OV - exec - Function hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace.extracted.9

	Function: hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace.extracted.9	Module: exec	Source: csr_matvec.c:234-237	Coverage (incl. loops): 0.35% \| (excl. loops): 0.00%

/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matvec.c: 234 - 237

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

234: #pragma omp parallel for private(i) HYPRE_SMP_SCHEDULE

235: #endif

236:          for (i = 0; i < num_rows*num_vectors; i++)

237:             y_data[i] *= alpha;

0x4deeb0 PUSH	%RBP

0x4deeb1 MOV	%RSP,%RBP

0x4deeb4 PUSH	%R15

0x4deeb6 PUSH	%R14

0x4deeb8 PUSH	%RBX

0x4deeb9 SUB	$0x28,%RSP

0x4deebd MOV	%RCX,%RBX

0x4deec0 MOV	%RDX,%R15

0x4deec3 MOVL	$0,-0x1c(%RBP)

0x4deeca MOV	(%RDI),%R14D

0x4deecd MOVQ	$0,-0x30(%RBP)

0x4deed5 MOV	%R9,-0x28(%RBP)

0x4deed9 MOVQ	$0x1,-0x38(%RBP)

0x4deee1 SUB	$0x8,%RSP

0x4deee5 LEA	-0x38(%RBP),%RAX

0x4deee9 LEA	-0x1c(%RBP),%RCX

0x4deeed LEA	-0x30(%RBP),%R8

0x4deef1 LEA	-0x28(%RBP),%R9

0x4deef5 MOV	$0x536cb0,%EDI

0x4deefa MOV	%R14D,%ESI

0x4deefd MOV	$0x22,%EDX

0x4def02 PUSH	$0x1

0x4def04 PUSH	$0x1

0x4def06 PUSH	%RAX

0x4def07 CALL	410420 <__kmpc_for_static_init_8@plt>

0x4def0c ADD	$0x20,%RSP

0x4def10 MOV	-0x30(%RBP),%RDX

0x4def14 MOV	-0x28(%RBP),%RAX

0x4def18 CMP	%RAX,%RDX

0x4def1b JA	4def92

0x4def1d VMOVQ	%R15,%XMM0

0x4def22 INC	%RAX

0x4def25 MOV	%RAX,%RSI

0x4def28 SUB	%RDX,%RSI

0x4def2b MOV	%RSI,%RCX

0x4def2e AND	$-0x4,%RCX

0x4def32 JE	4def6c

0x4def34 LEA	-0x1(%RCX),%RDI

0x4def38 VPBROADCASTQ	%XMM0,%YMM1

0x4def3d LEA	(%RBX,%RDX,8),%R8

0x4def41 XOR	%R9D,%R9D

0x4def44 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

(4316) 0x4def50 VMULPD	(%R8,%R9,8),%YMM1,%YMM2

(4316) 0x4def56 VMOVUPD	%YMM2,(%R8,%R9,8)

(4316) 0x4def5c ADD	$0x4,%R9

(4316) 0x4def60 CMP	%RDI,%R9

(4316) 0x4def63 JLE	4def50

0x4def65 CMP	%RCX,%RSI

0x4def68 JNE	4def6e

0x4def6a JMP	4def92

0x4def6c XOR	%ECX,%ECX

0x4def6e ADD	%RDX,%RCX

0x4def71 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

(4315) 0x4def80 VMULSD	(%RBX,%RCX,8),%XMM0,%XMM1

(4315) 0x4def85 VMOVSD	%XMM1,(%RBX,%RCX,8)

(4315) 0x4def8a INC	%RCX

(4315) 0x4def8d CMP	%RCX,%RAX

(4315) 0x4def90 JNE	4def80

0x4def92 MOV	$0x536cd0,%EDI

0x4def97 MOV	%R14D,%ESI

0x4def9a ADD	$0x28,%RSP

0x4def9e POP	%RBX

0x4def9f POP	%R14

0x4defa1 POP	%R15

0x4defa3 POP	%RBP

0x4defa4 VZEROUPPER

0x4defa7 JMP	410170

0x4defac NOPL	(%RAX)

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libiomp5.so

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run orig_0

Source file and lines	csr_matvec.c:234-237
Module	exec

The function is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matvec.c:234-237.

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 10.00 to 2.00 cycles (5.00x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your function is probably not vectorized. Only 10% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions).

Details

Store and arithmetical SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers).

Workaround

Read the "512-bits vectorization" report at "Potential" confidence level.

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

512-bits vectorization

On some x86 processors supporting 512-bits vectorization, compilers are often too conservative and limit vectorization to 256 bits. Performance can then be improved by enforcing 512-bits vectorization, especially with many vectorized and high trip count loops. 512-bits vectorization performance overhead (compared to 256-bits) is generally lower on newer processors.

Workaround

Recompile with -mprefer-vector-width=512

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

Calling (and then returning from) a function prevents many compiler optimizations (like vectorization), breaks control flow (which reduces pipeline performance) and executes extra instructions to save/restore the registers used inside it, which is very expensive (dozens of cycles). Consider to inline small functions.

__kmpc_for_static_init_8@plt: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matvec.c:234

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

VZEROUPPER: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matvec.c:234

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 20 bytes. The binary function is storing 28 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	58
nb uops	60
loop length	217
used x86 registers	12
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	1
used ymm registers	1
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	10.00 cycles
front end	10.00 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11
uops	2.70	2.60	2.33	2.33	6.00	2.60	2.50	6.00	6.00	6.00	2.60	2.33
cycles	2.70	2.60	2.33	2.33	6.00	2.60	2.50	6.00	6.00	6.00	2.60	2.33

Execution ports to units layout:

P0 (256 bits): VPU, BRU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P1 (256 bits): ALU, VPU
P2 (512 bits): load
P3 (512 bits): load
P4 (512 bits): store data
P5 (512 bits): ALU, VPU
P6: ALU, BRU
P7: store address
P8: store address
P9 (512 bits): store data
P10: ALU
P11 (512 bits): load

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	10.00
Dispatch	6.00
Overall L1	10.00

Vectorization ratios

all	6%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	10%

Vector efficiency ratios

all	10%
load	6%
store	7%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	11%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 10.00 cycles. At this rate:

1% of peak load performance is reached (2.00 out of 192.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
2% of peak store performance is reached (2.80 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Performance is limited by instruction throughput (loading/decoding program instructions to execution core) (front-end is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 10.00 to 6.00 cycles (1.67x speedup).

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 4deeb0

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x28,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %RCX,%RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %RDX,%R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOVL $0,-0x1c(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV (%RDI),%R14D	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV %R9,-0x28(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x38(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x38(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x1c(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x30(%RBP),%R8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x28(%RBP),%R9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x536cb0,%EDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
MOV %R14D,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
CALL 410420 <__kmpc_for_static_init_8@plt>	2	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	1	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x30(%RBP),%RDX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	N/A
MOV -0x28(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	N/A
CMP %RAX,%RDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JA 4def92 <hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace.extracted.9+0xe2>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
VMOVQ %R15,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	scal (12.5%)
INC %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %RAX,%RSI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
SUB %RDX,%RSI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RSI,%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
AND $-0x4,%RCX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1-2	0.20	N/A
JE 4def6c <hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace.extracted.9+0xbc>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
LEA -0x1(%RCX),%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %XMM0,%YMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	scal (12.5%)
LEA (%RBX,%RDX,8),%R8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
XOR %R9D,%R9D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
CMP %RCX,%RSI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JNE 4def6e <hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace.extracted.9+0xbe>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
JMP 4def92 <hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace.extracted.9+0xe2>	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5.84	N/A
XOR %ECX,%ECX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
ADD %RDX,%RCX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x536cd0,%EDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
MOV %R14D,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
ADD $0x28,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %R15	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
VZEROUPPER	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	vect (25.0%)
JMP 410170 <__kmpc_for_static_fini@plt>	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2.08	N/A
NOPL (%RAX)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run orig_0

Source file and lines	csr_matvec.c:234-237
Module	exec

The function is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matvec.c:234-237.

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 10.00 to 2.00 cycles (5.00x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your function is probably not vectorized. Only 10% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions).

Details

Store and arithmetical SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers).

Workaround

Read the "512-bits vectorization" report at "Potential" confidence level.

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

512-bits vectorization

Workaround

Recompile with -mprefer-vector-width=512

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

__kmpc_for_static_init_8@plt: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matvec.c:234

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

VZEROUPPER: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matvec.c:234

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 20 bytes. The binary function is storing 28 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	58
nb uops	60
loop length	217
used x86 registers	12
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	1
used ymm registers	1
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	10.00 cycles
front end	10.00 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11
uops	2.70	2.60	2.33	2.33	6.00	2.60	2.50	6.00	6.00	6.00	2.60	2.33
cycles	2.70	2.60	2.33	2.33	6.00	2.60	2.50	6.00	6.00	6.00	2.60	2.33

Execution ports to units layout:

P0 (256 bits): VPU, BRU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P1 (256 bits): ALU, VPU
P2 (512 bits): load
P3 (512 bits): load
P4 (512 bits): store data
P5 (512 bits): ALU, VPU
P6: ALU, BRU
P7: store address
P8: store address
P9 (512 bits): store data
P10: ALU
P11 (512 bits): load

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	10.00
Dispatch	6.00
Overall L1	10.00

Vectorization ratios

all	6%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	10%

Vector efficiency ratios

all	10%
load	6%
store	7%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	11%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 10.00 cycles. At this rate:

1% of peak load performance is reached (2.00 out of 192.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
2% of peak store performance is reached (2.80 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 4deeb0

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x28,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %RCX,%RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %RDX,%R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOVL $0,-0x1c(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV (%RDI),%R14D	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV %R9,-0x28(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x38(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x38(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x1c(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x30(%RBP),%R8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x28(%RBP),%R9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x536cb0,%EDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
MOV %R14D,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
CALL 410420 <__kmpc_for_static_init_8@plt>	2	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	1	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x30(%RBP),%RDX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	N/A
MOV -0x28(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	N/A
CMP %RAX,%RDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JA 4def92 <hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace.extracted.9+0xe2>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
VMOVQ %R15,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	scal (12.5%)
INC %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %RAX,%RSI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
SUB %RDX,%RSI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RSI,%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
AND $-0x4,%RCX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1-2	0.20	N/A
JE 4def6c <hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace.extracted.9+0xbc>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
LEA -0x1(%RCX),%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %XMM0,%YMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	scal (12.5%)
LEA (%RBX,%RDX,8),%R8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
XOR %R9D,%R9D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
CMP %RCX,%RSI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JNE 4def6e <hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace.extracted.9+0xbe>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
JMP 4def92 <hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace.extracted.9+0xe2>	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5.84	N/A
XOR %ECX,%ECX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
ADD %RDX,%RCX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x536cd0,%EDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
MOV %R14D,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
ADD $0x28,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %R15	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
VZEROUPPER	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	vect (25.0%)
JMP 410170 <__kmpc_for_static_fini@plt>	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2.08	N/A
NOPL (%RAX)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A

Name	Coverage (%)	Time (s)
▼hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace.extracted.9–	0.35	0.19
○Loop 4316 - csr_matvec.c:234-237 - exec	0.35	0.15
○Loop 4315 - csr_matvec.c:234-237 - exec	0.00	0.00

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

512-bits vectorization

Workaround

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

512-bits vectorization

Workaround

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code