OV - exec - Loop 3237

0x4cfe00 VMOVUPD	(%RCX,%R14,8),%YMM4    [3]

0x4cfe06 VXORPD	%XMM5,%XMM5,%XMM5

0x4cfe0a KXNORW	%K0,%K0,%K1

0x4cfe0e VGATHERQPD	(%R13,%YMM4,8),%YMM5{%K1}    [2]

0x4cfe16 VFNMADD231PD	(%RAX,%R14,8),%YMM5,%YMM3    [1]

0x4cfe1c ADD	$0x4,%R14

0x4cfe20 CMP	%R11,%R14

0x4cfe23 JBE	4cfe00

/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/ams.c: 3672 - 3675

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3672:             for (jj = A_diag_i[i]; jj < A_diag_i[i+1]; jj++)

3673:             {

3674:                ii = A_diag_j[jj];

3675:                res -= A_diag_data[jj] * Vtemp_data[ii];

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libiomp5.so

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.52
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	2.91
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	2.00
Bottlenecks
Function	hypre_ParCSRRelaxThreads.extracted.57
Source	ams.c:3672-3675
Source loop unroll info	unrolled by 4
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	main
Unroll factor	4
CQA cycles	4.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	4.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	2.63
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	1.38
Front-end cycles	2.00
P0 cycles	2.00
P1 cycles	2.00
P2 cycles	2.00
P3 cycles	2.00
P4 cycles	0.00
P5 cycles	1.00
P6 cycles	1.00
P7 cycles	0.00
P8 cycles	0.00
P9 cycles	0.00
P10 cycles	0.00
P11 cycles	2.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	4
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	8.00
Nb uops	11.00
Nb loads	3.00
Nb stores	0.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	2.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	4.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	24.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	96.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	2.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	1.00
Vectorization ratio all	100.00
Vectorization ratio load	100.00
Vectorization ratio store	NA
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	NA
Vectorization ratio fma	100.00
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	100.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	43.75
Vector-efficiency ratio load	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	37.50

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.52
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	2.91
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	2.00
Bottlenecks
Function	hypre_ParCSRRelaxThreads.extracted.57
Source	ams.c:3672-3675
Source loop unroll info	unrolled by 4
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	main
Unroll factor	4
CQA cycles	4.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	4.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	2.63
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	1.38
Front-end cycles	2.00
P0 cycles	2.00
P1 cycles	2.00
P2 cycles	2.00
P3 cycles	2.00
P4 cycles	0.00
P5 cycles	1.00
P6 cycles	1.00
P7 cycles	0.00
P8 cycles	0.00
P9 cycles	0.00
P10 cycles	0.00
P11 cycles	2.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	4
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	8.00
Nb uops	11.00
Nb loads	3.00
Nb stores	0.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	2.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	4.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	24.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	96.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	2.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	1.00
Vectorization ratio all	100.00
Vectorization ratio load	100.00
Vectorization ratio store	NA
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	NA
Vectorization ratio fma	100.00
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	100.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	43.75
Vector-efficiency ratio load	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	50.00
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	37.50

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	hypre_ParCSRRelaxThreads.extracted.57
Source file and lines	ams.c:3672-3675
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/ams.c:3672-3675.

It is main loop of related source loop which is unrolled by 4 (including vectorization).

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is vectorized, but using 43% register length (average across all SSE/AVX instructions).

Details

All SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers).

Workaround

Read the "512-bits vectorization" report at "Potential" confidence level.

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

512-bits vectorization

On some x86 processors supporting 512-bits vectorization, compilers are often too conservative and limit vectorization to 256 bits. Performance can then be improved by enforcing 512-bits vectorization, especially with many vectorized and high trip count loops. 512-bits vectorization performance overhead (compared to 256-bits) is generally lower on newer processors.

Workaround

Recompile with -mprefer-vector-width=512

FMA

Detected 4 FMA (fused multiply-add) operations.

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

VGATHERQPD: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/ams.c:3675

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Irregular (variable stride) or indirect: 1 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to remove indirect accesses. If applicable, precompute elements out of the innermost loop.

Vector unaligned load/store instructions

Detected 1 optimal vector unaligned load/store instructions.

Details

VMOVUPD: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/ams.c:3674

Workaround

Use vector aligned instructions:

align your arrays on 64 bytes boundaries: replace { void *p = malloc (size); } with { void *p; posix_memalign (&p, 64, size); }.
inform your compiler that your arrays are vector aligned: if array 'foo' is 64 bytes-aligned, define a pointer 'p_foo' as __builtin_assume_aligned (foo, 64) and use it instead of 'foo' in the loop.

Gather/scatter instructions

Detected gather/scatter instructions (typically caused by indirect accesses).

Details

VGATHERQPD: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/ams.c:3675

Workaround

Try to simplify your code and/or replace indirect accesses with unit-stride ones.

Type of elements and instruction set

1 AVX instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in vector mode (four at a time).

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 8 FP arithmetical operations:

4: addition or subtraction (all inside FMA instructions)
4: multiply (all inside FMA instructions)

The binary loop is loading 96 bytes (12 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.08 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	8
nb uops	11
loop length	37
used x86 registers	5
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	1
used ymm registers	3
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	0

Front-end

ASSUMED MACRO FUSION FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	2.00 cycles
front end	2.00 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11
uops	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	0.00	1.00	1.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	2.00
cycles	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	0.00	1.00	1.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	2.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0 (256 bits): VPU, BRU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P1 (256 bits): ALU, VPU
P2 (512 bits): load
P3 (512 bits): load
P4 (512 bits): store data
P5 (512 bits): ALU, VPU
P6: ALU, BRU
P7: store address
P8: store address
P9 (512 bits): store data
P10: ALU
P11 (512 bits): load

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	4.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	2.00
Dispatch	2.00
Data deps.	4.00
Overall L1	4.00

Vectorization ratios

all	100%
load	100%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	100%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	100%

Vector efficiency ratios

all	43%
load	50%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	50%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	37%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 4.00 cycles. At this rate:

12% of peak load performance is reached (24.00 out of 192.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 4cfe00

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P5	P6	P10	P11	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
VMOVUPD (%RCX,%R14,8),%YMM4	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0.33	0-1	0.33	vect (50.0%)
VXORPD %XMM5,%XMM5,%XMM5	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	vect (25.0%)
KXNORW %K0,%K0,%K1	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	N/A
VGATHERQPD (%R13,%YMM4,8),%YMM5{%K1}	5	1	1	1.33	1.33	1	0	0	1.33	28	2	vect (50.0%)
VFNMADD231PD (%RAX,%R14,8),%YMM5,%YMM3	1	0.50	0.50	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0.33	4	0.50	vect (50.0%)
ADD $0x4,%R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CMP %R11,%R14	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0.20	0.20	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
JBE 4cfe00 <hypre_ParCSRRelaxThreads.extracted.57+0x1c0>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	N/A

Function	hypre_ParCSRRelaxThreads.extracted.57
Source file and lines	ams.c:3672-3675
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/ams.c:3672-3675.

It is main loop of related source loop which is unrolled by 4 (including vectorization).

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is vectorized, but using 43% register length (average across all SSE/AVX instructions).

Details

All SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers).

Workaround

Read the "512-bits vectorization" report at "Potential" confidence level.

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

512-bits vectorization

On some x86 processors supporting 512-bits vectorization, compilers are often too conservative and limit vectorization to 256 bits. Performance can then be improved by enforcing 512-bits vectorization, especially with many vectorized and high trip count loops. 512-bits vectorization performance overhead (compared to 256-bits) is generally lower on newer processors.

Workaround

Recompile with -mprefer-vector-width=512

FMA

Detected 4 FMA (fused multiply-add) operations.

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

VGATHERQPD: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/ams.c:3675

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Irregular (variable stride) or indirect: 1 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to remove indirect accesses. If applicable, precompute elements out of the innermost loop.

Vector unaligned load/store instructions

Detected 1 optimal vector unaligned load/store instructions.

Details

VMOVUPD: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/ams.c:3674

Workaround

Use vector aligned instructions:

align your arrays on 64 bytes boundaries: replace { void *p = malloc (size); } with { void *p; posix_memalign (&p, 64, size); }.
inform your compiler that your arrays are vector aligned: if array 'foo' is 64 bytes-aligned, define a pointer 'p_foo' as __builtin_assume_aligned (foo, 64) and use it instead of 'foo' in the loop.

Gather/scatter instructions

Detected gather/scatter instructions (typically caused by indirect accesses).

Details

VGATHERQPD: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/ams.c:3675

Workaround

Try to simplify your code and/or replace indirect accesses with unit-stride ones.

Type of elements and instruction set

1 AVX instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in vector mode (four at a time).

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 8 FP arithmetical operations:

4: addition or subtraction (all inside FMA instructions)
4: multiply (all inside FMA instructions)

The binary loop is loading 96 bytes (12 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.08 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	8
nb uops	11
loop length	37
used x86 registers	5
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	1
used ymm registers	3
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	0

Front-end

ASSUMED MACRO FUSION FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	2.00 cycles
front end	2.00 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11
uops	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	0.00	1.00	1.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	2.00
cycles	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	0.00	1.00	1.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	2.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0 (256 bits): VPU, BRU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P1 (256 bits): ALU, VPU
P2 (512 bits): load
P3 (512 bits): load
P4 (512 bits): store data
P5 (512 bits): ALU, VPU
P6: ALU, BRU
P7: store address
P8: store address
P9 (512 bits): store data
P10: ALU
P11 (512 bits): load

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	4.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	2.00
Dispatch	2.00
Data deps.	4.00
Overall L1	4.00

Vectorization ratios

all	100%
load	100%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	100%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	100%

Vector efficiency ratios

all	43%
load	50%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	50%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	37%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 4.00 cycles. At this rate:

12% of peak load performance is reached (24.00 out of 192.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 4cfe00

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P5	P6	P10	P11	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
VMOVUPD (%RCX,%R14,8),%YMM4	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0.33	0-1	0.33	vect (50.0%)
VXORPD %XMM5,%XMM5,%XMM5	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	vect (25.0%)
KXNORW %K0,%K0,%K1	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	N/A
VGATHERQPD (%R13,%YMM4,8),%YMM5{%K1}	5	1	1	1.33	1.33	1	0	0	1.33	28	2	vect (50.0%)
VFNMADD231PD (%RAX,%R14,8),%YMM5,%YMM3	1	0.50	0.50	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0.33	4	0.50	vect (50.0%)
ADD $0x4,%R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
CMP %R11,%R14	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0.20	0.20	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
JBE 4cfe00 <hypre_ParCSRRelaxThreads.extracted.57+0x1c0>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0.50	N/A

Report Configuration

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

512-bits vectorization

Workaround

FMA

Complex instructions

Details

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Vector unaligned load/store instructions

Details

Workaround

Gather/scatter instructions

Details

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

512-bits vectorization

Workaround

FMA

Complex instructions

Details

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Vector unaligned load/store instructions

Details

Workaround

Gather/scatter instructions

Details

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code