OV - exec - Function hypre_SeqVectorAxpy.extracted

	Function: hypre_SeqVectorAxpy.extracted	Module: exec	Source: vector.c:449-452	Coverage (incl. loops): 1.54% \| (excl. loops): 0.00%

/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/vector.c: 449 - 452

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

449: #pragma omp parallel for private(i) HYPRE_SMP_SCHEDULE

450: #endif

451:    for (i = 0; i < size; i++)

452:       y_data[i] += alpha * x_data[i];

0x514e40 PUSH	%RBP

0x514e41 MOV	%RSP,%RBP

0x514e44 PUSH	%R15

0x514e46 PUSH	%R14

0x514e48 PUSH	%R12

0x514e4a PUSH	%RBX

0x514e4b SUB	$0x20,%RSP

0x514e4f MOVL	$0,-0x24(%RBP)

0x514e56 MOV	%R8,%R14

0x514e59 MOV	%RCX,%R15

0x514e5c MOV	%RDX,%R12

0x514e5f MOV	(%RDI),%EBX

0x514e61 MOVQ	$0,-0x30(%RBP)

0x514e69 MOVQ	$0x1,-0x38(%RBP)

0x514e71 SUB	$0x8,%RSP

0x514e75 LEA	-0x38(%RBP),%RAX

0x514e79 LEA	-0x24(%RBP),%RCX

0x514e7d LEA	-0x30(%RBP),%R8

0x514e81 LEA	0x10(%RBP),%R9

0x514e85 MOV	$0x561490,%EDI

0x514e8a MOV	%EBX,%ESI

0x514e8c MOV	$0x22,%EDX

0x514e91 PUSH	$0x1

0x514e93 PUSH	$0x1

0x514e95 PUSH	%RAX

0x514e96 CALL	410430 <__kmpc_for_static_init_8@plt>

0x514e9b ADD	$0x20,%RSP

0x514e9f MOV	-0x30(%RBP),%RCX

0x514ea3 MOV	0x10(%RBP),%RAX

0x514ea7 CMP	%RAX,%RCX

0x514eaa JA	514faa

0x514eb0 VMOVQ	%R12,%XMM0

0x514eb5 LEA	(%R15,%RAX,8),%RDX

0x514eb9 LEA	(%R14,%RCX,8),%RSI

0x514ebd LEA	(%R15,%RCX,8),%RDI

0x514ec1 CMP	%RSI,%RDX

0x514ec4 JB	514f00

0x514ec6 LEA	(%R14,%RAX,8),%RDX

0x514eca CMP	%RDI,%RDX

0x514ecd JB	514f00

0x514ecf INC	%RAX

0x514ed2 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

(4399) 0x514ee0 VMOVSD	(%R15,%RCX,8),%XMM1

(4399) 0x514ee6 VFMADD213SD	(%R14,%RCX,8),%XMM0,%XMM1

(4399) 0x514eec VMOVSD	%XMM1,(%R14,%RCX,8)

(4399) 0x514ef2 INC	%RCX

(4399) 0x514ef5 CMP	%RCX,%RAX

(4399) 0x514ef8 JNE	514ee0

0x514efa JMP	514faa

0x514eff NOP

0x514f00 INC	%RAX

0x514f03 MOV	%RAX,%R8

0x514f06 SUB	%RCX,%R8

0x514f09 MOV	%R8,%RDX

0x514f0c AND	$-0x4,%RDX

0x514f10 JE	514f80

0x514f12 LEA	-0x1(%RDX),%R9

0x514f16 VBROADCASTSD	%XMM0,%YMM1

0x514f1b XOR	%R10D,%R10D

0x514f1e XCHG	%AX,%AX

(4398) 0x514f20 VMOVUPD	(%RDI,%R10,8),%YMM2

(4398) 0x514f26 VFMADD213PD	(%RSI,%R10,8),%YMM1,%YMM2

(4398) 0x514f2c VMOVUPD	%YMM2,(%RSI,%R10,8)

(4398) 0x514f32 ADD	$0x4,%R10

(4398) 0x514f36 CMP	%R9,%R10

(4398) 0x514f39 JLE	514f20

0x514f3b CMP	%RDX,%R8

0x514f3e JNE	514f82

0x514f40 JMP	514faa

0x514f42 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

0x514f51 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

0x514f60 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

0x514f6f NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

0x514f7e XCHG	%AX,%AX

0x514f80 XOR	%EDX,%EDX

0x514f82 ADD	%RCX,%RDX

0x514f85 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

(4397) 0x514f90 VMOVSD	(%R15,%RDX,8),%XMM1

(4397) 0x514f96 VFMADD213SD	(%R14,%RDX,8),%XMM0,%XMM1

(4397) 0x514f9c VMOVSD	%XMM1,(%R14,%RDX,8)

(4397) 0x514fa2 INC	%RDX

(4397) 0x514fa5 CMP	%RDX,%RAX

(4397) 0x514fa8 JNE	514f90

0x514faa MOV	$0x5614b0,%EDI

0x514faf MOV	%EBX,%ESI

0x514fb1 ADD	$0x20,%RSP

0x514fb5 POP	%RBX

0x514fb6 POP	%R12

0x514fb8 POP	%R14

0x514fba POP	%R15

0x514fbc POP	%RBP

0x514fbd VZEROUPPER

0x514fc0 JMP	410180

0x514fc5 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libiomp5.so

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run icx_4

Source file and lines	vector.c:449-452
Module	exec

The function is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/vector.c:449-452.

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 13.00 to 2.50 cycles (5.20x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your function is probably not vectorized. Only 10% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions).

Details

Store and arithmetical SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers).

Workaround

Read the "512-bits vectorization" report at "Potential" confidence level.

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

512-bits vectorization

On some x86 processors supporting 512-bits vectorization, compilers are often too conservative and limit vectorization to 256 bits. Performance can then be improved by enforcing 512-bits vectorization, especially with many vectorized and high trip count loops. 512-bits vectorization performance overhead (compared to 256-bits) is generally lower on newer processors.

Workaround

Recompile with -mprefer-vector-width=512

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

Calling (and then returning from) a function prevents many compiler optimizations (like vectorization), breaks control flow (which reduces pipeline performance) and executes extra instructions to save/restore the registers used inside it, which is very expensive (dozens of cycles). Consider to inline small functions.

__kmpc_for_static_init_8@plt: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/vector.c:449

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

VZEROUPPER: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/vector.c:449

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 20 bytes. The binary function is storing 20 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	76
nb uops	78
loop length	321
used x86 registers	14
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	1
used ymm registers	1
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	13.00 cycles
front end	13.00 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11
uops	3.50	3.40	2.67	2.67	6.00	3.40	3.30	6.00	6.00	6.00	3.40	2.67
cycles	3.50	3.40	2.67	2.67	6.00	3.40	3.30	6.00	6.00	6.00	3.40	2.67

Execution ports to units layout:

P0 (256 bits): VPU, BRU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P1 (256 bits): ALU, VPU
P2 (512 bits): load
P3 (512 bits): load
P4 (512 bits): store data
P5 (512 bits): ALU, VPU
P6: ALU, BRU
P7: store address
P8: store address
P9 (512 bits): store data
P10: ALU
P11 (512 bits): load

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	13.00
Dispatch	6.00
Overall L1	13.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	6%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	9%

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

INT+FP

all	5%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	8%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	10%
load	6%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	11%

all	12%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	12%

INT+FP

all	10%
load	6%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	11%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 13.00 cycles. At this rate:

0% of peak load performance is reached (1.54 out of 192.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
1% of peak store performance is reached (1.54 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Performance is limited by instruction throughput (loading/decoding program instructions to execution core) (front-end is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 13.00 to 6.00 cycles (2.17x speedup).

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 514e40

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R12	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x20,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVL $0,-0x24(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV %R8,%R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %RCX,%R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %RDX,%R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV (%RDI),%EBX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x38(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x38(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x24(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x30(%RBP),%R8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA 0x10(%RBP),%R9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x561490,%EDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
CALL 410430 <__kmpc_for_static_init_8@plt>	2	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	1	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x30(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	N/A
MOV 0x10(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	N/A
CMP %RAX,%RCX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JA 514faa <hypre_SeqVectorAxpy.extracted+0x16a>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
VMOVQ %R12,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	scal (12.5%)
LEA (%R15,%RAX,8),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA (%R14,%RCX,8),%RSI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA (%R15,%RCX,8),%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
CMP %RSI,%RDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JB 514f00 <hypre_SeqVectorAxpy.extracted+0xc0>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
LEA (%R14,%RAX,8),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
CMP %RDI,%RDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JB 514f00 <hypre_SeqVectorAxpy.extracted+0xc0>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
INC %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
JMP 514faa <hypre_SeqVectorAxpy.extracted+0x16a>	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2.08	N/A
NOP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
INC %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %RAX,%R8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
SUB %RCX,%R8	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
MOV %R8,%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
AND $-0x4,%RDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1-2	0.20	N/A
JE 514f80 <hypre_SeqVectorAxpy.extracted+0x140>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
LEA -0x1(%RDX),%R9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
VBROADCASTSD %XMM0,%YMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	scal (12.5%)
XOR %R10D,%R10D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
XCHG %AX,%AX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
CMP %RDX,%R8	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JNE 514f82 <hypre_SeqVectorAxpy.extracted+0x142>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
JMP 514faa <hypre_SeqVectorAxpy.extracted+0x16a>	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5.84	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
XCHG %AX,%AX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
XOR %EDX,%EDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
ADD %RCX,%RDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x5614b0,%EDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %R12	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %R15	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
VZEROUPPER	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	vect (25.0%)
JMP 410180 <__kmpc_for_static_fini@plt>	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2.08	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run icx_4

Source file and lines	vector.c:449-452
Module	exec

The function is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/vector.c:449-452.

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 13.00 to 2.50 cycles (5.20x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your function is probably not vectorized. Only 10% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions).

Details

Store and arithmetical SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers).

Workaround

Read the "512-bits vectorization" report at "Potential" confidence level.

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

512-bits vectorization

Workaround

Recompile with -mprefer-vector-width=512

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

__kmpc_for_static_init_8@plt: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/vector.c:449

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

VZEROUPPER: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/vector.c:449

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 20 bytes. The binary function is storing 20 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	76
nb uops	78
loop length	321
used x86 registers	14
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	1
used ymm registers	1
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	13.00 cycles
front end	13.00 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11
uops	3.50	3.40	2.67	2.67	6.00	3.40	3.30	6.00	6.00	6.00	3.40	2.67
cycles	3.50	3.40	2.67	2.67	6.00	3.40	3.30	6.00	6.00	6.00	3.40	2.67

Execution ports to units layout:

P0 (256 bits): VPU, BRU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P1 (256 bits): ALU, VPU
P2 (512 bits): load
P3 (512 bits): load
P4 (512 bits): store data
P5 (512 bits): ALU, VPU
P6: ALU, BRU
P7: store address
P8: store address
P9 (512 bits): store data
P10: ALU
P11 (512 bits): load

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	13.00
Dispatch	6.00
Overall L1	13.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	6%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	9%

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

INT+FP

all	5%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	8%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	10%
load	6%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	11%

all	12%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	12%

INT+FP

all	10%
load	6%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	11%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 13.00 cycles. At this rate:

0% of peak load performance is reached (1.54 out of 192.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
1% of peak store performance is reached (1.54 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 514e40

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R12	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x20,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOVL $0,-0x24(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV %R8,%R14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %RCX,%R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %RDX,%R12	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV (%RDI),%EBX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x38(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x38(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x24(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x30(%RBP),%R8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA 0x10(%RBP),%R9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x561490,%EDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
CALL 410430 <__kmpc_for_static_init_8@plt>	2	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	1	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x30(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	N/A
MOV 0x10(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	N/A
CMP %RAX,%RCX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JA 514faa <hypre_SeqVectorAxpy.extracted+0x16a>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
VMOVQ %R12,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	scal (12.5%)
LEA (%R15,%RAX,8),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA (%R14,%RCX,8),%RSI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA (%R15,%RCX,8),%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
CMP %RSI,%RDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JB 514f00 <hypre_SeqVectorAxpy.extracted+0xc0>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
LEA (%R14,%RAX,8),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
CMP %RDI,%RDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JB 514f00 <hypre_SeqVectorAxpy.extracted+0xc0>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
INC %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
JMP 514faa <hypre_SeqVectorAxpy.extracted+0x16a>	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2.08	N/A
NOP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
INC %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %RAX,%R8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
SUB %RCX,%R8	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
MOV %R8,%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
AND $-0x4,%RDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1-2	0.20	N/A
JE 514f80 <hypre_SeqVectorAxpy.extracted+0x140>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
LEA -0x1(%RDX),%R9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
VBROADCASTSD %XMM0,%YMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	scal (12.5%)
XOR %R10D,%R10D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
XCHG %AX,%AX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
CMP %RDX,%R8	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JNE 514f82 <hypre_SeqVectorAxpy.extracted+0x142>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
JMP 514faa <hypre_SeqVectorAxpy.extracted+0x16a>	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5.84	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
XCHG %AX,%AX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
XOR %EDX,%EDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
ADD %RCX,%RDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x5614b0,%EDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
MOV %EBX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %R12	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %R15	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
VZEROUPPER	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	vect (25.0%)
JMP 410180 <__kmpc_for_static_fini@plt>	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2.08	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A

Name	Coverage (%)	Time (s)
▼hypre_SeqVectorAxpy.extracted–	1.54	0.81
○Loop 4398 - vector.c:449-452 - exec	1.54	0.66
○Loop 4399 - vector.c:449-452 - exec	0.00	0.00
○Loop 4397 - vector.c:449-452 - exec	0.00	0.00

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

512-bits vectorization

Workaround

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

512-bits vectorization

Workaround

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code