OV - exec - Loop 3463

0x49b5e8 ADD	X18, X18, #1

0x49b5ec CMP	X18, X1

0x49b5f0 B.GE	49b5c0

0x49b5f4 LDR	X0, [X16, X18,LSL #3]    [2]

0x49b5f8 LDR	X2, [X20, X0,LSL #3]    [3]

0x49b5fc CMP	X2, X14

0x49b600 B.EQ	49b5e8

0x49b604 STR	X14, [X20, X0,LSL #3]    [3]

0x49b608 ADD	X8, X8, #1

0x49b60c LDR	X1, [X17, #8]    [1]

0x49b610 B	49b5e8

/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matop.c: 225 - 231

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

225: 	   for (ib = B_i[ja]; ib < B_i[ja+1]; ib++)

226: 	   {

227: 	      jb = B_j[ib];

228: 	      if (B_marker[jb] != ic)

229: 	      {

230: 	 	 B_marker[jb] = ic;

231: 		 num_nonzeros++;

Coverage (%)	Name	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask	libomp.so
○	__kmp_fork_call	libomp.so
○	Unknown function	libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	2.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.11
Bottlenecks
Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply.omp_outlined
Source	csr_matop.c:225-231
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	1.25
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	1.25
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	1.25
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.63
Front-end cycles	1.13
P0 cycles	1.25
P1 cycles	1.25
P2 cycles	0.58
P3 cycles	0.58
P4 cycles	0.58
P5 cycles	0.58
P6 cycles	0.58
P7 cycles	0.58
P8 cycles	0.00
P9 cycles	0.00
P10 cycles	0.00
P11 cycles	0.00
P12 cycles	1.08
P13 cycles	0.92
P14 cycles	1.00
P15 cycles	0.25
P16 cycles	0.25
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	9.00
Nb uops	9.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	0.50
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	18.67
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	20.00
Bytes stored	4.00
Stride 0	0.50
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	1.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	NA
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	50.00

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	2.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.09
Bottlenecks	P0, P1, P12,
Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply.omp_outlined
Source	csr_matop.c:225-231
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	1.50
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	1.50
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	1.50
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.75
Front-end cycles	1.38
P0 cycles	1.50
P1 cycles	1.50
P2 cycles	0.67
P3 cycles	0.67
P4 cycles	0.67
P5 cycles	0.67
P6 cycles	0.67
P7 cycles	0.67
P8 cycles	0.00
P9 cycles	0.00
P10 cycles	0.00
P11 cycles	0.00
P12 cycles	1.50
P13 cycles	1.17
P14 cycles	1.33
P15 cycles	0.50
P16 cycles	0.50
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	11.00
Nb uops	11.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	1.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	21.33
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	24.00
Bytes stored	8.00
Stride 0	1.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	1.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	NA
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	50.00

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	2.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.14
Bottlenecks	P0, P1,
Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply.omp_outlined
Source	csr_matop.c:225-231
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	1.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.50
Front-end cycles	0.88
P0 cycles	1.00
P1 cycles	1.00
P2 cycles	0.50
P3 cycles	0.50
P4 cycles	0.50
P5 cycles	0.50
P6 cycles	0.50
P7 cycles	0.50
P8 cycles	0.00
P9 cycles	0.00
P10 cycles	0.00
P11 cycles	0.00
P12 cycles	0.67
P13 cycles	0.67
P14 cycles	0.67
P15 cycles	0.00
P16 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	7.00
Nb uops	7.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	0.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	16.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	16.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	1.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	NA
Vectorization ratio store	NA
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	NA
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio store	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	50.00

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply.omp_outlined
Source file and lines	csr_matop.c:225-231
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matop.c:225-231.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.
The structure of this loop is probably <if then [else] end>.

The presence of multiple execution paths is typically the main/first bottleneck.
Try to simplify control inside loop: ideally, try to remove all conditional expressions, for example by (if applicable):

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 2 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 1.25 to 0.62 cycles (2.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

No data for this section

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop is loading 20 bytes. The binary loop is storing 4 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	9
loop length	36
nb stack references	0

Front-end

front end

1.13 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	P16
uops	1.25	1.25	0.58	0.58	0.58	0.58	0.58	0.58	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.08	0.92	1.00	0.25	0.25
cycles	1.25	1.25	0.58	0.58	0.58	0.58	0.58	0.58	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.08	0.92	1.00	0.25	0.25

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6: ALU
P7: ALU
P8 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P10 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P12 (256 bits): store address, load
P13 (256 bits): store address, load
P14 (256 bits): load
P15 (64 bits): store data
P16 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	1.13
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	1.25

Vectorization ratios

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 1.25 cycles. At this rate:

16% of peak load performance is reached (16.00 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
5% of peak store performance is reached (2.67 out of 48.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply.omp_outlined
Source file and lines	csr_matop.c:225-231
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matop.c:225-231.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.
The structure of this loop is probably <if then [else] end>.

The presence of multiple execution paths is typically the main/first bottleneck.
Try to simplify control inside loop: ideally, try to remove all conditional expressions, for example by (if applicable):

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 2 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 1.50 to 0.75 cycles (2.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

No data for this section

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop is loading 24 bytes. The binary loop is storing 8 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	11
loop length	44
nb stack references	0

Front-end

FIT IN UOP CACHE

front end

1.38 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	P16
uops	1.50	1.50	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.50	1.17	1.33	0.50	0.50
cycles	1.50	1.50	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.50	1.17	1.33	0.50	0.50

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6: ALU
P7: ALU
P8 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P10 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P12 (256 bits): store address, load
P13 (256 bits): store address, load
P14 (256 bits): load
P15 (64 bits): store data
P16 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	1.38
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	1.50

Vectorization ratios

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 1.50 cycles. At this rate:

16% of peak load performance is reached (16.00 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
11% of peak store performance is reached (5.33 out of 48.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 49b5f4

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P12	P13	P14	P15	P16	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
ADD X18, X18, #1	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CMP X18, X1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (50.0%)
B.GE 49b5c0 <hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply.omp_outlined+0x160>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
LDR X0, [X16, X18,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	N/A
LDR X2, [X20, X0,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	scal (50.0%)
CMP X2, X14	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (50.0%)
B.EQ 49b5e8 <hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply.omp_outlined+0x188>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
STR X14, [X20, X0,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (50.0%)
ADD X8, X8, #1	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LDR X1, [X17, #8]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	scal (50.0%)
B 49b5e8 <hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply.omp_outlined+0x188>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply.omp_outlined
Source file and lines	csr_matop.c:225-231
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matop.c:225-231.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.
The structure of this loop is probably <if then [else] end>.

The presence of multiple execution paths is typically the main/first bottleneck.
Try to simplify control inside loop: ideally, try to remove all conditional expressions, for example by (if applicable):

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 2 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 1.00 to 0.50 cycles (2.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

No data for this section

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop is loading 16 bytes.

Unroll opportunity

Loop body is too small to efficiently use resources.

Workaround

Unroll your loop if trip count is significantly higher than target unroll factor. This can be done manually. Or with the unroll (resp. unroll_and_jam) directive on top of the inner (resp. surrounding) loop. You can enforce an unroll factor: #pragma unroll_and_jam N, unroll_and_jam(N), unroll N or unroll(N)

General properties

nb instructions	7
loop length	28
nb stack references	0

Front-end

FIT IN UOP CACHE

front end

0.88 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	P16
uops	1.00	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.00	0.00
cycles	1.00	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6: ALU
P7: ALU
P8 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P10 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P12 (256 bits): store address, load
P13 (256 bits): store address, load
P14 (256 bits): load
P15 (64 bits): store data
P16 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	0.88
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	1.00

Vectorization ratios

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 1.00 cycles. At this rate:

16% of peak load performance is reached (16.00 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 49b5f4

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P12	P13	P14	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
ADD X18, X18, #1	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CMP X18, X1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (50.0%)
B.GE 49b5c0 <hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply.omp_outlined+0x160>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
LDR X0, [X16, X18,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	N/A
LDR X2, [X20, X0,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	N/A
CMP X2, X14	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
B.EQ 49b5e8 <hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply.omp_outlined+0x188>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

▶Scalability Runs Description

Run 1x1	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_NUM_THREADS: 1OMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x2	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 2OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x4	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 4OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x8	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 8OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x16	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 16OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x24	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 24OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x32	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 32OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x40	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 40OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x48	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 48OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x56	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 56OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x64	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 64OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x72	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 72OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x80	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 80OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x88	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 88OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x96	Number processes: 1Number nodes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_run_1741633338OMP_NUM_THREADS: 96OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads

(1x1) Efficiency	(1x1) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x2) Efficiency	(1x2) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x4) Efficiency	(1x4) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x8) Efficiency	(1x8) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x16) Efficiency	(1x16) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x24) Efficiency	(1x24) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x32) Efficiency	(1x32) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x40) Efficiency	(1x40) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x48) Efficiency	(1x48) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x56) Efficiency	(1x56) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x64) Efficiency	(1x64) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x72) Efficiency	(1x72) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x80) Efficiency	(1x80) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x88) Efficiency	(1x88) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x96) Efficiency	(1x96) Potential Speed-Up (%)
1	0	2.05	0	3.71	0	6.9	0	12.4	0	17.14	0	22.66	0	24.81	0	30.38	0	35.14	0	37.03	0	39.4	0	47.71	0	42.3	0	45.22	0

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency

Run	Number of threads	Efficiency (ideal is 1)	Speedup	Ideal Speedup	Time (s)	Coverage (%)
1x1	1	1	1	1	2.4499995708466	0.92095249891281
1x2	2	2.05	2.05	2	1.1949999332428	0.84312379360199
1x4	4	3.71	3.71	4	0.66999995708466	0.87296438217163
1x8	8	6.9	6.9	8	0.35500001907349	0.80483943223953
1x16	16	12.4	12.4	16	0.19999997317791	0.68566370010376
1x24	24	17.14	17.14	24	0.13999998569489	0.57723838090897
1x32	32	22.66	22.66	32	0.10999999940395	0.47619915008545
1x40	40	24.81	24.81	40	0.094999998807907	0.40934419631958
1x48	48	30.38	30.38	48	0.084999985992908	0.36385852098465
1x56	56	35.14	35.14	56	0.075000002980232	0.34608066082001
1x64	64	37.03	37.03	64	0.070000000298023	0.33971318602562
1x72	72	39.4	39.4	72	0.064999997615814	0.31969317793846
1x80	80	47.71	47.71	80	0.060000002384186	0.28687393665314
1x88	88	42.3	42.3	88	0.060000002384186	0.29524722695351
1x96	96	45.22	45.22	96	0.054999999701977	0.27736479043961

Report Configuration

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

ASM code

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Unroll opportunity

Workaround

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

ASM code

▶Scalability Runs Description

▼Columns Filter

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency