OV - exec - Function hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace.extracted.9

	Function: hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace.extracted.9	Module: exec	Source: csr_matvec.c:234-237	Coverage (incl. loops): 0.36% \| (excl. loops): 0.00%

/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matvec.c: 234 - 237

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

234: #pragma omp parallel for private(i) HYPRE_SMP_SCHEDULE

235: #endif

236:          for (i = 0; i < num_rows*num_vectors; i++)

237:             y_data[i] *= alpha;

0x511d20 PUSH	%RBP

0x511d21 MOV	%RSP,%RBP

0x511d24 PUSH	%R15

0x511d26 PUSH	%R14

0x511d28 PUSH	%RBX

0x511d29 SUB	$0x28,%RSP

0x511d2d MOV	%RCX,%RBX

0x511d30 MOV	%RDX,%R15

0x511d33 MOVL	$0,-0x1c(%RBP)

0x511d3a MOV	(%RDI),%R14D

0x511d3d MOVQ	$0,-0x30(%RBP)

0x511d45 MOV	%R9,-0x28(%RBP)

0x511d49 MOVQ	$0x1,-0x38(%RBP)

0x511d51 SUB	$0x8,%RSP

0x511d55 LEA	-0x38(%RBP),%RAX

0x511d59 LEA	-0x1c(%RBP),%RCX

0x511d5d LEA	-0x30(%RBP),%R8

0x511d61 LEA	-0x28(%RBP),%R9

0x511d65 MOV	$0x560cf0,%EDI

0x511d6a MOV	%R14D,%ESI

0x511d6d MOV	$0x22,%EDX

0x511d72 PUSH	$0x1

0x511d74 PUSH	$0x1

0x511d76 PUSH	%RAX

0x511d77 CALL	410430 <__kmpc_for_static_init_8@plt>

0x511d7c ADD	$0x20,%RSP

0x511d80 MOV	-0x30(%RBP),%RDX

0x511d84 MOV	-0x28(%RBP),%RAX

0x511d88 CMP	%RAX,%RDX

0x511d8b JA	511e22

0x511d91 VMOVQ	%R15,%XMM0

0x511d96 INC	%RAX

0x511d99 MOV	%RAX,%RSI

0x511d9c SUB	%RDX,%RSI

0x511d9f MOV	%RSI,%RCX

0x511da2 AND	$-0x4,%RCX

0x511da6 JE	511e00

0x511da8 LEA	-0x1(%RCX),%RDI

0x511dac VPBROADCASTQ	%XMM0,%YMM1

0x511db1 LEA	(%RBX,%RDX,8),%R8

0x511db5 XOR	%R9D,%R9D

0x511db8 NOPL	(%RAX,%RAX,1)

(4333) 0x511dc0 VMULPD	(%R8,%R9,8),%YMM1,%YMM2

(4333) 0x511dc6 VMOVUPD	%YMM2,(%R8,%R9,8)

(4333) 0x511dcc ADD	$0x4,%R9

(4333) 0x511dd0 CMP	%RDI,%R9

(4333) 0x511dd3 JLE	511dc0

0x511dd5 CMP	%RCX,%RSI

0x511dd8 JNE	511e02

0x511dda JMP	511e22

0x511ddc NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

0x511deb NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

0x511dfa NOPW	(%RAX,%RAX,1)

0x511e00 XOR	%ECX,%ECX

0x511e02 ADD	%RDX,%RCX

0x511e05 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

(4332) 0x511e10 VMULSD	(%RBX,%RCX,8),%XMM0,%XMM1

(4332) 0x511e15 VMOVSD	%XMM1,(%RBX,%RCX,8)

(4332) 0x511e1a INC	%RCX

(4332) 0x511e1d CMP	%RCX,%RAX

(4332) 0x511e20 JNE	511e10

0x511e22 MOV	$0x560d10,%EDI

0x511e27 MOV	%R14D,%ESI

0x511e2a ADD	$0x28,%RSP

0x511e2e POP	%RBX

0x511e2f POP	%R14

0x511e31 POP	%R15

0x511e33 POP	%RBP

0x511e34 VZEROUPPER

0x511e37 JMP	410180

0x511e3c NOPL	(%RAX)

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libiomp5.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libiomp5.so

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run icx_4

Source file and lines	csr_matvec.c:234-237
Module	exec

The function is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matvec.c:234-237.

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 10.50 to 2.00 cycles (5.25x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your function is probably not vectorized. Only 10% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions).

Details

Store and arithmetical SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers).

Workaround

Read the "512-bits vectorization" report at "Potential" confidence level.

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

512-bits vectorization

On some x86 processors supporting 512-bits vectorization, compilers are often too conservative and limit vectorization to 256 bits. Performance can then be improved by enforcing 512-bits vectorization, especially with many vectorized and high trip count loops. 512-bits vectorization performance overhead (compared to 256-bits) is generally lower on newer processors.

Workaround

Recompile with -mprefer-vector-width=512

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

Calling (and then returning from) a function prevents many compiler optimizations (like vectorization), breaks control flow (which reduces pipeline performance) and executes extra instructions to save/restore the registers used inside it, which is very expensive (dozens of cycles). Consider to inline small functions.

__kmpc_for_static_init_8@plt: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matvec.c:234

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

VZEROUPPER: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matvec.c:234

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 20 bytes. The binary function is storing 28 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	61
nb uops	63
loop length	249
used x86 registers	12
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	1
used ymm registers	1
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	10.50 cycles
front end	10.50 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11
uops	2.70	2.60	2.33	2.33	6.00	2.60	2.50	6.00	6.00	6.00	2.60	2.33
cycles	2.70	2.60	2.33	2.33	6.00	2.60	2.50	6.00	6.00	6.00	2.60	2.33

Execution ports to units layout:

P0 (256 bits): VPU, BRU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P1 (256 bits): ALU, VPU
P2 (512 bits): load
P3 (512 bits): load
P4 (512 bits): store data
P5 (512 bits): ALU, VPU
P6: ALU, BRU
P7: store address
P8: store address
P9 (512 bits): store data
P10: ALU
P11 (512 bits): load

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	10.50
Dispatch	6.00
Overall L1	10.50

Vectorization ratios

all	6%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	10%

Vector efficiency ratios

all	10%
load	6%
store	7%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	11%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 10.50 cycles. At this rate:

0% of peak load performance is reached (1.90 out of 192.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
2% of peak store performance is reached (2.67 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Performance is limited by instruction throughput (loading/decoding program instructions to execution core) (front-end is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 10.50 to 6.00 cycles (1.75x speedup).

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 511d20

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x28,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %RCX,%RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %RDX,%R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOVL $0,-0x1c(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV (%RDI),%R14D	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV %R9,-0x28(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x38(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x38(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x1c(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x30(%RBP),%R8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x28(%RBP),%R9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x560cf0,%EDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
MOV %R14D,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
CALL 410430 <__kmpc_for_static_init_8@plt>	2	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	1	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x30(%RBP),%RDX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	N/A
MOV -0x28(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	N/A
CMP %RAX,%RDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JA 511e22 <hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace.extracted.9+0x102>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
VMOVQ %R15,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	scal (12.5%)
INC %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %RAX,%RSI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
SUB %RDX,%RSI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RSI,%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
AND $-0x4,%RCX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1-2	0.20	N/A
JE 511e00 <hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace.extracted.9+0xe0>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
LEA -0x1(%RCX),%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %XMM0,%YMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	scal (12.5%)
LEA (%RBX,%RDX,8),%R8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
XOR %R9D,%R9D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
NOPL (%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
CMP %RCX,%RSI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JNE 511e02 <hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace.extracted.9+0xe2>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
JMP 511e22 <hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace.extracted.9+0x102>	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5.84	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPW (%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
XOR %ECX,%ECX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
ADD %RDX,%RCX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x560d10,%EDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
MOV %R14D,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
ADD $0x28,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %R15	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
VZEROUPPER	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	vect (25.0%)
JMP 410180 <__kmpc_for_static_fini@plt>	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2.08	N/A
NOPL (%RAX)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.00% of application time for run icx_4

Source file and lines	csr_matvec.c:234-237
Module	exec

The function is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matvec.c:234-237.

Warnings:
Ignoring paths for analysis

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 10.50 to 2.00 cycles (5.25x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your function is probably not vectorized. Only 10% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions).

Details

Store and arithmetical SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers).

Workaround

Read the "512-bits vectorization" report at "Potential" confidence level.

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

512-bits vectorization

Workaround

Recompile with -mprefer-vector-width=512

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

__kmpc_for_static_init_8@plt: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matvec.c:234

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

VZEROUPPER: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_GNR/173-927-0874/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matvec.c:234

Type of elements and instruction set

No instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on FP elements. This function is probably writing/copying data or processing integer elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary function is loading 20 bytes. The binary function is storing 28 bytes.

General properties

nb instructions	61
nb uops	63
loop length	249
used x86 registers	12
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	1
used ymm registers	1
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	10.50 cycles
front end	10.50 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11
uops	2.70	2.60	2.33	2.33	6.00	2.60	2.50	6.00	6.00	6.00	2.60	2.33
cycles	2.70	2.60	2.33	2.33	6.00	2.60	2.50	6.00	6.00	6.00	2.60	2.33

Execution ports to units layout:

P0 (256 bits): VPU, BRU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P1 (256 bits): ALU, VPU
P2 (512 bits): load
P3 (512 bits): load
P4 (512 bits): store data
P5 (512 bits): ALU, VPU
P6: ALU, BRU
P7: store address
P8: store address
P9 (512 bits): store data
P10: ALU
P11 (512 bits): load

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	10.50
Dispatch	6.00
Overall L1	10.50

Vectorization ratios

all	6%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	10%

Vector efficiency ratios

all	10%
load	6%
store	7%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	11%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 10.50 cycles. At this rate:

0% of peak load performance is reached (1.90 out of 192.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
2% of peak store performance is reached (2.67 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 511d20

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
PUSH %RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
MOV %RSP,%RBP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
PUSH %R15	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %R14	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
SUB $0x28,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %RCX,%RBX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %RDX,%R15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOVL $0,-0x1c(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV (%RDI),%R14D	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
MOVQ $0,-0x30(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
MOV %R9,-0x28(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOVQ $0x1,-0x38(%RBP)	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
SUB $0x8,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x38(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x1c(%RBP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x30(%RBP),%R8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
LEA -0x28(%RBP),%R9	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x560cf0,%EDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
MOV %R14D,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0x22,%EDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH $0x1	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
PUSH %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	5-12	0.50	N/A
CALL 410430 <__kmpc_for_static_init_8@plt>	2	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	1	N/A
ADD $0x20,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV -0x30(%RBP),%RDX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	N/A
MOV -0x28(%RBP),%RAX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1	0.33	N/A
CMP %RAX,%RDX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JA 511e22 <hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace.extracted.9+0x102>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
VMOVQ %R15,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	scal (12.5%)
INC %RAX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %RAX,%RSI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
SUB %RDX,%RSI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RSI,%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
AND $-0x4,%RCX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1-2	0.20	N/A
JE 511e00 <hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace.extracted.9+0xe0>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
LEA -0x1(%RCX),%RDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %XMM0,%YMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	scal (12.5%)
LEA (%RBX,%RDX,8),%R8	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
XOR %R9D,%R9D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
NOPL (%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
CMP %RCX,%RSI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	scal (12.5%)
JNE 511e02 <hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace.extracted.9+0xe2>	1	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
JMP 511e22 <hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace.extracted.9+0x102>	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5.84	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPW (%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
XOR %ECX,%ECX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
ADD %RDX,%RCX	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x560d10,%EDI	1	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0.20	0	0	0	0.20	0	1	0.20	N/A
MOV %R14D,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
ADD $0x28,%RSP	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
POP %RBX	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %R14	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %R15	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
POP %RBP	1	0	0	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	1-6	0.33	N/A
VZEROUPPER	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	vect (25.0%)
JMP 410180 <__kmpc_for_static_fini@plt>	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2.08	N/A
NOPL (%RAX)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A

Name	Coverage (%)	Time (s)
▼hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace.extracted.9–	0.36	0.19
○Loop 4333 - csr_matvec.c:234-237 - exec	0.36	0.15
○Loop 4332 - csr_matvec.c:234-237 - exec	0.00	0.00

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

512-bits vectorization

Workaround

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

512-bits vectorization

Workaround

CALL instructions

Details

Complex instructions

Details

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code