OV - exec - Loop 182

	Loop Id: 182	Module: exec	Source: advec_mom.cpp:219-221 [...]	Coverage: 4.10%

0x238150 CQTO

0x238152 IDIV	%RBX

0x238155 LEA	(%R14,%RDI,1),%R9D

0x238159 LEA	(%R14,%RAX,1),%R13D

0x23815d MOV	-0x2c(%RBP),%R14D    [3]

0x238161 ADD	%R14D,%R8D

0x238164 ADD	%R14D,%EDX

0x238167 MOVSXD	%R8D,%R14

0x23816a MOVSXD	%EDX,%RDX

0x23816d MOVSXD	%R9D,%R9

0x238170 MOVSXD	%R13D,%R8

0x238173 MOV	-0x68(%RBP),%RBX    [3]

0x238177 MOV	%RBX,%R13

0x23817a IMUL	%R9,%R13

0x23817e ADD	%R14,%R13

0x238181 MOV	-0x60(%RBP),%R10    [3]

0x238185 MOVSD	(%R10,%R13,8),%XMM0    [2]

0x23818b IMUL	%R8,%RBX

0x23818f ADD	%RDX,%RBX

0x238192 MOVHPD	(%R10,%RBX,8),%XMM0    [2]

0x238198 MOV	-0xa8(%RBP),%R13    [3]

0x23819f ADD	%R13D,%EDI

0x2381a2 MOVSXD	%EDI,%RDI

0x2381a5 IMUL	%R12,%RDI

0x2381a9 ADD	%R14,%RDI

0x2381ac MOVSD	(%R15,%RDI,8),%XMM1    [4]

0x2381b2 ADD	%R13D,%EAX

0x2381b5 CLTQ

0x2381b7 IMUL	%R12,%RAX

0x2381bb ADD	%RDX,%RAX

0x2381be MOVHPD	(%R15,%RAX,8),%XMM1    [4]

0x2381c4 MOV	%R12,%RAX

0x2381c7 IMUL	%R9,%RAX

0x2381cb ADD	%R14,%RAX

0x2381ce MOVSD	(%R15,%RAX,8),%XMM2    [4]

0x2381d4 MOV	%R12,%RAX

0x2381d7 IMUL	%R8,%RAX

0x2381db ADD	%RDX,%RAX

0x2381de MOVHPD	(%R15,%RAX,8),%XMM2    [4]

0x2381e4 MOV	-0x70(%RBP),%RDI    [3]

0x2381e8 MOV	%RDI,%RAX

0x2381eb IMUL	%R9,%RAX

0x2381ef ADD	%R14,%RAX

0x2381f2 MOV	-0x58(%RBP),%R10    [3]

0x2381f6 IMUL	%R10,%R9

0x2381fa ADD	%R14,%R9

0x2381fd MOV	-0x50(%RBP),%RBX    [3]

0x238201 MOVSD	(%RBX,%R9,8),%XMM3    [5]

0x238207 IMUL	%R8,%RDI

0x23820b IMUL	%R10,%R8

0x23820f ADD	%RDX,%R8

0x238212 MOVHPD	(%RBX,%R8,8),%XMM3    [5]

0x238218 ADD	%RDX,%RDI

0x23821b MOV	-0x98(%RBP),%R10    [3]

0x238222 MOVSD	(%R10,%RAX,8),%XMM4    [1]

0x238228 MOVHPD	(%R10,%RDI,8),%XMM4    [1]

0x23822e MULPD	%XMM4,%XMM0

0x238232 ADDPD	%XMM0,%XMM1

0x238236 SUBPD	%XMM2,%XMM1

0x23823a DIVPD	%XMM3,%XMM1

0x23823e MOVLPD	%XMM1,(%R10,%RAX,8)    [1]

0x238244 MOVHPD	%XMM1,(%R10,%RDI,8)    [1]

0x23824a ADD	$0x2,%RSI

0x23824e ADD	$-0x2,%R11

0x238252 MOV	-0xa0(%RBP),%RBX    [3]

0x238259 JE	2382a9

0x23825b MOV	%RSI,%RAX

0x23825e SHR	$0x20,%RAX

0x238262 JE	238280

0x238264 MOV	%RSI,%RAX

0x238267 CQTO

0x238269 IDIV	%RBX

0x23826c MOV	%RDX,%R8

0x23826f MOV	%RAX,%RDI

0x238272 JMP	23828b

0x238280 MOV	%ESI,%EAX

0x238282 XOR	%EDX,%EDX

0x238284 DIV	%EBX

0x238286 MOV	%EDX,%R8D

0x238289 MOV	%EAX,%EDI

0x23828b MOV	-0x38(%RBP),%R14    [3]

0x23828f LEA	0x1(%RSI),%RAX

0x238293 MOV	%RAX,%RDX

0x238296 SHR	$0x20,%RDX

0x23829a JNE	238150

0x2382a0 XOR	%EDX,%EDX

0x2382a2 DIV	%EBX

0x2382a4 JMP	238155

/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/context.h: 69 - 69

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

69:   T &operator()(size_t i, size_t j) const { return data[i + j * sizeX]; }

/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp: 219 - 221

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

219:     for (int j = (y_min + 1); j < (y_max + 1 + 2); j++) {

220:       for (int i = (x_min + 1); i < (x_max + 1 + 2); i++) {

221:         vel1(i, j) = (vel1(i, j) * node_mass_pre(i, j) + mom_flux(i + 0, j - 1) - mom_flux(i, j)) / node_mass_post(i, j);

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	4.25 - 5.50
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.16
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	7.56 - 7.65
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.68 - 2.17
Bottlenecks
Function	advec_mom_kernel(int, int, int, int, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer1D&, clover::Buffer1D&, int, int, int) [clone .omp_outlined.22]
Source	context.h:69-69,advec_mom.cpp:219-221
Source loop unroll info	unrolled by 2
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	main
Unroll factor	2
CQA cycles	17.00 - 22.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	4.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	14.00 - 19.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	2.25 - 2.88
Front-end cycles	10.13
P0 cycles	7.33
P1 cycles	7.33
P2 cycles	7.33
P3 cycles	7.33
P4 cycles	7.33
P5 cycles	7.33
P6 cycles	5.50
P7 cycles	5.50
P8 cycles	5.50
P9 cycles	5.50
P10 cycles	2.50
P11 cycles	2.50
P12 cycles	2.50
P13 cycles	2.50
P14 cycles	1.00
P15 cycles	1.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	17.00 - 22.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	80.00
Nb uops	81.00
Nb loads	20.00
Nb stores	2.00
Nb stack references	10.00
FLOP/cycle	0.47 - 0.36
Nb FLOP add-sub	4.00
Nb FLOP mul	2.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	2.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	8.13 - 10.14
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	156.00
Bytes stored	16.00
Stride 0	1.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	4.00
Vectorization ratio all	16.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	100.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	66.67
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	33.33
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	13.50
Vector-efficiency ratio load	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio store	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	18.75
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	14.58
Vector-efficiency ratio other	10.42

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	4.25 - 5.50
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.16
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	7.56 - 7.65
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.66 - 2.15
Bottlenecks	P10, P11,
Function	advec_mom_kernel(int, int, int, int, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer1D&, clover::Buffer1D&, int, int, int) [clone .omp_outlined.22]
Source	context.h:69-69,advec_mom.cpp:219-221
Source loop unroll info	unrolled by 2
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	main
Unroll factor	2
CQA cycles	17.00 - 22.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	4.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	14.00 - 19.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	2.25 - 2.88
Front-end cycles	10.25
P0 cycles	7.50
P1 cycles	7.50
P2 cycles	7.50
P3 cycles	7.50
P4 cycles	7.50
P5 cycles	7.50
P6 cycles	5.50
P7 cycles	5.50
P8 cycles	5.50
P9 cycles	5.50
P10 cycles	2.50
P11 cycles	2.50
P12 cycles	2.50
P13 cycles	2.50
P14 cycles	1.00
P15 cycles	1.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	17.00 - 22.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	81.00
Nb uops	82.00
Nb loads	20.00
Nb stores	2.00
Nb stack references	10.00
FLOP/cycle	0.47 - 0.36
Nb FLOP add-sub	4.00
Nb FLOP mul	2.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	2.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	7.82 - 10.12
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	156.00
Bytes stored	16.00
Stride 0	1.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	4.00
Vectorization ratio all	16.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	100.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	66.67
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	33.33
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	13.50
Vector-efficiency ratio load	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio store	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	18.75
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	14.58
Vector-efficiency ratio other	10.42

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	4.50 - 7.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.12
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	6.55 - 7.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.80 - 2.80
Bottlenecks	P10, P11,
Function	advec_mom_kernel(int, int, int, int, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer1D&, clover::Buffer1D&, int, int, int) [clone .omp_outlined.22]
Source	context.h:69-69,advec_mom.cpp:219-221
Source loop unroll info	unrolled by 2
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	main
Unroll factor	2
CQA cycles	18.00 - 28.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	4.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	15.00 - 25.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	2.75 - 4.00
Front-end cycles	10.00
P0 cycles	7.33
P1 cycles	7.33
P2 cycles	7.33
P3 cycles	7.33
P4 cycles	7.33
P5 cycles	7.33
P6 cycles	5.50
P7 cycles	5.50
P8 cycles	5.50
P9 cycles	5.50
P10 cycles	2.50
P11 cycles	2.50
P12 cycles	2.50
P13 cycles	2.50
P14 cycles	1.00
P15 cycles	1.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	18.00 - 28.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	80.00
Nb uops	80.00
Nb loads	20.00
Nb stores	2.00
Nb stack references	10.00
FLOP/cycle	0.44 - 0.29
Nb FLOP add-sub	4.00
Nb FLOP mul	2.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	2.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	6.14 - 9.56
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	156.00
Bytes stored	16.00
Stride 0	1.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	4.00
Vectorization ratio all	16.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	100.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	66.67
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	33.33
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	14.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio store	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	18.75
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	16.67
Vector-efficiency ratio other	11.46

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	4.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.23
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	9.14
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.56
Bottlenecks	P10, P11,
Function	advec_mom_kernel(int, int, int, int, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer1D&, clover::Buffer1D&, int, int, int) [clone .omp_outlined.22]
Source	context.h:69-69,advec_mom.cpp:219-221
Source loop unroll info	unrolled by 2
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	main
Unroll factor	2
CQA cycles	16.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	4.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	13.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	1.75
Front-end cycles	10.25
P0 cycles	7.33
P1 cycles	7.33
P2 cycles	7.33
P3 cycles	7.33
P4 cycles	7.33
P5 cycles	7.33
P6 cycles	5.50
P7 cycles	5.50
P8 cycles	5.50
P9 cycles	5.50
P10 cycles	2.50
P11 cycles	2.50
P12 cycles	2.50
P13 cycles	2.50
P14 cycles	1.00
P15 cycles	1.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	16.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	80.00
Nb uops	82.00
Nb loads	20.00
Nb stores	2.00
Nb stack references	10.00
FLOP/cycle	0.50
Nb FLOP add-sub	4.00
Nb FLOP mul	2.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	2.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	10.75
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	156.00
Bytes stored	16.00
Stride 0	1.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	4.00
Vectorization ratio all	16.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	100.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	66.67
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	33.33
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	13.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio store	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	18.75
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio other	9.38

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	4.25 - 5.50
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.16
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	7.56 - 7.65
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.70 - 2.20
Bottlenecks	P10, P11,
Function	advec_mom_kernel(int, int, int, int, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer1D&, clover::Buffer1D&, int, int, int) [clone .omp_outlined.22]
Source	context.h:69-69,advec_mom.cpp:219-221
Source loop unroll info	unrolled by 2
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	main
Unroll factor	2
CQA cycles	17.00 - 22.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	4.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	14.00 - 19.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	2.25 - 2.88
Front-end cycles	10.00
P0 cycles	7.17
P1 cycles	7.17
P2 cycles	7.17
P3 cycles	7.17
P4 cycles	7.17
P5 cycles	7.17
P6 cycles	5.50
P7 cycles	5.50
P8 cycles	5.50
P9 cycles	5.50
P10 cycles	2.50
P11 cycles	2.50
P12 cycles	2.50
P13 cycles	2.50
P14 cycles	1.00
P15 cycles	1.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	17.00 - 22.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	79.00
Nb uops	80.00
Nb loads	20.00
Nb stores	2.00
Nb stack references	10.00
FLOP/cycle	0.47 - 0.36
Nb FLOP add-sub	4.00
Nb FLOP mul	2.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	2.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	7.82 - 10.12
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	156.00
Bytes stored	16.00
Stride 0	1.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	4.00
Vectorization ratio all	16.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	100.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	66.67
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	33.33
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	13.50
Vector-efficiency ratio load	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio store	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	18.75
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	14.58
Vector-efficiency ratio other	10.42

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	advec_mom_kernel(int, int, int, int, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer1D&, clover::Buffer1D&, int, int, int) [clone .omp_outlined.22]
Source file and lines	advec_mom.cpp:219-221
Module	exec

The loop is defined in:

/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/context.h:69
/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219-221

It is main loop of related source loop which is unrolled by 2 (including vectorization).
This loop has 4 execution paths.

The presence of multiple execution paths is typically the main/first bottleneck.
Try to simplify control inside loop: ideally, try to remove all conditional expressions, for example by (if applicable):

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. Only 13% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions). By fully vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 22.00 to 2.87 cycles (7.65x speedup).

Details

16% of SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

0% of SSE/AVX loads are used in vector version.
0% of SSE/AVX stores are used in vector version.
66% of SSE/AVX addition or subtraction instructions are used in vector version.
33% of SSE/AVX divide and square root instructions are used in vector version.
0% of SSE/AVX instructions that are not load, store, addition, subtraction nor multiply instructions are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ffast-math (included in Ofast) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

Detected performance impact from expensive FP math instructions/calls. By removing/reexpressing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 22.00 to 9.88 cycles (2.23x speedup).

FMA

Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Pass to your compiler a micro-architecture specialization option:
- use march=native
Try to change order in which elements are evaluated (using parentheses) in arithmetic expressions containing both ADD/SUB and MUL operations to enable your compiler to generate FMA instructions wherever possible. For instance a + b*c is a valid FMA (MUL then ADD). However (a+b)* c cannot be translated into an FMA (ADD then MUL).

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

DIV: 0 occurrences
IDIV: 0 occurrences
MOVHPD: 0 occurrences

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Irregular (variable stride) or indirect: 4 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to remove indirect accesses. If applicable, precompute elements out of the innermost loop.

Conversion instructions

Detected expensive conversion instructions.

Details

CLTQ: 0 occurrences
CQTO: 0 occurrences

Workaround

Avoid mixing data with different types. In particular, check if the type of constants is the same as array elements.

Type of elements and instruction set

4 SSE or AVX instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in vector mode (two at a time).

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 8 FP arithmetical operations:

4: addition or subtraction
2: multiply
2: divide

The binary loop is loading 156 bytes (19 double precision FP elements). The binary loop is storing 16 bytes (2 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.05 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	80
nb uops	81
loop length	312.50
used x86 registers	14
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	5
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	10
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	2.00

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE

micro-operation queue	10.13 cycles
front end	10.13 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	7.33	7.33	7.33	7.33	7.33	7.33	5.50	5.50	5.50	5.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	1.00	1.00
cycles	7.33	7.33	7.33	7.33	7.33	7.33	5.50	5.50	5.50	5.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	1.00	1.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	17.00-22.00
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	10.13
Dispatch	7.33
DIV/SQRT	17.00-22.00
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	17.00-22.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	25%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	100%
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	100%
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	16%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	100%
add-sub	66%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	33%
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	9%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	6%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	10%

all	15%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	25%
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	13%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	25%
add-sub	18%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	14%
other	10%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 22.00 cycles. At this rate:

2% of peak load performance is reached (7.38 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
0% of peak store performance is reached (0.76 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Function	advec_mom_kernel(int, int, int, int, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer1D&, clover::Buffer1D&, int, int, int) [clone .omp_outlined.22]
Source file and lines	advec_mom.cpp:219-221
Module	exec

The loop is defined in:

/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/context.h:69
/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219-221

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 22.00 to 4.00 cycles (5.50x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Details

16% of SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

0% of SSE/AVX loads are used in vector version.
0% of SSE/AVX stores are used in vector version.
66% of SSE/AVX addition or subtraction instructions are used in vector version.
33% of SSE/AVX divide and square root instructions are used in vector version.
0% of SSE/AVX instructions that are not load, store, addition, subtraction nor multiply instructions are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ffast-math (included in Ofast) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Performance is limited by execution of divide and square root operations (the divide/square root unit is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 22.00 to 10.25 cycles (2.15x speedup).

Workaround

Reduce the number of division or square root instructions:
- If denominator is constant over iterations, use reciprocal (replace x/y with x*(1/y)). Check precision impact. This will be done by your compiler with ffast-math or Ofast
Check whether you really need double precision. If not, switch to single precision to speedup execution

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

Detected performance impact from expensive FP math instructions/calls. By removing/reexpressing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 22.00 to 10.00 cycles (2.20x speedup).

FMA

Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Pass to your compiler a micro-architecture specialization option:
- use march=native
Try to change order in which elements are evaluated (using parentheses) in arithmetic expressions containing both ADD/SUB and MUL operations to enable your compiler to generate FMA instructions wherever possible. For instance a + b*c is a valid FMA (MUL then ADD). However (a+b)* c cannot be translated into an FMA (ADD then MUL).

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

DIV: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219
IDIV: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219
MOVHPD: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:221

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Irregular (variable stride) or indirect: 4 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to remove indirect accesses. If applicable, precompute elements out of the innermost loop.

Vector unaligned load/store instructions

Detected 6 suboptimal vector unaligned load/store instructions.

Details

MOVHPD: 6 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:221
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/context.h:69
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:221

Workaround

Pass to your compiler a micro-architecture specialization option:
- use march=native
Use vector aligned instructions:
1. align your arrays on 64 bytes boundaries: replace { void *p = malloc (size); } with { void *p; posix_memalign (&p, 64, size); }.
2. inform your compiler that your arrays are vector aligned: if array 'foo' is 64 bytes-aligned, define a pointer 'p_foo' as __builtin_assume_aligned (foo, 64) and use it instead of 'foo' in the loop.

Conversion instructions

Detected expensive conversion instructions.

Details

CLTQ: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:221
CQTO: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219

Workaround

Avoid mixing data with different types. In particular, check if the type of constants is the same as array elements.

Type of elements and instruction set

4 SSE or AVX instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in vector mode (two at a time).

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 8 FP arithmetical operations:

4: addition or subtraction
2: multiply
2: divide

The binary loop is loading 156 bytes (19 double precision FP elements). The binary loop is storing 16 bytes (2 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.05 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	81
nb uops	82
loop length	317
used x86 registers	14
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	5
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	10
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	2.00

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	10.25 cycles
front end	10.25 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	7.50	7.50	7.50	7.50	7.50	7.50	5.50	5.50	5.50	5.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	1.00	1.00
cycles	7.50	7.50	7.50	7.50	7.50	7.50	5.50	5.50	5.50	5.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	1.00	1.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	17.00-22.00
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	10.25
Dispatch	7.50
DIV/SQRT	17.00-22.00
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	17.00-22.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	25%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	100%
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	100%
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	16%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	100%
add-sub	66%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	33%
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	9%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	6%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	10%

all	15%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	25%
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	13%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	25%
add-sub	18%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	14%
other	10%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 22.00 cycles. At this rate:

2% of peak load performance is reached (7.09 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
0% of peak store performance is reached (0.73 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 23825b

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LEA (%R14,%RDI,1),%R9D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA (%R14,%RAX,1),%R13D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV -0x2c(%RBP),%R14D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
ADD %R14D,%R8D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD %R14D,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOVSXD %R8D,%R14	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSXD %EDX,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOVSXD %R9D,%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSXD %R13D,%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x68(%RBP),%RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOV %RBX,%R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
IMUL %R9,%R13	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %R14,%R13	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x60(%RBP),%R10	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOVSD (%R10,%R13,8),%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
IMUL %R8,%RBX	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %RDX,%RBX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVHPD (%R10,%RBX,8),%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV -0xa8(%RBP),%R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
ADD %R13D,%EDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSXD %EDI,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
IMUL %R12,%RDI	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %R14,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSD (%R15,%RDI,8),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
ADD %R13D,%EAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CLTQ																				scal (12.5%)
IMUL %R12,%RAX	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %RDX,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVHPD (%R15,%RAX,8),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV %R12,%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
IMUL %R9,%RAX	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %R14,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSD (%R15,%RAX,8),%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV %R12,%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
IMUL %R8,%RAX	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %RDX,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVHPD (%R15,%RAX,8),%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV -0x70(%RBP),%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOV %RDI,%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
IMUL %R9,%RAX	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %R14,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x58(%RBP),%R10	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
IMUL %R10,%R9	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %R14,%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x50(%RBP),%RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOVSD (%RBX,%R9,8),%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
IMUL %R8,%RDI	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
IMUL %R10,%R8	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %RDX,%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVHPD (%RBX,%R8,8),%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
ADD %RDX,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x98(%RBP),%R10	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOVSD (%R10,%RAX,8),%XMM4	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOVHPD (%R10,%RDI,8),%XMM4	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MULPD %XMM4,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
ADDPD %XMM0,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (25.0%)
SUBPD %XMM2,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (25.0%)
DIVPD %XMM3,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	13	4	vect (25.0%)
MOVLPD %XMM1,(%R10,%RAX,8)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOVHPD %XMM1,(%R10,%RDI,8)	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.50	2	0.50	scal (12.5%)
ADD $0x2,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD $-0x2,%R11	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0xa0(%RBP),%RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
JE 2382a9 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.omp_outlined.22+0x2b9>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
MOV %RSI,%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
SHR $0x20,%RAX	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
JE 238280 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.omp_outlined.22+0x290>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
MOV %RSI,%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
CQTO																				scal (12.5%)
IDIV %RBX	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	9-19	7-12	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RDX,%R8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV %RAX,%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
JMP 23828b <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.omp_outlined.22+0x29b>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	N/A
MOV -0x38(%RBP),%R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
LEA 0x1(%RSI),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %RAX,%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (12.5%)
SHR $0x20,%RDX	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
JNE 238150 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.omp_outlined.22+0x160>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
XOR %EDX,%EDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	scal (6.3%)
DIV %EBX	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	10-17	6	scal (6.3%)
JMP 238155 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.omp_outlined.22+0x165>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	N/A

Function	advec_mom_kernel(int, int, int, int, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer1D&, clover::Buffer1D&, int, int, int) [clone .omp_outlined.22]
Source file and lines	advec_mom.cpp:219-221
Module	exec

The loop is defined in:

/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/context.h:69
/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219-221

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 28.00 to 4.00 cycles (7.00x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. Only 14% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions). By fully vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 28.00 to 4.00 cycles (7.00x speedup).

Details

16% of SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

0% of SSE/AVX loads are used in vector version.
0% of SSE/AVX stores are used in vector version.
66% of SSE/AVX addition or subtraction instructions are used in vector version.
33% of SSE/AVX divide and square root instructions are used in vector version.
0% of SSE/AVX instructions that are not load, store, addition, subtraction nor multiply instructions are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ffast-math (included in Ofast) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Workaround

Reduce the number of division or square root instructions:
- If denominator is constant over iterations, use reciprocal (replace x/y with x*(1/y)). Check precision impact. This will be done by your compiler with ffast-math or Ofast
Check whether you really need double precision. If not, switch to single precision to speedup execution

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

Detected performance impact from expensive FP math instructions/calls. By removing/reexpressing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 28.00 to 9.75 cycles (2.87x speedup).

FMA

Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Pass to your compiler a micro-architecture specialization option:
- use march=native
Try to change order in which elements are evaluated (using parentheses) in arithmetic expressions containing both ADD/SUB and MUL operations to enable your compiler to generate FMA instructions wherever possible. For instance a + b*c is a valid FMA (MUL then ADD). However (a+b)* c cannot be translated into an FMA (ADD then MUL).

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

IDIV: 2 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219
MOVHPD: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:221

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Irregular (variable stride) or indirect: 4 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to remove indirect accesses. If applicable, precompute elements out of the innermost loop.

Vector unaligned load/store instructions

Detected 6 suboptimal vector unaligned load/store instructions.

Details

MOVHPD: 6 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:221
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/context.h:69
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:221

Workaround

Pass to your compiler a micro-architecture specialization option:
- use march=native
Use vector aligned instructions:
1. align your arrays on 64 bytes boundaries: replace { void *p = malloc (size); } with { void *p; posix_memalign (&p, 64, size); }.
2. inform your compiler that your arrays are vector aligned: if array 'foo' is 64 bytes-aligned, define a pointer 'p_foo' as __builtin_assume_aligned (foo, 64) and use it instead of 'foo' in the loop.

Conversion instructions

Detected expensive conversion instructions.

Details

CLTQ: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:221
CQTO: 2 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219

Workaround

Avoid mixing data with different types. In particular, check if the type of constants is the same as array elements.

Type of elements and instruction set

4 SSE or AVX instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in vector mode (two at a time).

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 8 FP arithmetical operations:

4: addition or subtraction
2: multiply
2: divide

The binary loop is loading 156 bytes (19 double precision FP elements). The binary loop is storing 16 bytes (2 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.05 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	80
nb uops	80
loop length	313
used x86 registers	14
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	5
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	10
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	2.00

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	10.00 cycles
front end	10.00 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	7.33	7.33	7.33	7.33	7.33	7.33	5.50	5.50	5.50	5.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	1.00	1.00
cycles	7.33	7.33	7.33	7.33	7.33	7.33	5.50	5.50	5.50	5.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	1.00	1.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	18.00-28.00
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	10.00
Dispatch	7.33
DIV/SQRT	18.00-28.00
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	18.00-28.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	25%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	100%
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	100%
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	16%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	100%
add-sub	66%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	33%
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	11%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	6%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	11%

all	15%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	25%
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	14%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	25%
add-sub	18%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	16%
other	11%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 28.00 cycles. At this rate:

2% of peak load performance is reached (5.57 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
0% of peak store performance is reached (0.57 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 23825b

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
CQTO																				scal (12.5%)
IDIV %RBX	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	9-19	7-12	scal (12.5%)
LEA (%R14,%RDI,1),%R9D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA (%R14,%RAX,1),%R13D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV -0x2c(%RBP),%R14D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
ADD %R14D,%R8D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD %R14D,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOVSXD %R8D,%R14	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSXD %EDX,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOVSXD %R9D,%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSXD %R13D,%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x68(%RBP),%RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOV %RBX,%R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
IMUL %R9,%R13	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %R14,%R13	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x60(%RBP),%R10	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOVSD (%R10,%R13,8),%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
IMUL %R8,%RBX	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %RDX,%RBX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVHPD (%R10,%RBX,8),%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV -0xa8(%RBP),%R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
ADD %R13D,%EDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSXD %EDI,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
IMUL %R12,%RDI	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %R14,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSD (%R15,%RDI,8),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
ADD %R13D,%EAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CLTQ																				scal (12.5%)
IMUL %R12,%RAX	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %RDX,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVHPD (%R15,%RAX,8),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV %R12,%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
IMUL %R9,%RAX	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %R14,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSD (%R15,%RAX,8),%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV %R12,%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
IMUL %R8,%RAX	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %RDX,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVHPD (%R15,%RAX,8),%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV -0x70(%RBP),%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOV %RDI,%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
IMUL %R9,%RAX	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %R14,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x58(%RBP),%R10	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
IMUL %R10,%R9	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %R14,%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x50(%RBP),%RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOVSD (%RBX,%R9,8),%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
IMUL %R8,%RDI	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
IMUL %R10,%R8	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %RDX,%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVHPD (%RBX,%R8,8),%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
ADD %RDX,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x98(%RBP),%R10	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOVSD (%R10,%RAX,8),%XMM4	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOVHPD (%R10,%RDI,8),%XMM4	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MULPD %XMM4,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
ADDPD %XMM0,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (25.0%)
SUBPD %XMM2,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (25.0%)
DIVPD %XMM3,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	13	4	vect (25.0%)
MOVLPD %XMM1,(%R10,%RAX,8)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOVHPD %XMM1,(%R10,%RDI,8)	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.50	2	0.50	scal (12.5%)
ADD $0x2,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD $-0x2,%R11	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0xa0(%RBP),%RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
JE 2382a9 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.omp_outlined.22+0x2b9>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
MOV %RSI,%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
SHR $0x20,%RAX	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
JE 238280 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.omp_outlined.22+0x290>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
MOV %RSI,%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
CQTO																				scal (12.5%)
IDIV %RBX	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	9-19	7-12	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RDX,%R8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV %RAX,%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
JMP 23828b <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.omp_outlined.22+0x29b>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	N/A
MOV -0x38(%RBP),%R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
LEA 0x1(%RSI),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %RAX,%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (12.5%)
SHR $0x20,%RDX	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
JNE 238150 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.omp_outlined.22+0x160>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A

Function	advec_mom_kernel(int, int, int, int, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer1D&, clover::Buffer1D&, int, int, int) [clone .omp_outlined.22]
Source file and lines	advec_mom.cpp:219-221
Module	exec

The loop is defined in:

/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/context.h:69
/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219-221

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 16.00 to 4.00 cycles (4.00x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Details

16% of SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

0% of SSE/AVX loads are used in vector version.
0% of SSE/AVX stores are used in vector version.
66% of SSE/AVX addition or subtraction instructions are used in vector version.
33% of SSE/AVX divide and square root instructions are used in vector version.
0% of SSE/AVX instructions that are not load, store, addition, subtraction nor multiply instructions are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ffast-math (included in Ofast) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Workaround

Reduce the number of division or square root instructions:
- If denominator is constant over iterations, use reciprocal (replace x/y with x*(1/y)). Check precision impact. This will be done by your compiler with ffast-math or Ofast
Check whether you really need double precision. If not, switch to single precision to speedup execution

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

Detected performance impact from expensive FP math instructions/calls. By removing/reexpressing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 16.00 to 10.00 cycles (1.60x speedup).

FMA

Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Pass to your compiler a micro-architecture specialization option:
- use march=native
Try to change order in which elements are evaluated (using parentheses) in arithmetic expressions containing both ADD/SUB and MUL operations to enable your compiler to generate FMA instructions wherever possible. For instance a + b*c is a valid FMA (MUL then ADD). However (a+b)* c cannot be translated into an FMA (ADD then MUL).

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

DIV: 2 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219
MOVHPD: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:221

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Irregular (variable stride) or indirect: 4 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to remove indirect accesses. If applicable, precompute elements out of the innermost loop.

Vector unaligned load/store instructions

Detected 6 suboptimal vector unaligned load/store instructions.

Details

MOVHPD: 6 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:221
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/context.h:69
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:221

Workaround

Pass to your compiler a micro-architecture specialization option:
- use march=native
Use vector aligned instructions:
1. align your arrays on 64 bytes boundaries: replace { void *p = malloc (size); } with { void *p; posix_memalign (&p, 64, size); }.
2. inform your compiler that your arrays are vector aligned: if array 'foo' is 64 bytes-aligned, define a pointer 'p_foo' as __builtin_assume_aligned (foo, 64) and use it instead of 'foo' in the loop.

Conversion instructions

Detected expensive conversion instructions.

Details

CLTQ: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:221

Workaround

Avoid mixing data with different types. In particular, check if the type of constants is the same as array elements.

Type of elements and instruction set

4 SSE or AVX instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in vector mode (two at a time).

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 8 FP arithmetical operations:

4: addition or subtraction
2: multiply
2: divide

The binary loop is loading 156 bytes (19 double precision FP elements). The binary loop is storing 16 bytes (2 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.05 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	80
nb uops	82
loop length	312
used x86 registers	14
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	5
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	10
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	2.00

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	10.25 cycles
front end	10.25 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	7.33	7.33	7.33	7.33	7.33	7.33	5.50	5.50	5.50	5.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	1.00	1.00
cycles	7.33	7.33	7.33	7.33	7.33	7.33	5.50	5.50	5.50	5.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	1.00	1.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	16.00
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	10.25
Dispatch	7.33
DIV/SQRT	16.00
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	16.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	25%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	100%
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	100%
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	16%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	100%
add-sub	66%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	33%
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	8%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	6%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	8%

all	15%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	25%
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	13%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	25%
add-sub	18%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	12%
other	9%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 16.00 cycles. At this rate:

3% of peak load performance is reached (9.75 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
0% of peak store performance is reached (1.00 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 23825b

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LEA (%R14,%RDI,1),%R9D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA (%R14,%RAX,1),%R13D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV -0x2c(%RBP),%R14D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
ADD %R14D,%R8D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD %R14D,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOVSXD %R8D,%R14	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSXD %EDX,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOVSXD %R9D,%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSXD %R13D,%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x68(%RBP),%RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOV %RBX,%R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
IMUL %R9,%R13	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %R14,%R13	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x60(%RBP),%R10	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOVSD (%R10,%R13,8),%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
IMUL %R8,%RBX	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %RDX,%RBX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVHPD (%R10,%RBX,8),%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV -0xa8(%RBP),%R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
ADD %R13D,%EDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSXD %EDI,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
IMUL %R12,%RDI	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %R14,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSD (%R15,%RDI,8),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
ADD %R13D,%EAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CLTQ																				scal (12.5%)
IMUL %R12,%RAX	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %RDX,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVHPD (%R15,%RAX,8),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV %R12,%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
IMUL %R9,%RAX	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %R14,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSD (%R15,%RAX,8),%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV %R12,%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
IMUL %R8,%RAX	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %RDX,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVHPD (%R15,%RAX,8),%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV -0x70(%RBP),%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOV %RDI,%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
IMUL %R9,%RAX	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %R14,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x58(%RBP),%R10	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
IMUL %R10,%R9	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %R14,%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x50(%RBP),%RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOVSD (%RBX,%R9,8),%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
IMUL %R8,%RDI	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
IMUL %R10,%R8	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %RDX,%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVHPD (%RBX,%R8,8),%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
ADD %RDX,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x98(%RBP),%R10	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOVSD (%R10,%RAX,8),%XMM4	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOVHPD (%R10,%RDI,8),%XMM4	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MULPD %XMM4,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
ADDPD %XMM0,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (25.0%)
SUBPD %XMM2,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (25.0%)
DIVPD %XMM3,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	13	4	vect (25.0%)
MOVLPD %XMM1,(%R10,%RAX,8)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOVHPD %XMM1,(%R10,%RDI,8)	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.50	2	0.50	scal (12.5%)
ADD $0x2,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD $-0x2,%R11	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0xa0(%RBP),%RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
JE 2382a9 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.omp_outlined.22+0x2b9>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
MOV %RSI,%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
SHR $0x20,%RAX	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
JE 238280 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.omp_outlined.22+0x290>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
MOV %ESI,%EAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
XOR %EDX,%EDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	scal (6.3%)
DIV %EBX	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	10-17	6	scal (6.3%)
MOV %EDX,%R8D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV %EAX,%EDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x38(%RBP),%R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
LEA 0x1(%RSI),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %RAX,%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (12.5%)
SHR $0x20,%RDX	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
JNE 238150 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.omp_outlined.22+0x160>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
XOR %EDX,%EDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	scal (6.3%)
DIV %EBX	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	10-17	6	scal (6.3%)
JMP 238155 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.omp_outlined.22+0x165>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	N/A

Function	advec_mom_kernel(int, int, int, int, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer2D&, clover::Buffer1D&, clover::Buffer1D&, int, int, int) [clone .omp_outlined.22]
Source file and lines	advec_mom.cpp:219-221
Module	exec

The loop is defined in:

/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/context.h:69
/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219-221

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 22.00 to 4.00 cycles (5.50x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Details

16% of SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

0% of SSE/AVX loads are used in vector version.
0% of SSE/AVX stores are used in vector version.
66% of SSE/AVX addition or subtraction instructions are used in vector version.
33% of SSE/AVX divide and square root instructions are used in vector version.
0% of SSE/AVX instructions that are not load, store, addition, subtraction nor multiply instructions are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ffast-math (included in Ofast) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Workaround

Reduce the number of division or square root instructions:
- If denominator is constant over iterations, use reciprocal (replace x/y with x*(1/y)). Check precision impact. This will be done by your compiler with ffast-math or Ofast
Check whether you really need double precision. If not, switch to single precision to speedup execution

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

Detected performance impact from expensive FP math instructions/calls. By removing/reexpressing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 22.00 to 9.75 cycles (2.26x speedup).

FMA

Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Pass to your compiler a micro-architecture specialization option:
- use march=native
Try to change order in which elements are evaluated (using parentheses) in arithmetic expressions containing both ADD/SUB and MUL operations to enable your compiler to generate FMA instructions wherever possible. For instance a + b*c is a valid FMA (MUL then ADD). However (a+b)* c cannot be translated into an FMA (ADD then MUL).

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

DIV: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219
IDIV: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219
MOVHPD: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:221

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Irregular (variable stride) or indirect: 4 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to remove indirect accesses. If applicable, precompute elements out of the innermost loop.

Vector unaligned load/store instructions

Detected 6 suboptimal vector unaligned load/store instructions.

Details

MOVHPD: 6 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:221
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/context.h:69
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:221

Workaround

Pass to your compiler a micro-architecture specialization option:
- use march=native
Use vector aligned instructions:
1. align your arrays on 64 bytes boundaries: replace { void *p = malloc (size); } with { void *p; posix_memalign (&p, 64, size); }.
2. inform your compiler that your arrays are vector aligned: if array 'foo' is 64 bytes-aligned, define a pointer 'p_foo' as __builtin_assume_aligned (foo, 64) and use it instead of 'foo' in the loop.

Conversion instructions

Detected expensive conversion instructions.

Details

CLTQ: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:221
CQTO: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-937-4090/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/advec_mom.cpp:219

Workaround

Avoid mixing data with different types. In particular, check if the type of constants is the same as array elements.

Type of elements and instruction set

4 SSE or AVX instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in vector mode (two at a time).

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 8 FP arithmetical operations:

4: addition or subtraction
2: multiply
2: divide

The binary loop is loading 156 bytes (19 double precision FP elements). The binary loop is storing 16 bytes (2 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.05 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	79
nb uops	80
loop length	308
used x86 registers	14
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	5
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	10
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	2.00

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	10.00 cycles
front end	10.00 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	7.17	7.17	7.17	7.17	7.17	7.17	5.50	5.50	5.50	5.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	1.00	1.00
cycles	7.17	7.17	7.17	7.17	7.17	7.17	5.50	5.50	5.50	5.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	1.00	1.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	17.00-22.00
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	10.00
Dispatch	7.17
DIV/SQRT	17.00-22.00
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	17.00-22.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	25%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	100%
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	100%
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	16%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	100%
add-sub	66%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	33%
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	9%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	6%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	10%

all	15%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	25%
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	13%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	25%
add-sub	18%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	14%
other	10%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 22.00 cycles. At this rate:

2% of peak load performance is reached (7.09 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
0% of peak store performance is reached (0.73 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 23825b

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
CQTO																				scal (12.5%)
IDIV %RBX	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	9-19	7-12	scal (12.5%)
LEA (%R14,%RDI,1),%R9D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA (%R14,%RAX,1),%R13D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV -0x2c(%RBP),%R14D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
ADD %R14D,%R8D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD %R14D,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOVSXD %R8D,%R14	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSXD %EDX,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOVSXD %R9D,%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSXD %R13D,%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x68(%RBP),%RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOV %RBX,%R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
IMUL %R9,%R13	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %R14,%R13	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x60(%RBP),%R10	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOVSD (%R10,%R13,8),%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
IMUL %R8,%RBX	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %RDX,%RBX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVHPD (%R10,%RBX,8),%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV -0xa8(%RBP),%R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
ADD %R13D,%EDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSXD %EDI,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
IMUL %R12,%RDI	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %R14,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSD (%R15,%RDI,8),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
ADD %R13D,%EAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CLTQ																				scal (12.5%)
IMUL %R12,%RAX	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %RDX,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVHPD (%R15,%RAX,8),%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV %R12,%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
IMUL %R9,%RAX	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %R14,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVSD (%R15,%RAX,8),%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV %R12,%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
IMUL %R8,%RAX	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %RDX,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVHPD (%R15,%RAX,8),%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV -0x70(%RBP),%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOV %RDI,%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
IMUL %R9,%RAX	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %R14,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x58(%RBP),%R10	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
IMUL %R10,%R9	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %R14,%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x50(%RBP),%RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOVSD (%RBX,%R9,8),%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
IMUL %R8,%RDI	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
IMUL %R10,%R8	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %RDX,%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVHPD (%RBX,%R8,8),%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
ADD %RDX,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x98(%RBP),%R10	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOVSD (%R10,%RAX,8),%XMM4	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOVHPD (%R10,%RDI,8),%XMM4	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MULPD %XMM4,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
ADDPD %XMM0,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (25.0%)
SUBPD %XMM2,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (25.0%)
DIVPD %XMM3,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	13	4	vect (25.0%)
MOVLPD %XMM1,(%R10,%RAX,8)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOVHPD %XMM1,(%R10,%RDI,8)	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.50	2	0.50	scal (12.5%)
ADD $0x2,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD $-0x2,%R11	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0xa0(%RBP),%RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
JE 2382a9 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.omp_outlined.22+0x2b9>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
MOV %RSI,%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
SHR $0x20,%RAX	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
JE 238280 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.omp_outlined.22+0x290>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
MOV %ESI,%EAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
XOR %EDX,%EDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	scal (6.3%)
DIV %EBX	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	10-17	6	scal (6.3%)
MOV %EDX,%R8D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV %EAX,%EDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x38(%RBP),%R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
LEA 0x1(%RSI),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %RAX,%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (12.5%)
SHR $0x20,%RDX	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
JNE 238150 <_Z16advec_mom_kerneliiiiRN6clover8Buffer2DIdEES2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_S2_RNS_8Buffer1DIdEES5_iii.omp_outlined.22+0x160>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A

Report Configuration

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

FMA

Workaround

Complex instructions

Details

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Conversion instructions

Details

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Workaround

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

FMA

Workaround

Complex instructions

Details

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Vector unaligned load/store instructions

Details

Workaround

Conversion instructions

Details

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Workaround

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

FMA

Workaround

Complex instructions

Details

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Vector unaligned load/store instructions

Details

Workaround

Conversion instructions

Details

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set