OV - exec - Function hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS.omp

	Function: hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS.omp_outlined.15	Module: exec	Source: par_coarsen.c:2327-2334	Coverage (incl. loops): 0.07% \| (excl. loops): 0.00%

/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-989-6379/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_coarsen.c: 2327 - 2334

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2327: #pragma omp parallel for private(ig, i) HYPRE_SMP_SCHEDULE

2328: #endif

2329:         for (ig = 0; ig < graph_size; ig++)

2330:         {

2331:            i = graph_array[ig];

2332:            if (measure_array[i] > 1)

2333:            {

2334:               CF_marker[i] = 1;

0x2598d0 PUSH	%RBP

0x2598d1 MOV	%RSP,%RBP

0x2598d4 PUSH	%R15

0x2598d6 PUSH	%R14

0x2598d8 PUSH	%R13

0x2598da PUSH	%R12

0x2598dc PUSH	%RBX

0x2598dd SUB	$0x28,%RSP

0x2598e1 MOV	(%RDX),%R13

0x2598e4 TEST	%R13,%R13

0x2598e7 JLE	259968

0x2598e9 MOV	(%RDI),%EBX

0x2598eb DEC	%R13

0x2598ee MOV	%R9,%R14

0x2598f1 MOV	%R8,%R15

0x2598f4 MOV	%RCX,%R12

0x2598f7 MOVQ	$0,-0x40(%RBP)

0x2598ff MOVQ	$0x1,-0x48(%RBP)

0x259907 MOVL	$0,-0x34(%RBP)

0x25990e MOV	%R13,-0x30(%RBP)

0x259912 SUB	$0x8,%RSP

0x259916 LEA	-0x48(%RBP),%RAX

0x25991a LEA	0xadfbf(%RIP),%RDI

0x259921 LEA	-0x34(%RBP),%RCX

0x259925 LEA	-0x40(%RBP),%R8

0x259929 LEA	-0x30(%RBP),%R9

0x25992d MOV	%EBX,%ESI

0x25992f MOV	$0x22,%EDX

0x259934 PUSH	$0x1

0x259936 PUSH	$0x1

0x259938 PUSH	%RAX

0x259939 CALL	305fa0 <@plt_start@+0x90>

0x25993e ADD	$0x20,%RSP

0x259942 MOV	-0x30(%RBP),%RAX

0x259946 CMP	%R13,%RAX

0x259949 CMOVL	%RAX,%R13

0x25994d MOV	-0x40(%RBP),%RAX

0x259951 MOV	%R13,-0x30(%RBP)

0x259955 CMP	%R13,%RAX

0x259958 JLE	259977

0x25995a LEA	0xadf97(%RIP),%RDI

0x259961 MOV	%EBX,%ESI

0x259963 CALL	305fb0 <@plt_start@+0xa0>

0x259968 ADD	$0x28,%RSP

0x25996c POP	%RBX

0x25996d POP	%R12

0x25996f POP	%R13

0x259971 POP	%R14

0x259973 POP	%R15

0x259975 POP	%RBP

0x259976 RET

0x259977 VMOVSD	-0x4a657(%RIP),%XMM0

0x25997f MOV	(%R12),%RCX

0x259983 MOV	(%R15),%RDX

0x259986 MOV	(%R14),%RSI

0x259989 DEC	%RAX

0x25998c JMP	259998

0x25998e XCHG	%AX,%AX

(614) 0x259990 INC	%RAX

(614) 0x259993 CMP	%R13,%RAX

(614) 0x259996 JGE	25995a

(614) 0x259998 MOV	0x8(%RCX,%RAX,8),%RDI

(614) 0x25999d VUCOMISD	(%RDX,%RDI,8),%XMM0

(614) 0x2599a2 JAE	259990

(614) 0x2599a4 MOVQ	$0x1,(%RSI,%RDI,8)

(614) 0x2599ac MOV	-0x30(%RBP),%R13

(614) 0x2599b0 JMP	259990

0x2599b2 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►97.26+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_worker(void*)		libomp.so
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	__GI___clone3		libc.so.6
►2.52+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_fork_call		libomp.so
○	__kmpc_fork_call		libomp.so
○	hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS	par_coarsen.c:2327	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:601	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run aocc_2

Source file and lines	par_coarsen.c:2327-2334
Module	exec

The function is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-989-6379/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_coarsen.c:2327-2334.

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.50 to 0.88 cycles (8.57x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your function is not vectorized. Only 10% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions). By vectorizing your function, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.50 to 0.58 cycles (12.93x speedup).

Details

All SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized function can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

No data for this section

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

Calling (and then returning from) a function prevents many compiler optimizations (like vectorization), breaks control flow (which reduces pipeline performance) and executes extra instructions to save/restore the registers used inside it, which is very expensive (dozens of cycles). Consider to inline small functions.

unknown: 2 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-989-6379/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_coarsen.c:2327
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-989-6379/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_coarsen.c:2327

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

CMOVL: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-989-6379/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_coarsen.c:2329

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 60 bytes. The binary function is storing 36 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	59
nb uops	60
loop length	206
used x86 registers	14
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	1
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	7.50 cycles
front end	7.50 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	4.00	4.00	4.00	4.00	4.00	4.00	3.75	3.75	3.75	3.75	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	4.00	4.00	4.00	4.00	4.00	4.00	3.75	3.75	3.75	3.75	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	7.50
Dispatch	4.00
Overall L1	7.50

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	10%
load	10%
store	8%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	10%

all	12%
load	12%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	10%
load	11%
store	8%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	10%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 7.50 cycles. At this rate:

3% of peak load performance is reached (8.00 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
3% of peak store performance is reached (4.80 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Performance is limited by instruction throughput (loading/decoding program instructions to execution core) (front-end is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.50 to 4.00 cycles (1.88x speedup).

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 2598d0

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x28,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV (%RDX),%R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
TEST %R13,%R13	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JLE 259968 <hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS.omp_outlined.15+0x98>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
MOV (%RDI),%EBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (6.3%)
DEC %R13	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV %R9,%R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV %R8,%R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV %RCX,%R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOVQ $0,-0x40(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x48(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVL $0,-0x34(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV %R13,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (12.5%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
LEA -0x48(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA 0xadfbf(%RIP),%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x34(%RBP),%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x40(%RBP),%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x30(%RBP),%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
CALL 305fa0 <@plt_start@+0x90>	2	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0.50	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV -0x30(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
CMP %R13,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
CMOVL %RAX,%R13	2	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
MOV -0x40(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
MOV %R13,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (12.5%)
CMP %R13,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JLE 259977 <hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS.omp_outlined.15+0xa7>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
LEA 0xadf97(%RIP),%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
CALL 305fb0 <@plt_start@+0xa0>	2	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0.50	N/A
ADD $0x28,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
RET	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
VMOVSD -0x4a657(%RIP),%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV (%R12),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV (%R15),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
MOV (%R14),%RSI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
DEC %RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
JMP 259998 <hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS.omp_outlined.15+0xc8>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	1	N/A
XCHG %AX,%AX	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run aocc_2

Source file and lines	par_coarsen.c:2327-2334
Module	exec

The function is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-989-6379/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_coarsen.c:2327-2334.

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.50 to 0.88 cycles (8.57x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

No data for this section

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

unknown: 2 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-989-6379/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_coarsen.c:2327
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-989-6379/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_coarsen.c:2327

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

CMOVL: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/173-989-6379/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_coarsen.c:2329

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 60 bytes. The binary function is storing 36 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	59
nb uops	60
loop length	206
used x86 registers	14
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	1
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	7.50 cycles
front end	7.50 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	4.00	4.00	4.00	4.00	4.00	4.00	3.75	3.75	3.75	3.75	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	4.00	4.00	4.00	4.00	4.00	4.00	3.75	3.75	3.75	3.75	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	7.50
Dispatch	4.00
Overall L1	7.50

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	10%
load	10%
store	8%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	10%

all	12%
load	12%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	10%
load	11%
store	8%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	10%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 7.50 cycles. At this rate:

3% of peak load performance is reached (8.00 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
3% of peak store performance is reached (4.80 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 2598d0

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x28,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV (%RDX),%R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
TEST %R13,%R13	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JLE 259968 <hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS.omp_outlined.15+0x98>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
MOV (%RDI),%EBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (6.3%)
DEC %R13	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV %R9,%R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV %R8,%R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV %RCX,%R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOVQ $0,-0x40(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x48(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVL $0,-0x34(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV %R13,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (12.5%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
LEA -0x48(%RBP),%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA 0xadfbf(%RIP),%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x34(%RBP),%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x40(%RBP),%R8	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LEA -0x30(%RBP),%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
CALL 305fa0 <@plt_start@+0x90>	2	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0.50	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV -0x30(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
CMP %R13,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
CMOVL %RAX,%R13	2	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
MOV -0x40(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
MOV %R13,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	4	0.50	scal (12.5%)
CMP %R13,%RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JLE 259977 <hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS.omp_outlined.15+0xa7>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50-1	N/A
LEA 0xadf97(%RIP),%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
CALL 305fb0 <@plt_start@+0xa0>	2	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0.50	N/A
ADD $0x28,%RSP	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
RET	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
VMOVSD -0x4a657(%RIP),%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV (%R12),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV (%R15),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	N/A
MOV (%R14),%RSI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
DEC %RAX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
JMP 259998 <hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS.omp_outlined.15+0xc8>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	1	N/A
XCHG %AX,%AX	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.09	N/A

Name	Coverage (%)	Time (s)
▼hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS.omp_outlined.15–	0.07	0.04
○Loop 614 - par_coarsen.c:2329-2334 - exec	0.07	0.03

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code