, clover::Buffer1D&, int, int, int) [clone .extracted.37]
Source	context.h:69-69,advec_mom.cpp:85-88
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	12.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	2.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	12.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.75
Front-end cycles	5.13
P0 cycles	4.50
P1 cycles	4.50
P2 cycles	4.50
P3 cycles	4.50
P4 cycles	4.50
P5 cycles	4.50
P6 cycles	1.50
P7 cycles	1.50
P8 cycles	1.50
P9 cycles	1.50
P10 cycles	0.50
P11 cycles	0.50
P12 cycles	1.50
P13 cycles	1.50
P14 cycles	0.50
P15 cycles	0.50
DIV/SQRT cycles	12.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	0
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	38.00
Nb uops	41.00
Nb loads	4.00
Nb stores	1.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.33
Nb FLOP add-sub	3.00
Nb FLOP mul	1.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	3.33
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	32.00
Bytes stored	8.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	2.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	0.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	0.00
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	11.25
Vector-efficiency ratio load	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio store	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	6.25
Vector-efficiency ratio other	12.50

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	6.50 - 9.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	10.40 - 9.60
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	2.74 - 3.79
Bottlenecks	P10, P11,
Function	advec_mom_kernel(int, int, int, int, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer1D&, clover::Buffer1D&, int, int, int) [clone .extracted.37]
Source	context.h:69-69,advec_mom.cpp:85-88
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	13.00 - 18.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	2.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	13.00 - 18.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	1.25 - 1.88
Front-end cycles	4.75
P0 cycles	4.17
P1 cycles	4.17
P2 cycles	4.17
P3 cycles	4.17
P4 cycles	4.17
P5 cycles	4.17
P6 cycles	1.50
P7 cycles	1.50
P8 cycles	1.50
P9 cycles	1.50
P10 cycles	0.50
P11 cycles	0.50
P12 cycles	1.50
P13 cycles	1.50
P14 cycles	0.50
P15 cycles	0.50
DIV/SQRT cycles	13.00 - 18.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	0
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	37.00
Nb uops	38.00
Nb loads	4.00
Nb stores	1.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.31 - 0.22
Nb FLOP add-sub	3.00
Nb FLOP mul	1.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	2.22 - 3.08
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	32.00
Bytes stored	8.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	2.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	0.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	0.00
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	11.93
Vector-efficiency ratio load	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio store	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	9.38
Vector-efficiency ratio other	12.50

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	6.50 - 9.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	10.40 - 9.60
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	2.48 - 3.43
Bottlenecks	P10, P11,
Function	advec_mom_kernel(int, int, int, int, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer1D&, clover::Buffer1D&, int, int, int) [clone .extracted.37]
Source	context.h:69-69,advec_mom.cpp:85-88
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	13.00 - 18.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	2.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	13.00 - 18.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	1.25 - 1.88
Front-end cycles	5.25
P0 cycles	4.67
P1 cycles	4.67
P2 cycles	4.67
P3 cycles	4.67
P4 cycles	4.67
P5 cycles	4.67
P6 cycles	1.50
P7 cycles	1.50
P8 cycles	1.50
P9 cycles	1.50
P10 cycles	0.50
P11 cycles	0.50
P12 cycles	1.50
P13 cycles	1.50
P14 cycles	0.50
P15 cycles	0.50
DIV/SQRT cycles	13.00 - 18.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	0
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	39.00
Nb uops	42.00
Nb loads	4.00
Nb stores	1.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.31 - 0.22
Nb FLOP add-sub	3.00
Nb FLOP mul	1.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	2.22 - 3.08
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	32.00
Bytes stored	8.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	2.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	0.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	0.00
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	11.88
Vector-efficiency ratio load	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio store	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	9.38
Vector-efficiency ratio other	12.50

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	7.00 - 12.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	8.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	2.95 - 5.05
Bottlenecks	P10, P11,
Function	advec_mom_kernel(int, int, int, int, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer1D&, clover::Buffer1D&, int, int, int) [clone .extracted.37]
Source	context.h:69-69,advec_mom.cpp:85-88
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	14.00 - 24.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	2.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	14.00 - 24.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	1.75 - 3.00
Front-end cycles	4.75
P0 cycles	4.17
P1 cycles	4.17
P2 cycles	4.17
P3 cycles	4.17
P4 cycles	4.17
P5 cycles	4.17
P6 cycles	1.50
P7 cycles	1.50
P8 cycles	1.50
P9 cycles	1.50
P10 cycles	0.50
P11 cycles	0.50
P12 cycles	1.50
P13 cycles	1.50
P14 cycles	0.50
P15 cycles	0.50
DIV/SQRT cycles	14.00 - 24.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	0
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	37.00
Nb uops	38.00
Nb loads	4.00
Nb stores	1.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.29 - 0.17
Nb FLOP add-sub	3.00
Nb FLOP mul	1.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	1.67 - 2.86
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	32.00
Bytes stored	8.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	2.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	0.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	0.00
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio load	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio store	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio other	12.50

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	advec_mom_kernel(int, int, int, int, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer1D&, clover::Buffer1D&, int, int, int) [clone .extracted.37]
Source file and lines	advec_mom.cpp:85-88
Module	exec

The loop is defined in:

/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/context.h:69
/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:85-88

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.
This loop has 4 execution paths.

The presence of multiple execution paths is typically the main/first bottleneck.
Try to simplify control inside loop: ideally, try to remove all conditional expressions, for example by (if applicable):

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. Only 11% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions). By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 18.00 to 1.87 cycles (9.60x speedup).

Details

All SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ffast-math (included in Ofast) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

Detected performance impact from expensive FP math instructions/calls. By removing/reexpressing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 18.00 to 4.72 cycles (3.81x speedup).

FMA

Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Pass to your compiler a micro-architecture specialization option:
- use march=native
Try to change order in which elements are evaluated (using parentheses) in arithmetic expressions containing both ADD/SUB and MUL operations to enable your compiler to generate FMA instructions wherever possible. For instance a + b*c is a valid FMA (MUL then ADD). However (a+b)* c cannot be translated into an FMA (ADD then MUL).

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

DIV: 0 occurrences
LEA: 0 occurrences

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Irregular (variable stride) or indirect: 2 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to remove indirect accesses. If applicable, precompute elements out of the innermost loop.

Type of elements and instruction set

4 SSE or AVX instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in scalar mode (one at a time).

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 4 FP arithmetical operations:

3: addition or subtraction
1: multiply

The binary loop is loading 32 bytes (4 double precision FP elements). The binary loop is storing 8 bytes (1 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.10 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	37.75
nb uops	39.75
loop length	139.50
used x86 registers	14
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	2
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	0
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	3.00

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE

micro-operation queue	4.97 cycles
front end	4.97 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	4.37	4.37	4.37	4.38	4.37	4.37	1.50	1.50	1.50	1.50	0.50	0.50	1.50	1.50	0.50	0.50
cycles	4.37	4.37	4.37	4.38	4.37	4.37	1.50	1.50	1.50	1.50	0.50	0.50	1.50	1.50	0.50	0.50

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	13.00-18.00
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	0.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	4.97
Dispatch	4.38
DIV/SQRT	13.00-18.00
Data deps.	0.00
Overall L1	13.00-18.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	0%
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	11%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	10%

all	12%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	12%
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	11%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	12%
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	9%
other	12%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 18.00 cycles. At this rate:

0% of peak load performance is reached (1.89 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
0% of peak store performance is reached (0.47 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Function	advec_mom_kernel(int, int, int, int, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer1D&, clover::Buffer1D&, int, int, int) [clone .extracted.37]
Source file and lines	advec_mom.cpp:85-88
Module	exec

The loop is defined in:

/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/context.h:69
/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:85-88

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 12.00 to 2.00 cycles (6.00x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Details

All SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ffast-math (included in Ofast) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Performance is limited by execution of divide and square root operations (the divide/square root unit is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 12.00 to 5.13 cycles (2.34x speedup).

Workaround

Reduce the number of division or square root instructions:
- If denominator is constant over iterations, use reciprocal (replace x/y with x*(1/y)). Check precision impact. This will be done by your compiler with ffast-math or Ofast
Check whether you really need double precision. If not, switch to single precision to speedup execution

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

Detected performance impact from expensive FP math instructions/calls. By removing/reexpressing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 12.00 to 4.88 cycles (2.46x speedup).

FMA

Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Pass to your compiler a micro-architecture specialization option:
- use march=native
Try to change order in which elements are evaluated (using parentheses) in arithmetic expressions containing both ADD/SUB and MUL operations to enable your compiler to generate FMA instructions wherever possible. For instance a + b*c is a valid FMA (MUL then ADD). However (a+b)* c cannot be translated into an FMA (ADD then MUL).

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

DIV: 2 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:86
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:86
LEA: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/context.h:69

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Irregular (variable stride) or indirect: 2 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to remove indirect accesses. If applicable, precompute elements out of the innermost loop.

Type of elements and instruction set

4 SSE or AVX instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in scalar mode (one at a time).

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 4 FP arithmetical operations:

3: addition or subtraction
1: multiply

The binary loop is loading 32 bytes (4 double precision FP elements). The binary loop is storing 8 bytes (1 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.10 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	38
nb uops	41
loop length	140
used x86 registers	14
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	2
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	0
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	3.00

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	5.13 cycles
front end	5.13 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	4.50	4.50	4.50	4.50	4.50	4.50	1.50	1.50	1.50	1.50	0.50	0.50	1.50	1.50	0.50	0.50
cycles	4.50	4.50	4.50	4.50	4.50	4.50	1.50	1.50	1.50	1.50	0.50	0.50	1.50	1.50	0.50	0.50

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	12.00
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	0.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	5.13
Dispatch	4.50
DIV/SQRT	12.00
Data deps.	0.00
Overall L1	12.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	0%
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	9%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	8%

all	12%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	12%
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	11%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	12%
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	6%
other	12%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 12.00 cycles. At this rate:

1% of peak load performance is reached (2.67 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
0% of peak store performance is reached (0.67 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 43125d

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
ADD %R14D,%ESI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD %EBX,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSXD %EDX,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x1(%RSI),%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOVSXD %EDX,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
IMUL %R8,%RDX	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
MOVSXD %ESI,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %R8,%R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
IMUL %RSI,%R12	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
LEA (%R12,%RAX,1),%R13	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOVSD (%R9,%R13,8),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
LEA (%RDX,%RAX,1),%R13	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADDSD (%R9,%R13,8),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	scal (12.5%)
LEA 0x1(%RDX,%RAX,1),%RDX	2	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	N/A
ADDSD (%R9,%RDX,8),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	scal (12.5%)
LEA (%R12,%RAX,1),%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
INC %RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADDSD (%R9,%RDX,8),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	scal (12.5%)
IMUL %R10,%RSI	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %RAX,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MULSD %XMM0,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOVSD %XMM1,(%R11,%RSI,8)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
INC %RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
CMP %RCX,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JE 4311a3 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.extracted.37+0x83>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
MOV %RCX,%R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
SHR $0x20,%R12	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
JE 431280 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.extracted.37+0x160>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
MOV %ECX,%EAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
XOR %EDX,%EDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	N/A
DIV %R15D	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	10-17	6	scal (6.3%)
MOV %EAX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
TEST %R12,%R12	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
JNE 4311f0 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.extracted.37+0xd0>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
MOV %ECX,%EAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
XOR %EDX,%EDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	N/A
DIV %R15D	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	10-17	6	scal (6.3%)
JMP 4311f8 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.extracted.37+0xd8>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	N/A

Function	advec_mom_kernel(int, int, int, int, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer1D&, clover::Buffer1D&, int, int, int) [clone .extracted.37]
Source file and lines	advec_mom.cpp:85-88
Module	exec

The loop is defined in:

/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/context.h:69
/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:85-88

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 18.00 to 2.00 cycles (9.00x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Details

All SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ffast-math (included in Ofast) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Workaround

Reduce the number of division or square root instructions:
- If denominator is constant over iterations, use reciprocal (replace x/y with x*(1/y)). Check precision impact. This will be done by your compiler with ffast-math or Ofast
Check whether you really need double precision. If not, switch to single precision to speedup execution

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

Detected performance impact from expensive FP math instructions/calls. By removing/reexpressing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 18.00 to 4.50 cycles (4.00x speedup).

FMA

Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Pass to your compiler a micro-architecture specialization option:
- use march=native
Try to change order in which elements are evaluated (using parentheses) in arithmetic expressions containing both ADD/SUB and MUL operations to enable your compiler to generate FMA instructions wherever possible. For instance a + b*c is a valid FMA (MUL then ADD). However (a+b)* c cannot be translated into an FMA (ADD then MUL).

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

DIV: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:86
IDIV: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:86
LEA: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/context.h:69

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Irregular (variable stride) or indirect: 2 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to remove indirect accesses. If applicable, precompute elements out of the innermost loop.

Conversion instructions

Detected expensive conversion instructions.

Details

CQTO: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:86

Workaround

Avoid mixing data with different types. In particular, check if the type of constants is the same as array elements.

Type of elements and instruction set

4 SSE or AVX instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in scalar mode (one at a time).

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 4 FP arithmetical operations:

3: addition or subtraction
1: multiply

The binary loop is loading 32 bytes (4 double precision FP elements). The binary loop is storing 8 bytes (1 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.10 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	37
nb uops	38
loop length	136
used x86 registers	14
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	2
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	0
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	3.00

Front-end

ASSUMED MACRO FUSION FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	4.75 cycles
front end	4.75 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	4.17	4.17	4.17	4.17	4.17	4.17	1.50	1.50	1.50	1.50	0.50	0.50	1.50	1.50	0.50	0.50
cycles	4.17	4.17	4.17	4.17	4.17	4.17	1.50	1.50	1.50	1.50	0.50	0.50	1.50	1.50	0.50	0.50

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	13.00-18.00
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	0.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	4.75
Dispatch	4.17
DIV/SQRT	13.00-18.00
Data deps.	0.00
Overall L1	13.00-18.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	0%
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	11%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	10%

all	12%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	12%
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	11%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	12%
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	9%
other	12%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 18.00 cycles. At this rate:

0% of peak load performance is reached (1.78 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
0% of peak store performance is reached (0.44 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 43125d

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
MOV %RCX,%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
CQTO																				scal (12.5%)
IDIV %R15	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	9-19	7-12	scal (12.5%)
ADD %R14D,%ESI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD %EBX,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSXD %EDX,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x1(%RSI),%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOVSXD %EDX,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
IMUL %R8,%RDX	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
MOVSXD %ESI,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %R8,%R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
IMUL %RSI,%R12	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
LEA (%R12,%RAX,1),%R13	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOVSD (%R9,%R13,8),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
LEA (%RDX,%RAX,1),%R13	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADDSD (%R9,%R13,8),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	scal (12.5%)
LEA 0x1(%RDX,%RAX,1),%RDX	2	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	N/A
ADDSD (%R9,%RDX,8),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	scal (12.5%)
LEA (%R12,%RAX,1),%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
INC %RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADDSD (%R9,%RDX,8),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	scal (12.5%)
IMUL %R10,%RSI	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %RAX,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MULSD %XMM0,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOVSD %XMM1,(%R11,%RSI,8)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
INC %RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
CMP %RCX,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JE 4311a3 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.extracted.37+0x83>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
MOV %RCX,%R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
SHR $0x20,%R12	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
JE 431280 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.extracted.37+0x160>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
MOV %ECX,%EAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
XOR %EDX,%EDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	N/A
DIV %R15D	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	10-17	6	scal (6.3%)
MOV %EAX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
TEST %R12,%R12	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
JNE 4311f0 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.extracted.37+0xd0>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A

Function	advec_mom_kernel(int, int, int, int, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer1D&, clover::Buffer1D&, int, int, int) [clone .extracted.37]
Source file and lines	advec_mom.cpp:85-88
Module	exec

The loop is defined in:

/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/context.h:69
/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:85-88

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 18.00 to 2.00 cycles (9.00x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Details

All SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ffast-math (included in Ofast) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Workaround

Reduce the number of division or square root instructions:
- If denominator is constant over iterations, use reciprocal (replace x/y with x*(1/y)). Check precision impact. This will be done by your compiler with ffast-math or Ofast
Check whether you really need double precision. If not, switch to single precision to speedup execution

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

Detected performance impact from expensive FP math instructions/calls. By removing/reexpressing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 18.00 to 5.00 cycles (3.60x speedup).

FMA

Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Pass to your compiler a micro-architecture specialization option:
- use march=native
Try to change order in which elements are evaluated (using parentheses) in arithmetic expressions containing both ADD/SUB and MUL operations to enable your compiler to generate FMA instructions wherever possible. For instance a + b*c is a valid FMA (MUL then ADD). However (a+b)* c cannot be translated into an FMA (ADD then MUL).

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

DIV: 2 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:86
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:86
LEA: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/context.h:69

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Irregular (variable stride) or indirect: 2 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to remove indirect accesses. If applicable, precompute elements out of the innermost loop.

Type of elements and instruction set

4 SSE or AVX instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in scalar mode (one at a time).

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 4 FP arithmetical operations:

3: addition or subtraction
1: multiply

The binary loop is loading 32 bytes (4 double precision FP elements). The binary loop is storing 8 bytes (1 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.10 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	39
nb uops	42
loop length	144
used x86 registers	14
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	2
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	0
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	3.00

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	5.25 cycles
front end	5.25 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	1.50	1.50	1.50	1.50	0.50	0.50	1.50	1.50	0.50	0.50
cycles	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	4.67	1.50	1.50	1.50	1.50	0.50	0.50	1.50	1.50	0.50	0.50

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	13.00-18.00
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	0.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	5.25
Dispatch	4.67
DIV/SQRT	13.00-18.00
Data deps.	0.00
Overall L1	13.00-18.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	0%
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	10%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	10%

all	12%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	12%
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	11%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	12%
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	9%
other	12%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 18.00 cycles. At this rate:

0% of peak load performance is reached (1.78 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
0% of peak store performance is reached (0.44 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 43125d

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
ADD %R14D,%ESI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD %EBX,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSXD %EDX,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x1(%RSI),%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOVSXD %EDX,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
IMUL %R8,%RDX	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
MOVSXD %ESI,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %R8,%R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
IMUL %RSI,%R12	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
LEA (%R12,%RAX,1),%R13	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOVSD (%R9,%R13,8),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
LEA (%RDX,%RAX,1),%R13	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADDSD (%R9,%R13,8),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	scal (12.5%)
LEA 0x1(%RDX,%RAX,1),%RDX	2	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	N/A
ADDSD (%R9,%RDX,8),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	scal (12.5%)
LEA (%R12,%RAX,1),%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
INC %RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADDSD (%R9,%RDX,8),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	scal (12.5%)
IMUL %R10,%RSI	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %RAX,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MULSD %XMM0,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOVSD %XMM1,(%R11,%RSI,8)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
INC %RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
CMP %RCX,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JE 4311a3 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.extracted.37+0x83>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
MOV %RCX,%R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
SHR $0x20,%R12	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
JE 431280 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.extracted.37+0x160>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
MOV %RCX,%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
XOR %EDX,%EDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	N/A
DIV %R15	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	10-22	7-12	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RAX,%RSI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
TEST %R12,%R12	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
JNE 4311f0 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.extracted.37+0xd0>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
JMP 431292 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.extracted.37+0x172>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	N/A
MOV %ECX,%EAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
XOR %EDX,%EDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	N/A
DIV %R15D	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	10-17	6	scal (6.3%)
JMP 4311f8 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.extracted.37+0xd8>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	N/A

Function	advec_mom_kernel(int, int, int, int, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer1D&, clover::Buffer1D&, int, int, int) [clone .extracted.37]
Source file and lines	advec_mom.cpp:85-88
Module	exec

The loop is defined in:

/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/context.h:69
/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:85-88

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 24.00 to 2.00 cycles (12.00x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 8 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers.

By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 24.00 to 3.00 cycles (8.00x speedup).

Details

All SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ffast-math (included in Ofast) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Workaround

Reduce the number of division or square root instructions:
- If denominator is constant over iterations, use reciprocal (replace x/y with x*(1/y)). Check precision impact. This will be done by your compiler with ffast-math or Ofast
Check whether you really need double precision. If not, switch to single precision to speedup execution

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

Detected performance impact from expensive FP math instructions/calls. By removing/reexpressing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 24.00 to 4.50 cycles (5.33x speedup).

FMA

Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Pass to your compiler a micro-architecture specialization option:
- use march=native
Try to change order in which elements are evaluated (using parentheses) in arithmetic expressions containing both ADD/SUB and MUL operations to enable your compiler to generate FMA instructions wherever possible. For instance a + b*c is a valid FMA (MUL then ADD). However (a+b)* c cannot be translated into an FMA (ADD then MUL).

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

DIV: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:86
IDIV: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:86
LEA: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/context.h:69

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Irregular (variable stride) or indirect: 2 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to remove indirect accesses. If applicable, precompute elements out of the innermost loop.

Conversion instructions

Detected expensive conversion instructions.

Details

CQTO: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:86

Workaround

Avoid mixing data with different types. In particular, check if the type of constants is the same as array elements.

Type of elements and instruction set

4 SSE or AVX instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in scalar mode (one at a time).

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 4 FP arithmetical operations:

3: addition or subtraction
1: multiply

The binary loop is loading 32 bytes (4 double precision FP elements). The binary loop is storing 8 bytes (1 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.10 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	37
nb uops	38
loop length	138
used x86 registers	14
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	2
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	0
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	3.00

Front-end

ASSUMED MACRO FUSION FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	4.75 cycles
front end	4.75 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	4.17	4.17	4.17	4.17	4.17	4.17	1.50	1.50	1.50	1.50	0.50	0.50	1.50	1.50	0.50	0.50
cycles	4.17	4.17	4.17	4.17	4.17	4.17	1.50	1.50	1.50	1.50	0.50	0.50	1.50	1.50	0.50	0.50

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	14.00-24.00
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	0.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	4.75
Dispatch	4.17
DIV/SQRT	14.00-24.00
Data deps.	0.00
Overall L1	14.00-24.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	0%
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	12%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	12%

all	12%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	12%
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	12%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	12%
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	12%
other	12%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 24.00 cycles. At this rate:

0% of peak load performance is reached (1.33 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
0% of peak store performance is reached (0.33 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 43125d

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
MOV %RCX,%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
CQTO																				scal (12.5%)
IDIV %R15	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	9-19	7-12	scal (12.5%)
ADD %R14D,%ESI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD %EBX,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSXD %EDX,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x1(%RSI),%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOVSXD %EDX,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
IMUL %R8,%RDX	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
MOVSXD %ESI,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %R8,%R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
IMUL %RSI,%R12	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
LEA (%R12,%RAX,1),%R13	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOVSD (%R9,%R13,8),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
LEA (%RDX,%RAX,1),%R13	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADDSD (%R9,%R13,8),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	scal (12.5%)
LEA 0x1(%RDX,%RAX,1),%RDX	2	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	N/A
ADDSD (%R9,%RDX,8),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	scal (12.5%)
LEA (%R12,%RAX,1),%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
INC %RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADDSD (%R9,%RDX,8),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	scal (12.5%)
IMUL %R10,%RSI	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %RAX,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MULSD %XMM0,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOVSD %XMM1,(%R11,%RSI,8)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
INC %RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
CMP %RCX,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JE 4311a3 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.extracted.37+0x83>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
MOV %RCX,%R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
SHR $0x20,%R12	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
JE 431280 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.extracted.37+0x160>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
MOV %RCX,%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
XOR %EDX,%EDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	N/A
DIV %R15	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	10-22	7-12	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RAX,%RSI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
TEST %R12,%R12	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
JNE 4311f0 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.extracted.37+0xd0>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A

Report Configuration

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

FMA

Workaround

Complex instructions

Details

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Workaround

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

FMA

Workaround

Complex instructions

Details

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Workaround

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

FMA

Workaround

Complex instructions

Details

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Conversion instructions

Details

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check