OV - exec - Function hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS._omp

	Function: hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS._omp_fn.6	Module: exec	Source: par_coarsen.c:2354-2381	Coverage (incl. loops): 0.95% \| (excl. loops): 0.00%

/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-989-6379/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_coarsen.c: 2354 - 2381

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2354: #pragma omp parallel for private(ig, i, jS, j, jj) HYPRE_SMP_SCHEDULE

2355: #endif

2356:         for (ig = 0; ig < graph_size; ig++)

2357:         {

2358:            i = graph_array[ig];

2359:            if (measure_array[i] > 1)

2360:            {

2361:               for (jS = S_diag_i[i]; jS < S_diag_i[i+1]; jS++)

2362:               {

2363:                  j = S_diag_j[jS];

2364:                  if (measure_array[j] > 1)

2365:                  {

2366:                     if (measure_array[i] > measure_array[j])

2367:                        CF_marker[j] = 0;

2368:                     else if (measure_array[j] > measure_array[i])

2369:                        CF_marker[i] = 0;

2370:                  }

2371:               } /* for each local neighbor j of i */

2372:               for (jS = S_offd_i[i]; jS < S_offd_i[i+1]; jS++)

2373:               {

2374:                  jj = S_offd_j[jS];

2375:                  j = num_variables+jj;

2376:                  if (measure_array[j] > 1)

2377:                  {

2378:                     if (measure_array[i] > measure_array[j])

2379:                        CF_marker_offd[jj] = 0;

2380:                     else if (measure_array[j] > measure_array[i])

2381:                        CF_marker[i] = 0;

0x42f5c0 PUSH	%RBP

0x42f5c1 MOV	%RSP,%RBP

0x42f5c4 PUSH	%R15

0x42f5c6 PUSH	%R14

0x42f5c8 PUSH	%R13

0x42f5ca PUSH	%R12

0x42f5cc PUSH	%RBX

0x42f5cd MOV	%RDI,%R12

0x42f5d0 SUB	$0x8,%RSP

0x42f5d4 CALL	4110b0 <omp_get_num_threads@plt>

0x42f5d9 MOV	%EAX,%EBX

0x42f5db CALL	4111f0 <omp_get_thread_num@plt>

0x42f5e0 MOVSXD	%EAX,%RCX

0x42f5e3 MOV	0x48(%R12),%RAX

0x42f5e8 MOVSXD	%EBX,%RSI

0x42f5eb MOV	(%RAX),%RAX

0x42f5ee CQTO

0x42f5f0 IDIV	%RSI

0x42f5f3 CMP	%RDX,%RCX

0x42f5f6 JL	42f790

0x42f5fc IMUL	%RAX,%RCX

0x42f600 ADD	%RCX,%RDX

0x42f603 ADD	%RDX,%RAX

0x42f606 CMP	%RAX,%RDX

0x42f609 JGE	42f780

0x42f60f MOV	0x40(%R12),%RDI

0x42f614 VMOVQ	0x10(%R12),%XMM3

0x42f61b VMOVQ	(%R12),%XMM4

0x42f621 MOV	0x38(%R12),%RCX

0x42f626 MOV	0x30(%R12),%R15

0x42f62b MOV	0x28(%R12),%R14

0x42f630 MOV	0x20(%R12),%RBX

0x42f635 MOV	0x18(%R12),%R11

0x42f63a MOV	0x8(%R12),%R10

0x42f63f VMOVSD	0x180101(%RIP),%XMM2

0x42f647 LEA	(%RDI,%RDX,8),%R9

0x42f64b LEA	(%RDI,%RAX,8),%R12

0x42f64f JMP	42f68d

0x42f651 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

0x42f65c NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

0x42f667 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

0x42f672 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

0x42f67d NOPL	(%RAX)

(98) 0x42f680 ADD	$0x8,%R9

(98) 0x42f684 CMP	%R9,%R12

(98) 0x42f687 JE	42f780

(98) 0x42f68d MOV	(%R9),%R8

(98) 0x42f690 LEA	(,%R8,8),%RSI

(98) 0x42f698 VMOVSD	(%RCX,%RSI,1),%XMM1

(98) 0x42f69d VCOMISD	%XMM2,%XMM1

(98) 0x42f6a1 JBE	42f680

(98) 0x42f6a3 VMOVQ	%XMM4,%RAX

(98) 0x42f6a8 LEA	0x8(%RSI),%R13

(98) 0x42f6ac LEA	0x8(%RAX,%RSI,1),%R8

(98) 0x42f6b1 MOV	(%RAX,%RSI,1),%RDX

(98) 0x42f6b5 MOV	(%R8),%RDI

(98) 0x42f6b8 CMP	%RDI,%RDX

(98) 0x42f6bb JL	42f6d9

(98) 0x42f6bd JMP	42f705

0x42f6bf NOP

  (100) 0x42f6c0 VCOMISD	%XMM1,%XMM0

  (100) 0x42f6c4 JBE	42f6d1

  (100) 0x42f6c6 MOVQ	$0,(%R14,%RSI,1)

  (100) 0x42f6ce MOV	(%R8),%RDI

  (100) 0x42f6d1 INC	%RDX

  (100) 0x42f6d4 CMP	%RDI,%RDX

  (100) 0x42f6d7 JGE	42f705

  (100) 0x42f6d9 MOV	(%R10,%RDX,8),%RAX

  (100) 0x42f6dd SAL	$0x3,%RAX

  (100) 0x42f6e1 VMOVSD	(%RCX,%RAX,1),%XMM0

  (100) 0x42f6e6 VCOMISD	%XMM2,%XMM0

  (100) 0x42f6ea JBE	42f6d1

  (100) 0x42f6ec VCOMISD	%XMM0,%XMM1

  (100) 0x42f6f0 JBE	42f6c0

  (100) 0x42f6f2 MOVQ	$0,(%R14,%RAX,1)

  (100) 0x42f6fa MOV	(%R8),%RDI

  (100) 0x42f6fd INC	%RDX

  (100) 0x42f700 CMP	%RDI,%RDX

  (100) 0x42f703 JL	42f6d9

(98) 0x42f705 VMOVQ	%XMM3,%RDX

(98) 0x42f70a ADD	%RDX,%R13

(98) 0x42f70d MOV	(%RDX,%RSI,1),%RAX

(98) 0x42f711 MOV	(%R13),%R8

(98) 0x42f715 CMP	%R8,%RAX

(98) 0x42f718 JL	42f74c

(98) 0x42f71a JMP	42f680

0x42f71f NOP

  (99) 0x42f720 VCOMISD	%XMM1,%XMM5

  (99) 0x42f724 JBE	42f740

  (99) 0x42f726 MOVQ	$0,(%R14,%RSI,1)

  (99) 0x42f72e MOV	(%R13),%R8

  (99) 0x42f732 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

  (99) 0x42f73d NOPL	(%RAX)

  (99) 0x42f740 INC	%RAX

  (99) 0x42f743 CMP	%R8,%RAX

  (99) 0x42f746 JGE	42f680

  (99) 0x42f74c MOV	(%R11,%RAX,8),%RDX

  (99) 0x42f750 LEA	(%RBX,%RDX,1),%RDI

  (99) 0x42f754 VMOVSD	(%RCX,%RDI,8),%XMM5

  (99) 0x42f759 VCOMISD	%XMM2,%XMM5

  (99) 0x42f75d JBE	42f740

  (99) 0x42f75f VCOMISD	%XMM5,%XMM1

  (99) 0x42f763 JBE	42f720

  (99) 0x42f765 MOVQ	$0,(%R15,%RDX,8)

  (99) 0x42f76d MOV	(%R13),%R8

  (99) 0x42f771 JMP	42f740

0x42f773 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

0x42f77e XCHG	%AX,%AX

0x42f780 ADD	$0x8,%RSP

0x42f784 POP	%RBX

0x42f785 POP	%R12

0x42f787 POP	%R13

0x42f789 POP	%R14

0x42f78b POP	%R15

0x42f78d POP	%RBP

0x42f78e RET

0x42f78f NOP

0x42f790 INC	%RAX

0x42f793 XOR	%EDX,%EDX

0x42f795 JMP	42f5fc

0x42f79a NOPW	(%RAX,%RAX,1)

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►97.14+	gomp_thread_start	team.c:130	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	__GI___clone3		libc.so.6
►2.71+	GOMP_parallel	libgomp.h:982	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS	par_coarsen.c:2393	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:612	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run gcc_3

Source file and lines	par_coarsen.c:2354-2381
Module	exec

The function is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-989-6379/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_coarsen.c:2354-2381.

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 12.00 to 1.38 cycles (8.73x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your function is not vectorized. Only 11% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions). By vectorizing your function, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 12.00 to 1.50 cycles (8.00x speedup).

Details

All SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized function can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Performance is limited by execution of divide and square root operations (the divide/square root unit is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 12.00 to 6.38 cycles (1.88x speedup).

Workaround

Reduce the number of division or square root instructions:

If denominator is constant over iterations, use reciprocal (replace x/y with x*(1/y)). Check precision impact. This will be done by your compiler with ffast-math or Ofast

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

Detected performance impact from expensive FP math instructions/calls. By removing/reexpressing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 12.00 to 6.25 cycles (1.92x speedup).

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

Calling (and then returning from) a function prevents many compiler optimizations (like vectorization), breaks control flow (which reduces pipeline performance) and executes extra instructions to save/restore the registers used inside it, which is very expensive (dozens of cycles). Consider to inline small functions.

omp_get_num_threads@plt: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-989-6379/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_coarsen.c:2354
omp_get_thread_num@plt: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-989-6379/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_coarsen.c:2354

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

IDIV: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-989-6379/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_coarsen.c:2354

Conversion instructions

Detected expensive conversion instructions.

Details

CQTO: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-989-6379/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_coarsen.c:2354

Workaround

Avoid mixing data with different types. In particular, check if the type of constants is the same as array elements.

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 96 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	60
nb uops	51
loop length	239
used x86 registers	15
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	3
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	0

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	6.38 cycles
front end	6.38 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

7.00-12.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	6.38
Dispatch	3.50
DIV/SQRT	7.00-12.00
Overall L1	7.00-12.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	0%
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	11%
load	12%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	12%
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	10%

all	12%
load	12%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	11%
load	12%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	12%
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	12%
other	9%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 12.00 cycles. At this rate:

3% of peak load performance is reached (8.00 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 42f5c0

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (12.5%)
PUSH %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RDI,%R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
CALL 4110b0 <omp_get_num_threads@plt>	2	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
MOV %EAX,%EBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
CALL 4111f0 <omp_get_thread_num@plt>	2	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
MOVSXD %EAX,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV 0x48(%R12),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOVSXD %EBX,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV (%RAX),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
CQTO																				scal (12.5%)
IDIV %RSI	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	9-19	7-12	scal (12.5%)
CMP %RDX,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JL 42f790 <hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS._omp_fn.6+0x1d0>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
IMUL %RAX,%RCX	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	scal (12.5%)
ADD %RCX,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD %RDX,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CMP %RAX,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JGE 42f780 <hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS._omp_fn.6+0x1c0>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
MOV 0x40(%R12),%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
VMOVQ 0x10(%R12),%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVQ (%R12),%XMM4	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x38(%R12),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x30(%R12),%R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x28(%R12),%R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x20(%R12),%RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x18(%R12),%R11	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x8(%R12),%R10	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x180101(%RIP),%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
LEA (%RDI,%RDX,8),%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA (%RDI,%RAX,8),%R12	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
JMP 42f68d <hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS._omp_fn.6+0xcd>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
NOPL (%RAX)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
NOP	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
NOP	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
XCHG %AX,%AX	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
ADD $0x8,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
RET	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
NOP	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
INC %RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
XOR %EDX,%EDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	N/A
JMP 42f5fc <hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS._omp_fn.6+0x3c>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	N/A
NOPW (%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run gcc_3

Source file and lines	par_coarsen.c:2354-2381
Module	exec

The function is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-989-6379/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_coarsen.c:2354-2381.

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 12.00 to 1.38 cycles (8.73x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Workaround

Reduce the number of division or square root instructions:

If denominator is constant over iterations, use reciprocal (replace x/y with x*(1/y)). Check precision impact. This will be done by your compiler with ffast-math or Ofast

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

Detected performance impact from expensive FP math instructions/calls. By removing/reexpressing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 12.00 to 6.25 cycles (1.92x speedup).

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

omp_get_num_threads@plt: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-989-6379/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_coarsen.c:2354
omp_get_thread_num@plt: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-989-6379/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_coarsen.c:2354

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

IDIV: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-989-6379/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_coarsen.c:2354

Conversion instructions

Detected expensive conversion instructions.

Details

CQTO: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-989-6379/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_coarsen.c:2354

Workaround

Avoid mixing data with different types. In particular, check if the type of constants is the same as array elements.

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 96 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	60
nb uops	51
loop length	239
used x86 registers	15
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	3
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	0

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	6.38 cycles
front end	6.38 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	3.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

7.00-12.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	6.38
Dispatch	3.50
DIV/SQRT	7.00-12.00
Overall L1	7.00-12.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	0%
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	11%
load	12%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	12%
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	10%

all	12%
load	12%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	11%
load	12%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	12%
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	12%
other	9%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 12.00 cycles. At this rate:

3% of peak load performance is reached (8.00 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 42f5c0

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (12.5%)
PUSH %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RDI,%R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
CALL 4110b0 <omp_get_num_threads@plt>	2	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
MOV %EAX,%EBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
CALL 4111f0 <omp_get_thread_num@plt>	2	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
MOVSXD %EAX,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV 0x48(%R12),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOVSXD %EBX,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV (%RAX),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
CQTO																				scal (12.5%)
IDIV %RSI	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	9-19	7-12	scal (12.5%)
CMP %RDX,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JL 42f790 <hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS._omp_fn.6+0x1d0>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
IMUL %RAX,%RCX	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	scal (12.5%)
ADD %RCX,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD %RDX,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CMP %RAX,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JGE 42f780 <hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS._omp_fn.6+0x1c0>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
MOV 0x40(%R12),%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
VMOVQ 0x10(%R12),%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
VMOVQ (%R12),%XMM4	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x38(%R12),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x30(%R12),%R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x28(%R12),%R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x20(%R12),%RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x18(%R12),%R11	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x8(%R12),%R10	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
VMOVSD 0x180101(%RIP),%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
LEA (%RDI,%RDX,8),%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA (%RDI,%RAX,8),%R12	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
JMP 42f68d <hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS._omp_fn.6+0xcd>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
NOPL (%RAX)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
NOP	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
NOP	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
XCHG %AX,%AX	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
ADD $0x8,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
RET	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
NOP	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
INC %RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
XOR %EDX,%EDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	N/A
JMP 42f5fc <hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS._omp_fn.6+0x3c>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	N/A
NOPW (%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A

Name	Coverage (%)	Time (s)
▼hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS._omp_fn.6–	0.95	0.49
▼Loop 98 - par_coarsen.c:2354-2381 - exec–	0.06	0.03
○Loop 100 - par_coarsen.c:2361-2369 - exec	0.88	0.42
○Loop 99 - par_coarsen.c:2372-2381 - exec	0.00	0.01

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Workaround

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Conversion instructions

Details

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Workaround

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Conversion instructions

Details

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code