OV - attention-avx512 - Loop 60

	Loop Id: 60	Module: attention-avx512	Source: attention.cpp:26-33	Coverage: 0.21%

0x64d0 MOV	0xb0(%RSP),%RDX

0x64d8 VCVTSD2SS	%XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM0

0x64dc LEA	(%RAX,%R9,1),%ESI

0x64e0 INC	%R9

0x64e3 VMOVSS	%XMM0,(%RDX,%RSI,4)

0x64e8 CMP	%R15,%R9

0x64eb JE	6480

0x64ed VXORPS	%XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM0

0x64f1 CMP	$0x4,%R15D

0x64f5 JB	6505

0x64f7 MOV	%R9D,%ESI

0x64fa ADD	%ECX,%ESI

0x64fc SETB	%SIL

0x6500 OR	%R14B,%SIL

0x6503 JE	6550

0x6505 MOV	0x98(%RSP),%R11

0x650d XOR	%R13D,%R13D

0x6510 MOV	%R12,%RSI

0x6513 IMUL	%R13,%RSI

0x6517 ADD	%R9,%RSI

0x651a NOPW	(%RAX,%RAX,1)

  (57) 0x6520 LEA	(%R10,%R13,1),%EDX

  (57) 0x6524 INC	%R13

  (57) 0x6527 VMOVSS	(%RBX,%RDX,4),%XMM1

  (57) 0x652c MOV	%ESI,%EDX

  (57) 0x652e VMOVSS	(%R11,%RDX,4),%XMM2

  (57) 0x6534 ADD	%R12,%RSI

  (57) 0x6537 VCVTSS2SD	%XMM1,%XMM1,%XMM1

  (57) 0x653b VCVTSS2SD	%XMM2,%XMM2,%XMM2

  (57) 0x653f VFMADD231SD	%XMM2,%XMM1,%XMM0

  (57) 0x6544 CMP	%R13,%R15

  (57) 0x6547 JNE	6520

0x6549 JMP	64d0

0x6550 CMP	$0x20,%R15D

0x6554 JAE	6565

0x6556 MOV	0x98(%RSP),%R11

0x655e XOR	%ESI,%ESI

0x6560 JMP	6641

0x6565 MOV	0x98(%RSP),%RDX

0x656d VXORPS	%XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM0

0x6571 VXORPS	%XMM1,%XMM1,%XMM1

0x6575 VXORPS	%XMM2,%XMM2,%XMM2

0x6579 VPXOR	%XMM3,%XMM3,%XMM3

0x657d XOR	%R13D,%R13D

  (61) 0x6580 LEA	(%R10,%R13,1),%ESI

  (61) 0x6584 VCVTPS2PD	(%RBX,%RSI,4),%ZMM4

  (61) 0x658b VCVTPS2PD	0x20(%RBX,%RSI,4),%ZMM5

  (61) 0x6593 VCVTPS2PD	0x40(%RBX,%RSI,4),%ZMM6

  (61) 0x659b VCVTPS2PD	0x60(%RBX,%RSI,4),%ZMM7

  (61) 0x65a3 LEA	(%R9,%R13,1),%ESI

  (61) 0x65a7 ADD	$0x20,%R13

  (61) 0x65ab VCVTPS2PD	(%RDX,%RSI,4),%ZMM8

  (61) 0x65b2 VCVTPS2PD	0x20(%RDX,%RSI,4),%ZMM9

  (61) 0x65ba VFMADD231PD	%ZMM8,%ZMM4,%ZMM0

  (61) 0x65c0 VCVTPS2PD	0x40(%RDX,%RSI,4),%ZMM8

  (61) 0x65c8 VFMADD231PD	%ZMM9,%ZMM5,%ZMM1

  (61) 0x65ce VCVTPS2PD	0x60(%RDX,%RSI,4),%ZMM5

  (61) 0x65d6 VFMADD231PD	%ZMM8,%ZMM6,%ZMM2

  (61) 0x65dc VFMADD231PD	%ZMM5,%ZMM7,%ZMM3

  (61) 0x65e2 CMP	%R13,%RDI

  (61) 0x65e5 JNE	6580

0x65e7 VADDPD	%ZMM0,%ZMM1,%ZMM0

0x65ed VADDPD	%ZMM2,%ZMM3,%ZMM2

0x65f3 MOV	0x240(%RSP),%RDX

0x65fb VADDPD	%ZMM0,%ZMM2,%ZMM0

0x6601 VEXTRACTF64X4	$0x1,%ZMM0,%YMM1

0x6608 VADDPD	%ZMM1,%ZMM0,%ZMM0

0x660e VEXTRACTF128	$0x1,%YMM0,%XMM1

0x6614 VADDPD	%XMM1,%XMM0,%XMM0

0x6618 VSHUFPD	$0x1,%XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM1

0x661d VADDSD	%XMM1,%XMM0,%XMM0

0x6621 TEST	%RDX,%RDX

0x6624 JE	64d0

0x662a MOV	0x98(%RSP),%R11

0x6632 MOV	%RDI,%RSI

0x6635 MOV	%RDI,%R13

0x6638 CMP	$0x4,%EDX

0x663b JB	6510

0x6641 VMOVQ	%XMM0,%XMM0

0x6645 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

  (62) 0x6650 LEA	(%R10,%RSI,1),%R13D

  (62) 0x6654 VCVTPS2PD	(%RBX,%R13,4),%YMM1

  (62) 0x665a LEA	(%R9,%RSI,1),%R13D

  (62) 0x665e ADD	$0x4,%RSI

  (62) 0x6662 VCVTPS2PD	(%R11,%R13,4),%YMM2

  (62) 0x6668 VFMADD231PD	%YMM2,%YMM1,%YMM0

  (62) 0x666d CMP	%RSI,%R8

  (62) 0x6670 JNE	6650

0x6672 VEXTRACTF128	$0x1,%YMM0,%XMM1

0x6678 CMPQ	$0,0x28(%RSP)

0x667e MOV	%R8,%R13

0x6681 VADDPD	%XMM1,%XMM0,%XMM0

0x6685 VSHUFPD	$0x1,%XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM1

0x668a VADDSD	%XMM1,%XMM0,%XMM0

0x668e JNE	6510

0x6694 JMP	64d0

/home/eoseret/llm-attention/attention.cpp: 26 - 33

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

26:    for (unsigned int i = 0; i < M; ++i) {

27:       for (unsigned int j = 0; j < N; ++j) {  //vectorized

28:          double sum = 0.0;

29: #pragma clang loop vectorize(enable)

30:          for (unsigned int k = 0; k < K; ++k) { //vectorized

31:             sum += (double)A[i * K + k] * (double)B[k * N + j];

32:          }

33:          C[i * N + j] = alpha * static_cast<float>(sum);

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.61
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.06
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	1.36
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.61
Bottlenecks	micro-operation queue,
Function	main
Source	attention.cpp:26-27,attention.cpp:30-30,attention.cpp:33-33
Source loop unroll info	NA
Source loop unroll confidence level	NA
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	7.25
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	4.50
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	6.86
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	5.35
Front-end cycles	7.25
P0 cycles	3.83
P1 cycles	3.83
P2 cycles	3.83
P3 cycles	3.83
P4 cycles	3.83
P5 cycles	3.83
P6 cycles	2.00
P7 cycles	2.00
P8 cycles	2.00
P9 cycles	2.00
P10 cycles	3.00
P11 cycles	3.00
P12 cycles	4.50
P13 cycles	4.50
P14 cycles	0.50
P15 cycles	0.50
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	NA
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	60.00
Nb uops	58.00
Nb loads	7.00
Nb stores	1.00
Nb stack references	4.00
FLOP/cycle	5.24
Nb FLOP add-sub	38.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	8.28
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	56.00
Bytes stored	4.00
Stride 0	NA
Stride 1	NA
Stride n	NA
Stride unknown	NA
Stride indirect	NA
Vectorization ratio all	48.48
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	75.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	47.62
Vector-efficiency ratio all	27.27
Vector-efficiency ratio load	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio store	6.25
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	59.38
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	18.15

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.61
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.06
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	1.36
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.61
Bottlenecks	micro-operation queue,
Function	main
Source	attention.cpp:26-27,attention.cpp:30-30,attention.cpp:33-33
Source loop unroll info	NA
Source loop unroll confidence level	NA
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	7.25
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	4.50
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	6.86
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	5.35
Front-end cycles	7.25
P0 cycles	3.83
P1 cycles	3.83
P2 cycles	3.83
P3 cycles	3.83
P4 cycles	3.83
P5 cycles	3.83
P6 cycles	2.00
P7 cycles	2.00
P8 cycles	2.00
P9 cycles	2.00
P10 cycles	3.00
P11 cycles	3.00
P12 cycles	4.50
P13 cycles	4.50
P14 cycles	0.50
P15 cycles	0.50
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	NA
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	60.00
Nb uops	58.00
Nb loads	7.00
Nb stores	1.00
Nb stack references	4.00
FLOP/cycle	5.24
Nb FLOP add-sub	38.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	8.28
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	56.00
Bytes stored	4.00
Stride 0	NA
Stride 1	NA
Stride n	NA
Stride unknown	NA
Stride indirect	NA
Vectorization ratio all	48.48
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	75.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	47.62
Vector-efficiency ratio all	27.27
Vector-efficiency ratio load	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio store	6.25
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	59.38
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	18.15

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	main
Source file and lines	attention.cpp:26-33
Module	attention-avx512

The loop is defined in /home/eoseret/llm-attention/attention.cpp:26-33.

Analyzed code is defined in /home/eoseret/llm-attention/attention.cpp:26-27,30,33.

Warnings:

Non-innermost loop: analyzing only self part (ignoring child loops).
Ignoring paths for analysis
Too many paths. Rerun with max-paths=8
RecMII not computed since number of paths is unknown or > max_paths
Streams not analyzed since number of paths is unknown or > max_paths

Try to simplify control and/or increase the maximum number of paths per function/loop through the 'max-paths-nb' option.

This loop has 8 execution paths.

The presence of multiple execution paths is typically the main/first bottleneck.
Try to simplify control inside loop: ideally, try to remove all conditional expressions, for example by (if applicable):

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.25 to 4.50 cycles (1.61x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your loop is poorly vectorized. Only 27% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions). By fully vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.25 to 5.35 cycles (1.36x speedup).

Details

48% of SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

0% of SSE/AVX loads are used in vector version.
0% of SSE/AVX stores are used in vector version.
75% of SSE/AVX addition or subtraction instructions are used in vector version.
47% of SSE/AVX instructions that are not load, store, addition, subtraction nor multiply instructions are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ffast-math (included in Ofast) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

No data for this section

Vector unaligned load/store instructions

Detected 3 suboptimal vector unaligned load/store instructions.

Details

VEXTRACTF128: 2 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/llm-attention/attention.cpp:30
- /home/eoseret/llm-attention/attention.cpp:30
VEXTRACTF64X4: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/llm-attention/attention.cpp:30

Workaround

Pass to your compiler a micro-architecture specialization option:
- use march=native
Use vector aligned instructions:
1. align your arrays on 64 bytes boundaries: replace { void *p = malloc (size); } with { void *p; posix_memalign (&p, 64, size); }.
2. inform your compiler that your arrays are vector aligned: if array 'foo' is 64 bytes-aligned, define a pointer 'p_foo' as __builtin_assume_aligned (foo, 64) and use it instead of 'foo' in the loop.

Conversion instructions

Detected expensive conversion instructions.

Details

VCVTSD2SS (FP64 to FP32, scalar): 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/llm-attention/attention.cpp:33

Workaround

Avoid mixing data with different types. In particular, check if the type of constants is the same as array elements. Use double instead of single precision only when/where needed by numerical stability and avoid mixing precision. In C/C++, FP constants are double precision by default and must be suffixed by 'f' to make them single precision.

Type of elements and instruction set

2 SSE or AVX instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in scalar mode (one at a time). 2 SSE or AVX instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in vector mode (two at a time). 4 AVX-512 instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on double precision FP elements in vector mode (eight at a time).

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 38 FP arithmetical operations:

38: addition or subtraction

The binary loop is loading 56 bytes (7 double precision FP elements). The binary loop is storing 4 bytes (0 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.63 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	60
nb uops	58
loop length	274
used x86 registers	13
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	4
used ymm registers	2
used zmm registers	4
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	7.25 cycles
front end	7.25 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	3.83	3.83	3.83	3.83	3.83	3.83	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	3.00	3.00	4.50	4.50	0.50	0.50
cycles	3.83	3.83	3.83	3.83	3.83	3.83	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	3.00	3.00	4.50	4.50	0.50	0.50

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	7.25
Dispatch	4.50
Overall L1	7.25

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	7%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	9%

all	78%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	75%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	90%

INT+FP

all	48%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	75%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	47%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	11%
load	12%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	10%

all	39%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	59%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	26%

INT+FP

all	27%
load	12%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	59%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	18%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 7.25 cycles. At this rate:

3% of peak load performance is reached (7.72 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
0% of peak store performance is reached (0.55 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Performance is limited by instruction throughput (loading/decoding program instructions to execution core) (front-end is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.25 to 4.50 cycles (1.61x speedup).

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 64ed

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
MOV 0xb0(%RSP),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
VCVTSD2SS %XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
LEA (%RAX,%R9,1),%ESI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
INC %R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
VMOVSS %XMM0,(%RDX,%RSI,4)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
CMP %R15,%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JE 6480 <main+0x1a30>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
VXORPS %XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	vect (25.0%)
CMP $0x4,%R15D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
JB 6505 <main+0x1ab5>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
MOV %R9D,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
ADD %ECX,%ESI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
SETB %SIL	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
OR %R14B,%SIL	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
JE 6550 <main+0x1b00>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
MOV 0x98(%RSP),%R11	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
XOR %R13D,%R13D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV %R12,%RSI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
IMUL %R13,%RSI	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %R9,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
NOPW (%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A
JMP 64d0 <main+0x1a80>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
CMP $0x20,%R15D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
JAE 6565 <main+0x1b15>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
MOV 0x98(%RSP),%R11	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
XOR %ESI,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
JMP 6641 <main+0x1bf1>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
MOV 0x98(%RSP),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
VXORPS %XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	vect (25.0%)
VXORPS %XMM1,%XMM1,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	vect (25.0%)
VXORPS %XMM2,%XMM2,%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	vect (25.0%)
VPXOR %XMM3,%XMM3,%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	vect (25.0%)
XOR %R13D,%R13D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
VADDPD %ZMM0,%ZMM1,%ZMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
VADDPD %ZMM2,%ZMM3,%ZMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
MOV 0x240(%RSP),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
VADDPD %ZMM0,%ZMM2,%ZMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
VEXTRACTF64X4 $0x1,%ZMM0,%YMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	4	0.50	vect (50.0%)
VADDPD %ZMM1,%ZMM0,%ZMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
VEXTRACTF128 $0x1,%YMM0,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
VADDPD %XMM1,%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (25.0%)
VSHUFPD $0x1,%XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.25	vect (25.0%)
VADDSD %XMM1,%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	scal (12.5%)
TEST %RDX,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JE 64d0 <main+0x1a80>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
MOV 0x98(%RSP),%R11	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RDI,%RSI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV %RDI,%R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (12.5%)
CMP $0x4,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
JB 6510 <main+0x1ac0>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
VMOVQ %XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A
VEXTRACTF128 $0x1,%YMM0,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
CMPQ $0,0x28(%RSP)	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %R8,%R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (12.5%)
VADDPD %XMM1,%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (25.0%)
VSHUFPD $0x1,%XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.25	vect (25.0%)
VADDSD %XMM1,%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	scal (12.5%)
JNE 6510 <main+0x1ac0>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
JMP 64d0 <main+0x1a80>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A

Function	main
Source file and lines	attention.cpp:26-33
Module	attention-avx512

The loop is defined in /home/eoseret/llm-attention/attention.cpp:26-33.

Analyzed code is defined in /home/eoseret/llm-attention/attention.cpp:26-27,30,33.

Warnings:

Non-innermost loop: analyzing only self part (ignoring child loops).
Ignoring paths for analysis
Too many paths. Rerun with max-paths=8
RecMII not computed since number of paths is unknown or > max_paths
Streams not analyzed since number of paths is unknown or > max_paths

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.25 to 4.50 cycles (1.61x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Details

48% of SSE/AVX instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

0% of SSE/AVX loads are used in vector version.
0% of SSE/AVX stores are used in vector version.
75% of SSE/AVX addition or subtraction instructions are used in vector version.
47% of SSE/AVX instructions that are not load, store, addition, subtraction nor multiply instructions are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ffast-math (included in Ofast) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

No data for this section

Vector unaligned load/store instructions

Detected 3 suboptimal vector unaligned load/store instructions.

Details

VEXTRACTF128: 2 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/llm-attention/attention.cpp:30
- /home/eoseret/llm-attention/attention.cpp:30
VEXTRACTF64X4: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/llm-attention/attention.cpp:30

Workaround

Pass to your compiler a micro-architecture specialization option:
- use march=native
Use vector aligned instructions:
1. align your arrays on 64 bytes boundaries: replace { void *p = malloc (size); } with { void *p; posix_memalign (&p, 64, size); }.
2. inform your compiler that your arrays are vector aligned: if array 'foo' is 64 bytes-aligned, define a pointer 'p_foo' as __builtin_assume_aligned (foo, 64) and use it instead of 'foo' in the loop.

Conversion instructions

Detected expensive conversion instructions.

Details

VCVTSD2SS (FP64 to FP32, scalar): 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/llm-attention/attention.cpp:33

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 38 FP arithmetical operations:

38: addition or subtraction

The binary loop is loading 56 bytes (7 double precision FP elements). The binary loop is storing 4 bytes (0 double precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.63 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	60
nb uops	58
loop length	274
used x86 registers	13
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	4
used ymm registers	2
used zmm registers	4
nb stack references	4

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	7.25 cycles
front end	7.25 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	3.83	3.83	3.83	3.83	3.83	3.83	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	3.00	3.00	4.50	4.50	0.50	0.50
cycles	3.83	3.83	3.83	3.83	3.83	3.83	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	3.00	3.00	4.50	4.50	0.50	0.50

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	7.25
Dispatch	4.50
Overall L1	7.25

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	7%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	9%

all	78%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	75%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	90%

INT+FP

all	48%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	75%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	47%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	11%
load	12%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	10%

all	39%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	59%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	26%

INT+FP

all	27%
load	12%
store	6%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	59%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	18%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 7.25 cycles. At this rate:

3% of peak load performance is reached (7.72 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
0% of peak store performance is reached (0.55 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 64ed

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
MOV 0xb0(%RSP),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
VCVTSD2SS %XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50	scal (12.5%)
LEA (%RAX,%R9,1),%ESI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
INC %R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
VMOVSS %XMM0,(%RDX,%RSI,4)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (6.3%)
CMP %R15,%R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JE 6480 <main+0x1a30>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
VXORPS %XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	vect (25.0%)
CMP $0x4,%R15D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
JB 6505 <main+0x1ab5>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
MOV %R9D,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
ADD %ECX,%ESI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
SETB %SIL	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
OR %R14B,%SIL	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
JE 6550 <main+0x1b00>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
MOV 0x98(%RSP),%R11	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
XOR %R13D,%R13D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV %R12,%RSI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
IMUL %R13,%RSI	1	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.33	N/A
ADD %R9,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
NOPW (%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A
JMP 64d0 <main+0x1a80>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
CMP $0x20,%R15D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
JAE 6565 <main+0x1b15>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
MOV 0x98(%RSP),%R11	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
XOR %ESI,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
JMP 6641 <main+0x1bf1>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A
MOV 0x98(%RSP),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
VXORPS %XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	vect (25.0%)
VXORPS %XMM1,%XMM1,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	vect (25.0%)
VXORPS %XMM2,%XMM2,%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	vect (25.0%)
VPXOR %XMM3,%XMM3,%XMM3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	vect (25.0%)
XOR %R13D,%R13D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (6.3%)
VADDPD %ZMM0,%ZMM1,%ZMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
VADDPD %ZMM2,%ZMM3,%ZMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
MOV 0x240(%RSP),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
VADDPD %ZMM0,%ZMM2,%ZMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
VEXTRACTF64X4 $0x1,%ZMM0,%YMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	4	0.50	vect (50.0%)
VADDPD %ZMM1,%ZMM0,%ZMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
VEXTRACTF128 $0x1,%YMM0,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
VADDPD %XMM1,%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (25.0%)
VSHUFPD $0x1,%XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.25	vect (25.0%)
VADDSD %XMM1,%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	scal (12.5%)
TEST %RDX,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
JE 64d0 <main+0x1a80>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
MOV 0x98(%RSP),%R11	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RDI,%RSI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
MOV %RDI,%R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (12.5%)
CMP $0x4,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
JB 6510 <main+0x1ac0>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
VMOVQ %XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A
VEXTRACTF128 $0x1,%YMM0,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (25.0%)
CMPQ $0,0x28(%RSP)	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOV %R8,%R13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	scal (12.5%)
VADDPD %XMM1,%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	vect (25.0%)
VSHUFPD $0x1,%XMM0,%XMM0,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	1	0.25	vect (25.0%)
VADDSD %XMM1,%XMM0,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	2	0.50	scal (12.5%)
JNE 6510 <main+0x1ac0>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-1	N/A
JMP 64d0 <main+0x1a80>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Vector unaligned load/store instructions

Details

Workaround

Conversion instructions

Details

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

Vector unaligned load/store instructions

Details

Workaround

Conversion instructions

Details

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code