OV - exec - Loop 968

0x4640c8 LDR	X2, [SP, #128]

0x4640cc ORR	X24, XZR, X4

0x4640d0 STR	X3, [SP, #112]

0x4640d4 LDR	X6, [SP, #232]

0x4640d8 STP	X14, X25, [SP, #248]

0x4640dc ORR	X14, XZR, X11

0x4640e0 STR	X9, [SP, #264]

0x4640e4 B	464114

  (969) 0x464114 LDR	X25, [SP, #112]

  (969) 0x464118 LDR	X4, [X12, X25,LSL #3]

  (969) 0x46411c UBFM	X9, X4, #61, #60

  (969) 0x464120 LDR	X7, [X19, X9]

  (969) 0x464124 STR	X9, [SP, #120]

  (969) 0x464128 CMP	X2, X7

  (969) 0x46412c B.LE	4640e8

  (969) 0x464130 CMP	X7, X30

  (969) 0x464134 B.EQ	4646b4

  (969) 0x464138 LDR	X8, [X20, X9]

  (969) 0x46413c CMN	X8, #3

  (969) 0x464140 B.EQ	464100

  (969) 0x464144 LDR	X11, [SP, #152]

  (969) 0x464148 CMP	X11, #1

  (969) 0x46414c B.EQ	464164

  (969) 0x464150 LDR	X10, [SP, #120]

  (969) 0x464154 LDR	X1, [X6, X22,LSL #3]

  (969) 0x464158 LDR	X5, [X6, X10]

  (969) 0x46415c CMP	X1, X5

  (969) 0x464160 B.NE	464100

  (969) 0x464164 LDR	X0, [SP, #112]

  (969) 0x464168 LDR	X10, [SP, #112]

  (969) 0x46416c LDR	D4, [X26, X0,LSL #3]

  (969) 0x464170 ADD	X4, X10, #1

  (969) 0x464174 STR	X4, [SP, #112]

  (969) 0x464178 FADD	D25, D25, D4

  (969) 0x46417c CMP	X4, X18

  (969) 0x464180 B.NE	464114

0x4646b4 LDR	X25, [SP, #224]

0x4646b8 ADD	X11, X9, #8

0x4646bc STR	X11, [SP, #312]

0x4646c0 LDR	X8, [X25, X9]

0x4646c4 LDR	X4, [X25, X11]

0x4646c8 UBFM	X7, X8, #61, #60

0x4646cc ADD	X9, X8, #1

0x4646d0 LDR	D5, [X26, X7]

0x4646d4 FCMPE	D5, #0

0x4646d8 FCSEL	D24, D2, D3, #4

0x4646dc CMP	X9, X4

0x4646e0 B.GE	46628c

/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_lr_interp.c: 1609 - 1675

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1609:            for (jj = A_diag_i[i]+1; jj < A_diag_i[i+1]; jj++)

1610:            { /* i1 is a c-point and strongly influences i, accumulate

1611:               * a_(i,i1) into interpolation weight */

1612:              i1 = A_diag_j[jj];

1613:              if (P_marker[i1] >= jj_begin_row)

1614:              {

1615:                P_diag_data[P_marker[i1]] += A_diag_data[jj];

1616:              }

1617:              else if(P_marker[i1] == strong_f_marker)

1618:              {

1619:                sum = zero;

1620:                sgn = 1;

1621:                if(A_diag_data[A_diag_i[i1]] < 0) sgn = -1;

1622:                /* Loop over row of A for point i1 and calculate the sum

1623:                 * of the connections to c-points that strongly influence i. */

1624:                for(jj1 = A_diag_i[i1]+1; jj1 < A_diag_i[i1+1]; jj1++)

[...]

1672:              else if (CF_marker[i1] != -3)

1673:              {

1674:                if(num_functions == 1 || dof_func[i] == dof_func[i1])

1675:                  diagonal += A_diag_data[jj];

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►99.06+	gomp_thread_start	team.c:130	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	5.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	1.48
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.33
Bottlenecks	P12, P13, P14,
Function	hypre_BoomerAMGBuildExtPIInterp._omp_fn.0
Source	par_lr_interp.c:1609-1609,par_lr_interp.c:1621-1621,par_lr_interp.c:1624-1624
Source loop unroll info	NA
Source loop unroll confidence level	NA
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	3.33
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	0.67
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	3.33
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	2.25
Front-end cycles	2.50
P0 cycles	1.00
P1 cycles	1.00
P2 cycles	1.08
P3 cycles	1.08
P4 cycles	1.00
P5 cycles	1.00
P6 cycles	0.92
P7 cycles	0.92
P8 cycles	1.00
P9 cycles	1.00
P10 cycles	0.00
P11 cycles	0.00
P12 cycles	3.33
P13 cycles	3.33
P14 cycles	3.33
P15 cycles	2.00
P16 cycles	2.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	NA
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	20.00
Nb uops	20.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	4.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	26.40
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	48.00
Bytes stored	40.00
Stride 0	NA
Stride 1	NA
Stride n	NA
Stride unknown	NA
Stride indirect	NA
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	NA
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	54.17
Vector-efficiency ratio load	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	62.50
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	50.00

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	5.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	1.48
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.33
Bottlenecks	P12, P13, P14,
Function	hypre_BoomerAMGBuildExtPIInterp._omp_fn.0
Source	par_lr_interp.c:1609-1609,par_lr_interp.c:1621-1621,par_lr_interp.c:1624-1624
Source loop unroll info	NA
Source loop unroll confidence level	NA
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	3.33
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	0.67
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	3.33
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	2.25
Front-end cycles	2.50
P0 cycles	1.00
P1 cycles	1.00
P2 cycles	1.08
P3 cycles	1.08
P4 cycles	1.00
P5 cycles	1.00
P6 cycles	0.92
P7 cycles	0.92
P8 cycles	1.00
P9 cycles	1.00
P10 cycles	0.00
P11 cycles	0.00
P12 cycles	3.33
P13 cycles	3.33
P14 cycles	3.33
P15 cycles	2.00
P16 cycles	2.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	NA
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	20.00
Nb uops	20.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	4.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	26.40
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	48.00
Bytes stored	40.00
Stride 0	NA
Stride 1	NA
Stride n	NA
Stride unknown	NA
Stride indirect	NA
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	NA
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	54.17
Vector-efficiency ratio load	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	62.50
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	50.00

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	hypre_BoomerAMGBuildExtPIInterp._omp_fn.0
Source file and lines	par_lr_interp.c:1609-1675
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_lr_interp.c:1609-1624,1672-1675.

Analyzed code is defined in /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_lr_interp.c:1609,1621,1624.

Warnings:

Non-innermost loop: analyzing only self part (ignoring child loops).
Ignoring paths for analysis
Failed to get the number of paths
RecMII not computed since number of paths is unknown or > max_paths
Streams not analyzed since number of paths is unknown or > max_paths

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 3.33 to 0.67 cycles (5.00x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. Only 54% of vector register length is used (average across all VPU instructions). By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 3.33 to 2.25 cycles (1.48x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

No data for this section

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop is loading 48 bytes. The binary loop is storing 40 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	20
loop length	80
nb stack references	0

Front-end

FIT IN UOP CACHE

front end

2.50 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	P16
uops	1.00	1.00	1.08	1.08	1.00	1.00	0.92	0.92	1.00	1.00	0.00	0.00	3.33	3.33	3.33	2.00	2.00
cycles	1.00	1.00	1.08	1.08	1.00	1.00	0.92	0.92	1.00	1.00	0.00	0.00	3.33	3.33	3.33	2.00	2.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6: ALU
P7: ALU
P8 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P10 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P12 (256 bits): store address, load
P13 (256 bits): store address, load
P14 (256 bits): load
P15 (64 bits): store data
P16 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

NA

Cycles summary

Front-end	2.50
Overall L1	3.33

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

FP

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 3.33 cycles. At this rate:

14% of peak load performance is reached (14.40 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
24% of peak store performance is reached (12.00 out of 48.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 4640c8

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P12	P13	P14	P15	P16	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LDR X2, [SP, #128]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	scal (50.0%)
ORR X24, XZR, X4	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (50.0%)
STR X3, [SP, #112]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (50.0%)
LDR X6, [SP, #232]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	scal (50.0%)
STP X14, X25, [SP, #248]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (100.0%)
ORR X14, XZR, X11	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (50.0%)
STR X9, [SP, #264]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (50.0%)
B 464114 <hypre_BoomerAMGBuildExtPIInterp._omp_fn.0+0xba8>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
LDR X25, [SP, #224]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	N/A
ADD X11, X9, #8	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
STR X11, [SP, #312]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (50.0%)
LDR X8, [X25, X9]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	scal (50.0%)
LDR X4, [X25, X11]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	N/A
UBFM X7, X8, #61, #60	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD X9, X8, #1	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LDR D5, [X26, X7]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
FCMPE D5, #0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	scal (50.0%)
FCSEL D24, D2, D3, #4	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (50.0%)
CMP X9, X4	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
B.GE 46628c <hypre_BoomerAMGBuildExtPIInterp._omp_fn.0+0x2d20>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

Function	hypre_BoomerAMGBuildExtPIInterp._omp_fn.0
Source file and lines	par_lr_interp.c:1609-1675
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_lr_interp.c:1609-1624,1672-1675.

Analyzed code is defined in /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_lr_interp.c:1609,1621,1624.

Warnings:

Non-innermost loop: analyzing only self part (ignoring child loops).
Ignoring paths for analysis
Failed to get the number of paths
RecMII not computed since number of paths is unknown or > max_paths
Streams not analyzed since number of paths is unknown or > max_paths

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 3.33 to 0.67 cycles (5.00x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. Only 54% of vector register length is used (average across all VPU instructions). By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 3.33 to 2.25 cycles (1.48x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

No data for this section

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop is loading 48 bytes. The binary loop is storing 40 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	20
loop length	80
nb stack references	0

Front-end

FIT IN UOP CACHE

front end

2.50 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	P16
uops	1.00	1.00	1.08	1.08	1.00	1.00	0.92	0.92	1.00	1.00	0.00	0.00	3.33	3.33	3.33	2.00	2.00
cycles	1.00	1.00	1.08	1.08	1.00	1.00	0.92	0.92	1.00	1.00	0.00	0.00	3.33	3.33	3.33	2.00	2.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6: ALU
P7: ALU
P8 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P10 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P12 (256 bits): store address, load
P13 (256 bits): store address, load
P14 (256 bits): load
P15 (64 bits): store data
P16 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

NA

Cycles summary

Front-end	2.50
Overall L1	3.33

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

FP

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 3.33 cycles. At this rate:

14% of peak load performance is reached (14.40 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
24% of peak store performance is reached (12.00 out of 48.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 4640c8

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P12	P13	P14	P15	P16	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LDR X2, [SP, #128]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	scal (50.0%)
ORR X24, XZR, X4	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (50.0%)
STR X3, [SP, #112]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (50.0%)
LDR X6, [SP, #232]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	scal (50.0%)
STP X14, X25, [SP, #248]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (100.0%)
ORR X14, XZR, X11	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (50.0%)
STR X9, [SP, #264]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (50.0%)
B 464114 <hypre_BoomerAMGBuildExtPIInterp._omp_fn.0+0xba8>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
LDR X25, [SP, #224]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	N/A
ADD X11, X9, #8	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
STR X11, [SP, #312]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (50.0%)
LDR X8, [X25, X9]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	scal (50.0%)
LDR X4, [X25, X11]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	N/A
UBFM X7, X8, #61, #60	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
ADD X9, X8, #1	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LDR D5, [X26, X7]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
FCMPE D5, #0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	scal (50.0%)
FCSEL D24, D2, D3, #4	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (50.0%)
CMP X9, X4	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
B.GE 46628c <hypre_BoomerAMGBuildExtPIInterp._omp_fn.0+0x2d20>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

ASM code