Help is available by moving the cursor above any 
symbol or by checking MAQAO website.
[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (54.04 s)
To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.
[ 0 / 3 ] Some functions are compiled with a low optimization level (O0 or O1)
To have better performances, it is advised to help the compiler by using a proper optimization level (-O2 of higher). Warning, depending on compilers, faster optimization levels can decrease numeric accuracy.
[ 0 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions without compilation information
Functions without compilation information (typically not compiled with -g) cumulate 100.00% of the time spent in analyzed modules. Check that -g is present. Remark: if -g is indeed used, this can also be due to some compiler built-in functions (typically math) or statically linked libraries. This warning can be ignored in that case.
[ 0 / 3 ] Compilation of some functions is not optimized for the target processor
Architecture specific options are needed to produce efficient code for a specific processor ( -mcpu=native ).
[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 0 % of the execution time)
To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (99.93%)
If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat
At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (7.39%), representing an hotspot for the application
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (99.90%)
If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in BLAS1 operations
It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations
[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (0.03%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (99.9%)
Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in BLAS2 operations
BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.
| Loop ID | Module | Analysis | Penalty Score | Coverage (%) | Vectorization Ratio (%) | Vector Length Use (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ►358 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 50 | 7.39 | 81.16 | 98.91 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 12 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each. | 48 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
| ○190 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - No issue detected | 0 | 7.31 | 71.76 | 87.81 |
| ►309 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 50 | 6.98 | 80.88 | 97.79 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 12 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each. | 48 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
| ○180 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - No issue detected | 0 | 6.46 | 76.99 | 92.7 |
| ○146 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - No issue detected | 0 | 6.05 | 79.26 | 93.89 |
| ○202 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - No issue detected | 0 | 5.97 | 68.25 | 88.1 |
| ►241 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 50 | 5.42 | 81.82 | 96.68 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 12 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each. | 48 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
| ○312 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - No issue detected | 0 | 5.41 | 79.28 | 96.71 |
| ►168 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 38 | 4.88 | 82.76 | 97.41 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 8 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each. | 32 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points. | 4 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
| ○160 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - No issue detected | 0 | 4.38 | 70 | 90 |