OV - exec - Loop 3476

0x49c100 LDR	X15, [X13, X14,LSL #3]    [3]

0x49c104 LDR	D0, [X12, X14,LSL #3]    [6]

0x49c108 SUB	X16, X14, #1

0x49c10c LDR	X14, [X19]    [8]

0x49c110 MADD	X14, X14, X20, XZR

0x49c114 ADD	X14, X9, X14,LSL #3

0x49c118 LDR	X17, [X14, X15,LSL #3]    [5]

0x49c11c SUB	X17, X17, #1

0x49c120 STR	X17, [X14, X15,LSL #3]    [5]

0x49c124 LDR	X14, [X19]    [8]

0x49c128 MADD	X14, X14, X20, XZR

0x49c12c ADD	X14, X9, X14,LSL #3

0x49c130 LDR	X14, [X14, X15,LSL #3]    [4]

0x49c134 STR	X22, [X11, X14,LSL #3]    [2]

0x49c138 STR	D0, [X10, X14,LSL #3]    [1]

0x49c13c ORR	X14, XZR, X16

0x49c140 LDR	X15, [X8, X22,LSL #3]    [7]

0x49c144 CMP	X16, X15

0x49c148 B.GT	49c100

/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matop.c: 541 - 548

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

541:         for (j = A_i[i + 1] - 1; j >= A_i[i]; --j) {

542:           HYPRE_Int idx = A_j[j];

543:           --bucket[my_thread_num*num_colsA + idx];

544:

545:           HYPRE_Int offset = bucket[my_thread_num*num_colsA + idx];

546:

547:           AT_data[offset] = A_data[j];

548:           AT_j[offset] = i;

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.75
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	2.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.05
Bottlenecks	P12,
Function	hypre_CSRMatrixTranspose.omp_outlined
Source	csr_matop.c:541-548
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	3.50
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	2.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	3.50
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	1.75
Front-end cycles	2.38
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.50
P2 cycles	1.17
P3 cycles	1.25
P4 cycles	1.17
P5 cycles	1.17
P6 cycles	2.00
P7 cycles	1.25
P8 cycles	0.50
P9 cycles	0.50
P10 cycles	0.00
P11 cycles	0.00
P12 cycles	3.50
P13 cycles	3.17
P14 cycles	3.33
P15 cycles	1.00
P16 cycles	1.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	2
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	19.00
Nb uops	19.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	3.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	22.86
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	56.00
Bytes stored	24.00
Stride 0	2.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	6.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.75
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	2.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.05
Bottlenecks	P12,
Function	hypre_CSRMatrixTranspose.omp_outlined
Source	csr_matop.c:541-548
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	3.50
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	2.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	3.50
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	1.75
Front-end cycles	2.38
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.50
P2 cycles	1.17
P3 cycles	1.25
P4 cycles	1.17
P5 cycles	1.17
P6 cycles	2.00
P7 cycles	1.25
P8 cycles	0.50
P9 cycles	0.50
P10 cycles	0.00
P11 cycles	0.00
P12 cycles	3.50
P13 cycles	3.17
P14 cycles	3.33
P15 cycles	1.00
P16 cycles	1.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	2
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	19.00
Nb uops	19.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	3.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	22.86
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	56.00
Bytes stored	24.00
Stride 0	2.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	6.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	hypre_CSRMatrixTranspose.omp_outlined
Source file and lines	csr_matop.c:541-548
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matop.c:541-548.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 3.50 to 2.00 cycles (1.75x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 2 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 3.50 to 1.75 cycles (2.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

No data for this section

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop is loading 56 bytes. The binary loop is storing 24 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	19
loop length	76
nb stack references	0

Front-end

FIT IN UOP CACHE

front end

2.38 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	P16
uops	0.50	0.50	1.17	1.25	1.17	1.17	2.00	1.25	0.50	0.50	0.00	0.00	3.50	3.17	3.33	1.00	1.00
cycles	0.50	0.50	1.17	1.25	1.17	1.17	2.00	1.25	0.50	0.50	0.00	0.00	3.50	3.17	3.33	1.00	1.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6: ALU
P7: ALU
P8 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P10 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P12 (256 bits): store address, load
P13 (256 bits): store address, load
P14 (256 bits): load
P15 (64 bits): store data
P16 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	2.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	2.38
Data deps.	2.00
Overall L1	3.50

Vectorization ratios

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 3.50 cycles. At this rate:

16% of peak load performance is reached (16.00 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
14% of peak store performance is reached (6.86 out of 48.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 49c100

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P12	P13	P14	P15	P16	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LDR X15, [X13, X14,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	N/A
LDR D0, [X12, X14,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
SUB X16, X14, #1	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LDR X14, [X19]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	N/A
MADD X14, X14, X20, XZR	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	N/A
ADD X14, X9, X14,LSL #3	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LDR X17, [X14, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	scal (50.0%)
SUB X17, X17, #1	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (50.0%)
STR X17, [X14, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (50.0%)
LDR X14, [X19]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	N/A
MADD X14, X14, X20, XZR	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	N/A
ADD X14, X9, X14,LSL #3	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LDR X14, [X14, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	N/A
STR X22, [X11, X14,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (50.0%)
STR D0, [X10, X14,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	2	0.50	scal (50.0%)
ORR X14, XZR, X16	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LDR X15, [X8, X22,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	N/A
CMP X16, X15	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
B.GT 49c100 <hypre_CSRMatrixTranspose.omp_outlined+0x3b0>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

Function	hypre_CSRMatrixTranspose.omp_outlined
Source file and lines	csr_matop.c:541-548
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matop.c:541-548.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 3.50 to 2.00 cycles (1.75x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 2 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 3.50 to 1.75 cycles (2.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

No data for this section

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop is loading 56 bytes. The binary loop is storing 24 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	19
loop length	76
nb stack references	0

Front-end

FIT IN UOP CACHE

front end

2.38 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	P16
uops	0.50	0.50	1.17	1.25	1.17	1.17	2.00	1.25	0.50	0.50	0.00	0.00	3.50	3.17	3.33	1.00	1.00
cycles	0.50	0.50	1.17	1.25	1.17	1.17	2.00	1.25	0.50	0.50	0.00	0.00	3.50	3.17	3.33	1.00	1.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6: ALU
P7: ALU
P8 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P10 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P12 (256 bits): store address, load
P13 (256 bits): store address, load
P14 (256 bits): load
P15 (64 bits): store data
P16 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	2.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	2.38
Data deps.	2.00
Overall L1	3.50

Vectorization ratios

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 3.50 cycles. At this rate:

16% of peak load performance is reached (16.00 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
14% of peak store performance is reached (6.86 out of 48.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 49c100

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P12	P13	P14	P15	P16	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LDR X15, [X13, X14,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	N/A
LDR D0, [X12, X14,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
SUB X16, X14, #1	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LDR X14, [X19]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	N/A
MADD X14, X14, X20, XZR	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	N/A
ADD X14, X9, X14,LSL #3	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LDR X17, [X14, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	scal (50.0%)
SUB X17, X17, #1	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (50.0%)
STR X17, [X14, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (50.0%)
LDR X14, [X19]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	N/A
MADD X14, X14, X20, XZR	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	N/A
ADD X14, X9, X14,LSL #3	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LDR X14, [X14, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	N/A
STR X22, [X11, X14,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (50.0%)
STR D0, [X10, X14,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	2	0.50	scal (50.0%)
ORR X14, XZR, X16	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LDR X15, [X8, X22,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	N/A
CMP X16, X15	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
B.GT 49c100 <hypre_CSRMatrixTranspose.omp_outlined+0x3b0>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

▶Scalability Runs Description

Run 1x1	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_NUM_THREADS: 1OMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x2	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 2OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x4	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 4OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x8	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 8OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x16	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 16OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x24	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 24OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x32	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 32OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x40	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 40OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x48	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 48OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x56	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 56OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x64	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 64OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x72	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 72OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x80	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 80OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x88	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 88OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x96	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 96OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads

(1x1) Efficiency	(1x1) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x2) Efficiency	(1x2) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x4) Efficiency	(1x4) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x8) Efficiency	(1x8) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x16) Efficiency	(1x16) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x24) Efficiency	(1x24) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x32) Efficiency	(1x32) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x40) Efficiency	(1x40) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x48) Efficiency	(1x48) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x56) Efficiency	(1x56) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x64) Efficiency	(1x64) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x72) Efficiency	(1x72) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x80) Efficiency	(1x80) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x88) Efficiency	(1x88) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x96) Efficiency	(1x96) Potential Speed-Up (%)
1	0	1.71	0	3.21	0	6.92	0	9.9	0	15.39	0	16.89	0	18.56	0	20.7	0	25.62	0	28.62	0	29.33	0	29.58	0	30.5	0	34.44	0

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency

Run	Number of threads	Efficiency (ideal is 1)	Speedup	Ideal Speedup	Time (s)	Coverage (%)
1x1	1	1	1	1	0.37499997019768	0.14096209406853
1x2	2	1.71	1.71	2	0.23499998450279	0.15507772564888
1x4	4	3.21	3.21	4	0.12499998509884	0.15455204248428
1x8	8	6.92	6.92	8	0.064999997615814	0.12289913743734
1x16	16	9.9	9.9	16	0.049999993294477	0.1314484924078
1x24	24	15.39	15.39	24	0.029999997466803	0.098414413630962
1x32	32	16.89	16.89	32	0.035000000149012	0.097817979753017
1x40	40	18.56	18.56	40	0.029999999329448	0.083758123219013
1x48	48	20.7	20.7	48	0.029999995604157	0.08171633630991
1x56	55	25.62	25.62	56	0.030000001192093	0.072671860456467
1x64	64	28.62	28.62	64	0.024999998509884	0.067283913493156
1x72	72	29.33	29.33	72	0.025000000372529	0.065731301903725
1x80	80	29.58	29.58	80	0.019999999552965	0.070828184485435
1x88	87	30.5	30.5	88	0.019999999552965	0.062672108411789
1x96	96	34.44	34.44	96	0.01999999769032	0.055741585791111

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

ASM code

▶Scalability Runs Description

▼Columns Filter

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency