OV - exec - Loop 825

0x439b04 SUBS	X15, X15, #1

0x439b08 ADD	X14, X14, #8

0x439b0c B.EQ	439b5c

0x439b10 LDR	X18, [X16], #8    [3]

0x439b14 LDR	X0, [X22, X18,LSL #3]    [4]

0x439b18 CMP	X0, X5

0x439b1c B.LT	439b3c

0x439b20 LDR	D5, [X14]    [2]

0x439b24 FMUL	D6, D5, D3

0x439b28 FCMP	D6, #0

0x439b2c B.GE	439b3c

0x439b30 LDR	D6, [X13, X0,LSL #3]    [1]

0x439b34 FMADD	D5, D5, D4, D6

0x439b38 STR	D5, [X13, X0,LSL #3]    [1]

0x439b3c CMP	X18, X27

0x439b40 B.NE	439b04

0x439b44 LDR	D5, [X14]    [2]

0x439b48 FMUL	D6, D5, D3

0x439b4c FCMP	D6, #0

0x439b50 B.GE	439b04

0x439b54 FMADD	D2, D5, D4, D2

0x439b58 B	439b04

/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_lr_interp.c: 1644 - 1651

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1644:                  for(jj1 = A_diag_i[i1]+1; jj1 < A_diag_i[i1+1]; jj1++)

1645:                  {

1646:                    i2 = A_diag_j[jj1];

1647:                    if(P_marker[i2] >= jj_begin_row && (sgn*A_diag_data[jj1]) < 0)

1648:                       P_diag_data[P_marker[i2]] +=

1649:                       distribute*A_diag_data[jj1];

1650:                        if(i2 == i && (sgn*A_diag_data[jj1]) < 0)

1651:                          diagonal += distribute*A_diag_data[jj1];

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.50
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.50
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	2.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.09
Bottlenecks	P0, P1,
Function	hypre_BoomerAMGBuildExtPIInterp.omp_outlined
Source	par_lr_interp.c:1644-1651
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	3.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	2.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	2.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	1.50
Front-end cycles	2.75
P0 cycles	3.00
P1 cycles	3.00
P2 cycles	0.92
P3 cycles	0.92
P4 cycles	0.83
P5 cycles	0.83
P6 cycles	0.75
P7 cycles	0.75
P8 cycles	2.00
P9 cycles	1.75
P10 cycles	1.75
P11 cycles	1.50
P12 cycles	2.17
P13 cycles	1.83
P14 cycles	2.00
P15 cycles	0.00
P16 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	NA
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	22.00
Nb uops	22.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	1.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	2.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	2.00
Nb FLOP fma	2.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	16.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	40.00
Bytes stored	8.00
Stride 0	NA
Stride 1	NA
Stride n	NA
Stride unknown	NA
Stride indirect	NA
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	0.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	0.00
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	50.00

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.50
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.50
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	2.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.09
Bottlenecks	P0, P1,
Function	hypre_BoomerAMGBuildExtPIInterp.omp_outlined
Source	par_lr_interp.c:1644-1651
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	3.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	2.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	2.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	1.50
Front-end cycles	2.75
P0 cycles	3.00
P1 cycles	3.00
P2 cycles	0.92
P3 cycles	0.92
P4 cycles	0.83
P5 cycles	0.83
P6 cycles	0.75
P7 cycles	0.75
P8 cycles	2.00
P9 cycles	1.75
P10 cycles	1.75
P11 cycles	1.50
P12 cycles	2.17
P13 cycles	1.83
P14 cycles	2.00
P15 cycles	0.00
P16 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	NA
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	22.00
Nb uops	22.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	1.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	2.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	2.00
Nb FLOP fma	2.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	16.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	40.00
Bytes stored	8.00
Stride 0	NA
Stride 1	NA
Stride n	NA
Stride unknown	NA
Stride indirect	NA
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	0.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	0.00
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	50.00

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	hypre_BoomerAMGBuildExtPIInterp.omp_outlined
Source file and lines	par_lr_interp.c:1644-1651
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_lr_interp.c:1644-1651.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.
Warnings:

Ignoring paths for analysis
Too many paths. Rerun with max-paths=9
RecMII not computed since number of paths is unknown or > max_paths
Streams not analyzed since number of paths is unknown or > max_paths

Try to simplify control and/or increase the maximum number of paths per function/loop through the 'max-paths-nb' option.

This loop has 9 execution paths.

The presence of multiple execution paths is typically the main/first bottleneck.
Try to simplify control inside loop: ideally, try to remove all conditional expressions, for example by (if applicable):

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 3.00 to 2.00 cycles (1.50x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 2 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 3.00 to 1.50 cycles (2.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

FMA

Detected 2 FMA (fused multiply-add) operations.

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 6 FP arithmetical operations:

2: addition or subtraction (all inside FMA instructions)
4: multiply (2 inside FMA instructions)

The binary loop is loading 40 bytes. The binary loop is storing 8 bytes.

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.12 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	22
loop length	88
nb stack references	0

Front-end

FIT IN UOP CACHE

front end

2.75 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	P16
uops	3.00	3.00	0.92	0.92	0.83	0.83	0.75	0.75	2.00	1.75	1.75	1.50	2.17	1.83	2.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	3.00	3.00	0.92	0.92	0.83	0.83	0.75	0.75	2.00	1.75	1.75	1.50	2.17	1.83	2.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6: ALU
P7: ALU
P8 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P10 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P12 (256 bits): store address, load
P13 (256 bits): store address, load
P14 (256 bits): load
P15 (64 bits): store data
P16 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

NA

Cycles summary

Front-end	2.75
Overall L1	3.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

FP

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	0%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	0%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 3.00 cycles. At this rate:

13% of peak load performance is reached (13.33 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
5% of peak store performance is reached (2.67 out of 48.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 439b10

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
SUBS X15, X15, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (50.0%)
ADD X14, X14, #8	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
B.EQ 439b5c <hypre_BoomerAMGBuildExtPIInterp.omp_outlined+0x115c>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
LDR X18, [X16], #8	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	N/A
LDR X0, [X22, X18,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	N/A
CMP X0, X5	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (50.0%)
B.LT 439b3c <hypre_BoomerAMGBuildExtPIInterp.omp_outlined+0x113c>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
LDR D5, [X14]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
FMUL D6, D5, D3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (50.0%)
FCMP D6, #0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	scal (50.0%)
B.GE 439b3c <hypre_BoomerAMGBuildExtPIInterp.omp_outlined+0x113c>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
LDR D6, [X13, X0,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
FMADD D5, D5, D4, D6	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (50.0%)
STR D5, [X13, X0,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (50.0%)
CMP X18, X27	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (50.0%)
B.NE 439b04 <hypre_BoomerAMGBuildExtPIInterp.omp_outlined+0x1104>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
LDR D5, [X14]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
FMUL D6, D5, D3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (50.0%)
FCMP D6, #0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	scal (50.0%)
B.GE 439b04 <hypre_BoomerAMGBuildExtPIInterp.omp_outlined+0x1104>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
FMADD D2, D5, D4, D2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (50.0%)
B 439b04 <hypre_BoomerAMGBuildExtPIInterp.omp_outlined+0x1104>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

Function	hypre_BoomerAMGBuildExtPIInterp.omp_outlined
Source file and lines	par_lr_interp.c:1644-1651
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_lr_interp.c:1644-1651.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.
Warnings:

Ignoring paths for analysis
Too many paths. Rerun with max-paths=9
RecMII not computed since number of paths is unknown or > max_paths
Streams not analyzed since number of paths is unknown or > max_paths

Try to simplify control and/or increase the maximum number of paths per function/loop through the 'max-paths-nb' option.

This loop has 9 execution paths.

The presence of multiple execution paths is typically the main/first bottleneck.
Try to simplify control inside loop: ideally, try to remove all conditional expressions, for example by (if applicable):

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 3.00 to 2.00 cycles (1.50x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 2 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 3.00 to 1.50 cycles (2.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

FMA

Detected 2 FMA (fused multiply-add) operations.

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 6 FP arithmetical operations:

2: addition or subtraction (all inside FMA instructions)
4: multiply (2 inside FMA instructions)

The binary loop is loading 40 bytes. The binary loop is storing 8 bytes.

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.12 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	22
loop length	88
nb stack references	0

Front-end

FIT IN UOP CACHE

front end

2.75 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	P16
uops	3.00	3.00	0.92	0.92	0.83	0.83	0.75	0.75	2.00	1.75	1.75	1.50	2.17	1.83	2.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	3.00	3.00	0.92	0.92	0.83	0.83	0.75	0.75	2.00	1.75	1.75	1.50	2.17	1.83	2.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6: ALU
P7: ALU
P8 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P10 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P12 (256 bits): store address, load
P13 (256 bits): store address, load
P14 (256 bits): load
P15 (64 bits): store data
P16 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

NA

Cycles summary

Front-end	2.75
Overall L1	3.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

FP

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	0%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	0%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 3.00 cycles. At this rate:

13% of peak load performance is reached (13.33 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
5% of peak store performance is reached (2.67 out of 48.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 439b10

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
SUBS X15, X15, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (50.0%)
ADD X14, X14, #8	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
B.EQ 439b5c <hypre_BoomerAMGBuildExtPIInterp.omp_outlined+0x115c>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
LDR X18, [X16], #8	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	N/A
LDR X0, [X22, X18,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	N/A
CMP X0, X5	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (50.0%)
B.LT 439b3c <hypre_BoomerAMGBuildExtPIInterp.omp_outlined+0x113c>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
LDR D5, [X14]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
FMUL D6, D5, D3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (50.0%)
FCMP D6, #0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	scal (50.0%)
B.GE 439b3c <hypre_BoomerAMGBuildExtPIInterp.omp_outlined+0x113c>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
LDR D6, [X13, X0,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
FMADD D5, D5, D4, D6	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (50.0%)
STR D5, [X13, X0,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (50.0%)
CMP X18, X27	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (50.0%)
B.NE 439b04 <hypre_BoomerAMGBuildExtPIInterp.omp_outlined+0x1104>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
LDR D5, [X14]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
FMUL D6, D5, D3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (50.0%)
FCMP D6, #0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	scal (50.0%)
B.GE 439b04 <hypre_BoomerAMGBuildExtPIInterp.omp_outlined+0x1104>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
FMADD D2, D5, D4, D2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (50.0%)
B 439b04 <hypre_BoomerAMGBuildExtPIInterp.omp_outlined+0x1104>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

▶Scalability Runs Description

Run 1x1	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_NUM_THREADS: 1OMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x2	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 2OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x4	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 4OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x8	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 8OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x16	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 16OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x24	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 24OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x32	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 32OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x40	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 40OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x48	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 48OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x56	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 56OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x64	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 64OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x72	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 72OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x80	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 80OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x88	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 88OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x96	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 96OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads

(1x1) Efficiency	(1x1) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x2) Efficiency	(1x2) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x4) Efficiency	(1x4) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x8) Efficiency	(1x8) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x16) Efficiency	(1x16) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x24) Efficiency	(1x24) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x32) Efficiency	(1x32) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x40) Efficiency	(1x40) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x48) Efficiency	(1x48) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x56) Efficiency	(1x56) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x64) Efficiency	(1x64) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x72) Efficiency	(1x72) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x80) Efficiency	(1x80) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x88) Efficiency	(1x88) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x96) Efficiency	(1x96) Potential Speed-Up (%)
1	0	2.13	0	3.93	0	7.74	0	14.54	0	24.83	0	30.73	0	34.81	0	47.98	0	55.32	0	64.08	0	74.85	0	66.93	0	75.69	0	84.11	0

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency

Run	Number of threads	Efficiency (ideal is 1)	Speedup	Ideal Speedup	Time (s)	Coverage (%)
1x1	1	1	1	1	0.63999992609024	0.24057532846928
1x2	2	2.13	2.13	2	0.29999998211861	0.21211782097816
1x4	4	3.93	3.93	4	0.18499998748302	0.21569350361824
1x8	8	7.74	7.74	8	0.08500000834465	0.18734626471996
1x16	16	14.54	14.54	16	0.059999991208315	0.15276443958282
1x24	24	24.83	24.83	24	0.049999993294477	0.10409215837717
1x32	32	30.73	30.73	32	0.044999998062849	0.091751746833324
1x40	39	34.81	34.81	40	0.029999999329448	0.076200999319553
1x48	46	47.98	47.98	48	0.024999996647239	0.060182973742485
1x56	48	55.32	55.32	56	0.024999998509884	0.057426020503044
1x64	56	64.08	64.08	64	0.02000000141561	0.051286339759827
1x72	55	74.85	74.85	72	0.019999999552965	0.043963141739368
1x80	72	66.93	66.93	80	0.019999999552965	0.053417906165123
1x88	70	75.69	75.69	88	0.02000000141561	0.043109714984894
1x96	67	84.11	84.11	96	0.019999999552965	0.038951952010393

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

FMA

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

FMA

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

ASM code

▶Scalability Runs Description

▼Columns Filter

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency