OV - exec - Loop 2045

0x464648 LDR	X11, [X14, X19,LSL #3]    [4]

0x46464c STR	X11, [X24, X19,LSL #3]    [1]

0x464650 LDR	X11, [X1, X12,LSL #3]    [3]

0x464654 ADD	X19, X19, #1

0x464658 CMP	X19, X11

0x46465c B.GE	464688

0x464660 LDR	D5, [X0, X19,LSL #3]    [2]

0x464664 FCMP	D5, D4

0x464668 B.LT	464648

0x46466c SUB	X10, X10, #1

0x464670 STR	X26, [X24, X19,LSL #3]    [1]

0x464674 STUR	X10, [X29, #480]    [5]

0x464678 LDR	X11, [X1, X12,LSL #3]    [3]

0x46467c ADD	X19, X19, #1

0x464680 CMP	X19, X11

0x464684 B.LT	464660

/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_strength.c: 451 - 460

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

451:                for (jA = A_diag_i[i]+1; jA < A_diag_i[i+1]; jA++)

452:                {

453:                   if (A_diag_data[jA] >= strength_threshold * row_scale)

454:                   {

455:                      S_temp_diag_j[jA] = -1;

456:                      --jS_diag;

457:                   }

458:                   else

459:                   {

460:                      S_temp_diag_j[jA] = A_diag_j[jA];

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
○100.00	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.42
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	2.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.10
Bottlenecks
Function	hypre_BoomerAMGCreateS.omp_outlined.2
Source	par_strength.c:451-460
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	1.42
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	1.42
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.71
Front-end cycles	1.19
P0 cycles	1.00
P1 cycles	1.00
P2 cycles	0.50
P3 cycles	0.50
P4 cycles	0.42
P5 cycles	0.42
P6 cycles	0.33
P7 cycles	0.33
P8 cycles	1.00
P9 cycles	0.00
P10 cycles	0.00
P11 cycles	0.00
P12 cycles	1.42
P13 cycles	1.25
P14 cycles	1.33
P15 cycles	0.75
P16 cycles	0.75
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	9.50
Nb uops	9.50
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	1.50
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	22.67
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	20.00
Bytes stored	12.00
Stride 0	1.50
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	50.00

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.33
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	2.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.07
Bottlenecks	P12, P13, P14,
Function	hypre_BoomerAMGCreateS.omp_outlined.2
Source	par_strength.c:451-460
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	1.33
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	1.33
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.67
Front-end cycles	1.25
P0 cycles	1.00
P1 cycles	1.00
P2 cycles	0.58
P3 cycles	0.58
P4 cycles	0.50
P5 cycles	0.50
P6 cycles	0.42
P7 cycles	0.42
P8 cycles	1.00
P9 cycles	0.00
P10 cycles	0.00
P11 cycles	0.00
P12 cycles	1.33
P13 cycles	1.33
P14 cycles	1.33
P15 cycles	1.00
P16 cycles	1.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	10.00
Nb uops	10.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	2.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	24.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	16.00
Bytes stored	16.00
Stride 0	2.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	50.00

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.50
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	2.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.13
Bottlenecks	P12,
Function	hypre_BoomerAMGCreateS.omp_outlined.2
Source	par_strength.c:451-460
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	1.50
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	1.50
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.75
Front-end cycles	1.13
P0 cycles	1.00
P1 cycles	1.00
P2 cycles	0.42
P3 cycles	0.42
P4 cycles	0.33
P5 cycles	0.33
P6 cycles	0.25
P7 cycles	0.25
P8 cycles	1.00
P9 cycles	0.00
P10 cycles	0.00
P11 cycles	0.00
P12 cycles	1.50
P13 cycles	1.17
P14 cycles	1.33
P15 cycles	0.50
P16 cycles	0.50
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	9.00
Nb uops	9.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	1.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	21.33
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	24.00
Bytes stored	8.00
Stride 0	1.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	NA
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	50.00

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	hypre_BoomerAMGCreateS.omp_outlined.2
Source file and lines	par_strength.c:451-460
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_strength.c:451-460.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.
The structure of this loop is probably <if then [else] end>.

The presence of multiple execution paths is typically the main/first bottleneck.
Try to simplify control inside loop: ideally, try to remove all conditional expressions, for example by (if applicable):

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 2 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 1.42 to 0.71 cycles (2.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ffast-math (included in Ofast) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

No data for this section

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop is loading 20 bytes. The binary loop is storing 12 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	9.50
loop length	38
nb stack references	0

Front-end

front end

1.19 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	P16
uops	1.00	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.42	0.42	0.33	0.33	1.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.42	1.25	1.33	0.75	0.75
cycles	1.00	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.42	0.42	0.33	0.33	1.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.42	1.25	1.33	0.75	0.75

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6: ALU
P7: ALU
P8 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P10 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P12 (256 bits): store address, load
P13 (256 bits): store address, load
P14 (256 bits): load
P15 (64 bits): store data
P16 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	1.19
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	1.42

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

FP

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 1.42 cycles. At this rate:

14% of peak load performance is reached (14.00 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
18% of peak store performance is reached (8.67 out of 48.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Function	hypre_BoomerAMGCreateS.omp_outlined.2
Source file and lines	par_strength.c:451-460
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_strength.c:451-460.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.
The structure of this loop is probably <if then [else] end>.

The presence of multiple execution paths is typically the main/first bottleneck.
Try to simplify control inside loop: ideally, try to remove all conditional expressions, for example by (if applicable):

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 1.33 to 1.00 cycles (1.33x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 2 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 1.33 to 0.67 cycles (2.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ffast-math (included in Ofast) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

No data for this section

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop is loading 16 bytes. The binary loop is storing 16 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	10
loop length	40
nb stack references	0

Front-end

FIT IN UOP CACHE

front end

1.25 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	P16
uops	1.00	1.00	0.58	0.58	0.50	0.50	0.42	0.42	1.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.33	1.33	1.33	1.00	1.00
cycles	1.00	1.00	0.58	0.58	0.50	0.50	0.42	0.42	1.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.33	1.33	1.33	1.00	1.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6: ALU
P7: ALU
P8 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P10 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P12 (256 bits): store address, load
P13 (256 bits): store address, load
P14 (256 bits): load
P15 (64 bits): store data
P16 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	1.25
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	1.33

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

FP

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 1.33 cycles. At this rate:

12% of peak load performance is reached (12.00 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
25% of peak store performance is reached (12.00 out of 48.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 464660

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P12	P13	P14	P15	P16	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LDR D5, [X0, X19,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
FCMP D5, D4	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	scal (50.0%)
B.LT 464648 <hypre_BoomerAMGCreateS.omp_outlined.2+0xae8>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
SUB X10, X10, #1	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (50.0%)
STR X26, [X24, X19,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (50.0%)
STUR X10, [X29, #480]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (50.0%)
LDR X11, [X1, X12,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	N/A
ADD X19, X19, #1	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CMP X19, X11	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
B.LT 464660 <hypre_BoomerAMGCreateS.omp_outlined.2+0xb00>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

Function	hypre_BoomerAMGCreateS.omp_outlined.2
Source file and lines	par_strength.c:451-460
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_strength.c:451-460.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.
The structure of this loop is probably <if then [else] end>.

The presence of multiple execution paths is typically the main/first bottleneck.
Try to simplify control inside loop: ideally, try to remove all conditional expressions, for example by (if applicable):

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 1.50 to 1.00 cycles (1.50x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 2 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 1.50 to 0.75 cycles (2.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ffast-math (included in Ofast) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

No data for this section

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop is loading 24 bytes. The binary loop is storing 8 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	9
loop length	36
nb stack references	0

Front-end

FIT IN UOP CACHE

front end

1.13 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	P16
uops	1.00	1.00	0.42	0.42	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	1.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.50	1.17	1.33	0.50	0.50
cycles	1.00	1.00	0.42	0.42	0.33	0.33	0.25	0.25	1.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.50	1.17	1.33	0.50	0.50

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6: ALU
P7: ALU
P8 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P10 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P12 (256 bits): store address, load
P13 (256 bits): store address, load
P14 (256 bits): load
P15 (64 bits): store data
P16 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	1.13
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	1.50

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

FP

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 1.50 cycles. At this rate:

16% of peak load performance is reached (16.00 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
11% of peak store performance is reached (5.33 out of 48.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 464660

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P12	P13	P14	P15	P16	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LDR X11, [X14, X19,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	scal (50.0%)
STR X11, [X24, X19,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (50.0%)
LDR X11, [X1, X12,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	scal (50.0%)
ADD X19, X19, #1	1	0	0	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CMP X19, X11	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (50.0%)
B.GE 464688 <hypre_BoomerAMGCreateS.omp_outlined.2+0xb28>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
LDR D5, [X0, X19,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	6	0.33	scal (50.0%)
FCMP D5, D4	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	scal (50.0%)
B.LT 464648 <hypre_BoomerAMGCreateS.omp_outlined.2+0xae8>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

Report Configuration

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

ASM code