OV - attention-aocc-znver5-512 - Loop 80 - attention-aocc-znver5-512

	Loop Id: 80	Module: attention-aocc-znver5-512	Source: random.tcc:401-3367 [...]	Coverage: 0.10%

0x51a0 MOV	%R12,%RCX

0x51a3 INC	%R12

0x51a6 MOV	$0x200b,%EDX

0x51ab MOV	%R12,0x18f8(%RSP)

0x51b3 MOV	0x578(%RSP,%RCX,8),%RCX

0x51bb BEXTR	%RDX,%RCX,%RDX

0x51c0 XOR	%RCX,%RDX

0x51c3 MOV	%EDX,%ECX

0x51c5 SAL	$0x7,%ECX

0x51c8 AND	$-0x62d3a980,%ECX

0x51ce XOR	%RDX,%RCX

0x51d1 MOV	%ECX,%EDX

0x51d3 SAL	$0xf,%EDX

0x51d6 AND	$-0x103a0000,%EDX

0x51dc XOR	%RCX,%RDX

0x51df MOV	%RDX,%RCX

0x51e2 SHR	$0x12,%RCX

0x51e6 XOR	%RDX,%RCX

0x51e9 DEC	%R9

0x51ec VCVTUSI2SS	%RCX,%XMM5,%XMM2

0x51f2 VFMADD231SS	%XMM2,%XMM1,%XMM0

0x51f7 VMULSS	-0x435f(%RIP),%XMM1,%XMM1

0x51ff JE	5410

0x5205 CMP	$0x270,%R12

0x520c JB	51a0

0x520e VPBROADCASTQ	%RSI,%ZMM2

0x5214 XOR	%ECX,%ECX

0x5216 NOPW	%CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)

  (81) 0x5220 VMOVDQA64	%ZMM2,%ZMM3

  (81) 0x5226 VMOVDQU64	0x580(%RSP,%RCX,8),%ZMM2

  (81) 0x522e VPANDQ	-0x4378(%RIP){1to8},%ZMM2,%ZMM4

  (81) 0x5238 VPTESTMQ	-0x4362(%RIP){1to0},%ZMM2,%K1

  (81) 0x5242 VALIGNQ	$0x7,%ZMM3,%ZMM2,%ZMM3

  (81) 0x5249 VPTERNLOGQ	$-0x8,-0x436c(%RIP){1to8},%ZMM3,%ZMM4

  (81) 0x5254 VPSRLQ	$0x1,%ZMM4,%ZMM3

  (81) 0x525b VPXORQ	0x11e0(%RSP,%RCX,8),%ZMM3,%ZMM3

  (81) 0x5266 VPXORQ	-0x4380(%RIP){1to8},%ZMM3,%ZMM3{%K1}

  (81) 0x5270 VMOVDQU64	%ZMM3,0x578(%RSP,%RCX,8)

  (81) 0x527b ADD	$0x8,%RCX

  (81) 0x527f CMP	$0xe0,%RCX

  (81) 0x5286 JNE	5220

0x5288 MOV	0xc80(%RSP),%RDX

0x5290 VEXTRACTI32X4	$0x3,%ZMM2,%XMM2

0x5297 MOV	0xc88(%RSP),%RCX

0x529f MOV	$-0x66f74f21,%R8D

0x52a5 VPEXTRQ	$0x1,%XMM2,%RSI

0x52ab AND	$-0x80000000,%RSI

0x52b2 MOV	%EDX,%EDI

0x52b4 AND	$0x7ffffffe,%EDI

0x52ba OR	%RSI,%RDI

0x52bd MOV	%EDX,%ESI

0x52bf AND	$0x1,%ESI

0x52c2 AND	$-0x80000000,%RDX

0x52c9 SHR	$0x1,%RDI

0x52cc XOR	0x18e0(%RSP),%RDI

0x52d4 NEG	%ESI

0x52d6 AND	%R8D,%ESI

0x52d9 XOR	%RDI,%RSI

0x52dc MOV	$-0x66f74f21,%EDI

0x52e1 MOV	%RSI,0xc78(%RSP)

0x52e9 MOV	%ECX,%ESI

0x52eb AND	$0x7ffffffe,%ESI

0x52f1 OR	%RDX,%RSI

0x52f4 MOV	%ECX,%EDX

0x52f6 AND	$0x1,%EDX

0x52f9 AND	$-0x80000000,%RCX

0x5300 SHR	$0x1,%RSI

0x5303 XOR	0x18e8(%RSP),%RSI

0x530b NEG	%EDX

0x530d AND	%R8D,%EDX

0x5310 XOR	%RSI,%RDX

0x5313 MOV	%RDX,0xc80(%RSP)

0x531b MOV	0xc90(%RSP),%RDX

0x5323 MOV	%EDX,%ESI

0x5325 VPBROADCASTQ	%RDX,%XMM2

0x532b AND	$0x7ffffffe,%EDX

0x5331 AND	$0x1,%ESI

0x5334 OR	%RCX,%RDX

0x5337 NEG	%ESI

0x5339 MOV	$0xe4,%ECX

0x533e SHR	$0x1,%RDX

0x5341 XOR	0x18f0(%RSP),%RDX

0x5349 AND	%R8D,%ESI

0x534c XOR	%RDX,%RSI

0x534f MOV	%RSI,0xc88(%RSP)

0x5357 NOPW	(%RAX,%RAX,1)

  (82) 0x5360 VMOVDQU	0x578(%RSP,%RCX,8),%XMM3

  (82) 0x5369 VPANDQ	-0x44b3(%RIP){1to2},%XMM3,%XMM4

  (82) 0x5373 VPTESTMQ	-0x449d(%RIP){1to0},%XMM3,%K1

  (82) 0x537d VPALIGNR	$0x8,%XMM2,%XMM3,%XMM2

  (82) 0x5383 VPTERNLOGQ	$-0x8,-0x44a6(%RIP){1to2},%XMM2,%XMM4

  (82) 0x538e VPSRLQ	$0x1,%XMM4,%XMM2

  (82) 0x5393 VPXOR	-0x1a8(%RSP,%RCX,8),%XMM2,%XMM2

  (82) 0x539c VPXORQ	-0x44b6(%RIP){1to2},%XMM2,%XMM2{%K1}

  (82) 0x53a6 VMOVDQU	%XMM2,0x570(%RSP,%RCX,8)

  (82) 0x53af ADD	$0x2,%RCX

  (82) 0x53b3 VMOVDQA	%XMM3,%XMM2

  (82) 0x53b7 CMP	$0x270,%RCX

  (82) 0x53be JNE	5360

0x53c0 MOV	0x18f0(%RSP),%RCX

0x53c8 MOV	0x578(%RSP),%RSI

0x53d0 MOV	$-0x80000000,%RDX

0x53d7 XOR	%R12D,%R12D

0x53da AND	%RDX,%RCX

0x53dd MOV	%ESI,%EDX

0x53df AND	$0x7ffffffe,%EDX

0x53e5 OR	%RCX,%RDX

0x53e8 MOV	%ESI,%ECX

0x53ea AND	$0x1,%ECX

0x53ed SHR	$0x1,%RDX

0x53f0 XOR	0x11d8(%RSP),%RDX

0x53f8 NEG	%ECX

0x53fa AND	%EDI,%ECX

0x53fc XOR	%RDX,%RCX

0x53ff MOV	%RCX,0x18f0(%RSP)

0x5407 JMP	51a0

/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/random.tcc: 401 - 3367

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

401:       for (size_t __k = 0; __k < (__n - __m); ++__k)

402:         {

403: 	  _UIntType __y = ((_M_x[__k] & __upper_mask)

404: 			   | (_M_x[__k + 1] & __lower_mask));

405: 	  _M_x[__k] = (_M_x[__k + __m] ^ (__y >> 1)

406: 		       ^ ((__y & 0x01) ? __a : 0));

[...]

412: 			   | (_M_x[__k + 1] & __lower_mask));

413: 	  _M_x[__k] = (_M_x[__k + (__m - __n)] ^ (__y >> 1)

414: 		       ^ ((__y & 0x01) ? __a : 0));

415: 	}

416:

417:       _UIntType __y = ((_M_x[__n - 1] & __upper_mask)

418: 		       | (_M_x[0] & __lower_mask));

419:       _M_x[__n - 1] = (_M_x[__m - 1] ^ (__y >> 1)

420: 		       ^ ((__y & 0x01) ? __a : 0));

[...]

455:       if (_M_p >= state_size)

456: 	_M_gen_rand();

457:

458:       // Calculate o(x(i)).

459:       result_type __z = _M_x[_M_p++];

460:       __z ^= (__z >> __u) & __d;

461:       __z ^= (__z << __s) & __b;

462:       __z ^= (__z << __t) & __c;

463:       __z ^= (__z >> __l);

[...]

3364:       for (size_t __k = __m; __k != 0; --__k)

3365: 	{

3366: 	  __sum += _RealType(__urng() - __urng.min()) * __tmp;

3367: 	  __tmp *= __r;

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.97
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	2.21
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	12.51
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.25
Bottlenecks
Function	main
Source	random.tcc:401-406,random.tcc:413-413,random.tcc:417-420,random.tcc:455-455,random.tcc:459-463,random.tcc:3364-3367
Source loop unroll info	NA
Source loop unroll confidence level	NA
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	7.88
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	4.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	3.57
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.63
Front-end cycles	7.44
P0 cycles	6.00
P1 cycles	6.00
P2 cycles	6.00
P3 cycles	6.00
P4 cycles	6.00
P5 cycles	6.00
P6 cycles	2.38
P7 cycles	2.38
P8 cycles	2.38
P9 cycles	2.38
P10 cycles	1.13
P11 cycles	1.75
P12 cycles	1.25
P13 cycles	0.88
P14 cycles	0.25
P15 cycles	0.25
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	4
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	57.50
Nb uops	59.50
Nb loads	6.50
Nb stores	3.00
Nb stack references	5.50
FLOP/cycle	0.38
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	1.00
Nb FLOP fma	1.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	7.78
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	48.00
Bytes stored	24.00
Stride 0	2.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	2.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.82
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	0.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	0.00
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	1.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	9.46
Vector-efficiency ratio load	8.98
Vector-efficiency ratio store	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	6.25
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	6.25
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	9.21

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	2.94
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.94
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	12.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.24
Bottlenecks	micro-operation queue,
Function	main
Source	random.tcc:401-406,random.tcc:413-413,random.tcc:417-420,random.tcc:455-455,random.tcc:459-463,random.tcc:3364-3367
Source loop unroll info	NA
Source loop unroll confidence level	NA
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	11.75
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	4.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	6.06
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.98
Front-end cycles	11.75
P0 cycles	9.50
P1 cycles	9.50
P2 cycles	9.50
P3 cycles	9.50
P4 cycles	9.50
P5 cycles	9.50
P6 cycles	4.00
P7 cycles	4.00
P8 cycles	4.00
P9 cycles	4.00
P10 cycles	1.25
P11 cycles	2.50
P12 cycles	2.00
P13 cycles	1.25
P14 cycles	0.50
P15 cycles	0.50
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	4
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	90.00
Nb uops	94.00
Nb loads	11.00
Nb stores	5.00
Nb stack references	10.00
FLOP/cycle	0.26
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	1.00
Nb FLOP fma	1.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	10.55
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	84.00
Bytes stored	40.00
Stride 0	2.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	2.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	1.64
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	0.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	0.00
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	2.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	9.84
Vector-efficiency ratio load	11.72
Vector-efficiency ratio store	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	6.25
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	6.25
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	9.50

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	3.72
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	14.29
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.28
Bottlenecks
Function	main
Source	random.tcc:401-406,random.tcc:413-413,random.tcc:417-420,random.tcc:455-455,random.tcc:459-463,random.tcc:3364-3367
Source loop unroll info	NA
Source loop unroll confidence level	NA
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	4.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	4.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	1.07
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.28
Front-end cycles	3.13
P0 cycles	2.50
P1 cycles	2.50
P2 cycles	2.50
P3 cycles	2.50
P4 cycles	2.50
P5 cycles	2.50
P6 cycles	0.75
P7 cycles	0.75
P8 cycles	0.75
P9 cycles	0.75
P10 cycles	1.00
P11 cycles	1.00
P12 cycles	0.50
P13 cycles	0.50
P14 cycles	0.00
P15 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	4
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	25.00
Nb uops	25.00
Nb loads	2.00
Nb stores	1.00
Nb stack references	1.00
FLOP/cycle	0.75
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	1.00
Nb FLOP fma	1.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	5.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	12.00
Bytes stored	8.00
Stride 0	NA
Stride 1	NA
Stride n	NA
Stride unknown	NA
Stride indirect	NA
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	0.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	0.00
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	9.09
Vector-efficiency ratio load	6.25
Vector-efficiency ratio store	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	6.25
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	12.50
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	6.25
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	8.93

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	main
Source file and lines	random.tcc:401-3367
Module	attention-aocc-znver5-512

The loop is defined in /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/random.tcc:401-406,412-420,455-463,3364-3367.

Analyzed code is defined in /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/random.tcc:401-406,413,417-420,455,459-463,3364-3367.

Warnings:
Non-innermost loop: analyzing only self part (ignoring child loops).
The structure of this loop is probably <if then [else] end>.

The presence of multiple execution paths is typically the main/first bottleneck.
Try to simplify control inside loop: ideally, try to remove all conditional expressions, for example by (if applicable):

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is probably not vectorized. Only 9% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions). By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.88 to 0.63 cycles (12.51x speedup).

Details

Store and arithmetical SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ffast-math (included in Ofast) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

FMA

Detected 1 FMA (fused multiply-add) operations.

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

VCVTUSI2SS: 0 occurrences
VPBROADCASTQ: 0 occurrences
VPEXTRQ: 0 occurrences

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant unknown stride: 2 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Conversion instructions

Detected expensive conversion instructions.

Details

VCVTUSI2SS (INT32/64 to FP32, scalar): 0 occurrences

Workaround

Avoid mixing data with different types. In particular, check if the type of constants is the same as array elements.

Type of elements and instruction set

2 SSE or AVX instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on single precision FP elements in scalar mode (one at a time).

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 3 FP arithmetical operations:

1: addition or subtraction (all inside FMA instructions)
2: multiply (1 inside FMA instructions)

The binary loop is loading 48 bytes (12 single precision FP elements). The binary loop is storing 24 bytes (6 single precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.04 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	57.50
nb uops	59.50
loop length	265
used x86 registers	7
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	4
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0.50
nb stack references	5.50

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE

micro-operation queue	7.44 cycles
front end	7.44 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	6.00	6.00	6.00	6.00	6.00	6.00	2.38	2.38	2.38	2.38	1.13	1.75	1.25	0.88	0.25	0.25
cycles	6.00	6.00	6.00	6.00	6.00	6.00	2.38	2.38	2.38	2.38	1.13	1.75	1.25	0.88	0.25	0.25

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	4.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	7.44
Dispatch	6.00
Data deps.	4.00
Overall L1	7.88

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	1%

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	0%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	0%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	1%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	9%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	9%

all	6%
load	6%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	6%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	6%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	9%
load	8%
store	12%
mul	6%
add-sub	12%
fma	6%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	9%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 7.88 cycles. At this rate:

1% of peak load performance is reached (5.07 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
2% of peak store performance is reached (2.70 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Function	main
Source file and lines	random.tcc:401-3367
Module	attention-aocc-znver5-512

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 11.75 to 4.00 cycles (2.94x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ffast-math (included in Ofast) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

FMA

Detected 1 FMA (fused multiply-add) operations.

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

VCVTUSI2SS: 1 occurrences►
- /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/random.tcc:3366
VPBROADCASTQ: 2 occurrences►
- /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/random.tcc:401
- /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/random.tcc:401
VPEXTRQ: 1 occurrences►
- /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/random.tcc:401

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant unknown stride: 2 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Conversion instructions

Detected expensive conversion instructions.

Details

VCVTUSI2SS (INT32/64 to FP32, scalar): 1 occurrences►
- /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/random.tcc:3366

Workaround

Avoid mixing data with different types. In particular, check if the type of constants is the same as array elements.

Type of elements and instruction set

2 SSE or AVX instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on single precision FP elements in scalar mode (one at a time).

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 3 FP arithmetical operations:

1: addition or subtraction (all inside FMA instructions)
2: multiply (1 inside FMA instructions)

The binary loop is loading 84 bytes (21 single precision FP elements). The binary loop is storing 40 bytes (10 single precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.02 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	90
nb uops	94
loop length	420
used x86 registers	9
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	4
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	1
nb stack references	10

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	11.75 cycles
front end	11.75 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	9.50	9.50	9.50	9.50	9.50	9.50	4.00	4.00	4.00	4.00	1.25	2.50	2.00	1.25	0.50	0.50
cycles	9.50	9.50	9.50	9.50	9.50	9.50	4.00	4.00	4.00	4.00	1.25	2.50	2.00	1.25	0.50	0.50

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	4.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	11.75
Dispatch	9.50
Data deps.	4.00
Overall L1	11.75

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	1%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	2%

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	0%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	1%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	0%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	2%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	9%
load	12%
store	12%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	9%

all	6%
load	6%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	6%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	6%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	9%
load	11%
store	12%
mul	6%
add-sub	12%
fma	6%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	9%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 11.75 cycles. At this rate:

2% of peak load performance is reached (7.15 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
2% of peak store performance is reached (3.40 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Performance is limited by instruction throughput (loading/decoding program instructions to execution core) (front-end is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 11.75 to 9.50 cycles (1.24x speedup).

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 5205

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
MOV %R12,%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A
INC %R12	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x200b,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV %R12,0x18f8(%RSP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x578(%RSP,%RCX,8),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
BEXTR %RDX,%RCX,%RDX	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
XOR %RCX,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV %EDX,%ECX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A
SAL $0x7,%ECX	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
AND $-0x62d3a980,%ECX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
XOR %RDX,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %ECX,%EDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	scal (6.3%)
SAL $0xf,%EDX	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
AND $-0x103a0000,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
XOR %RCX,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RDX,%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A
SHR $0x12,%RCX	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
XOR %RDX,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
DEC %R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
VCVTUSI2SS %RCX,%XMM5,%XMM2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	3-9	1	scal (12.5%)
VFMADD231SS %XMM2,%XMM1,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
VMULSS -0x435f(%RIP),%XMM1,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	scal (6.3%)
JE 5410 <main+0xab0>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-0.50	N/A
CMP $0x270,%R12	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
JB 51a0 <main+0x840>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-0.50	N/A
VPBROADCASTQ %RSI,%ZMM2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	2	1	scal (12.5%)
XOR %ECX,%ECX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
NOPW %CS:(%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A
MOV 0xc80(%RSP),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
VEXTRACTI32X4 $0x3,%ZMM2,%XMM2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	5	0.50	vect (25.0%)
MOV 0xc88(%RSP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOV $-0x66f74f21,%R8D	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
VPEXTRQ $0x1,%XMM2,%RSI	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.50	7	0.50	scal (12.5%)
AND $-0x80000000,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV %EDX,%EDI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	scal (6.3%)
AND $0x7ffffffe,%EDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
OR %RSI,%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV %EDX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	scal (6.3%)
AND $0x1,%ESI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
AND $-0x80000000,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
SHR $0x1,%RDI	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
XOR 0x18e0(%RSP),%RDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
NEG %ESI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
AND %R8D,%ESI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
XOR %RDI,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV $-0x66f74f21,%EDI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV %RSI,0xc78(%RSP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV %ECX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	scal (6.3%)
AND $0x7ffffffe,%ESI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
OR %RDX,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV %ECX,%EDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	scal (6.3%)
AND $0x1,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
AND $-0x80000000,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
SHR $0x1,%RSI	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
XOR 0x18e8(%RSP),%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
NEG %EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
AND %R8D,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
XOR %RSI,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RDX,0xc80(%RSP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0xc90(%RSP),%RDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV %EDX,%ESI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	scal (6.3%)
VPBROADCASTQ %RDX,%XMM2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	2	1	scal (12.5%)
AND $0x7ffffffe,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
AND $0x1,%ESI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
OR %RCX,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
NEG %ESI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV $0xe4,%ECX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
SHR $0x1,%RDX	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
XOR 0x18f0(%RSP),%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
AND %R8D,%ESI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
XOR %RDX,%RSI	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RSI,0xc88(%RSP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	scal (12.5%)
NOPW (%RAX,%RAX,1)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A
MOV 0x18f0(%RSP),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
MOV 0x578(%RSP),%RSI	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (12.5%)
MOV $-0x80000000,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
XOR %R12D,%R12D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	N/A
AND %RDX,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %ESI,%EDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	scal (6.3%)
AND $0x7ffffffe,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
OR %RCX,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV %ESI,%ECX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A
AND $0x1,%ECX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
SHR $0x1,%RDX	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (12.5%)
XOR 0x11d8(%RSP),%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (12.5%)
NEG %ECX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
AND %EDI,%ECX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
XOR %RDX,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %RCX,0x18f0(%RSP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	scal (12.5%)
JMP 51a0 <main+0x840>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	N/A

Function	main
Source file and lines	random.tcc:401-3367
Module	attention-aocc-znver5-512

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. Only 9% of vector register length is used (average across all SSE/AVX instructions). By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 4.00 to 0.28 cycles (14.29x speedup).

Details

All SSE/AVX instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ffast-math (included in Ofast) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

Execution units bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks but see expert reports for more complex bottlenecks.

FMA

Detected 1 FMA (fused multiply-add) operations.

Complex instructions

Detected COMPLEX INSTRUCTIONS.

Details

These instructions generate more than one micro-operation and only one of them can be decoded during a cycle and the extra micro-operations increase pressure on execution units.

VCVTUSI2SS: 1 occurrences►
- /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/random.tcc:3366

Conversion instructions

Detected expensive conversion instructions.

Details

VCVTUSI2SS (INT32/64 to FP32, scalar): 1 occurrences►
- /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/random.tcc:3366

Workaround

Avoid mixing data with different types. In particular, check if the type of constants is the same as array elements.

Type of elements and instruction set

2 SSE or AVX instructions are processing arithmetic or math operations on single precision FP elements in scalar mode (one at a time).

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 3 FP arithmetical operations:

1: addition or subtraction (all inside FMA instructions)
2: multiply (1 inside FMA instructions)

The binary loop is loading 12 bytes (3 single precision FP elements). The binary loop is storing 8 bytes (2 single precision FP elements).

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.15 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	25
nb uops	25
loop length	110
used x86 registers	5
used mmx registers	0
used xmm registers	4
used ymm registers	0
used zmm registers	0
nb stack references	1

Front-end

ASSUMED MACRO FUSION FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	3.13 cycles
front end	3.13 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	P15
uops	2.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	0.75	0.75	0.75	0.75	1.00	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.00	0.00
cycles	2.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	0.75	0.75	0.75	0.75	1.00	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: ALU
P1: ALU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU, BRU
P4: ALU, BRU
P5: ALU, BRU
P6 (512 bits): store address, load
P7 (512 bits): store address, load
P8 (512 bits): store address, load
P9 (512 bits): store address, load
P10 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P11 (512 bits): VPU, DIV/SQRT
P12 (512 bits): VPU
P13 (512 bits): VPU
P14 (512 bits): FP store data
P15 (512 bits): FP store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	4.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	3.13
Dispatch	2.50
Data deps.	4.00
Overall L1	4.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	0%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	0%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	9%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	12%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	12%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	8%

all	6%
load	6%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	6%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	6%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	9%
load	6%
store	12%
mul	6%
add-sub	12%
fma	6%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	8%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 4.00 cycles. At this rate:

1% of peak load performance is reached (3.00 out of 256.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
1% of peak store performance is reached (2.00 out of 128.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 5205

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
MOV %R12,%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A
INC %R12	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV $0x200b,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
MOV %R12,0x18f8(%RSP)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	scal (12.5%)
MOV 0x578(%RSP,%RCX,8),%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	N/A
BEXTR %RDX,%RCX,%RDX	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
XOR %RCX,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV %EDX,%ECX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A
SAL $0x7,%ECX	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
AND $-0x62d3a980,%ECX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
XOR %RDX,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
MOV %ECX,%EDX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	scal (6.3%)
SAL $0xf,%EDX	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (6.3%)
AND $-0x103a0000,%EDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (6.3%)
XOR %RCX,%RDX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
MOV %RDX,%RCX	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	N/A
SHR $0x12,%RCX	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
XOR %RDX,%RCX	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
DEC %R9	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	scal (12.5%)
VCVTUSI2SS %RCX,%XMM5,%XMM2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	3-9	1	scal (12.5%)
VFMADD231SS %XMM2,%XMM1,%XMM0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	4	0.50	scal (6.3%)
VMULSS -0x435f(%RIP),%XMM1,%XMM1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.50	0	0	3	0.50	scal (6.3%)
JE 5410 <main+0xab0>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-0.50	N/A
CMP $0x270,%R12	1	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0.17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.17	N/A
JB 51a0 <main+0x840>	1	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33-0.50	N/A

Report Configuration

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

FMA

Complex instructions

Details

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Conversion instructions

Details

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

FMA

Complex instructions

Details

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Conversion instructions

Details

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Execution units bottlenecks

FMA

Complex instructions

Details

Conversion instructions

Details

Workaround

Type of elements and instruction set

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code