OV - exec - Loop 202

	Loop Id: 202	Module: exec	Source: :0-0	Coverage: 3.41%

0x4247f0 MOVUPD	(%R12,%RAX,1),%XMM2    [6]

0x4247f6 MOVUPD	(%RCX,%RAX,1),%XMM0    [9]

0x4247fb MOVUPD	(%RBP,%RAX,1),%XMM1    [5]

0x424801 MOVUPD	(%RDX,%RAX,1),%XMM4    [7]

0x424806 MULPD	%XMM2,%XMM0

0x42480a MOVUPD	(%R11,%RAX,1),%XMM5    [4]

0x424810 MOVUPD	(%RBX,%RAX,1),%XMM3    [8]

0x424815 MOVUPD	(%R9,%RAX,1),%XMM7    [2]

0x42481b MOVUPD	(%R10,%RAX,1),%XMM6    [3]

0x424821 ADDPD	%XMM7,%XMM2

0x424825 ADDPD	%XMM0,%XMM1

0x424829 MULPD	%XMM4,%XMM0

0x42482d SUBPD	%XMM3,%XMM1

0x424831 MOVUPD	(%R8,%RAX,1),%XMM3    [1]

0x424837 ADDPD	%XMM5,%XMM0

0x42483b SUBPD	%XMM3,%XMM2

0x42483f SUBPD	%XMM6,%XMM0

0x424843 DIVPD	%XMM1,%XMM0

0x424847 DIVPD	%XMM2,%XMM1

0x42484b MOVUPS	%XMM1,(%RCX,%RAX,1)    [9]

0x42484f MOVUPS	%XMM0,(%RDX,%RAX,1)    [7]

0x424853 ADD	$0x10,%RAX

0x424857 CMP	%RSI,%RAX

0x42485a JNE	4247f0

  ***  This Panel is Intentionally Left Blank.  ***

It is due to a lack of debug symbols in the given object
(loop or function).

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►96.85+	gomp_thread_start	team.c:130	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	__GI___clone3		libc.so.6
►1.57+	GOMP_parallel	libgomp.h:982	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	advec_cell_kernel(int, int, in[...]		exec
○	advec_cell_driver(global_varia[...]		exec
○	advection(global_variables&)		exec
○	hydro(global_variables&, paral[...]		exec
○	main		exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start		exec
►1.54+	GOMP_parallel	libgomp.h:982	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	advec_cell_kernel(int, int, in[...]		exec
○	advec_cell_driver(global_varia[...]		exec
○	advection(global_variables&)		exec
○	hydro(global_variables&, paral[...]		exec
○	main		exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start		exec

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	2.91
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	4.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	2.67
Bottlenecks	P10, P11,
Function	advec_cell_kernel(int, int, int, int, int, int, clover::Buffer1D&, clover::Buffer1D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&) [clone ._omp_fn.3]
Source
Source loop unroll info	NA
Source loop unroll confidence level	NA
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	8.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	8.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	2.75
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	2.00
Front-end cycles	2.88
P0 cycles	0.33
P1 cycles	0.33
P2 cycles	0.33
P3 cycles	0.33
P4 cycles	0.33
P5 cycles	0.33
P6 cycles	2.75
P7 cycles	2.75
P8 cycles	2.75
P9 cycles	2.75
P10 cycles	2.00
P11 cycles	2.00
P12 cycles	3.00
P13 cycles	3.00
P14 cycles	1.00
P15 cycles	1.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	8.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	24.00
Nb uops	23.00
Nb loads	9.00
Nb stores	2.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	2.50
Nb FLOP add-sub	12.00
Nb FLOP mul	4.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	4.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	22.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	144.00
Bytes stored	32.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	9.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	100.00
Vectorization ratio load	100.00
Vectorization ratio store	100.00
Vectorization ratio mul	100.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	100.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	100.00
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	2.91
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	4.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	2.67
Bottlenecks	P10, P11,
Function	advec_cell_kernel(int, int, int, int, int, int, clover::Buffer1D&, clover::Buffer1D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&) [clone ._omp_fn.3]
Source
Source loop unroll info	NA
Source loop unroll confidence level	NA
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	8.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	8.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	2.75
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	2.00
Front-end cycles	2.88
P0 cycles	0.33
P1 cycles	0.33
P2 cycles	0.33
P3 cycles	0.33
P4 cycles	0.33
P5 cycles	0.33
P6 cycles	2.75
P7 cycles	2.75
P8 cycles	2.75
P9 cycles	2.75
P10 cycles	2.00
P11 cycles	2.00
P12 cycles	3.00
P13 cycles	3.00
P14 cycles	1.00
P15 cycles	1.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	8.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	24.00
Nb uops	23.00
Nb loads	9.00
Nb stores	2.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	2.50
Nb FLOP add-sub	12.00
Nb FLOP mul	4.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	4.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	22.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	144.00
Bytes stored	32.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	9.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	100.00
Vectorization ratio load	100.00
Vectorization ratio store	100.00
Vectorization ratio mul	100.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	100.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	100.00
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	advec_cell_kernel(int, int, int, int, int, int, clover::Buffer1D&, clover::Buffer1D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&) [clone ._omp_fn.3]
Source file and lines
Module	exec

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is vectorized, but using only 128 out of 512 bits (SSE/AVX-128 instructions on AVX-512 processors).

By fully vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 8.00 to 2.00 cycles (4.00x speedup).

Details

All SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Pass to your compiler a micro-architecture specialization option:
- Please look into your compiler manual for march=native or equivalent
Use vector aligned instructions:
1. align your arrays on 64 bytes boundaries
2. inform your compiler that your arrays are vector aligned: read your compiler manual.

Execution units bottlenecks

Performance is limited by execution of divide and square root operations (the divide/square root unit is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 8.00 to 3.00 cycles (2.67x speedup).

Workaround

Reduce the number of division or square root instructions:
- If denominator is constant over iterations, use reciprocal (replace x/y with x*(1/y)). Check precision impact.
Check whether you really need double precision. If not, switch to single precision to speedup execution

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

Detected performance impact from expensive FP math instructions/calls. By removing/reexpressing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 8.00 to 4.00 cycles (2.00x speedup).

FMA

Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Pass to your compiler a micro-architecture specialization option:
- Please look into your compiler manual for march=native or equivalent
Try to change order in which elements are evaluated (using parentheses) in arithmetic expressions containing both ADD/SUB and MUL operations to enable your compiler to generate FMA instructions wherever possible. For instance a + b*c is a valid FMA (MUL then ADD). However (a+b)* c cannot be translated into an FMA (ADD then MUL).

Vector unaligned load/store instructions

Detected 11 suboptimal vector unaligned load/store instructions.

Details

MOVUPD: 9 occurrences►
MOVUPS: 2 occurrences►

Workaround

Pass to your compiler a micro-architecture specialization option:
- Please look into your compiler manual for march=native or equivalent
Use vector aligned instructions:
1. align your arrays on 64 bytes boundaries
2. inform your compiler that your arrays are vector aligned: read your compiler manual.

Type of elements and instruction set

10 SSE or AVX instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in vector mode (two at a time).

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 20 FP arithmetical operations:

12: addition or subtraction
4: multiply
4: divide

The binary loop is loading 144 bytes (18 double precision FP elements). The binary loop is storing 32 bytes (4 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.11 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	24
nb uops	23
loop length	108
used x86 registers	11
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	8
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	0
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	3.00

Front-end

ASSUMED MACRO FUSION FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	2.88 cycles
front end	2.88 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	2.75	2.75	2.75	2.75	2.00	2.00	3.00	3.00	1.00	1.00
cycles	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	2.75	2.75	2.75	2.75	2.00	2.00	3.00	3.00	1.00	1.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	8.00
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	2.88
Dispatch	3.00
DIV/SQRT	8.00
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	8.00

Vectorization ratios

all	100%
load	100%
store	100%
mul	100%
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	100%
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Vector efficiency ratios

all	25%
load	25%
store	25%
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	25%
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 8.00 cycles. At this rate:

7% of peak load performance is reached (18.00 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
3% of peak store performance is reached (4.00 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 4247f0

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
MOVUPD (%R12,%RAX,1),%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
MOVUPD (%RCX,%RAX,1),%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
MOVUPD (%RBP,%RAX,1),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
MOVUPD (%RDX,%RAX,1),%XMM4	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
MULPD %XMM2,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
MOVUPD (%R11,%RAX,1),%XMM5	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
MOVUPD (%RBX,%RAX,1),%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
MOVUPD (%R9,%RAX,1),%XMM7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
MOVUPD (%R10,%RAX,1),%XMM6	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
ADDPD %XMM7,%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (25.0%)
ADDPD %XMM0,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (25.0%)
MULPD %XMM4,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
SUBPD %XMM3,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (25.0%)
MOVUPD (%R8,%RAX,1),%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
ADDPD %XMM5,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (25.0%)
SUBPD %XMM3,%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (25.0%)
SUBPD %XMM6,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (25.0%)
DIVPD %XMM1,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	13	4	vect (25.0%)
DIVPD %XMM2,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	13	4	vect (25.0%)
MOVUPS %XMM1,(%RCX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	4	0.50	vect (25.0%)
MOVUPS %XMM0,(%RDX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	4	0.50	vect (25.0%)
ADD $0x10,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CMP %RSI,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
JNE 4247f0 <_Z17advec_cell_kerneliiiiiiRN6clover8Buffer1DIdEES2_RNS_8Buffer2DIdEES5_S5_S5_S5_S5_S5_S5_S5_S5_S5_S5_S5_S5_._omp_fn.3+0x220>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A

Function	advec_cell_kernel(int, int, int, int, int, int, clover::Buffer1D&, clover::Buffer1D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&) [clone ._omp_fn.3]
Source file and lines
Module	exec

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is vectorized, but using only 128 out of 512 bits (SSE/AVX-128 instructions on AVX-512 processors).

By fully vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 8.00 to 2.00 cycles (4.00x speedup).

Details

Workaround

Pass to your compiler a micro-architecture specialization option:
- Please look into your compiler manual for march=native or equivalent
Use vector aligned instructions:
1. align your arrays on 64 bytes boundaries
2. inform your compiler that your arrays are vector aligned: read your compiler manual.

Execution units bottlenecks

Workaround

Reduce the number of division or square root instructions:
- If denominator is constant over iterations, use reciprocal (replace x/y with x*(1/y)). Check precision impact.
Check whether you really need double precision. If not, switch to single precision to speedup execution

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

Detected performance impact from expensive FP math instructions/calls. By removing/reexpressing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 8.00 to 4.00 cycles (2.00x speedup).

FMA

Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Pass to your compiler a micro-architecture specialization option:
- Please look into your compiler manual for march=native or equivalent
Try to change order in which elements are evaluated (using parentheses) in arithmetic expressions containing both ADD/SUB and MUL operations to enable your compiler to generate FMA instructions wherever possible. For instance a + b*c is a valid FMA (MUL then ADD). However (a+b)* c cannot be translated into an FMA (ADD then MUL).

Vector unaligned load/store instructions

Detected 11 suboptimal vector unaligned load/store instructions.

Details

MOVUPD: 9 occurrences►
MOVUPS: 2 occurrences►

Workaround

Pass to your compiler a micro-architecture specialization option:
- Please look into your compiler manual for march=native or equivalent
Use vector aligned instructions:
1. align your arrays on 64 bytes boundaries
2. inform your compiler that your arrays are vector aligned: read your compiler manual.

Type of elements and instruction set

10 SSE or AVX instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in vector mode (two at a time).

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 20 FP arithmetical operations:

12: addition or subtraction
4: multiply
4: divide

The binary loop is loading 144 bytes (18 double precision FP elements). The binary loop is storing 32 bytes (4 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.11 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	24
nb uops	23
loop length	108
used x86 registers	11
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	8
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	0
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	3.00

Front-end

ASSUMED MACRO FUSION FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	2.88 cycles
front end	2.88 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	2.75	2.75	2.75	2.75	2.00	2.00	3.00	3.00	1.00	1.00
cycles	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	2.75	2.75	2.75	2.75	2.00	2.00	3.00	3.00	1.00	1.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	8.00
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	2.88
Dispatch	3.00
DIV/SQRT	8.00
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	8.00

Vectorization ratios

all	100%
load	100%
store	100%
mul	100%
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	100%
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Vector efficiency ratios

all	25%
load	25%
store	25%
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	25%
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 8.00 cycles. At this rate:

7% of peak load performance is reached (18.00 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
3% of peak store performance is reached (4.00 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 4247f0

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
MOVUPD (%R12,%RAX,1),%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
MOVUPD (%RCX,%RAX,1),%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
MOVUPD (%RBP,%RAX,1),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
MOVUPD (%RDX,%RAX,1),%XMM4	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
MULPD %XMM2,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
MOVUPD (%R11,%RAX,1),%XMM5	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
MOVUPD (%RBX,%RAX,1),%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
MOVUPD (%R9,%RAX,1),%XMM7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
MOVUPD (%R10,%RAX,1),%XMM6	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
ADDPD %XMM7,%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (25.0%)
ADDPD %XMM0,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (25.0%)
MULPD %XMM4,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
SUBPD %XMM3,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (25.0%)
MOVUPD (%R8,%RAX,1),%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
ADDPD %XMM5,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (25.0%)
SUBPD %XMM3,%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (25.0%)
SUBPD %XMM6,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (25.0%)
DIVPD %XMM1,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	13	4	vect (25.0%)
DIVPD %XMM2,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	13	4	vect (25.0%)
MOVUPS %XMM1,(%RCX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	4	0.50	vect (25.0%)
MOVUPS %XMM0,(%RDX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	4	0.50	vect (25.0%)
ADD $0x10,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CMP %RSI,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
JNE 4247f0 <_Z17advec_cell_kerneliiiiiiRN6clover8Buffer1DIdEES2_RNS_8Buffer2DIdEES5_S5_S5_S5_S5_S5_S5_S5_S5_S5_S5_S5_S5_._omp_fn.3+0x220>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A

Report Configuration

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Workaround

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

FMA

Workaround

Vector unaligned load/store instructions

Details

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Workaround

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

FMA

Workaround

Vector unaligned load/store instructions

Details

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code