OV - exec - Loop 3804

0x531f30 LDR	X18, [X20, X16,LSL #3]    [1]

0x531f34 LDR	D7, [X21, X16,LSL #3]    [2]

0x531f38 UBFM	X17, X18, #61, #60

0x531f3c LDR	X30, [X19, X17]    [5]

0x531f40 FMUL	D4, D31, D7

0x531f44 UBFM	X11, X30, #61, #60

0x531f48 CMP	X12, X30

0x531f4c B.GT	531fa4

0x531f50 LDR	D5, [X4, X11]    [6]

0x531f54 ADD	X16, X16, #1

0x531f58 FADD	D20, D5, D4

0x531f5c STR	D20, [X4, X11]    [6]

0x531f60 CMP	X5, X16

0x531f64 B.GT	531f30

0x531fa4 STR	X6, [X19, X17]    [5]

0x531fa8 ADD	X16, X16, #1

0x531fac STR	X18, [X22, X6,LSL #3]    [3]

0x531fb0 ADD	X6, X6, #1

0x531fb4 LDR	X2, [X19, X17]    [5]

0x531fb8 LDR	X5, [X15]    [4]

0x531fbc STR	D4, [X4, X2,LSL #3]    [6]

0x531fc0 CMP	X16, X5

0x531fc4 B.LT	531f30

/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matop.c: 286 - 298

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

286: 	 for (ib = B_i[ja]; ib < B_i[ja+1]; ib++)

287: 	 {

288: 	    jb = B_j[ib];

289: 	    b_entry = B_data[ib];

290: 	    if (B_marker[jb] < row_start)

291: 	    {

292: 		B_marker[jb] = counter;

293: 		C_j[B_marker[jb]] = jb;

294: 		C_data[B_marker[jb]] = a_entry*b_entry;

295: 		counter++;

296: 	    }

297: 	    else

298: 		C_data[B_marker[jb]] += a_entry*b_entry;

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►99.33+	gomp_thread_start	team.c:130	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	2.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.12
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	2.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.06
Bottlenecks
Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0
Source	csr_matop.c:286-298
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	2.33
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	1.17
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	2.08
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	1.17
Front-end cycles	1.94
P0 cycles	1.00
P1 cycles	1.00
P2 cycles	0.92
P3 cycles	0.92
P4 cycles	0.92
P5 cycles	0.92
P6 cycles	0.92
P7 cycles	0.92
P8 cycles	0.63
P9 cycles	0.63
P10 cycles	0.63
P11 cycles	0.63
P12 cycles	2.33
P13 cycles	2.00
P14 cycles	2.17
P15 cycles	0.50
P16 cycles	0.50
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	15.50
Nb uops	15.50
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	2.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.64
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.50
Nb FLOP mul	1.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	22.20
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	36.00
Bytes stored	16.00
Stride 0	0.50
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	2.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	0.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	50.00

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.57
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	2.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.05
Bottlenecks	P12,
Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0
Source	csr_matop.c:286-298
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	1.83
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	1.17
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	1.83
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.92
Front-end cycles	1.75
P0 cycles	1.00
P1 cycles	1.00
P2 cycles	0.83
P3 cycles	0.83
P4 cycles	0.83
P5 cycles	0.83
P6 cycles	0.83
P7 cycles	0.83
P8 cycles	0.75
P9 cycles	0.75
P10 cycles	0.75
P11 cycles	0.75
P12 cycles	1.83
P13 cycles	1.50
P14 cycles	1.67
P15 cycles	0.00
P16 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	14.00
Nb uops	14.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	1.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	1.09
Nb FLOP add-sub	1.00
Nb FLOP mul	1.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	21.82
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	32.00
Bytes stored	8.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	2.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	0.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	50.00

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	2.43
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.21
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	2.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.06
Bottlenecks	P12,
Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0
Source	csr_matop.c:286-298
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	2.83
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	1.17
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	2.33
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	1.42
Front-end cycles	2.13
P0 cycles	1.00
P1 cycles	1.00
P2 cycles	1.00
P3 cycles	1.00
P4 cycles	1.00
P5 cycles	1.00
P6 cycles	1.00
P7 cycles	1.00
P8 cycles	0.50
P9 cycles	0.50
P10 cycles	0.50
P11 cycles	0.50
P12 cycles	2.83
P13 cycles	2.50
P14 cycles	2.67
P15 cycles	1.00
P16 cycles	1.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	17.00
Nb uops	17.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	3.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.35
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	1.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	22.59
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	40.00
Bytes stored	24.00
Stride 0	1.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	2.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	0.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	NA
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	50.00

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0
Source file and lines	csr_matop.c:286-298
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matop.c:286-298.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.
The structure of this loop is probably <if then [else] end>.

The presence of multiple execution paths is typically the main/first bottleneck.
Try to simplify control inside loop: ideally, try to remove all conditional expressions, for example by (if applicable):

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 2 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 2.33 to 1.17 cycles (2.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

FMA

Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Try to change order in which elements are evaluated (using parentheses) in arithmetic expressions containing both ADD/SUB and MUL operations to enable your compiler to generate FMA instructions wherever possible. For instance a + b*c is a valid FMA (MUL then ADD). However (a+b)* c cannot be translated into an FMA (ADD then MUL).

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 1.5 FP arithmetical operations:

0.50: addition or subtraction
1: multiply

The binary loop is loading 36 bytes. The binary loop is storing 16 bytes.

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.03 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	15.50
loop length	62
nb stack references	0

Front-end

front end

1.94 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	P16
uops	1.00	1.00	0.92	0.92	0.92	0.92	0.92	0.92	0.63	0.63	0.63	0.63	2.33	2.00	2.17	0.50	0.50
cycles	1.00	1.00	0.92	0.92	0.92	0.92	0.92	0.92	0.63	0.63	0.63	0.63	2.33	2.00	2.17	0.50	0.50

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6: ALU
P7: ALU
P8 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P10 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P12 (256 bits): store address, load
P13 (256 bits): store address, load
P14 (256 bits): load
P15 (64 bits): store data
P16 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	1.94
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	2.33

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

FP

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 2.33 cycles. At this rate:

16% of peak load performance is reached (15.79 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
13% of peak store performance is reached (6.42 out of 48.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0
Source file and lines	csr_matop.c:286-298
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matop.c:286-298.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.
The structure of this loop is probably <if then [else] end>.

The presence of multiple execution paths is typically the main/first bottleneck.
Try to simplify control inside loop: ideally, try to remove all conditional expressions, for example by (if applicable):

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 1.83 to 1.17 cycles (1.57x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 2 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 1.83 to 0.92 cycles (2.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

FMA

Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Try to change order in which elements are evaluated (using parentheses) in arithmetic expressions containing both ADD/SUB and MUL operations to enable your compiler to generate FMA instructions wherever possible. For instance a + b*c is a valid FMA (MUL then ADD). However (a+b)* c cannot be translated into an FMA (ADD then MUL).

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 2 FP arithmetical operations:

1: addition or subtraction
1: multiply

The binary loop is loading 32 bytes. The binary loop is storing 8 bytes.

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.05 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	14
loop length	56
nb stack references	0

Front-end

FIT IN UOP CACHE

front end

1.75 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	P16
uops	1.00	1.00	0.83	0.83	0.83	0.83	0.83	0.83	0.75	0.75	0.75	0.75	1.83	1.50	1.67	0.00	0.00
cycles	1.00	1.00	0.83	0.83	0.83	0.83	0.83	0.83	0.75	0.75	0.75	0.75	1.83	1.50	1.67	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6: ALU
P7: ALU
P8 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P10 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P12 (256 bits): store address, load
P13 (256 bits): store address, load
P14 (256 bits): load
P15 (64 bits): store data
P16 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	1.75
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	1.83

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

FP

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 1.83 cycles. At this rate:

18% of peak load performance is reached (17.45 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
9% of peak store performance is reached (4.36 out of 48.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 531f30

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LDR X18, [X20, X16,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	scal (50.0%)
LDR D7, [X21, X16,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
UBFM X17, X18, #61, #60	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LDR X30, [X19, X17]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	scal (50.0%)
FMUL D4, D31, D7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (50.0%)
UBFM X11, X30, #61, #60	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CMP X12, X30	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (50.0%)
B.GT 531fa4 <hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0+0x824>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
LDR D5, [X4, X11]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
ADD X16, X16, #1	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
FADD D20, D5, D4	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (50.0%)
STR D20, [X4, X11]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (50.0%)
CMP X5, X16	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
B.GT 531f30 <hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0+0x7b0>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0
Source file and lines	csr_matop.c:286-298
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matop.c:286-298.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.
The structure of this loop is probably <if then [else] end>.

The presence of multiple execution paths is typically the main/first bottleneck.
Try to simplify control inside loop: ideally, try to remove all conditional expressions, for example by (if applicable):

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 2.83 to 1.17 cycles (2.43x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 2 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 2.83 to 1.42 cycles (2.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

No data for this section

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 1 FP arithmetical operations:

1: multiply

The binary loop is loading 40 bytes. The binary loop is storing 24 bytes.

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.02 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	17
loop length	68
nb stack references	0

Front-end

FIT IN UOP CACHE

front end

2.13 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	P16
uops	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	2.83	2.50	2.67	1.00	1.00
cycles	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	2.83	2.50	2.67	1.00	1.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6: ALU
P7: ALU
P8 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P10 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P12 (256 bits): store address, load
P13 (256 bits): store address, load
P14 (256 bits): load
P15 (64 bits): store data
P16 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	2.13
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	2.83

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

FP

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 2.83 cycles. At this rate:

14% of peak load performance is reached (14.12 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
17% of peak store performance is reached (8.47 out of 48.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 531f30

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	P16	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LDR X18, [X20, X16,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	scal (50.0%)
LDR D7, [X21, X16,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
UBFM X17, X18, #61, #60	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LDR X30, [X19, X17]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	scal (50.0%)
FMUL D4, D31, D7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (50.0%)
UBFM X11, X30, #61, #60	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (50.0%)
CMP X12, X30	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (50.0%)
B.GT 531fa4 <hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0+0x824>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
STR X6, [X19, X17]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (50.0%)
ADD X16, X16, #1	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
STR X18, [X22, X6,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (50.0%)
ADD X6, X6, #1	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LDR X2, [X19, X17]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	N/A
LDR X5, [X15]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	N/A
STR D4, [X4, X2,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	2	0.50	scal (50.0%)
CMP X16, X5	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
B.LT 531f30 <hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0+0x7b0>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

Report Configuration

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

FMA

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

FMA

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

ASM code